ITU-T Q 667-1993 Interworking of Signalling Systems - Logic Procedures for Interworking of Signalling System No 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No 7 (ISUP) - Interworking of Signallin.pdf

1、ITU-T RECNN*Qebb7 93 48b2.591 0588093 ObT INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS Q.667 (03/93) INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS - LOGIC PROCEDURES FOR INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 (TUP) TO SIGNALLING

2、 SYSTEM No. 7 (ISUP) ITU-T Recommendation Q.667 (Previously “CCIlT Recommendation”) FOREWORD The ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the International Telecom- munication Union. The ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions a

3、nd issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. The World Telecommunication Standardization Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, established the topics for study by the ITU-T Study Groups which, in their turn, produce Recommendatio

4、ns on these topics. ITU-T Recommendation 4.667 was prepared by the ITU-T Study Group XI (1988-1993) and was approved by the WTSC (Helsinki, March 1-12, 1993). NOTES 1 As a consequence of a reform process within the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the CCITT ceased to exist as of 28 Febru

5、ary 1993. In its place, the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) was created as of 1 March 1993. Similarly, in this reform process, the CCIR and the IFRE3 have been replaced by the Radiocommunication Sector. In order not to delay publication of this Recommendation, no change has been

6、 made in the text to references containing the acronyms ?CCITT, CCIR or IFRB? or their associated entities such as Plenary Assembly, Secretariat, etc. Future editions of this Recommendation will contain the proper terminology related to the new ITU structure. 2 telecommunication administration and a

7、 recognized operating agency. In this Recommendation, the expression ?Administration? is used for conciseness to indicate both a O ITU 1994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and

8、 microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU. ITU-T RECMN*Qebb7 93 m 48b25L 0588093 932 Recommendation Q.667 INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEMS - LOGIC PROCEDURES FOR INTERWORKING OF SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 (TUP) TO SIGNALLING SYSTEM No. 7 (ISUP) (Helsinki, 1993) Sate number O0 o1 o2 o3 o4

9、 o5 o6 07 State dascrpon Idle Wait for service provided FITE Wait for information FITE Weit for continuity FITE Wait fa address-complete Wait for answer Answered Wait fa resume Sheet refefmce 1.Z3.45 1 1 1 1 3 3 4 FIGURE UQ.667 State overview diagram for interworking of Signalling System Na 7 (TUP)

10、to Signalling System Na 7(IsUP) FIGURE ZQ.667 (Reserved for future notes) Recommendation Q.667 (OY93) 1 ITU-T RECMN*Q.b67 93 4862591 0588094 879 W Actibate No. 7 (TUP)Mo. 7 (ISUP) 4 wait for service provided FITE FITE 30 serdce prwided Wait for Information FITES FITB 9-13, 17-1 9 1 FIGURE 3/4.667 (s

11、heet 1 of 5) Interworking of Signelling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System Na 7 (SUP) FITE 25 1 FITE 26 FITE 27 FITE 1 2 Recommendation Q.667 (03/93) LA rv ITU-T RECMN*Q*bb7 93 m 48b2591 0588095 705 m 6- O “r Z Y W LA -t Recommendation 4.667 (OY93) 3 4 5,4 6 Wait for answer Answered (3 04 03 NO

12、TE -In principle, FE 22 should result in cause 16. However, in cases where FTTE 22 results from a timeout expiry, cause 127 should be sent. FIGURE 3/Q.667 (sheet 3 of 5) Interworking d Sigriaiiing System Na 7 (“) to Signalling System Na 7 (ISW) 4 Recommendation Q.667 (03193) ITU-T RECMN*Q.bb? 73 486

13、2571 0588077 588 = BITE Z FITE 23 FITE 22 BITE 25 NOTE - in principle, FlTE 22 should result in cause 16. However, in cases where FE 22 results from a timeout expiry, cause 127 should be sent. I I FIGURE 3/Q.667 (sheet 4 of 5) interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7

14、(ISUP) I I SPITE 53 (Table 7) NOTE - In principle, FITE 22 should result in cause 16. However, in cases where FlTE 22 results from a timeout expiry, cause 127 should be sent. - (Note) BITE 25 4 c FITE 23 FITE Z FIGURE 3/Q.667 (sheet 5 of 5) interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (Tup) to Signalling

15、 System Na 7 (ISUP) FITE 22 FITE 23 BITE 24 Recommendation 4.667 (03/93) 5 BITE Z I 4 -1TU-T RECMN*Q=bb7 93 48b257L 0588078 414 Received FITE TABLE UQ.667 CPC FITE A construction - Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (Tup) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) SPITE 22 NA1 9 10 SPITE 21 Yes No 18 19

16、 Pay phone ECI 1 O 1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 15 I CCH Received FITE SPITE 36 25 25 26 26 27 27 Yes No Yes No Yes No o1 O0 o1 10 o1 10 IO0 I No I o1 1 I Yes I SPITE 20 I SI I I o1 No I O0 I Yes Digital connectivity requested Yes CPC Calling partys category CCH Continuity check indicator NA1 Nature of addres

17、s indicator SI Satellite indicator ECI Echo control indicator TMR Transmission medium requirement 6 Recommendation 4.667 (03/93) ITU-T RECMN*Q-bb7 93 D 4862591 0588099 350 = Received BITE Y CH - O0 o1 10 TABLE UQ.667 BITE to be sent BITE 22 BITE 22 BITE 23 BITE 22 BITE X analysis - Interworking of S

18、ignailing System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) CH O0 O0 O0 O0 00 O0 o1 o1 o1 o1 o1 o1 IO IO 10 10 10 10 Received BITE X ST O0 O0 O0 o1 o1 o1 O0 O0 O0 o1 o1 o1 O0 O0 O0 o1 o1 o1 CAT O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 CH Charge indicator ST Called partys status indic

19、ator CAT Called partys category indicator BITE n to be sent BITE 2 + BITE 27 BITE 2 + BITE 27 BITE 4 BITE 5 BITE 5 BITE 7 BITE 3 BITE 3 BITE 4 BITE 6 BITE 6 BITE 7 BITE 2 + BITE 27 BITE 2 + BITE 27 BITE 4 BITE 5 BITE 5 BITE 7 TABLE 3/Q.667 BITE Y analysis - Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (T

20、UP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) NOTE - With this proposal, BITE 22 (answer, charge) may be sent for a call where an address complete no charge message was previously sent. It is assumed that it does result in charging the call. Recommendation Q.667 (03/93) 7 ITU-T RECMNUQ.667 93 48b259L 0588LO

21、O 9T2 Received BITE Z Cause 42 34 28 31 17 27 31 44 88 65 Other TABLE 4/Q.667 Sent BITE n 9 10 14 15 16 17 19 ,20 35 36 19 CONNECT analysis - Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signaiiing System No. 7 (ISUP) Received CONNEC fields CH O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 o1 o1 o1 o1 o1 o1 10 10 10 10 10 1

22、0 ST O0 O0 O0 o1 o1 o1 O0 O0 O0 o1 o1 o1 O0 O0 O0 o1 o1 o1 CAT O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 O0 o1 10 BITE J BITE K BITE 2 + BITE 27 BITE 2 + BITE 27 BITE4 BITE 5 BITE 5 BITE 7 BITE 3 BITE 3 BITE4 BITE 6 BITE 6 BITE 7 BITE2 +BITE27 BITE 2 +BITE 27 BITE 4 BITE5 BITE 5 BITE7 BITE 22 BIT

23、E 22 BITE 22 BITE 22 BITE 22 BITE 22 BITE 23 BITE 23 BITE 23 BITE 23 BITE 23 BITE 23 BITE 22 BITE 22 BITE 22 BITE 22 BITE 22 BITE 22 NOTE - In this proposal, an answer, no charge BITE is generated when a no charge information is carried through the connect message. TABLE 5/Q.667 Received RELEASE analysis before ACM - Interworking of Signalling System No. 7 (TUP) to Signalling System No. 7 (ISUP) 8 Recommendation Q.667 (03/93)