ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:30 ,大小:527.75KB ,
资源ID:806990      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-806990.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(JEDEC JEP159A-2015 Procedure for the Evaluation of Low-k Metal Inter Intra-Level Dielectric Integrity.pdf)为本站会员(visitstep340)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

JEDEC JEP159A-2015 Procedure for the Evaluation of Low-k Metal Inter Intra-Level Dielectric Integrity.pdf

1、JEDEC PUBLICATION Procedure for the Evaluation of Low-k/Metal Inter/Intra-Level Dielectric Integrity JEP159A (Revision of JEP159, August 2010) JULY 2015 JEDEC SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION NOTICE JEDEC standards and publications contain material that has been prepared, reviewed, and approved th

2、rough the JEDEC Board of Directors level and subsequently reviewed and approved by the JEDEC legal counsel. JEDEC standards and publications are designed to serve the public interest through eliminating misunderstandings between manufacturers and purchasers, facilitating interchangeability and impro

3、vement of products, and assisting the purchaser in selecting and obtaining with minimum delay the proper product for use by those other than JEDEC members, whether the standard is to be used either domestically or internationally. JEDEC standards and publications are adopted without regard to whethe

4、r or not their adoption may involve patents or articles, materials, or processes. By such action JEDEC does not assume any liability to any patent owner, nor does it assume any obligation whatever to parties adopting the JEDEC standards or publications. The information included in JEDEC standards an

5、d publications represents a sound approach to product specification and application, principally from the solid state device manufacturer viewpoint. Within the JEDEC organization there are procedures whereby a JEDEC standard or publication may be further processed and ultimately become an ANSI stand

6、ard. No claims to be in conformance with this standard may be made unless all requirements stated in the standard are met. Inquiries, comments, and suggestions relative to the content of this JEDEC standard or publication should be addressed to JEDEC at the address below, or refer to www.jedec.org u

7、nder Standards and Documents for alternative contact information. Published by JEDEC Solid State Technology Association 2015 3103 North 10th Street Suite 240 South Arlington, VA 22201-2107 This document may be downloaded free of charge; however JEDEC retains the copyright on this material. By downlo

8、ading this file the individual agrees not to charge for or resell the resulting material. PRICE: Contact JEDEC Printed in the U.S.A. All rights reserved PLEASE! DONT VIOLATE THE LAW! This document is copyrighted by JEDEC and may not be reproduced without permission. For information, contact: JEDEC S

9、olid State Technology Association 3103 North 10th Street Suite 240 South Arlington, VA 22201-2107 or refer to www.jedec.org under Standards-Documents/Copyright Information. JEDEC Publication No. 159A -i- PROCEDURE FOR THE EVALUATION OF LOW-K/METAL INTER/INTRA-LEVEL DIELECTRIC INTEGRITY Contents Page

10、 Foreword ii Introduction ii 1 Scope 1 2 Terms and definitions 2 2.1 Abbreviations 2 2.2 Symbols 2 3 Test Structure Overview 4 4 VRDB Test Overview 6 4.1 Pre-VRDB Test 6 4.2 VRDB Test 6 4.2.1 Dielectric Breakdown Criteria 7 4.2.1.1 Absolute Current Level 8 4.2.1.2 Slope change Breakdown criteria 8 4

11、.3 Post-VRDB Dielectric Current Test 9 4.4 Data Recording 9 4.5 VRDB Data Analysis 9 5 CVS Stress Overview 10 5.1 CVS Test 10 5.2 Test procedure 11 5.2.1 Pre-CVS Test 11 5.2.2 CVS Stress Test 11 5.2.3 Post-CVS Test 11 5.3 Data Recording 12 5.4 TDDB Data Analysis 12 6 References 12 Annex A (informati

12、ve) Supplemental data analysis 13 A.1 Determination of ILD Electric Field 13 A.2 Acceleration Models 13 A.2.1 Field Extrapolation Models 13 A.2.2 Thermal Acceleration Models 14 A.2.3 Area Scaling Model 14 A.2.4 Determining Failure Rate 14 A.2.5 Sample Size 15 A.2.6 TDDB Distribution 15 A.2.7 In-die

13、Weibull Slope Determination and Data Deconvolution 15 Annex B (informative) Differences between JEP159A and JEP159 21 JEDEC Publication No. 159A -ii- Foreword This document is intended for use in the semiconductor IC manufacturing industry and provides reliability characterization techniques for low

14、-k inter/intra level dielectrics (ILD) for the evaluation and control of ILD processes. It describes procedures developed for estimating the general integrity of back-end-of-line (BEOL) ILD. Two basic test procedures are described, the Voltage-Ramp Dielectric Breakdown (VRDB) test, and the Constant

15、Voltage Time-Dependent Dielectric Breakdown stress (CVS). Each test is designed for different reliability and process evaluation purposes. This document also describes robust techniques to detect breakdown and TDDB data analysis. Introduction Two test procedures are described within this document: a

16、 fast VRDB test, and a constant voltage TDDB test (CVS). Each of these procedures is designed for different evaluation purposes and can be implemented separately or complementally. The VRDB test starts at zero voltage or Vuseand ramps linearly until dielectric breakdown occurs and can be conducted a

17、t either room temperature or at higher temperatures to accelerate the occurrence of the degradation mechanism to failure. VRDB tests are important to characterize the defects at lower electrics fields and the dielectric breakdown strength of dielectric for a given process. The CVS test starts at a f

18、ixed voltage and is kept at this fixed voltage until dielectric breakdown occurs. The test can also be performed at higher temperatures to accelerate failure. TDDB tests are important to characterize the long-term dielectric acceleration parameters and to calculate the ILD based fraction of the fail

19、ure rate or lifetime of a product. JEDEC Publication No. 159A Page 1 PROCEDURE FOR THE EVALUATION OF LOW-K/METAL INTER/INTRA-LEVEL DIELECTRIC INTEGRITY (From JEDEC Board Ballot JCB-15-23, formulated under the cognizance of JC-14.2 Subcommittee on Wafer Level Reliability.) 1 Scope The continued scali

20、ng of advanced VLSI circuits, particularly of high performance logic circuits, is driving the need for low-k materials and copper metallization in back end of the line (BEOL) interconnect systems to reduce the resistance-capacitance (RC) delay, cross talk noise, and power dissipation. With the wide

21、applications of low-k and ultra-low-k dielectric materials at the 90nm technology node and beyond, the long-term reliability of such materials is rapidly becoming one of the most critical challenges for technology qualification. Low-k time dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) is commonly considered

22、 as an important reliability issue because low-k materials generally have weaker intrinsic breakdown strength than traditional SiO2dielectrics. This problem is further exacerbated by the aggressive shrinking of the interconnect pitch size due to continuous technology scaling. The procedures outlined

23、 herein were developed to estimate the electrical breakdown performance of low-k ILD and as a tool for driving constant improvement in the low-k ILD process. The test procedure described within this document should be used as common methodology for low-k ILD process control and improvement and could

24、 be used as a guideline to predict the effect of ILD TDDB on product lifetime or failure rate. In actual practice the ILD TDDB reliability of a semiconductor product is a complicated function of the interconnect critical area, power duty cycles, transient voltage variation, and series resistance. Th

25、ese parameters are not considered within this document. The purpose of this document is to describe test procedures for characterizing the reliability of inter/intra level dielectrics. It does not specify acceptance or rejection criteria for any of the described procedures. JEDEC Publication No. 159

26、A Page 2 2 Terms and definitions The following abbreviations and symbols are used in this document. They have been listed alphabetically for the convenience of the reader. 2.1 Abbreviations BEOL: Back end of line CVS: Constant voltage stress DUT: Device under test ILD: Intralevel and/or interlevel d

27、ielectric MLE: Maximum likelihood estimation TDDB: Time dependent dielectric breakdown VRDB: Voltage ramp dielectric breakdown 2.2 Symbols AILD(cm2): Total active area of dielectric. EILD(V/cm): The ILD electric field. The general formula for E is: EILD= VILD/ SILD, (1) where VILDis the ILD voltage

28、and SILDis the physical ILD spacing between two metal lines. SILDmust be determined by a consistent, documented method. The method of determining SILDor a reference to the documented standard must be included in the data report. Ebd (V/cm): The estimated ILD electric field just before ILD breakdown.

29、 Ibd(A): ILD current measured just before ILD breakdown. Icomp (A): The maximum current of the voltage forcing equipment. Often the user can specify a compliance limit for a particular test. Iinit(A): ILD failure current when Vuseis applied. This value is determined as a deviation from typical curre

30、nt vs. voltage characteristics measured from good devices. For maximum sensitivity the value should be well above the worst case ILD leakage current of a “good” ILD and at least 10 times greater than the noise floor of the test systems. A recommended value is 50 times the measured value for a good s

31、tructure. Or a pre-defined absolute leakage level such as 100nA, which could critically affect chip performance and cause chip operation failure, could be used as failure criterion. Imeas(A): The measured ILD current. JEDEC Publication No. 159A Page 3 2.2 Symbols (contd) Iuse(A): The typical measure

32、d current through the ILD at the normal use voltage. Istress(A): The ILD current measured during the CVS test. Iprevious(A): The previously measured ILD current. Istress-t0(A): The initial dielectric current measured at Vstressduring the CVS test. tbd(s): The recorded time at ILD failure. tint(s): T

33、he time interval to sense ILD current during the CVS test. This value should be Iinit, record as initial failure 5) Repeat for all available DUTs on wafer 4.2 VRDB test A linear or stepped voltage ramp is applied to the dielectric test structure. The voltage starts at zero voltage or the use voltage

34、 Vuse, and ramps at a predefined ramp rate, or is stepped by the voltage, Vstep, for a duration tstep. During the voltage ramp, the current is monitored as least as often as tstep. For the stepped voltage ramp, the current measurement should be delayed at each voltage step to allow displacement curr

35、ents to settle. This indicates that tstepmust be longer than the instruments settling time plus the measurement time of the test system. JEDEC Publication No. 159A Page 7 4.2 VRDB test (contd) Table 1 Recommended values for the VRDB and CVS tests Parameter Units Comments Kslope Slope increase factor

36、 when comparing subsequent slopes during the VRDB tests. Kslopecan vary between 3 and 10. See 4.2.1.2 Iinit A ILD breakdown failure current when Vuseis applied. This value is determined as a deviation from typical current vs. voltage characteristics measured from good devices. For maximum sensitivit

37、y the value should be well above the worst case ILD leakage current of a “good” ILD and at least 10 times greater than the noise floor of the test systems. A recommended value is 50 times the anticipated value for a good structure. Or a pre-defined absolute leakage level such as 100 nA, which could

38、critically affect chip performance and cause chip operation failure, could be used as failure criterion. Iuse A ILD current measured when Vuseis applied during the pre-ramp test. This current density should be at least 10 times greater than the noise floor of the test system. Ramp rate MV/cms The ra

39、mp rate is specified at 1 MV/cms tint s Interval time to sense ILD current during the CVS test. This value should be 10 X Iuse). This level must be carefully selected by measuring IV curves from representative samples as huge variations of ILD leakage and breakdown voltage are expected for test stru

40、ctures with different design geometries, at different metal levels, and with different process splits. Therefore, the criteria should be carefully selected to assure a real catastrophic ILD breakdown detection. This method is not suitable for ILD breakdown exhibiting an “open” signature instead of a

41、 “short” due to metal damage caused by extremely high transient discharge current during the breakdown event. 4.2.1.2 Slope change of dielectric current versus voltage An abrupt current increase This criteria specifies that dielectric breakdown occurs when the logarithmic slope of Imeasvs. Vstresscu

42、rve continuously increases by a slope increase factor (Kslope) greater than the previously calculated slope with at least four points and three slope comparisons. The previous logarithmic slope (Slope1) is calculated from ()() ()()21211=nnnnVVIAbsLnIAbsLnAbsSlopewhere In-1, Vn-1,In-2,and Vn-2are the

43、 measured currents and voltages of the previous two data points, respectively. The new slope (Slope2) is calculated using ()() ()()112=nnnnVVIAbsLnIAbsLnAbsSlopewhere In, Vn,In-1,and Vn-1are the measured currents and voltages of the second most recent and previous data points, respectively. The thir

44、d slope (Slope3) is further calculated to verify true slope increase ()() ()()nnnnVVIAbsLnIAbsLnAbsSlope=+113where In, Vn,In-1,and Vn-1are the measured currents and voltages of the most recent and previous data points, respectively. If slope3 Kslope X (slope2) Kslope X (slope1) then the test should

45、be terminated and the device is considered to be broken down. Kslope can have a value between 3 and 10 and can be varied for actual hard breakdown events depending on device area, ILD thickness, structure layout, or process. Voltage-to-breakdown, Vbdis defined as Vn. This method is suitable for dete

46、cting both “short” and “open” breakdowns. JEDEC Publication No. 159A Page 9 4.3 Post-VRDB dielectric current test Once the voltage ramp is completed, following the detection of breakdown defined in 4.2.1, a post-ramp current test with Vuse applied to the metal interconnect is used to determine the f

47、inal state of the tested device. Hard breakdown is attributed to all the devices with post-VRDB Iuse-post Iinitand is classified as a valid failure. If Iuse-post= .9 Vmaxthen the device has broken down, but is open circuited and is classified is a valid failure. During the breakdown event, extremely

48、 high transient currents flow. Such large discharge current comes from the charge stored in the test structure. The greater the local dielectric voltage, the greater the energy released into the breakdown electrodes. Peak discharge currents may occur during the ILD rupture event caused by voltage ra

49、mping. This high peak current could destroy metal to form open circuits or burn-out contacts. Therefore, a false “open” event instead of “short” could be detected by the instrument. As those “opens” are indeed induced by first electrical “shorts”, and the time interval between “short” and “open” is very short, the voltage at the onset of “open” could be treated as the breakdown voltage. An invalid breakdown would indicate a potential problem with the test fixture setup or with the instrumentation. 4.4 Data recording For VRDB test, the following information should be

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1