ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:33 ,大小:672.20KB ,
资源ID:836057      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-836057.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(NASA NACA-RM-L51F22-1951 Investigation of low-speed lateral control and hinge-moment characteristics of a 20-percent-chord plain aileron on a 47 7 degrees sweptback wing of aspect p 6).pdf)为本站会员(postpastor181)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

NASA NACA-RM-L51F22-1951 Investigation of low-speed lateral control and hinge-moment characteristics of a 20-percent-chord plain aileron on a 47 7 degrees sweptback wing of aspect p 6).pdf

1、RESEARCH MEMORANDUM INVESTIGATION OF LUW-SPEED LATERAL CONTROL AND HINGE-MOMENT CHARACTERXSTICS OF A 20-PERCENT-CHORD PLAIN AILERON OM A 47.7O SWEPTBACK WING OF ASPECT RATIO 5.1 AT A REYNOLDS NUMBER OF 6.0 x 106 By William M. Hadaway and Rein0 J, Salmi Langley Aeronautical Laboratory NATIONAL ADVISO

2、RY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS WASHINGTON October 22, 1951 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-1 r INVESTIGATION OF LOW-SPm LATa CONTROL AND HINGE-“ CHARACTERISTICS OF A 2O-PERCENT-CHOFCO PLCUN By William M. Ifadaway and Rein0 J. Sam SUMMAR

3、Y The low-speed lateral control and hin -moment characteristics of a 20-percent-chord plain aileron on a 47. 79“ sweptback wing of aspect ratio 5.1 have been determined in the Langley lg-foot PI-SSU tunnel. The tests were made with and without high-lift and stall-control devlces . at a Reynolds numb

4、er of 6.0 X LO . 6 The results indicated that an airplane with a wing similar to the one tested may exhibft undesirable rolling oscillations and vibrations at moderate and high anglee of attack due to intermittent separation of flow over the wing. The static rolling moments obtained with large ailer

5、on deflections were greater in magnitude, however, than the rolling moments induced by the separated flow, thereby indicating that some degree of lateral control could be maintained. At zero angle of attack, a rate of change of rolling-moment coefficient with aileron deflec- tion C of O.OO080 was ob

6、tained which was in fair agreement with the calculated value. The addition of leading- andtrailing-edge flaps did not appreciably affect C at law lift coefficients. Because of the nonlinear characteristics the rolling-moment data, the value of the aileron effectiveness parameter Cz8 was not well-def

7、ined in the angle- of-attack range through which flow separation occurred. Emever, the data indicated that the rolling moments near maximum lift were about 70 percent of the values obtained at zero angle of attack for. large total aileron deflections. Measurements of the aileron hinge moments and ba

8、lance-chanhr pressures indicated that a ratio of the aileron nose balance to the aileron chord of 0.60 or more will be required to balance ccmpletely the internally sealed type of aileron. 28 Z8 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-2 NACA

9、FtM L5lF22 Previous investigations of plain flap-type ailerons on sweptback wings (references 1 to 3) have shown that the aileron effec1;iveness in the low lift range can be predicted by semiempirical means based on simple sweep theory. The effectiveness of the aileron at the higher lift coefficient

10、s, however, cannot be calculated because of. the early separation of flow over the wing (reference k). An investigation waa made on a 47.70 meptback wing of aspect ratio 5.1 employing a 20-percent- chord outboard aileron to provide infonaation on the aileron effectfveness on a wing of relatively hig

11、her aspect ratio and sweep than has previously been investigated. The tests were husde at a Reynolda number of 6.0 X 10 6 and a Mach number of 0.14. These testa are part of a general investigation of the subject wing and the longitudinal stability characteristics have been reported in references 4 t

12、o 6. SYMBOLS All data are referred to a system of wind axes originating at the quarter-.chord point of the mean aerodynamic chord projected to the plane of symmetry. Symbols used herein are defined a6 f olltrws : CL c, ct lift coefficient (F) pitching-moment coefficient (Pitchi;Emment -) yawing-mome

13、nt coefficient rolling-moment coefficient (Rollintrment aileron hinge-moment coefficient aileron-load coefficient ( At moderate and high qles of attack, how- ever, the effects of the leeage acrom tKe seal on “the hinge monents and rolling moments for the wing of the present investigation are believe

14、d to be smsll. The aileron-load coefficient was measured normal to the wing chod for all deflection angles. An andysis of the aileron pressure distri- bution data of reference 8, however, indicated that the chorltwise forces on the aileron are small; therefore the force normal to the aileron chord l

15、ine can be 8pp320Ximated by dividing Cz, by the cosine of 8,. RESUiTS AMD DISCUSSION The basic aileron data are presented in figures 4 to 8. The results have been summarized in figures 9 to 12. Investigations of lateral control characteristics at low speeds and high Reynolds nmbers are of primary co

16、ncern at high lift coefficients. The rolling-moment data in the high-lift-coefficient range obtained in the present investigation, however, exhibited scatter snd nonlinearity due to unsteady and unsymmetrical forces on the wing which resulted from intermittent separated flow. Considerable vibration

17、of the model also occurred in the separated flow range, especially at angles of attack near maximum lift. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-NACA m L51F22 7 1 In an effort to establish the reliability of the data, some retests were made

18、whereas in the present investigation, separation occurred at an angle of attack well below Ch, as indicated by figures 4, 5, and 6. The results obtained frm tests on the wing of the present investigation do not necessarily mean that the same type of intermittent separated flow will be obtained on a

19、sfmilar wing having a different airfoil section. Also, the intermittent type of flow separation might be improved by the use of stall-control devices other than those tested. Rollinn-moment characteristics. - Rolling-mmnt data are presented for the entire angle-of-attack range tested; but the ailero

20、n effective- ESS parameter CZs, as detedned from a small range of aileron deflec- tions through 6, = Oo, WS not evaluated for angles of attack greater than 160 because of the scatter of data due to intemittent separated 0.00080 was obtained at Oo angle of attack for the plain wing (fig. 9). - flow i

21、n the higher angle-Of;8tt8Ck range. A Czg value of about - A corresponding Czg value of O.m72 was calculated by the method of Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-8 BACA. RM L5lF22 reference 9. The aileron effectiveness decreased gradually

22、 8,s the angle of attack was increased from 0 to 16O. With leading-edge flaps deflected, a value of C of 0.00075 was obtained at zero mgle of attack and remained fairly constant to about U0, beyond which it decreased. With both leading- and trailing-edge flaps deflected, CIS was about 0.00080 at 0 a

23、ngle of attack and remained approximately constant to an angle of attack of go and then decreased as tke angle of attack was increased to 16O. 28 At the angles of attack at which separation first occurred, as indicated by the unstable changes in the pitching mament (figs. 4(c), 5(c), and 6(c), a lar

24、ge decreaae in the rolling moment occurred for large negative (up) aileron deflection angles (figs. 4(a), ?(a), and 6(a). The rolling moment for large positive (dam) aileron deflection6 decreased gradually throughout the angle-of-attack range for the plain wing, decreased only in the high-lift-coeff

25、icient range with leading- edge flaps deflected, and remained approximately constant to maximum lift for the combination of leading- and trailing-edge flaps. Comparisons of the rolling moments for various total aileron deflections are presented in figure 10. For total aileron deflections of L2O or m

26、ore, the largest rolling moments were obtained bel-ow 5O angle of attack for the plain wing configuration. Between 5“ and b6O angle of attack, the largest rolling mosnents were generally obtained with leading-edge flaps deflected, and beyond 16O the largest rolling mcments were generally obtained wi

27、th both leading- and trailing-edge flaps deflected. The rolling moments near the maximum lift coefficient for large total aileron deflection angles were about 70 percent of the values obtained at zero lift coefficient. The yawing moments at small total aileron deflections were negli- gible through t

28、he angle-of-attack range for all conf%gumti.ms. As 8atotal was increased, however, adverse yawing moments were obtained for all except very low angles of attack for each configuration. The variations of the yawing-moment coefficient with angle of attack for the highest total aileron deflection teste

29、d (40O) are shown in fig- ure 10. The adverse yaw was greatest with the plain-wing configuration except at maximum lift coefficients. Pitching-moment characteristics.- The effect of maxinnmup and dm aileron deflections on the pitching-moment characteristics are presented in figures 4 to 6. The incre

30、ments in pitching moment were larger for the up-aileron that for the dm-aileron for all wing con- Pi rations except at angles below bo for the plain wing and between 11 g;u and 18 for the leading- and trailing-edge flip configuration, where the increments appeared to be equal. The dashed lines on th

31、e pitching-moment curves indicate the change in pitching moment due to I Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-.2 + NACA RM L5lJ?22 9 the combined maximum up and down aileron deflections for each wing con- figuration. Deflection of the lead

32、ing-edge flaps reduced the total pitching-moment increment between the maximum up and dam aileron deflec- tions to about 70 percent of the corresponding plain-wing increment at zero angle of attack. As the angle of attack was increased, the differ- ence in total increments became Bmaller until they

33、were about equal at 20. With the leading-edge flaps deflected, deflecting the trailing- edge flaps increased the pitching-moment increment between the maximum up and dm aileron deflections throughout the angle-of-attack range. Hinge-moment characteristics. - The parameters ch8, c consequently, the v

34、alues of C were more nearly constant with increase in &v Figure 5.- Continued. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-22 mAca RM L5D22 1.4 . .4 .P Q 72 -.4 0 Figure 5.- Concluded. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking pe

35、rmitted without license from IHS-,-,-KACA RM L51F22 .6 .4 -2 -. 4 0 -10 a -15 v -20 -02 Figure 6.- Aileron characteristics of the wing with leading- and trailing- edge flape deflected. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-24 12 .8 -. 4 . I

36、P .u8 .06 0 - /a ma. RM L51F22 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-L6 I. 2 x 0 .4 -2 0 .08 .04 . % a 20 (b6 00 v -20 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-26 mAeA RM L5IF22 702 .

37、o/ -.a? Figure 7.- The variation of rolling-moment coefficient with aileron deflection for various model configurations. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Figure 8.- The variation of aileron hinge-moment coefficient with aileron deflect

38、ion for various model conflgumtions. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-28 -. 06 .04 .02 0 Figure 9.- The effects of high-lift and stall-control devices on the aileron hinge-moment and effectiveneas parametere Ch , (:28, 6 pRa c&, 83-d p

39、qy c I I Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-XACA RM L5B22 .o/ 0 -. 01 702 tiiiiiiiiiiiir-1 .04 .03 .02 hOO .03 c* .02 30 . u/ G2 .QZ .u/ 0 * Figure 10.- Variation of rolling-moment and yawlng-moment coefficfents with angle of attack for several model configurations and total aileron deflectim. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1