[考研类试卷]考研英语（阅读）模拟试卷312及答案与解析.doc

1、考研英语（阅读）模拟试卷 312 及答案与解析Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. (40 points)0 The most thoroughly studied intellectuals in the history of the New World are the ministers and political leaders of seventeenth-century New England. Ac

2、cording to the standard history of American philosophy, nowhere else in colonial America was “So much importance attached to intellectual pursuits. “ According to many books and articles, New Englands leaders established the basic themes and preoccupations of an unfolding, dominant Puritan tradition

3、 in American intellectual life.To take this approach to the New Englanders normally mean to start with the Puritans theological innovations and their distinctive ideas about the churchimportant subjects that we may not neglect. But in keeping with our examination of southern intellectual life, we ma

4、y consider the original Puritans as carriers of European culture, adjusting to New world circumstances. The New England colonies were the scenes of important episodes in the pursuit of widely understood ideals of civility and virtuosity.The early settlers of Massachusetts Bay included men of impress

5、ive education and influence in England. Besides the ninety or so learned ministers who came to Massachusetts churches in the decade after 1629, there were political leaders like John Winthrop, an educated gentleman, lawyer, and official of the Crown before he journeyed to Boston. These men wrote and

6、 published extensively, reaching both New World and Old World audiences, and giving New England an atmosphere of intellectual earnestness.We should not forget, however, that most New Englanders were less well educated. While few craftsmen or farmers, let alone dependents and servants, left literary

7、compositions to be analyzed, it is obvious that their views were less fully intellectualized. Their thinking often had a traditional superstitious quality. A tailor named John Dane, who emigrated in the late 1630s, left an account of his reasons for leaving England that is filled with signs. Sexual

8、confusion, economic frustrations, and religious hopeall came together in a decisive moment when he opened the Bible, told his father the first line he saw would settle his fate, and read the magical words: “come out from among them, touch no unclean thing, and I will be your God and you shall be my

9、people.“ One wonders what Dane thought of the careful sermons explaining the Bible that he heard in puritan churches.Meanwhile, many settles had slighter religious commitments than Dane s, as one clergyman learned in confronting folk along the coast who mocked that they had not come to the New world

10、 for religion. “Our main end was to catch fish. “1 The author holds that in the seventeenth-century New England（A）Puritan tradition dominated political life.（B） intellectual interests were encouraged.（C） Politics benefited much from intellectual endeavors.（D）intellectual pursuits enjoyed a liberal e

11、nvironment.2 It is suggested in Paragraph 2 that New Englanders（A）experienced a comparatively peaceful early history.（B） brought with them the culture of the Old World.（C） paid little attention to southern intellectual life.（D）were obsessed with religious innovations.3 The early ministers and politi

12、cal leaders in Massachusetts Bay（A）were famous in the New World for their writings.（B） gained increasing importance in religious affairs.（C） abandoned high positions before coming to the New World.（D）created a new intellectual atmosphere in New England.4 The story of John Dane shows that less well-e

13、ducated New Englanders were often（A）influenced by superstitions.（B） troubled with religious beliefs.（C） puzzled by church sermons.（D）frustrated with family earnings.5 The text suggests that early settlers in New England（A）were mostly engaged in political activities.（B） were motivated by an illusory

14、prospect.（C） came from different backgrounds.（D）left few formal records for later reference.5 For the past several years, the Sunday newspaper supplement Parade has featured a column called “Ask Marilyn.“ People are invited to query Marilyn vos Savant, who at age 10 had tested at a mental level of s

15、omeone about 23 years old; that gave her an IQ of 228the highest score ever recorded. IQ tests ask you to complete verbal and visual analogies, to envision paper after it has been folded and cut, and to deduce numerical sequences, among other similar tasks. So it is a bit confusing when vos Savant f

16、ields such queries from the average Joe(whose IQ is 100)as, whats the difference between love and fondness? Or what is the nature of luck and coincidence? Its not obvious how the capacity to visualize objects and to figure out numerical patterns suits one to answer questions that have eluded some of

17、 the best poets and philosophers.Clearly, intelligence encompasses more than a score on a test. Just what does it mean to be smart? How much of intelligence can be specified, and how much can we learn about it from neurology, genetics, computer science and other fields?The defining term of intellige

18、nce in humans still seems to be the IQ score, even though IQ tests are not given as often as they used to be. The test comes primarily in two forms: the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and the Wechsler Intelligence Scales(both come in adult and childrens version). Generally costing several hundred

19、 dollars, they are usually given only by psychologists, although variations of them populate bookstores and the World Wide Web. Superhigh scores like vos Savants are no longer possible, because scoring is now based on a statistical population distribution among age peers, rather than simply dividing

20、 the mental age by the chronological age and multiplying by 100. Other standardized tests, such as the Scholastic Assessment Test(SAT)and the Graduate Record Exam(GRE), capture the main aspects of IQ tests.Such standardized tests may not assess all the important elements necessary to succeed in scho

21、ol and in life, argues Robert J. Sternberg. In his article “How Intelligent Is Intelligence Testing?“, Sternberg notes that traditional test best assess analytical and verbal skills but fail to measure creativity and practical knowledge, components also critical to problem solving and life success.

22、Moreover, IQ tests do not necessarily predict so well once populations or situations change. Research has found that IQ predicted leadership skills when the tests were given under low-stress conditions, but under high-stress conditions, IQ was negatively correlated with leadershipthat is, it predict

23、ed the opposite. Anyone who has toiled through SAT will testify that test-taking skill also matters, whether it s knowing when to guess or what questions to skip.6 Which of the following may be required in an intelligence test?（A）Answering philosophical questions.（B） Folding or cutting paper into di

24、fferent shapes.（C） Telling the differences between certain concepts.（D）Choosing words or graphs similar to the given ones.7 What can be inferred about intelligence testing from Paragraph 3?（A）People no longer use IQ scores as an indicator of intelligence.（B） More versions of IQ tests are now availab

25、le on the Internet.（C） The test contents and formats for adults and children may be different.（D）Scientists have defined the important elements of human intelligence.8 People nowadays can no longer achieve IQ scores as high as vos Savant s because（A）the scores are obtained through different computat

26、ional procedures.（B） creativity rather than analytical skills is emphasized now.（C） vos Savant s case is an extreme one that will not repeat.（D）the defining characteristic of IQ tests has changed.9 We can conclude from the last paragraph that（A）test scores may not be reliable indicators of one s abi

27、lity.（B） IQ scores and SAT results are highly correlated.（C） testing involves a lot of guesswork.（D）traditional test are out of date.10 What is the author s attitude towards IQ tests?（A）Supportive.（B） Skeptical.（C） Impartial.（D）Biased.10 Americans no longer expect public figures, whether in speech o

28、r in writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing: The Degradation of Language and Music and Why We Should, Like, Care, John Mc Whorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conser

29、vative views, sees the triumph of 1960s counterculture as responsible for the decline of formal English.Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yet another criticism against the decline in education. Mr. Mc Whorter s academic speciality is language history and change, and he see

30、s the gradual disappearance of “whom“, for example, to be natural and no more regrettable than the loss of the case-endings of Old English.But the cult of the authentic and the personal, “doing our own thing“, has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly e

31、ducated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal, performative genre is the only form that could claim real liveliness. In both oral an

32、d written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft.Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the question of his subtitle, why we should, like, c

33、are. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including nonstandard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressivethere exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas. He is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight

34、because we do not talk proper.Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not

35、strictly necessary, and proposes no radical education reformshe is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English “on paper plates instead of china“. A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.11 According to McWhorter, the decline of formal Engl

36、ish（A）is inevitable in radical education reforms.（B） is but all too natural in language development.（C） has caused the controversy over the counter-culture.（D）brought about changes in public attitudes in the 1960s.12 The word “talking“(Para. 3)denotes（A）modesty.（B） personality.（C） liveliness.（D）info

37、rmality.13 To which of the following statements would McWhorter most likely agree?（A）Logical thinking is not necessarily related to the way we talk.（B） Black English can be more expressive than standard English.（C） Non-standard varieties of human language are just as entertaining.（D）Of all the varie

38、ties, standard English can best convey complex ideas.14 The description of Russians love of memorizing poetry shows the author s（A）interest in their language.（B） appreciation of their efforts.（C） admiration for their memory.（D）contempt for their old-fashionedness.15 According to the last paragraph,

39、“paper plates“ is to “china“ as（A）temporary is to “permanent“.（B） radical is to “conservative“.（C） functional is to “artistic“.（D）humble is to “noble“.15 A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic included settlers and sojourners. Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent hom

40、e in the United States came those who had no intention to stay, and who would make some money and then go home. Between 1908 and 1915, about 7 million people arrived while about 2 million departed. About a quarter of all Italian immigrants, for example, eventually returned to Italy for good. They ev

41、en had an affectionate nickname, “uccelli di passaggio“, birds of passage.Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants. We divide newcomers into two categories: legal or illegal, good or bad. We hail them as Americans in the making, or brand them as aliens to be kicked out. That framework has cont

42、ributed mightily to our broken immigration system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it. We dont need more categories, but we need to change the way we think about categories. We need to look beyond strict definitions of legal and illegal. To start, we can recognize the new birds of pa

43、ssage, those living and thriving in the gray areas. We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.Crop pickers, violinists, construction workers, entrepreneurs, engineers, home health-care aides and physicists are among todays birds of passage. They are energetic participants in a global e

44、conomy driven by the flow of work, money and ideas. They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them. They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease. We need them to imagine the United Stat

45、es as a place where they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever. We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sid

46、es of the immigration battle. Looking beyond the culture war logic of right or wrong means opening up the middle ground and understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes, including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.16 “B

47、irds of passage“ refers to those who（A）find permanent jobs overseas.（B） leave their home countries for good.（C） immigrate across the Atlantic.（D）stay in a foreign country temporarily.17 It is implied in Paragraph 2 that the current immigration system in the US（A）needs new immigrant categories.（B） ha

48、s loosened control over immigrants.（C） should be adapted to meet challenges.（D）has been fixed via political means.18 According to the author, todays birds of passage want（A）financial incentives.（B） a global recognition.（C） opportunities to get regular jobs.（D）the freedom to stay and leave.19 The aut

49、hor suggests that the birds of passage today should be treated（A）as faithful partners.（B） with legal tolerance.（C） with economic favors.（D）as mighty rivals.20 The most appropriate title for this text would be（A）Come and Go: Big Mistake（B） Living and Thriving: Great Risk（C） Legal or Illegal: Big Mistake（D）With or without: Great Risk考研英语（阅读）模拟试卷 312 答案与解析Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. (40 points)【知识模块】 阅读1 【正确答案】 B【试题解析】 细节题。从第一段 nowhere else in colonial America was“So much importance