ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOC , 页数:16 ,大小:60KB ,
资源ID:855523      下载积分:2000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-855523.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文([考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷68及答案与解析.doc)为本站会员(bonesoil321)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

[考研类试卷]考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷68及答案与解析.doc

1、考研英语(阅读)模拟试卷 68 及答案与解析Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. (40 points)0 The city, Rousseau once suggested, is “the abyss of the human species. “And while that judgment represents a fairly 18th century view of the unpleasant i

2、ndustrial life, present examples dont necessarily dispute it. Many metropolitan areas have developed into dense grids of humanity surrounded by soulless office parks and a few nice, leafy streets.Yet this, according to Edward Glaeser, can be a good thing. Triumph of the City, the Harvard University

3、economics professors deeply researched manifesto on the importance of urban life to, among other things, business and innovation, suggests the most important investment in any city is human capitalor, more simply, population. His book convincingly argues that concentrated populations can have “magic

4、al consequences. “ A steady infusion of human capital helped transform New York City from a manufacturing hub into the worlds financial capital.Millions of Americans embrace the suburbs because they offer affordable housing, better schools, and decent-sized backyards. However, Glaeser also believes

5、the growth of suburbia typifies a nearsighted view of conservation. All that air-conditioning and driving comes at a cost. The environmentalists whove worked for laws that make it impossible to build in temperate regions have insidiously pushed the sprawl to some growing southern district -along the

6、 way facilitating a carbon emissions nightmare.However, Glaeser isnt out to attack the suburban life; instead, hes hoping to increase the number of options. He points out that many cities to a large extent are fast becoming provinces for the truly wealthy. Middle-class strivers have to take the comm

7、uter train home. Glaesers solution is simple: Where land is scarce, density becomes vital. Cities that cannot build out must build up. Freed from restrictive regulations, Glaeser notes Houston has built up and out to become the fourth-largest city in the U. S. Owing mainly to affordable housing and

8、the availability of jobs, an average family in high-density Houston is much better off than a comparable one in Queens or Staten Island.In Glaesers appraisal, cities must also aim for a sweet spot that combines good public schools and non-prohibitive zoning policies. From Bangalore to Vancouver, edu

9、cational institutions and the freedom to build help produce the kind of successful hubs that attract human capital. Human capital makes reinvention possible but complicated. Detroit, Glaeser argues, suffered from too much specialization: Huge integrated car companies crowded out other ideas that cou

10、ld have fostered valuable results long before disaster struck the Big Three.The authors prescription for Detroit, is to “shrink to greatness“ by searching for fresh advantages. Glaeser believes cities are about people, not places or buildings. Does it make economic sense to resurrect Detroit when th

11、e cost of building a house is greater than the reward from selling it? It could have been cheaper, he notes, to hand every household in New Orleans $200,000 after Hurricane Katrina rather than pump vast quantities of public money into rebuilding a city of diminishing economic significance.Glaeser ma

12、y be right. As the latest U. S. Census figures prove, the citys capital is disappearing in droves.1 The word “abyss“(Line Para. 1)most probably means “_“.(A)very threatening situation(B) densely-populated region(C) highly-industrialized area(D)quite splendid place2 According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, G

13、laeser most probably agrees_.(A)concentrated populations hinder the development of cities(B) city pollution is posing a threat to surrounding suburbs(C) suburbs develop at the expenses of environment(D)environmentalists are wrong in opposing building in temperate areas3 It is indicated in Paragraph

14、5 that human capital_.(A)invites constant conflicts with small companies(B) can produce negative effect in city reinvention(C) often suffer from over-specialization(D)can help huge companies avert disasters4 New Orleans is cited as an example of cities_.(A)searching actively for fresh advantages(B)

15、failing to weigh rebuilding risks against returns(C) focusing on people instead of buildings(D)responding effectively to economic depression5 Toward Glaesers opinion on city, the authors attitude is one of_.(A)appreciation(B) indifference(C) skepticism(D)disapproval5 The outcry over internet firms h

16、abit of surreptitiously tracking web surfers activities has clearly resonated inside the White House. The Obama administration announced that it intends to work with Congress to produce “a privacy bill of rights“ giving American consumers greater control over how their information is collected and u

17、sed by digital marketers.Those who have been lobbying for change agree with, but are unsympathetic to, internet firms worries that such a law could dent their advertising-driven business models, which rely on tracking and targeting consumers to maximise revenues. “This is dimming the prospects of Go

18、ogle, Facebook and other digital ad companies,“ says Jeffrey Chester of the Centre for Digital Democracy. Quite how dark things get for them will depend on the details of the bill. It will seek to lay down the basic principles of internet privacy rights, broadly following recommendations published l

19、ast December by the Department of Commerce. The departments report said consumers should be told more about why data are being collected a-bout them and how they are used; and it called for stricter limits on what companies can do with information they collect.Whatever legislation finally emerges is

20、 likely to give a broader role to the Federal Trade Commission(FTC), which will almost certainly be charged with deciding how those principles are translated into practice and with policing their implementation. Among other things, the FTC is known to be keen on a formal “do not track“ system, which

21、 would allow users to block certain sites from monitoring their online activities.Keen to avoid this, the online-advertising industry has been working overtime to convince policymakers that it can police itself using systems such as icons on web pages that show surfers when they are being tracked. A

22、nd it is telling anyone who will listen that consumers will suffer if tough do-not-track rules hit ad revenues, forcing web firms to charge for more content. With Mr Obama throwing his weight behind internet privacy, this rearguard action is less likely to be successful. Some ad firms have started t

23、alking of creating a do-not-track system of their own, that would limit the damage to their digital activities.Although all this may dent their revenues, Americas internet giants could also benefit from the legislation if it helps them in their dealings with the European Union. The EUs already fairl

24、y strict rules on privacy which it considers a fundamental human rightare being tightened further. The time-consuming and expensive legal hoops the EU makes American internet firms jump through, to be allowed to handle Europeans online data, will become more demanding. If by passing its own online-p

25、rivacy “bill of rights“ America can convince the EU to ease this legal burden, then it will be an important win for A-merican companies, says Joel Reidenberg, a professor at Fordham Universitys law school. Google, Facebook and others will no doubt be trackingboth online and offlinethe progress of EU

26、-American talks on this matter very closely.6 The privacy bill of rights is meant to_.(A)clamp down web surfers s dishonest behaviours(B) restrict internet firms control over information(C) give American government control over information(D)ease the tension between digital marketers and web users7

27、What is the biggest concern of internet firms with the privacy bill?(A)downsizing ad revenues(B) decreasing digital data(C) ever-growing user base(D)increasingly demanding users8 Whats the response of the online-advertising industry towards the formal “do not track system“?(A)A gentle persuasioa(B)

28、A stiff resistance.(C) A forced surrender.(D)A combination of tough and soft.9 The author suggests in the last paragraph that the privacy bill could_.(A)be harmful to Europeans privacy rights(B) be desirable for American internet firms(C) be helpful with the EU-American relationship(D)be questionabl

29、e in dealing with privacy problems10 According to the text, who will most fancy the privacy bill?(A)EU.(B) FTC.(C) Web consumers.(D)The Centre for Digital Democracy.10 Economics as currently presented in textbooks and taught in the classroom does not have much to do with business management, and sti

30、ll less with entrepreneurship. The degree to which economics is isolated from the ordinary business of life is extraordinary and unfortunate.That was not the case in the past. When modern economics was born, Adam Smith envisioned it as a study of the “nature and causes of the wealth of nations. “ Hi

31、s seminal work, The Wealth of Nations, was widely read by businessmen, even though Smith belittled them quite bluntly for their greed, shortsightedness, and other defects. The academic community in those days was small, and economists had to appeal to a broad audience. Even at the turn of the 20th c

32、entury, Alfred Marshall managed to keep economics as “both a study of wealth and a branch of the study of man. “ Economics remained relevant to industrialists.In the 20th century, economics consolidated as a profession; economists could afford to write exclusively for one another. At the same time,

33、the field experienced a paradigm shift, gradually identifying itself as a theoretical approach of economization and giving up the real-world economy as its subject matter. Today, production is marginalized in economics, and the paradigmatic question is a rather static one of resource allocatioa The

34、tools used by economists to analyze business firms are too abstract and speculative to offer any guidance to entrepreneurs and managers in their constant struggle to bring novel products to consumers at low cost.This separation of economics from the working economy has severely damaged both the busi

35、ness community and the academic discipline. Since economics offers little in the way of practical insight, managers and entrepreneurs depend on their own business brains, personal judgment, and rules of thumb in making decisions. In times of crisis, when business leaders lose their self-confidence,

36、they often look to political power to fill the void. Government is increasingly seen as the ultimate solution to tough economic problems, from innovation to employment.Today, a modern market economy with its ever-finer division of labor depends on a constantly expanding network of trade. It requires

37、 an intricate web of social institutions to coordinate the working of markets and firms across various boundaries. At a time when the modern economy is becoming increasingly institutions-intensive, the reduction of economics to price theory is troubling enough. It is suicidal for the field to slide

38、into a hard science of choice, ignoring the influences of society, history, culture, and politics on the working of the economy.It is time to reengage the severely impoverished field of economics with the economy. Market economies springing up herald a new era of entrepreneurship, and with it unprec

39、edented opportunities for economists to study how the market economy gains its resilience in societies with cultural, institutional, and organizational diversities. But knowledge will come only if economics can be reoriented to the study of man as he is and the economic system as it actually exists.

40、11 The Wealth of Nations is mentioned to exemplify that the community of economists used to_.(A)divorce from the ordinary business of life(B) provide businessmen with economic instructions(C) study entrepreneurship rather than business management(D)denounce businessmen as profiteers12 We can learn f

41、rom Paragraph 3 that economics today highlights_.(A)the pure study of the practice of using resources to the best effect(B) its practical insights into the real-world economy(C) the rational distribution of economic resources in the marketplace(D)the management ability development of businessmen13 T

42、he separation of economics from the working economy_.(A)has improved the image of government in the eyes of business leaders(B) has motivated a closer relationship between businessmen and government(C) has bridged the gap between economists and government(D)has facilitated governments replacement fo

43、r economists in providing economic guidance14 Modern market economies require economics to_.(A)deal with how social institutions work(B) give up the study of price theory(C) act more as a social science than a hard one(D)primarily concern itself with economic solutions15 As for reengaging economics

44、with economy, the author suggests that economists should primarily_.(A)conduct research on the spirit of entrepreneurship(B) make a close examination of the market elasticity(C) offer insightful guidance in business management(D)study how a society organizes its economy15 When Johannes Gutenberg inv

45、ented movable type a half-millennium ago, he also gave us immovable text. Before Gutenberg, books were handwritten by scribes, and no two copies were exactly the same. Scribes werent machines; they made mistakes. With the arrival of the letterpress, thousands of identical copies could enter the mark

46、etplace simultaneously. The publication of a book became an event.A new set of literary workers assembled in publishing houses, collaborating with writers to perfect texts before they went on press. The verb “to finalize“ became common in literary circles, expressing the permanence of printed words.

47、 Different editions still had textual variations, but books still came to be viewed as immutable objects. They were written for posterity.Beyond giving writers a spur to eloquence, what the historian Elizabeth Eisenstein calls “typographical fixity“ served as a cultural preservative. It helped to pr

48、otect original documents from corruption, providing a more solid foundation for the writing of history. It established a reliable record of knowledge, aiding the spread of science. It accelerated the standardization of everything from language to law. The preservative qualities of printed books, Ms.

49、 Eisenstein argues, may be the most important legacy of Gutenbergs invention.Once digitized, a page of words loses its fixity. It can change every time its refreshed on a screen. A book page turns into something like a Web page, able to be revised endlessly after its initial uploading. Thats an attractive development in many ways. It makes it easy for writers to correct errors and update facts. Guidebooks will no longer send travelers to restaurants that have closed. Even literary authors will

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1