ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:25 ,大小:422.42KB ,
资源ID:994317      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-994317.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(NEMA MS 12-2016 Quantification and Mapping of Geometric Distortion for Special Applications.pdf)为本站会员(outsidejudge265)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

NEMA MS 12-2016 Quantification and Mapping of Geometric Distortion for Special Applications.pdf

1、NEMA Standards PublicationNational Electrical Manufacturers AssociationNEMA MS 12-2016 Quantification and Mapping of Geometric Distortion for Special ApplicationsNEMA Standards Publication MS 12-2016 Quantification and Mapping of Geometric Distortion for Special Applications Published by: National E

2、lectrical Manufacturers Association 1300 North 17thStreet, Suite 900 Rosslyn, Virginia 22209 www.nema.org 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association. All rights including translation into other languages, reserved under the Universal Copyright Convention, the Berne Convention for the Protect

3、ion of Literary and Artistic Works, and the International and Pan American Copyright Conventions. NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this publication was considered technically sound by the consensus of persons engaged in the development and approval of the document at the time it was develope

4、d. Consensus does not necessarily mean that there is unanimous agreement among every person participating in the development of this document. NEMA standards and guideline publications, of which the document contained herein is one, are developed through a voluntary consensus standards development p

5、rocess. This process brings together volunteers and/or seeks out the views of persons who have an interest in the topic covered by this publication. While NEMA administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness in the development of consensus, it does not write the document and it doe

6、s not independently test, evaluate, or verify the accuracy or completeness of any information or the soundness of any judgments contained in its standards and guideline publications. NEMA disclaims liability for any personal injury, property, or other damages of any nature whatsoever, whether specia

7、l, indirect, consequential, or compensatory, directly or indirectly resulting from the publication, use of, application, or reliance on this document. NEMA disclaims and makes no guaranty or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any information published herein, and dis

8、claims and makes no warranty that the information in this document will fulfill any of your particular purposes or needs. NEMA does not undertake to guarantee the performance of any individual manufacturer or sellers products or services by virtue of this standard or guide. In publishing and making

9、this document available, NEMA is not undertaking to render professional or other services for or on behalf of any person or entity, nor is NEMA undertaking to perform any duty owed by any person or entity to someone else. Anyone using this document should rely on his or her own independent judgment

10、or, as appropriate, seek the advice of a competent professional in determining the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances. Information and other standards on the topic covered by this publication may be available from other sources, which the user may wish to consult for additional v

11、iews or information not covered by this publication. NEMA has no power, nor does it undertake to police or enforce compliance with the contents of this document. NEMA does not certify, test, or inspect products, designs, or installations for safety or health purposes. Any certification or other stat

12、ement of compliance with any health or safety-related information in this document shall not be attributable to NEMA and is solely the responsibility of the certifier or maker of the statement. NEMA MS 12-2016 Page i 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association CONTENTS Preamble ii Foreword .

13、iii Rationale . iv Scope v Section 1 Definitions . 1 1.1 Specification Volume . 1 1.2 Reference Position 1 1.3 Characterization Volume . 1 1.4 Characterization Area 1 1.5 Image Artifact 1 1.6 Image Distortion 1 1.7 Phantom 1 Section 2 Methods of Measurement . 3 2.1 Test Hardware . 3 2.1.1 MR Charact

14、eristics of the Signal Producing Volume 3 2.1.2 Signal Producing Volume 3 2.1.3 Construction of the Signal Producing Volume 3 2.2 Scan Conditions 5 2.2.1 Reference Position and Acquisition Orientation 6 2.3 Measurement Procedure . 7 2.3.1 Measurement Procedure Hints and Tips 7 Section 3 Reporting of

15、 Results . 9 3.1 Data Reduction 9 3.1.1 Spatial Mapping 9 3.1.2 Scatter Plots 11 3.1.3 Error Table 11 3.1.4 Data Acquisition Parameters . 12 3.2 Sources of Error 13 3.3 References 13 Annex A Polynomial Analysis of the Displacement Errors in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 14 Annex B Changes to Standard .

16、 15 NEMA MS 12-2016 Page ii 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Preamble This is one of a series of test standards developed by the medical diagnostic imaging industry for the measurement of performance parameters governing image quality of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) system

17、s. These test standards are intended for the use of equipment manufacturers, testing houses, prospective purchasers, and users alike. Manufacturers are permitted to use these standards for the determination of system performance specifications. This standardization of performance specifications is o

18、f benefit to the prospective equipment purchaser. The parameters supplied with each NEMA measurement serve as a guide to those factors that can influence the measurement. These standards can also serve as reference procedures for acceptance testing and periodic quality assurance. It must be recogniz

19、ed, however, that not all test standards lend themselves to measurement at the installation site. Some test standards require instrumentation better suited to factory measurements, while others require the facilities of an instrumentation laboratory to ensure stable test conditions necessary for rel

20、iable measurements. The NEMA test procedures are carried out using the normal clinical operating mode of the system. For example, standard calibration procedures, standard clinical sequences, and standard reconstruction processes shall be used. No modifications to alter test results shall be used un

21、less otherwise specified in these standards. The NEMA Magnetic Resonance Section has identified a set of key magnetic resonance image quality parameters. This standards publication describes the measurement of one of these parameters. Equivalence It is intended and expected that manufacturers or oth

22、ers who claim compliance with these NEMA standard test procedures for the determination of image quality parameters shall have carried out the tests in accordance with the procedures specified in the published standards. In those cases where it is impossible or impractical to follow the literal pres

23、cription of a NEMA test procedure, a complete description of any deviation from the published procedure must be included with any measurement claimed equivalent to the NEMA standard. The validity or equivalence of the modified procedure will be determined by the reader. Uncertainty of the Measuremen

24、ts The measurement uncertainty of the image quality parameter determined using this standards publication is to be reported, together with the value of the parameter. Justification for the claimed uncertainty limits shall also be provided by a listing and discussion of sources and magnitudes of erro

25、r. NEMA MS 12-2016 Page iii 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Foreword This standards publication is classified as a NEMA standard unless otherwise noted. It describes a method for evaluating the geometric distortion characteristics throughout a specified imaging volume of a Magneti

26、c Resonance Imaging (MRI) system. The equipment contribution to geometric distortion in MRI systems is largely due to imperfections of the main magnetic field and the spatially encoding gradient subsystem. In addition, the object to be imaged by the MRI system may also induce magnetic field distorti

27、ons that geometrically distort the image representation of the object to a lesser or greater extent than the MRI system imperfections, depending upon the object and scanning parameters. Since geometric distortion is spatially variable, it is important to understand the spatial distribution of error

28、when MR images are used quantitatively. The purpose of this procedure is to provide a standard means for measuring and reporting the geometric distortion characteristics of an MRI system. Clinically, this information is helpful in matching MR scanner characteristics to clinical requirements, when ge

29、ometric accuracy is crucial (e.g., image-guided interventions.) This information is also helpful in evaluating the impact of system changes on performance, for quality control programs that seek to continually reaffirm system performance, or in demonstrating effectiveness for FDA applications. The m

30、easurement methods have not been designed for compatibility with existing NEMA methods, but some of the methods for reporting described in this standard may be compatible with data acquired for MS 2, Determination of Two-Dimensional Geometric Distortion in Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Images. Evalu

31、ations are performed on images generated using standard clinical scan protocols. This standards publication is intended for use by MRI system manufacturers, testing houses, manufacturers of accessory equipment, and MRI end users. This standards publication has been developed by the Magnetic Resonanc

32、e Section of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. User needs have been considered throughout the development of this publication. Proposed or recommended revisions should be submitted to: Executive Director, Medical Imaging the results are spatial in nature. This standard deals exclusi

33、vely with absolute error measurements because it is assumed the end user will need geometric distortion error measurements in absolute versus relative terms. While the intent of this standard is to quantify equipment induced geometric errors only, the phantom used for these measurements will also in

34、troduce some geometric errors. It is not possible to remove the phantom-induced errors within the scope of this standard, and this standard assumes that the measured errors are exclusively equipment errors. Therefore, it is necessary for the user of this standard to be able to differentiate between

35、geometric errors due to the MR imaging system and errors that arise from measuring geometric distortion with a test object. The user should attempt to estimate the error the phantom introduces for the specific test conditions used. This standard also recognizes that these measurements are ideally pe

36、rformed with three-dimensional acquisitions and large volume phantoms, but the cost, weight, and size of the required phantom may be prohibitive in certain situations. Therefore, this standard permits the use of a substantially two-dimensional phantom in conjunction with a set of two-dimensional ima

37、ge acquisitions in different orientations. It is recognized that the use of a two-dimensional phantom will fundamentally undersample the three-dimensional spatial error map. These procedures could also be helpful in evaluating the impact of system changes on performance, for quality control programs

38、 that seek to continually reaffirm system performance, or in demonstrating effectiveness for FDA applications. However, this standard does not supersede NEMA MS 2 Determination of Two-Dimensional Geometric Distortion in Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Images. MS 2 is designed to produce simple figures

39、 of merit that describe basic geometric distortions, or image field of view errors, that could arise from imaging gradient amplitude scaling errors. NEMA MS 12-2016 Page vi 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association NEMA MS 12-2016 Page 1 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Se

40、ction 1 Definitions 1.1 Specification Volume The specification volume is the imaging volume within which a manufacturer guarantees image performance specifications. Images or portions of images outside this volume will not necessarily meet performance specifications, but may still be useful for diag

41、nostic or image guided purposes. For head scans, the specification volume must enclose, as a minimum, a 10 cm diameter spherical volume (dsv) centered in the RF head coil. For body scans, the specification volume must enclose a 20 cm dsv centered in the RF body coil. 1.2 Reference Position The refer

42、ence position is a well-defined point within the nearest measurable phantom element to magnet isocenter. The reference position must not be more than 1.5 cm from magnet isocenter (half of the element spacing). The reference position within the reference element will vary depending on the design of t

43、he phantom. The user may define the reference position as the middle of a discrete element, or the middle of the intersection of continuous elements, or any of the four corners created by intersecting continuous elements, or some other consistent, well-defined point. 1.3 Characterization Volume The

44、characterization volume is the intersection of the image volume and the specification volume and shall include the reference position. This implies that the phantom used to acquire the spatial distortion measurements is a three dimensional object. 1.4 Characterization Area The characterization area

45、is the intersection of the image plane and the specification volume, and it shall include the reference position, unless otherwise specifically noted. This implies that the phantom used to acquire the spatial distortion measurements is a planar two-dimensional object with sufficient size in the thir

46、d dimension to fill no more than the thickness of the imaging plane. In the case of a three-dimensional object and threedimensional image acquisitions, an arbitrarily extracted slice can also be used. 1.5 Image Artifact An image artifact is an image anomaly (excluding random noise) that is not repre

47、sentative of the structure or chemistry of the object being scanned, or, that is derived from the structure or chemistry of the object being scanned but which appears in the image at a location other than expected. 1.6 Image Distortion Image distortion is the spatial deviation of an arbitrary point

48、in the imaging volume from its expected true location. Image distortion will be specified as absolute (magnitude or signed magnitude) quantity. 1.7 Phantom A combination of signal producing and non-signal producing materials, used for MR image testing purposes. Two-dimensional phantoms have large ex

49、tent in two dimensions (much larger than one pixel in plane) and have limited extent in the third dimension, approximately equal to the slice thickness. NEMA MS 12-2016 Page 2 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Three-dimensional phantoms have large extent in all three dimensions (much larger than one pixel in plane and much larger than nominal thickness in the orthogonal direction). NEMA MS 12-2016 Page 3 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Section 2 Methods of Measurement 2.1 Test Hardware 2.1.1 MR Characteristics of the Signal Producing Volume

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1