ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:2 ,大小:12.70KB ,
资源ID:1018895      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1018895.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(REG NASA-LLIS-1256-2001 Lessons Learned - Project Selection for New Programs Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Software Specifically Expert Choice 2000 Software.pdf)为本站会员(outsidejudge265)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

REG NASA-LLIS-1256-2001 Lessons Learned - Project Selection for New Programs Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Software Specifically Expert Choice 2000 Software.pdf

1、Lessons Learned Entry: 1256Lesson Info:a71 Lesson Number: 1256a71 Lesson Date: 2001-11-16a71 Submitting Organization: KSCa71 Submitted by: Charles Wendling/ Gena BakerSubject: Project Selection for New Programs Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Software, Specifically Expert Choice 2000 Softwa

2、re Description of Driving Event: Prior to selecting a project to be funded, we rank each project against an AHP model that was based on the values of the program. We placed a 5 maximum user limitation on the software that constrained and prevented us from effectively and efficiently ranking projects

3、.Lesson(s) Learned: Team buy-in to the AHP model was essential prior to ranking. A lot of time was spent up front getting consensus. Upgrading to the 25 user license with remote keypads streamlined the process and made the results immediately available allowing the team to make a decision on the spo

4、t. The team members at remote locations voted on paper prior to the team voting. Their data was entered into the model but was hidden to avoid the possibility of anchoring.Recommendation(s): Rank project with keypad devices so decisions are not delayed and action can be taken. Evidence of Recurrence

5、 Control Effectiveness: N/ADocuments Related to Lesson: N/AProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Mission Directorate(s): a71 Exploration Systemsa71 Space Operationsa71 Aeronautics ResearchAdditional Key Phrase(s): a71 SoftwareAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2002-07-09a71 Approval Name: Gena Bakera71 Approval Organization: KSCa71 Approval Phone Number: 321-867-4261Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1