ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOC , 页数:24 ,大小:157.50KB ,
资源ID:1381518      下载积分:5000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1381518.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(【考研类试卷】2015年考研英语(一)真题试卷及答案解析.doc)为本站会员(arrownail386)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

【考研类试卷】2015年考研英语(一)真题试卷及答案解析.doc

1、2015 年考研英语(一)真题试卷及答案解析(总分:144.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Use of English(总题数:2,分数:80.00)1.Section I Use of EnglishDirections: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D.(分数:40.00)_Though not biologically related, friends are as “related“ as fourth cousins, sha

2、ring about 1% of genes. That is【B1】_1 a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has【B2】_ The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted【B3】_1, 932 unique subjects which【B4】_pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated

3、strangers. The same people were used in both【B5】_ While 1 % may seem【B6】_, it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says,“Most people do not even【B7】_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who【B8】_our kin.“ The stu

4、dy【B9】_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity. Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now. 【B10】_, as the team suggests,it draws us to similar environments but there is more【B11】_it. There could be many mechanisms wo

5、rking together that【B12】_us in choosing genetically similar friends【B13】_“functional kinship“ of being friends with【B14】_! One of the remarkable findings of the study was that the similar genes seem to be evolving 【B15】_than other genes. Studying this could help【B16】_why human evolution picked pace

6、in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major【B17】_factor. The findings do not simply explain people“s【B18】_to befriend those of similar【B19】_backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to【B20】_that a

7、ll subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.(分数:40.00)(1).【B1】(分数:2.00)A.whenB.whyC.howD.what(2).【B2】(分数:2.00)A.defendedB.concludedC.withdrawnD.advised(3).【B3】(分数:2.00)A.forB.withC.onD.by(4).【B4】(分数:2.00)A.comparedB.soughtC.separatedD.connected(5).【B5】(分数:2.00)A.testsB.ob

8、jectsC.samplesD.examples(6).【B6】(分数:2.00)A.insignificantB.unexpectedC.unreliableD.incredible(7).【B7】(分数:2.00)A.visitB.missC.seekD.know(8).【B8】(分数:2.00)A.resembleB.influenceC.favorD.surpass(9).【B9】(分数:2.00)A.againB.alsoC.insteadD.thus(10).【B10】(分数:2.00)A.MeanwhileB.FurthermoreC.LikewiseD.Perhaps(11).

9、【B11】(分数:2.00)A.aboutB.toC.fromD.like(12).【B12】(分数:2.00)A.driveB.observeC.confuseD.limit(13).【B13】(分数:2.00)A.according toB.rather thanC.regardless ofD.along with(14).【B14】(分数:2.00)A.chancesB.responsesC.missionsD.benefits(15).【B15】(分数:2.00)A.laterB.slowerC.fasterD.earlier(16).【B16】(分数:2.00)A.forecast

10、B.rememberC.understandD.express(17).【B17】(分数:2.00)A.unpredictableB.contributoryC.controllableD.disruptive(18).【B18】(分数:2.00)A.endeavorB.decisionC.arrangementD.tendency(19).【B19】(分数:2.00)A.politicalB.religiousC.ethnicD.economic(20).【B20】(分数:2.00)A.seeB.showC.proveD.tell二、Reading Comprehensio(总题数:10,分

11、数:60.00)2.Section II Reading Comprehension_3.Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D._King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted “kings don“t abdicate, they die in their sleep.“ But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the re

12、publican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyles? The Spani

13、sh case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above “mere“ politics and “embody“ a spirit of national unity. It is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains mona

14、rchs, continuing popularity as heads of state. And so, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms(not counting Vatican City and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because

15、they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure. Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very historyand sometimes the way they behave todayembodies outdated and indefensible priv

16、ileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modem democratic states. The most successful monarchies st

17、rive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses(or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international l%,and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image. While

18、Europe“s monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example. It is only the Queen who has preserved the monarchy“s reputation with her rather ordinary(if well-heeled)granny style. The danger will come wit

19、h Charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of the world. He has failed to understand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a serviceas non-controversial and non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history sh

20、ows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchy“s worst enemies.(分数:10.00)(1).According to the first two paragraphs, King Juan Carlos of Spain(分数:2.00)A.used to enjoy high public support.B.was unpopular among European royals.C.eased his relationship with his rivals.D.ended his reign in embar

21、rassment.(2).Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostly(分数:2.00)A.owing to their undoubted and respectable status.B.to achieve a balance between tradition and reality.C.to give voters more public figures to look up to.D.due to their everlasting political embodiment.(3).Which of the followi

22、ng is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4?(分数:2.00)A.Aristocrats“ excessive reliance on inherited wealth.B.The role of the nobility in modem democracies.C.The simple lifestyle of the aristocratic families.D.The nobility“s adherence to their privileges.(4).The British royals “have most to fear“

23、 because Charles(分数:2.00)A.takes a tough line on political issues.B.fails to change his lifestyle as advised.C.takes republicans as his potential allies.D.fails to adapt himself to his future role.(5).Which of the following is the best title of the text?(分数:2.00)A.Carlos, Glory and Disgrace Combined

24、B.Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the ThroneC.Carlos, a Lesson for All European MonarchsD.Charles, Slow to React to the Coming ThreatsJust how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a w

25、arrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest. California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling, particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argue

26、s, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies. The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California“s advice. Enough of the implications are discemable,even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police,lawyers and def

27、endants. They should start by discarding California“s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smartphone-a vast storehouse of digital informationis similar to, say, going through a suspect“s purse. The court has ruled that police don“t violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wal

28、let or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one“s smartphone is more like entering his or her home. A smartphone may contain an arrestee“s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of “cloud computing

29、,“ meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier. Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and pro

30、tected by the Constitution“s prohibition on unreasonable searches. As so often is the case,stating that principle doesn“t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly burdensome for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invali

31、date Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while waiting for a warrant. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more

32、 freedom. But the justices should not swallow California“s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution“s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the estab

33、lishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.(分数:10.00)(1).The Supreme Court will work out whether,

34、during ah arrest, it is legitimate to(分数:2.00)A.prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.B.search for suspects“ mobile phones without a warrant.C.check suspects“ phone contents without being authorized.D.prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.(2).The author“s attitude toward Cal

35、ifornia“s argument is one of(分数:2.00)A.disapproval.B.indifference.C.tolerance.D.cautiousness.(3).The author believes that exploring one“s phone contents is comparable to(分数:2.00)A.getting into one“s residence.B.handling one“s historical records.C.scanning one“s correspondences.D.going through one“s

36、wallet.(4).In Paragraphs 5 and 6,the author shows his concern that(分数:2.00)A.principles are hard to be clearly expressed.B.the court is giving police less room for action.C.citizens“ privacy is not effectively protected.D.phones are used to store sensitive information.(5).Orin Kerr“s comparison is q

37、uoted to indicate that(分数:2.00)A.the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.B.new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.C.California“s argument violates principles of the Constitution.D.principles of the Constitution should never be altered.The journal Science is adding an ex

38、tra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process,editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research finding

39、s. “Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,“ writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scr

40、utiny by the journal“s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts. Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: “The creation of the “stat

41、istics board“ was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science“s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.“ Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a

42、 member of the SBoRE group, says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.“ He agreed to join because he “found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Scienc

43、e itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.“ John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is “a most welcome step forward“ and “long overdue.“ “Most journals are weak in statistical rev

44、iew, and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays,statistical review is more essential than expert review,“ he says. But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Assoc

45、iation and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review. Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux,a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 20

46、12, but journals should also take a tougher line, “engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process.“ Vaux says that Science“s idea to pass some papers to statisticians “has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to ident

47、ify “the papers that need scrutiny“ in the first place.“(分数:10.00)(1).It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that(分数:2.00)A.Science intends to simplify its peer-review process.B.journals are strengthening their statistical checks.C.few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.D.lack of data ana

48、lysis is common in research projects.(2).The phrase “flagged up“(Para. 2)is the closest in meaning to(分数:2.00)A.found.B.marked.C.revised.D.stored.(3).Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE may(分数:2.00)A.pose a threat to all its peers.B.meet with strong opposition.C.increase Science“s circulation.D.set an example for other journals.(4).David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now(分数:2.00)A.adds to researchers“ workload.B.diminishes the role of reviewers.C.has room for further improvement.D.is to

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1