ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:67 ,大小:2.23MB ,
资源ID:399768      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-399768.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(API PUBL 4527-1993 Evaluation of Limiting Constituents Suggested for Land Disposal of Exploration and Production Wastes《评价体现石油勘探生产废弃物陆地扩散的极限成分》.pdf)为本站会员(ideacase155)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

API PUBL 4527-1993 Evaluation of Limiting Constituents Suggested for Land Disposal of Exploration and Production Wastes《评价体现石油勘探生产废弃物陆地扩散的极限成分》.pdf

1、API PUBLS4527 93 = 0732290 05LLO2 556 = Evaluation of Limiting Constituents Suggested for Land Disposal of Exploration and Production Wastes HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT AND EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT API PUBLICATION NUMBER 4527 AUGUST 1993 American Petroleum Institute 122

2、0 L Street. Northwest 111 Washington, D.C. 20005 API PUBLJ4527 93 0732290 0517103 492 Eva1 uation of Li miti ng Constituents Suggested for Land Disposal of Exploration and Production Wastes Health and Environmental Sciences Department and Exploration and Production Department API PUBLICATION NUMBER

3、4527 PREPARED UNDER CONTRACT BY: LLOYD E. DEUEL, JR., Ph.D. SOIL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. 41 5 GRAHAM ROAD COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77485 JULY 1991 Amerlcan Petroleum Institute API PUBL*4527 93 0732290 0517104 329 FOREWORD API PUBLICATIONS NECESSARILY ADDRESS PROBLEMS OF A GENERAL NATURE. WITH RESPEC

4、T TO PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES, LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS SHOULD BE REVIEWED. AFI IS NOT UNDERTmG TO MEET THE DUTIES OF EMPLOYERS, MANUFAC- TURERS, OR SUPPLIERS To WARN AND PROPERLY TRAIN AND EQUIP THEIR EMPLOYEES, AND OTHERS EXPOSED, CONCERNING HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS AND PRECAU

5、TIONS, NOR UNDFRTAKING THEIR OBLIGATIONS UNDER LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL LAWS. NOTHING CONTAINED IN ANY API PUBLICATION IS TO BE CONSTRUED AS GRANTING ANY RIGHT, BY IMPLICATION OR OTHERWISE, FOR THE MANU- FA-, SALE, OR USE OF ANY METHOD, APPARATUS, OR PRODUCT COV- ERED BY LETTERS PATENT. NEITHER SHOU

6、LD ANYTHING CONTAINED IN ITY FOR INFRINGEMENT OF LETERS PATENT. THE PUBLICATION BE CONSTRUED AS INSURING ANYONE AGAINST LIABIL- Cbpy-right (u 1993 American Petroieum Institute ii API PUBL*4527 33 = 0732230 0537305 265 Section 1: Section 2: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction and Executive Summary 1

7、Technical Justification and Literature Review 3 2.1 Limiting Constituents 3 2.2 Salinity . 3 2.3 Sodicity (ESP and SAR) 14 2.4 Hydrocarbons . 17 2.5 Summary . 24 Section 3: Pit Operations and Land Disposal . 25 3.1 Pit Operations 25 3.2 Summary of Guideline Thresholds and Application . 29 3.3 Flow D

8、iagram for Pit Liquid Disposal . 31 3.4 Flow Diagram for Pit Solids Disposal . 32 3.5 Parameters and Example Calculations for Management of Pit Wastes by Land Treatment 34 References . 39 Appendix 47 API PUBLX4527 93 W 0732290 0517106 LTL W SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Onshore explor

9、ation and production (E and oil and grease (O the rationale being that salt accumulated outside the bulk soil mass (in pores and on ped surfaces) is more easily displaced than that penetrated into and reacted with the bulk soil mass. If the salinity is initially too high for a given crop after land

10、applications of waste, soils will generally recover following rainfall or irrigation containing less salt because excess salts are leached when adequate drainage is present. Growth of more salt tolerant plants may be desirable during the interim 7 API PUBLX4527 93 0732290 05LLL3 331 cn n. O L - a o

11、a, a Co .- n L a, a LL .- .- U a m O L m c O o L c O O +., ci o (d a, Q 3 O o X a LL - ci 3 C Ca a, e r U U a n a, O - .- a E 3 c o, O cn L o m Lo cv O cv Lo F O r Lo O - Y 8 API PUBLX4527 93 0732290 0517115 LO4 cn Q O L a, 0 U S cd cn a, Co cn cd t nn aia ao a o 6 3 o a a lL o) E CLL O c9 Lo cv O C

12、u In 7 O 7 Lo O h L IL 9 API PUBL*4527 93 0732290 05L7LLb 040 W Lo c7 o Cll Lo N O N lo Y O Y Lo O h CD a3 -# x Q)= O U a.+) 10 API PUBLa4527 93 0732290 0517117 T87 between application and recovery (Foth and Turk, 1972). Reclama- tion of salt-containing soils may be hastened through the appli- catio

13、n of calcium sulfate (gypsum) which results in the replacement of exchangeable sodium by calcium (Oster and Rhoades, 1984). Plants grown on gypsiferous soils will tolerate an EC approximately 2 mmho/cm higher than those shown in Figures 1 through 3 (Mass, 1986). This is because gypsum is dissolved a

14、t moisture equivalents used in preparing saturated soil extracts for analysis but not at moisture equivalents normal to field conditions. USDA Handbook 60 (U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff,1954) clas- sifies water with EC values above 2.25 mmho/cm as unfit for agricultural purposes except under very s

15、pecial circumstances. Soils with salinity levels 4 mmho/cm are considered saline. The recommended criteria of 4 mmho/cm is too high for the mo:re salt sensitive crops (Table i), and some adjustments may have to be made relative to intended land use. Miller and Pesaran (:L980) found that high concent

16、rations of soluble salts in mud-treated soil hindered plant growth in a 1:l mud:soil mixture. their data where EC of the mud:soil mixture was 200 mmho/cm) posed a threat to local- ized groundwater resources. However, the EC of 200 mmho/cm greatly exceeds the recommended threshold of 4 mmho/cm. Bates

17、 (1988), working with a freshwater drilling fluid, demon- strated that C1 was not retained in the zone of incorporation when mixed with surface soil. The criteria of 4 mmho/cm (2452 mg/liter TDS for riA1r = 613) can be expected to have no measurable impact on groundwater even in the most sensitive h

18、ydrological settings. Water and associat- ed dissolved constituents do not move through soils as an isolat- ed unit (plug flow), instead there is a natural redistribution controlled by water potentials, pore dynamics, dispersion, and 12 API PUBL*12) in soil solution cause Ca and Mg deficiencies in p

19、lants by both antagonistic reactions and shift- ing of solubilities by common ion effect (Kramer, 1969; U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff, 1954). 15 API PUBLx4527 93 = 0732290 0517122 344 = Soils reacted with solutions of high SAR are at risk of becoming sodic. A soil is termed sodic when the ESP excee

20、ds 15% of the CEC (U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff, 1954). The most distinguishing feature of sodic soils is their lack of structure and tendency to disperse in water. A dispersed soil condition has a devastating impact on plants by limiting the free exchange of air and infiltration of water (Reeve a

21、nd Fireman, 1967; Bresler et al., 1983). Research conducted by Tucker (1985) involving land disposal of waste drilling fluids indicated that SAR 200 and ESP 90, when salinities were 3.0% of soil weight coastal bermuda grass, trees, plantain 20 API PUBLX4527 CI3 0732290 0517126 T9T These studies indi

22、cate that under hydrocarbon loadings 1%, E Weldon, 1978). The recent review by EPA (1987) of E Atlas and Bartha, 1972; Jobson et al., 1972; Kincannon, 1972; Westlake et al., 1974; Horowitz et al., 1975; Sveinung et al., 1986). Saturates and light-end aromatics are degraded first, with kinetics or ra

23、te of degradation controlled by concentration and composition of hydro- carbons, nutritive status, aeration, moisture and temperature (Schwendinger, 1968; Francke and Clark, 1974; Huddleston and 22 API PUBL*q527 93 m 0732290 0517128 862 m Meyers, 1978; Dibble and Bartha, 1979; Brown et al., 1983; Fl

24、owers et al., 1984; Bleckmann et al., 1989). Mechanisms and pathways of biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons are quite complex and are beyond the scope of this paper. Suffice it to say that the narrower the carbon:nitrogen ratio (60-100 C:N) and the nearer the moisture and temperature are to opt

25、imum levels (60-80% of the moisture retained in soil at 0.33 bar pressure and 35-38C, respectively), the greater the rate of degradation. Watts et al. (1982) measured a 2-year half life for a 14% by volume loading of oil to soil. Streebin et al. (1985) also found a half life of about 2 years for API

26、 separator sludge at a similar loading rate. At a loading rate of 2% in the field, 94% of hydrocarbons were removed after 3.5 years (Oudot et al, 1989). Lynch and Genes (1987) determined a half life of 77 days on a field plot containing up to 1% polyaromatic hydrocarbons in soil with 5% benzene extr

27、actable hydrocarbons. It has been demonstrated that degradative processes attenuate the more mobile, light-end aromatic and water-soluble petroleum hydrocarbons when applied to the surface with little potential for contaminant migration (Raymond, 1975; Brown et al., 1983; Brown and Deuel, 1983; Whit

28、fill and Boyd, 1987; Bleckmann et al., 1989). Whitfill and Boyd (1987) reported that soils may be treated with up to 5% oil by weight with no adverse environment impact. Several studies have shown that controlled oil applications actually improve soil physical conditions and fertility status (Plice,

29、 1948; Mackin, 1950; Ellis and Adams, 1961; Baker, 1970; Giddens, 1976). 23 API PUBL*4527 93 m 0732290 0517l129 7T9 m 2.4.4 Criteria The API Environmental Guidance Document recommends a 1% oil and grease threshold for land disposal of E&P wastes based on attenuation and degradation processes that wi

30、ll occur under landspreading conditions. This value is predicated on the con- cept of minimum management, whereby an operator may load a soil (add hydrocarbon) at an appropriate mix ratio (E&P waste:soil) not to exceed 1% oil and grease. Available information demon- strates that 1% hydrocarbon by we

31、ight was a reasonable threshold initiating only temporary plant yield reductions. 2.5 Summary This information supports the guidance values that have been developed for the land disposal of exploration and production wastes. values are EC 4 mmho/cm, SAR 12, ESP 15%, and O&G 1%. These guidance values

32、 have been developed to be generally ap- plicable for any waste containing salts or petroleum hydrocarbons including E&P wastes. They are designed to protect the environ- ment under conditions most likely to be found at E&P locations. While beins qenerally applicable, it is UD to the operator to det

33、ermine whether they apply to his particular site. For a one-time application the guidance 24 API PUBL*4527 93 = 0732290 0517130 410 SECTION 3 PIT OPERATIONS AND LAND DISPOSAL 3.1 Pit Operations 3.1.1 Sealing Process One factor that limits the potential of contaminant migra- tion from waste drilling

34、fluids managed in earthen pits and buried on site is the effective sealing offered by dispersed particulates (Rowsell et al., 1985). Many drilling muds are primarily clay-water suspensions that function to clean any cuttings from beneath the drill bit and carry them to the surface, seal and stabiliz

35、e the bore hole, and lubricate the drill string and bit. A significant portion of this mud is circulated to the reserve pit as waste drilling fluid along with the drill cuttings. associated with mud and cuttings penetrate the natural earthen surface defining the pit walls and bottom. This seals the

36、pit forming a natural liner system. The more clay and the smaller the pore diameter of the native soil the quicker the seal. Clay and fine silt particles It has been observed by the author of this paper that pits constructed in coarser textured soils, and loamy or clayey soils in an aridic soil mois

37、ture regime, are penetrated deeper by waste drilling fluids natural liner condition than in moist loamy or clayey soils. soil layer composing this mmnaturalmt liner not only serves as a physical barrier, but also has chemisorptive properties further and require more fine particulates to develop a Th

38、e 25 API PUBLm4527 93 = 0732290 05L7L3L 357 reducing the potential for pollutant migration. Prewetting the surface of pits constructed in coarse textured soils or loamy and clayey soils exhibiting vertical cracks may reduce the depth of penetration and the amount of fine particulates needed to effec

39、t a natural liner seal. 3.1.2 Pit Liquids 3.1.2.1 Operative Criteria Pit liquid is defined as the aqueous phase above settled solids. The API Environmental Guidance Document recommends an operative criteria of 4 mmho/cm (2452 mg/liter TDS for riA1r = 613). See Section 2.2.1 for parameter definitions

40、 and compara- tive discussion. EC serves as an index parameter for decision- making purposes relative to pit liquid disposal options. Pit liquid analyses do not necessarily reflect what is in the pit solids, separate analyses are required to obtain a complete understanding of pit contents. 3.1.2.2 S

41、ampling and Analysis Numerous grab samples at various depths improve statistical probability of obtaining a representative sample. Containers that can be opened below the surface at a selected depth interval are a must when sampling multiphase liquids (oil layer over water). Expensive sampling equipment is usually not necessary and more often than not fails under field trials. Scrupulous clean- ing of sampling hardware is requisite in preventing cross 26

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1