ANSI ASTM E691-2016 Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method.pdf

1、Designation: E691 16 An American National StandardStandard Practice forConducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine thePrecision of a Test Method1This standard is issued under the fixed designation E691; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or,

2、in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.1. Scop

3、e1.1 This practice describes the techniques for planning,conducting, analyzing, and treating the results of an interlabo-ratory study (ILS) of a test method. The statistical techniquesdescribed in this practice provide adequate information forformulating the precision statement of a test method.1.2

4、This practice does not concern itself with the develop-ment of test methods but rather with gathering the informationneeded for a test method precision statement after the devel-opment stage has been successfully completed. The dataobtained in the interlaboratory study may indicate, however,that fur

5、ther effort is needed to improve the test method.1.3 Since the primary purpose of this practice is the devel-opment of the information needed for a precision statement, theexperimental design in this practice may not be optimum forevaluating materials, apparatus, or individual laboratories.1.4 Field

6、 of ApplicationThis practice is concerned exclu-sively with test methods which yield a single numerical figureas the test result, although the single figure may be the outcomeof a calculation from a set of measurements.1.4.1 This practice does not cover methods in which themeasurement is a categoriz

7、ation; however, for many practicalpurposes categorical outcomes can be scored, such as zero-onescoring for binary measurements or as integers, ranks forexample, for well-ordered categories and then the test resultcan be defined as an average, or other summary statistic, ofseveral individual scores.1

8、.5 This standard may involve hazardous materials,operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport toaddress all of the safety problems associated with its use. It isthe responsibility of the user of this standard to establishappropriate safety and health practices and determine theapplicabi

9、lity of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E29 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data toDetermine Conformance with SpecificationsE177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias inASTM Test MethodsE456 Terminology Relating to Quality and S

10、tatisticsE1169 Practice for Conducting Ruggedness TestsE1402 Guide for Sampling DesignE2282 Guide for Defining the Test Result of a Test Method3. Terminology3.1 DefinitionsTerminology E456 provides a more exten-sive list of terms in E11 standards.3.1.1 accuracy, nthe closeness of agreement between a

11、test result and an accepted reference value. E1773.1.2 bias, nthe difference between the expectation of thetest results and an accepted reference value. E1773.1.3 interlaboratory study, (ILS) in ASTM, na designedprocedure for obtaining a precision statement for a test method,involving multiple labor

12、atories, each generating replicate testresults on one or more materials.3.1.4 observation, nthe process of obtaining informationregarding the presence or absence of an attribute of a testspecimen, or of making a reading on a characteristic ordimension of a test specimen. E22823.1.5 precision, nthe c

13、loseness of agreements betweenindependent test results obtained under stipulated conditions.E1773.1.6 repeatability, nprecision under repeatabilityconditions. E1773.1.7 repeatability conditions, nconditions where inde-pendent test results are obtained with the same method onidentical test items in t

14、he same laboratory by the same operatorusing the same equipment within short intervals of time. E1771This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee E11 on Quality andStatistics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E11.20 on Test MethodEvaluation and Quality Control.Current edit

15、ion approved Oct. 1, 2016. Published October 2016. Originallyapproved in 1979. Last previous edition approved in 2015 as E691 15. DOI:10.1520/E0691-16.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStan

16、dards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States13.1.8 repeatability limit (r), nthe value below which theabsolute difference between two individ

17、ual test results obtainedunder repeatability conditions may be expected to occur with aprobability of approximately 0.95 (95 %). E1773.1.9 repeatability standard deviation, (sr), nthe standarddeviation of test result obtained under repeatability conditions.E1773.1.10 reproducibility, nprecision unde

18、r reproducibilityconditions. E1773.1.11 reproducibility conditions, nconditions where testresults are obtained with the same method on identical testitems in different laboratories with different operators usingdifferent equipment. E1773.1.12 reproducibility limit (R), nthe value below whichthe abso

19、lute difference between two test results obtained underreproducibility conditions may be expected to occur with aprobability of approximately 0.95 (95 %). E1773.1.13 reproducibility standard deviation (sR), nthe stan-dard deviation of test results obtained under reproducibilityconditions. E1773.1.14

20、 ruggedness test, na planned experiment in whichenvironmental factors or test conditions are deliberately variedin order to evaluate the effects of such variation. E11693.1.15 test determination, nthe value of a characteristic ordimension of a single test specimen derived from one or moreobserved va

21、lues. E22823.1.16 test method, na definitive procedure that producesa test result. E22823.1.17 test observation, nsee observation. E22823.1.18 test result, nthe value of a characteristic obtainedby carrying out a specified test method. E22823.1.19 test specimen, nthe portion of a test unit needed to

22、obtain a single test determination. E22823.1.20 test unit, nthe total quantity of material (containingone or more test specimens) needed to obtain a test result asspecified in the test method; see test result. E22823.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 average of the cell averages

23、, x=,nthe average of thecell averages for a particular material.3.2.2 between-laboratory consistency statistic, h, ntheratio of the cell deviation to the standard deviation of the cellaverages.3.2.2.1 DiscussionThis statistic is an indicator of how onelaboratorys cell average compares with the avera

24、ge of theother laboratories for a particular material (see X1.2.2).3.2.3 between-laboratory standard deviation, sL,nthesample standard deviation attributable to differences of testresult means among laboratories.3.2.4 between-laboratory variance, sL2,nthe sample vari-ance component attributable to d

25、ifferences of test result meansamong laboratories.3.2.4.1 DiscussionThis statistic is estimated indirectlyfrom the variance of cell averages and the repeatabilityvariance. In situations where there is good agreement amonglaboratories the estimate of this variance component may beclose to zero or be

26、negative. In the latter case, the estimate isset to zero. (See Note 2 and X1.1.2).3.2.5 cell, nthe intersection of a row and column in atwo-way classification table, in which the rows represent thelaboratories and the columns represent the materials.3.2.5.1 DiscussionThe table holds the test results

27、 from aninterlaboratory study, and each cell contains the test resultsfrom a particular laboratory on a particular material (seeSection 7 and Table 1).3.2.6 cell average, x, nthe average of the test results in aparticular cell.3.2.7 cell deviation, d, nthe cell average minus the aver-age of the cell

28、 averages.3.2.8 cell standard deviation, s, nthe standard deviation ofthe test results in a particular cell.3.2.9 repeatability variance, sr2,nthe sample variance oftest results obtained under repeatability conditions.3.2.9.1 DiscussionThis statistic is estimated for a materialas the pooled within-l

29、aboratory variances over all of thelaboratories in the ILS.3.2.10 reproducibility variance, sR2,nthe sample varianceof test results obtained under reproducibility conditions.3.2.10.1 DiscussionThis statistic is estimated as the sumof the two variance components due to between-laboratories,sL2, and w

30、ithin-laboratories, sr2.3.2.11 standard deviation of the cell averages, sx,nthestandard deviation of the cell averages for a particular material.3.2.12 variance of the cell averages, sx2,nthe samplevariance of the cell averages for a particular material.3.2.13 within-laboratory consistency statistic

31、, k, nthe ra-tio of the cell standard deviation to the repeatability standarddeviation.3.2.13.1 DiscussionThis statistic is an indicator of howone laboratorys cell standard deviation under repeatabilityconditions compares with the repeatability standard deviationestimated from all laboratories for a

32、 particular material (seeX1.2.3).4. Significance and Use4.1 ASTM regulations require precision statements in alltest methods in terms of repeatability and reproducibility. Thispractice may be used in obtaining the needed information assimply as possible. This information may then be used toprepare a

33、 precision statement in accordance with PracticeE177. Knowledge of the test method precision is useful incommerce and in technical work when comparing test resultsagainst standard values (such as specification limits) or be-tween data sources (different laboratories, instruments, etc.).4.1.1 When a

34、test method is applied to a large number ofportions of a material that are as nearly alike as possible, thetest results obtained will not all have the same value. Ameasure of the degree of agreement among these test resultsdescribes the precision of the test method for that material.Numerical measur

35、es of the variability between such test resultsprovide inverse measures of the precision of the test method.E691 162Greater variability implies smaller (that is, poorer) precisionand larger imprecision.4.1.2 Precision is reported as a standard deviation, coeffi-cient of variation (relative standard

36、deviation), variance, or aprecision limit (a data range indicating no statistically signifi-cant difference between test results).4.1.3 This practice is designed only to estimate the precisionof a test method. However, when accepted reference values areavailable for the property levels, the test res

37、ult data obtainedaccording to this practice may be used in estimating the bias ofthe test method. For a discussion of bias estimation and therelationships between precision, bias, and accuracy, see Prac-tice E177.4.2 The procedures presented in this practice consist ofthree basic steps: planning the

38、 interlaboratory study, guidingthe testing phase of the study, and analyzing the test result data.4.2.1 The planning phase includes forming the ILS taskgroup, the study design, selection and number of participatinglaboratories, selection of test materials, and writing the ILSprotocol. A well-develop

39、ed test method, including a rugged-ness test to determine control of test method conditions, isessential.NOTE 1In this practice, the term test method is used both for the actualmeasurement process and for the written description of the process, whilethe term protocol is used for the directions given

40、 to the laboratories forconducting the ILS.4.2.2 The testing phase includes material preparation anddistribution, liaison with the participating laboratories, andhandling of test result data received from the laboratories.4.2.3 The data analysis utilizes tabular, graphical, and sta-tistical diagnost

41、ic tools for evaluating the consistency of thedata so that unusual values may be detected and investigated,and also includes the calculation of the numerical measures ofprecision of the test method pertaining to repeatability andreproducibility.4.3 The information in this practice is arranged as fol

42、lows:SectionScope 1Referenced Documents 2Terminology 3Significance and Use 4Concepts of Test Method Precision 5Planning the Interlaboratory Study (ILS) SectionILS Membership 6Basic Design 7Test Method 8Laboratories 9Materials 10Number of Test Results per Material 11Protocol 12Conducting the Testing

43、Phase of the ILS SectionPilot Run 13Full Scale Run 14Calculation and Display of Statistics SectionCalculation of the Statistics 15Tabular and Graphical Display of Statistics 16Data Consistency SectionFlagging Inconsistent Results 17Investigation 18Task Group Actions 19Glucose ILS Consistency 20Preci

44、sion Statement Information SectionRepeatability and Reproducibility 21SectionKeywords 22Tables TableGlucose in Serum Example 14, 68Critical Values of Consistency Statistics, h and k 5Figures FigureGlucose in Serum Example 13Appendixes AppendixTheoretical Considerations Appendix X1Pentosans in Pulp E

45、xample Appendix X2Spreadsheet for E691 Calculations Appendix X35. Concepts of Test Method Precision5.1 Repeatability and ReproducibilityThese two termsdeal with the variability of test results obtained under specifiedlaboratory conditions and represent the two extremes of testmethod precision. Repea

46、tability concerns the variability be-tween independent test results obtained within a single labo-ratory in the shortest practical period of time by a singleoperator with a specific set of test apparatus using testspecimens (or test units) taken at random from a single quantityof homogeneous materia

47、l obtained or prepared for the ILS.Reproducibility deals with the variability between single testresults obtained in different laboratories, each of which hasapplied the test method to test specimens (or test units) takenat random from a single quantity of homogeneous materialobtained or prepared fo

48、r the ILS.5.1.1 Repeatability ConditionsThe single-operator,single-set-of-apparatus requirement means that for a particularstep in the measurement process the same combination ofoperator and apparatus is used for every test result and on everymaterial. Thus, one operator may prepare the test specime

49、ns, asecond measure the dimensions and a third measure thebreaking force. “Shortest practical period of time“ means thatthe test results, at least for one material, are obtained in a timenot less than in normal testing and not so long as to permitsignificant changes in test material, equipment or environment.5.1.2 Reproducibility ConditionsThe factors that contrib-ute to variability in a single laboratory, such as operator,equipment used, calibration of the equipment, and environment(for example, temperature, humidity, air polluti