ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:28 ,大小:2.05MB ,
资源ID:589020      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-589020.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(BS PD ISO TR 16158-2013 Space systems Avoiding collisions with orbiting objects《空间系统 避免与轨道物体的碰撞》.pdf)为本站会员(medalangle361)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

BS PD ISO TR 16158-2013 Space systems Avoiding collisions with orbiting objects《空间系统 避免与轨道物体的碰撞》.pdf

1、BSI Standards PublicationPD ISO/TR 16158:2013Space systems Avoidingcollisions with orbiting objectsCopyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:201

2、3 PUBLISHED DOCUMENTNational forewordThis Published Document is the UK implementation of ISO/TR16158:2013.The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to TechnicalCommittee ACE/68/-/3, Space systems and operations - Operationsand Ground Support.A list of organizations represented on this co

3、mmittee can beobtained on request to its secretary.This publication does not purport to include all the necessaryprovisions of a contract. Users are responsible for its correctapplication. The British Standards Institution 2014. Published by BSI StandardsLimited 2014ISBN 978 0 580 69952 8ICS 49.140C

4、ompliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity fromlegal obligations.This Published Document was published under the authority of theStandards Policy and Strategy Committee on 28 February 2014.Amendments issued since publicationDate Text affectedCopyright British Standards Institution Prov

5、ided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013 ISO 2013Space systems Avoiding collisions with orbiting objectsSystmes spatiaux vitement des collisions avec les objets en orbiteTECHNICAL RE

6、PORTISO/TR16158First edition2013-12-01Reference numberISO/TR 16158:2013(E)Copyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013ISO/TR 16158:2013(E)ii I

7、SO 2013 All rights reservedCOPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT ISO 2013All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intrane

8、t, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISOs member body in the country of the requester.ISO copyright officeCase postale 56 CH-1211 Geneva 20Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11Fax + 41 22 749 09 47E-mail copyrightiso.orgWeb www.iso.orgPublished in

9、 SwitzerlandCopyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013ISO/TR 16158:2013(E) ISO 2013 All rights reserved iiiContents PageForeword ivIntroduct

10、ion v1 Scope . 12 Normative references 13 Terms and definitions . 14 Collision avoidance workflow . 25 Perceiving close approaches 35.1 Orbit data . 35.2 Initial filtering 45.3 Eliminating infeasible conjunctions . 46 Determining potential collisions for warning and further action (close approach sc

11、reening) . 56.1 Symmetric keepout . 56.2 Bounding volume keepout 56.3 Probability techniques . 66.4 Maximum probability 76.5 Bounding volume based on probability 86.6 Comparison of techniques 97 Probability of survival 97.1 Trending. 107.2 Cumulative probability . 107.3 Bayesian assessment 118 Addit

12、ional information for judging courses of action 128.1 Maneuver capability 128.2 Spacecraft characteristics . 128.3 Quality of underlying orbit data 129 Consequence assessment .129.1 Guidance for population risk . 129.2 Traffic impacts 1310 Requirements for warning and information for avoidance 1310.

13、1 Orbit data 1310.2 Minimum data required for warning of and avoiding collisions .1310.3 Optional elements of information . 1411 Conjunction and collision assessment work flow and operational concept .15Bibliography .17Copyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI -

14、Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013ISO/TR 16158:2013(E)ForewordISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of prepar

15、ing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in li

16、aison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described in the ISO/IEC Di

17、rectives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives). Attention is drawn to the possibility that

18、 some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or on the ISO list of patent dec

19、larations received (see www.iso.org/patents). Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not constitute an endorsement.For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information

20、 about ISOs adherence to the WTO principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: Foreword - Supplementary informationThe committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 20, Aircraft and space vehicles, Subcommittee SC 14, Space systems and operations.iv ISO 2013 All righ

21、ts reservedCopyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013ISO/TR 16158:2013(E)IntroductionThis Technical Report describes the work flow for perce

22、iving and avoiding collisions among orbiting objects, data requirements for these tasks, techniques that can be used to estimate the probability of collision and guidance for executing avoidance maneuvres.The process begins with the best possible trajectory data, provided by satellite operators or s

23、ensor systems developed for this purpose. The orbits of satellites must be compared with each other to discern physically feasible approaches that could result in collisions. The trajectories so revealed must then be examined more closely to estimate the probability of collision. Should a collision

24、be likely within the criteria established by each satellite operator, the spectrum of feasible maneuvers must be examined.There are several different approaches to conjunction assessment. All have merits and deficiencies. Most focus on how closely satellites approach each other. This is often very u

25、ncertain since satellite orbits generally change more rapidly under the influence of non-conservative forces than observations of satellites in orbit can be acquired and employed to improve orbit estimates. Spacecraft operators require the fullness of orbit data in order to judge the credibility and

26、 quality of conjunction perception. This information includes the moment of time of the last elaboration of orbit (the epoch) and the standard time scale employed, state vector value or elements of orbit at this moment of time, the coordinate system description that presents the orbital data, the fo

27、rces model description that was used for orbital plotting, and information about the estimation errors of the orbital parameters. Essential elements of information for this purpose are specified in ISO 26900.There are also diverse approaches to estimating the probability that a close approach might

28、really result in a collision. This is a statistical process very similar to weather forecasting. Meteorologists no longer make definitive predictions. They provide the probability of precipitation, not whether it will rain. All conjunction assessment approaches are in some way founded in probabiliti

29、es. Probability of collision is also a highly desirable element of data. It must be accompanied by metadata that allows operators to interpret the information within their own operational procedures.How near satellites might be to each other and the probability they might collide if they were that c

30、lose are only two discriminants of potentially catastrophic events. Since the objective is that the satellite survives despite many potential close approaches, cumulative probability of survival is also important information. Responding precipitously to the close approach nearest at hand might only

31、delay the demise of the satellite or even contribute to a subsequent more serious event. The evolution of orbits toward close approaches and the cumulative probability that a satellite might survive for a period of time are also important.Finally, the state of each of the conjunction partners, their

32、 ability to maneuver or otherwise avoid contact, and the outcomes of past events that are similar guide courses of action. ISO 2013 All rights reserved vCopyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking perm

33、itted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013Copyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013Space systems Avoiding collisions with orbi

34、ting objects1 ScopeThis Technical Report is a guide for establishing essential collaborative enterprises to sustain the space environment and employ it effectively. This requires diligent collaboration among all who operate satellites.This Technical Report describes some widely used techniques for p

35、erceiving close approaches, estimating collision probability, estimating the cumulative probability of survival, and manoeuvring to avoid collisions.NOTE Satellite operators accept that all conjunction and collision assessment techniques are statistical. All suffer false positives and/or missed dete

36、ctions. The degree of uncertainty in the estimated outcomes is not uniform across all satellite orbits or all assessment intervals. No comparison within a feasible number of test cases can reveal the set of techniques that is uniformly most appropriate for all.2 Normative referencesThe following doc

37、uments, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.ISO/TR 11233, Space Syste

38、ms Orbit determination and estimation Process for describing techniquesISO 26900, Space data and information transfer systems Orbit data messagesANSI/AIAA S-131-2010, Best Practices in Astronautics: PropagationAIAA G-043-1992, Guide to Developing Operational Concepts3 Terms and definitionsFor the pu

39、rposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.3.1conjunctionapparent meeting or passing of two or more objects in space3.2collisionact of colliding; an instance of one object striking another3.3covariancemeasure of how much variables change togetherNote 1 to entry: For multiple

40、dependent variables, a square, symmetric, positive definite matrix of dimensionality N N, where N is the number of variables.3.4encounter planeplane normal to the relative velocity at the time of closest approach3.5false alarmstatistical Type I error, when a statistical test fails to reject a false

41、null hypothesisTECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 16158:2013(E) ISO 2013 All rights reserved 1Copyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013ISO/TR 16158:20

42、13(E)3.6ICDInterface Control Documentformal means of describing the inputs and outputs of a system, the interfaces among systems, or the protocols among physical or electronic elements of an entity3.7operational conceptroles, relationships, and information flows among tasks and stakeholders and the

43、manner in which systems and processes will be used4 Collision avoidance workflowThe avoidance process begins with orbit data, the content of which is specified in ISO 26900. The data can be provided by collaborating satellite operators and from observers who are capable of viewing satellites. The na

44、ture of each object should also be known if possible. This information includes size, mass, geometry, and the operational state (for example, whether active or inactive). Finally, collision probability should be estimated based on the inevitable imprecision associated with orbit determination and ot

45、her hypotheses and measurements. Figure 1 depicts this top-level work flow.2 ISO 2013 All rights reservedCopyright British Standards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 161

46、58:2013ISO/TR 16158:2013(E)Figure 1 Top-level collision avoidance work flow5 Perceiving close approaches5.1 Orbit data5.1.1 InputsInputs to conjunction assessment are principally data that specify the trajectories of the objects of interest. These are one of three types of information: orbit element

47、s, ephemerides, or observations of satellites. Orbit elements in this context include parameters that describe the evolution of the trajectory and which can be used to estimate the trajectory in the future. They are derived from past observations ISO 2013 All rights reserved 3Copyright British Stand

48、ards Institution Provided by IHS under license with BSI - Uncontrolled Copy Not for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-PD ISO/TR 16158:2013ISO/TR 16158:2013(E)of satellites. Ephemerides are time-ordered sets of position and velocity within which one interpolates to estimate the position and velocity at intermediate times. Ephemerides should span the future time interval of interest, the equations of motion having been propagated by the provider. Observations are measurements of satel

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1