CEPT ERC REC 01 08 E-1998 Exchange of Information between Monitoring Stations (Izmir 1997)《监控站之间的信息交换 1997年伊兹密尔》.pdf

1、STD-CEPT CEPT/ERC/REC 03/OB E-ENGL L99 2326434 0033339 5T CEPTIERCIREC 01-08 E Page 1 Distribution: B CEPTERC RECOMMENDATION 01-08 E (Izmir 1997) EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION BETWEEN MONITORING STATIONS Recommendation adopted by the Working Group “Frequency Management“ (WGFM): “The European Conference of

2、 Postal and Telecommunications Administrations, INTRODUCTION One of the aims of the International Telecommunications Union (IT) is to ensure efficient and economic use of the frequency spectrum and help towards the rapid elimination of harmful interference. The Radio Regulations contain the provisio

3、ns governing the establishment and operation of the International Monitoring System. “The European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT), considering a) the need to develop common and coordinated procedures and measurement techniques for monitoring within the CEPT framew

4、ork and the need for timely exchange of monitoring information between Administrations; b) the need for a simple, effective means of exchanging such information; C) the desirability of using current communication means; d) the advantages resulting from the use of a standard format, noting a) that un

5、der the International Monitoring System, requests for monitoring information should be sent to the . Centralizing Office (see IJ document “List of Addresses”) designated by each Administration which then assembles the information for transmission back to the originating Administration; that in Resol

6、ution ITU-R 23 the IT Radiocommunications Assembly (1993) reconfumed the need to extend the Intemational Monitoring System on a worldwide scale and also decided that cooperation between monitoring stations of different Administrations should be encouraged and improved with a view to exchanging infor

7、mation; that most monitoring stations have sufficient communication facilities available and in cases of responding to interference, the fastest method of communication should be used, b) c) Edition of February 26, 1998 CEPTIERCIREC 01-08 E Page 2 recognising a) that there is a need for all monitori

8、ng stations to be able to request from each other clearly defined information; b) that such information could relate to emissions in any frequency band; c d) that the need for the request could be to deal with urgent cases of interference to legitimate users of radio; that there will be occasions wh

9、en monitoring stations have resource problems and will be unable, for example, to provide bearing requests on all emissions; e) that it will usually be self-evident why information is being requested, particularly in the case of the clearance of interference. There may, however, be occasions when th

10、e requesting station is asked to justi the reason for the information exchange and national security may prevent a full reply. In these circumstances Administrations are asked to Co-operate and understand the nature of the problem, recommends 1) that common formats for the exchange of information be

11、tween monitoring stations be adopted as shown in Annex 1 (for communication via facsimile) or Annex 2 (for communication via telex); that a request from one station to another for information relating to any emission should include the following details: 2) a. Frequency b. Class of Emission c. Field

12、 strength, power flux density or signal strength (QSA) d. Bearing (QTE) or estimated location e. Classification of bearing f. Bandwidth g. Other characteristics Of these parameters, the minimum requirement that each monitoring station should be able to provide is: a. Frequency b. Class of Emission c

13、. Field strength, power flux density or signal strength (QSA)” - STD=CEPT CEPT/ERC/REC 01/08 E-ENGL L998 m 2326414 0013141 138 m I E. Emission details provided: EI. (Frequency) E2. (Class of Emission) E3. (Field strengtMSigna1 strength (QSA) E4. (Bearing or estimated location) E5. (Classification of

14、 bearing) E6. (Bandwidth) E 7. (Other Information) CEPTIERCIREC 01-08 E Page 3 Please provide the following information: Annex 1 FACSIMILE REQUEST FOR MONITORING INFORMATION i. From: Monitoring Station, Tountry, Telephone & Fax lumbers) D. To: Destination Address, Monitoring Station 13 Country) B. (

15、Name of Operator) (DateTime (UTC) I c. REPLY TO A FACSIMILE REQUEST FOR MONITORING INFORMATION Datenime (UTC). . . . . . 31 (Frequency measured) E4. (Bearing or estimated location) E7. (Other Information) E2. (Class of Emission) E5. (Classifcation of bearing) E3. (Field strengthlsignal strength meas

16、ured (QSA) E6. (Bandwidth measured) STD*CEPT CEPT/ERC/REC 01/08 E-ENGL 1998 W 2326414 0013142 074 W CEPTIERCIREC 07-08 E Page 4 Annex 2 TELEX REQUEST FOR MONITORING INFORMATION From (Monitoring Station & Country): To (Monitoring Station & Country): Datenime (UTC): Please monitor the emission specifi

17、ed below and provide your observations against the headings marked (X): El. E2. E3. E4. E5. E6. E7. (X)(Frequency) (X)(Class of Emission) (X)(Field strength or signal strength (QSA) (X)(Bearing or estimated location) (X) (Classzjcation of bearing) (X)(Bandwidth) (X) (Other information) TELEX REPLY T

18、O A REQUEST FOR MEASUREMENTS From: (Monitoring Station & Country) To: (Monitoring Station & Country) Datemime (UTC): In reply to your request for information, the following parameters for your emission of interest have been observed and measured: E 1. (X)(Frequency) E2. (X)(Class of Emission) E3. E4. (X)(Bearing or estimated location) E5. (X)(Cla.ssification of bearing) (X)(Field strength or signal strength (QSA) E6. (X)(Bundwidth) E7. (X)(Other information)