1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-04-3a71 Center Point of Contact: GRCa71 Submitted by: Wil HarkinsSubject: Design Reliable Ceramic Components With Cares Code Practice: Use the Ceramics Analysis and Reliability Evaluation of Structures (CARES) computer progra
2、m to calculate the fast-fracture reliability or failure probability of macroscopically isotropic ceramic components.Programs that Certify Usage: This practice has been used on SSME.Center to Contact for Information: GRCImplementation Method: This Lesson Learned is based on Reliability Practice No. P
3、D-ED-1254; from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.Benefit:The increasing importance of ceramics as structural materials places high demand on assuring component integrity while simultaneously optimizing performance and cost. Components using ce
4、ramics can be designed for high reliability in service if the contributing factors that cause material failure are accounted for. This design methodology must combine the statistical nature of strength controlling flaws with fracture mechanics to allow for multiaxial stress states and concurrent fla
5、w populations. The Ceramics Analysis and Reliability Evaluation of Structures (CARES) uses results Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-from MSC/NASTRAN or ANSYS finite-element analysis programs to evaluate how inherent surface and/or volu
6、me type flaws affect component reliability.Implementation Method:IntroductionThe unique properties that advanced ceramics have to offer for future commercial industries, propulsion and space related programs are phenomenal, such as high temperature strength, environmental resistance, and low density
7、 materials. NASA is dedicating a major effort to propulsion systems that reduce pollution, noise, and fuel consumption while improving reliability and service life. Consequently, research has been focused on improving ceramic material processing and properties as well as on establishing a sound desi
8、gn methodology.Because of the variable severity of inherent flaws, the nature of ceramic failure is probabilistic and optimization of design requires the ability to accurately determine a load components reliability. Methods of quantifying this reliability and the corresponding failure probability h
9、ave been investigated and refined at NASAs Lewis Research Center. The result of this effort is a public domain computer program with the acronym CARES.The design methodology used by CARES combines three major elements: (1) linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) theory which relates the strength of
10、 ceramics to the size, shape, and orientation of critical flaws, (2) extreme value statistics to obtain the characteristic flaw size distribution function, which is a material property, and (3) material microstructure. Inherent in this design procedure is that component integrity is a function of th
11、e entire field solution of the stresses and is not based only on the most highly stressed point. In addition, the size of the stressed material surface area and volume affect the component strength.Program Capability and DescriptionCARES is an integrated computer program written in FORTRAN 77 WAT V
12、compiler which uses Weibull and Batdorf fracture statistics to predict the fast fracture reliability of isotropic ceramic components. CARES has three primary functions: (1) to analyze statistically the data obtained from the fracture of simple uniaxial tensile or flexural specimens, (2) to estimate
13、the Weibull and batdorf material parameters using these data, (3) to perform a fast fracture reliability evaluation of a ceramic component experiencing thermomechanical loading. Component reliability is predicted by using elastostatic finite element analysis output from the MSCNASTRAN or ANSYS compu
14、ter programs.The CARES code includes a number of fracture theories to predict material response due to multiaxial stresses. These methods are summarized in Table 1.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Weakest Link Fracture ModelSize Effect
15、Stress State EffectsCompensational SimplicityTheoretical BasisWeibull (1939) Yes Unaxial Simple PhenomenologicalNormal stress Yes Multiaxial Complex PhenomenologicalPrinciple of independent action (1967)Yes Multiaxial Complex Maximum principal stress theoryBatdorf: a71 Shear-insensitive (1974)a71 Sh
16、ear-sensitive (1978)Yes Multiaxial Complex Linear elastic fracture mechanicsTable 1. Statistical Fast-Fracture Models Available with CARES The Batdorf method is recommended because it couples LEFM with the Weibull weakest link theory (WLT). The Weibull normal stress averaging method and the principl
17、e of independent action (PIA) theories are included for comparison purposes and because of their previous popularity. All the fracture models available of strength distribution.Figure 1 shows the fracture criteria and crack geometries available to the user for both surface and volume distributed fla
18、ws. The PIA and Weibull normal stress averaging fracture theories do not require a crack geometry. Batdorfs fracture theory can be used with several different mixed-mode fracture criteria and crack geometries. For coplanar crack extension, CARES uses the total strain energy release rate theory. Out-
19、of-plane crack extension criteria are approximated by a simple semiempirical equation. This equation involves a parameter which can be used to approximate various mixed-mode theories or experimental result. For comparison, Griffiths maximum tensile stress analysis for volume flaws is also included.
20、The highlighted boxes in Figure 1 show the recommended fracture criteria and flaw shapes.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Figure 1. Available Failure Criteria and Crack Shapes. (Recommended failure criteria and
21、crack shapes are highlighted) Two version of the code, designed as CARES1 and CARES2, are available. The CARES1 version Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-assumes that stress and temperature gradients within each element are negligible,
22、and, therefore, only element centroidal principle stress is used in the reliability calculations. The CARES2 version takes into account element stress gradients by dividing each brick element into 27 subelements and each quadrilateral shell element into 9 subelements. Subelement centroidal principle
23、 stress is then computed and used in the subsequent reliability calculations. CARES2 enables the finite-element model to consist of fewer elements for the same level of convergence to the true solution as CARES1.Input RequirementsTo control the execution of the CARES program, an input file must be p
24、repared. On the tape or disks provided with the program is a file called TEMPLET INP that can be used to construct an input file for a particular problem. Input to CARES is keyword driven. Data are input by the user under each keyword. An explanation of the input required or a list of input choices
25、is provided next to the keyword.The CARES program requires three categories of input: (1) Master Control Input, (2) Material Control Input, which includes temperature-dependent material data, and, optionally, (3) MSCNASTRAN or ANSYS output data files from finite-element analysis. The Master Control
26、Input is a set of control indices that directs the overall program execution. The Material Control Input consists of control indices and either the data required to estimate the statistical material parameters or direct input of the statistical parameter values themselves for various temperatures. T
27、his input category includes the choices of fracture criteria and flaw shapes shown Figure 1. The Master Control Input and the Material Control Input are contained in the TEMPLET INP file. The third input category, MSC/NASTRAN or ANSYS output data files, includes finite-element analysis data files co
28、ntaining the element stresses, volumes/areas, and temperatures.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Figure 2. Block Diagram for Analysis and Reliability Evaluation of Ceramic Components Provided by IHSNot for Resale
29、No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Output InformationThe first part of the CARES output is an echo of the choices selected (or default values) from the Master Control Input. If a finite-element model reliability analysis is not performed, then CARES proceeds to echo
30、 the Material Control Input. If postprocessing of a finite-element model is done, then, for each element, the centroidal or subelement principle stresses with appropriate element area or volume and temperature are listed. The printing of element stress tables in CARES is optional. In addition, two e
31、lement cross-reference tables are printed. The first table lists the shell element number and gives the corresponding solid element to which it is attached. The second table lists the solid element identification number and lists up to six associated shell element (a brick element could have all of
32、its six faces as external surface).CARES echoes the user inputs for each section of the Material Control Input. If statistical material parameters are directly input, then output pertaining to calculated values of the normalized Batdorf crack density coefficient kbwill follow. If statistical materia
33、l parameters are determined from experimental fracture data, then the output will identify the method of solution, the number of specimens in each batch, and the temperature of each test. In addition, the output echoes the sorted input values of all specimen fracture stresses with proper failure mod
34、e identification.Results from the statistical analysis of the fracture data are then printed. The fracture strength and corresponding significance level are listed for detected outliers followed by the estimated statistical material parameters from least-squares or maximum likelihood analyses. The b
35、iased and the unbiased values of the Weibull shape parameter, the specimen Weibull characteristic strength, the upper and lower bound values at 90-percent confidence level for both parameters, the specimen Weibull mean value, and corresponding standard deviation are printed for each specified temper
36、ature. For censored statistics these values are generated first for volume flaw analysis and subsequently for the surface flaw analysis.The K-S goodness-of-fit test is done for each specimen fracture stress and the corresponding K-S statistics D+, D-, and significance level are listed. Similarly, th
37、e K-S statistic for the overall sample set is printed along with the significance level. This overall statistic is the absolute maximum of individual data D+ and D- factors. For the A-D goodness-of-fit test, the A-D statistic A2is determined for overall population and its associated significance lev
38、el is printed.The next table of the output contains data to construct K-S 90-percent confidence bands about the Weibull distribution. The table includes fracture stress data, the corresponding Weibull probability of failure values, the 90-percent upper and lower confidence band values about the Weib
39、ull line, and the median rank value for each data point.The last table from the statistical analysis section of CARES summarizes the material parameters used in component reliability calculations. These parameters, which are listed as a function of temperature, include the biased Weibull modules, th
40、e normalized Batdorf crack density coefficient, Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-and the Weibull scale parameter or the unit volume or unit area characteristic strength, whichever is appropriate. The values printed correspond to the ex
41、perimental temperatures input and five additional interpolated sets of values between each input temperature. The interpolated parameters are output for checking purposes. Information on the selected fracture criterion and the crack shape is printed as required.If a component reliability analysis wi
42、th finite-element data is being performed, then tables will be generated to summarize the reliability evaluation of each finite element. One table is provided for volume flaw analysis (solid elements) and one table is given for surface flaw analysis (shell elements) as requested by the user. The tab
43、les list the element identification (ID) numbers and the corresponding element material ID, survival probability, failure probability, risk-of-rupture intensity (risk-of-rupture divided by element volume or area), and temperature-interpolated statistical material parameters. Following each table is
44、a list of the 15 most critical risk-of-rupture intensity values and corresponding element numbers. Also included is the probability of failure and survival for the component surface or volume, whichever is appropriate. Finally, the overall component probability of failure and the component probabili
45、ty of survival are printed.Theory and ExampleFor additional information on theory and example of different applications such as statistical material parameter estimation, rotating annular disk and Si3N4mixed flow rotor, please refer to NASA TM 102369 and other referenced articles on the reference se
46、ction of the practice.Technical Rationale:The CARES computer program was developed by NASA LeRCs Structural Integrity branch. The branch combines the three disciplines of analytical modeling, mechanical testing, and nondestructive testing to understand and predict the behavior of advanced high-tempe
47、rature materials, particularly brittle ceramic and inter-metallic matrix composites. CARES is an enabling technology primary created to foster the introduction of ceramic materials in demanding engine environments to achieve breakthrough gains in energy efficiency and emissions reduction. The specif
48、ic purpose of the project is to transfer and upgrade technology for understanding and predicting the behavior of brittle ceramic materials. To accomplish this, CARES incorporates the capability to design for any component shape and services environment. The resulting software is a comprehensive gene
49、ral-purpose design tool for government, industry, and academia that predicts the probability of a ceramic component failing as a function of its time in service.For the past three years over 100 companies worldwide have obtained the CARES software. As the only general-purpose public domain integrated design program for predicting the reliability of brittle materials in
