1、 NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE MIL-STD-810G 31 October 2008 SUPERSEDING MIL-STD-810F 1 January 2000 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TEST METHOD STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS AMSC N/A AREA ENVR DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited
2、. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-810G PART ONE FOREWORD 1. This standard is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense (DoD). Although prepared specifically for DoD applications, this standa
3、rd may be tailored for commercial applications as well. While MIL-STD-810F incorporated a significant revision of MIL-STD-810E, MIL-STD-810G not only consolidates the basic -810F with its three change notices to result in one comprehensive document, but also includes a number of corrections, signifi
4、cant changes, and additions to the comprehensive -810F, to include five new test methods, one of which (Method 526) was extracted from Method 516. The primary emphases are still the same (with the exception of Method 528) tailoring a materiel items environmental design and test limits to the conditi
5、ons that the specific materiel will experience throughout its service life, and establishing laboratory test methods that replicate the effects of environments on materiel, rather than trying to reproduce the environments themselves. However, the “G“ revision continues the up-front explanation of ho
6、w to implement the environmental tailoring process throughout the materiel acquisition cycle. As in MIL-STD-810F, this revision recognizes that the environmental design and test tailoring process has expanded to involve a wide range of managerial and technical interests. Accordingly, this revision o
7、rients environmental design and test direction toward three basic types of users who have distinctly different, although closely associated, interests: program managers who, among other responsibilities, ensure proposed concepts and systems are valid and functional in intended operational environmen
8、ts; environmental engineering specialists (EES), who enter the acquisition process early to assist combat and materiel developer tailoring efforts by preparing life cycle environmental profiles and drafting tailored design criteria and test programs; and the design, test, and evaluation community, w
9、hose analysts, engineers, and facility operators use tailored designs and tests to meet user needs. 2. Part One describes management, engineering, and technical roles in the environmental design and test tailoring process. It focuses on the process of tailoring materiel design and test criteria to t
10、he specific environmental conditions a materiel item is likely to encounter during its service life. New appendices support the succinctly presented text of Part One. Annex A contains complete descriptions of environmental engineering tasks. These tasks, along with management information in Annex B
11、and EES guidance in Annex C, will help to ensure the environmental design and test tailoring process is implemented and documented according to the disciplined, but flexible approach to materiel acquisition called for in Department of Defense (DoD) 5000-series documents (DoDD 5000.1). Terms used in
12、this standard relating to the materiel acquisition process are limited to terms used in the DoD 5000-series documents; to avoid confusion and promote simplicity, service-specific terms/processes are not used. 3. Part Two contains environmental laboratory test methods to be applied according to the g
13、eneral and specific test tailoring guidelines described in Part One. It is important to emphasize that, with the exception of Method 528, these methods are not to be called out in blanket fashion, nor applied as unalterable routines, but are to be selected and tailored to generate the most relevant
14、test data possible. To support the tailoring process described in Part One, each test method in Part Two contains some environmental data and references, and identifies tailoring opportunities for the particular method. Some methods afford a wide latitude for tailoring; some can be tailored up to es
15、tablished limits, and some have relatively few tailoring options. Whenever possible, each method contains background rationale to help determine the appropriate level of tailoring. Each test method supports the test engineer and test facility operator by describing preferred laboratory test faciliti
16、es and methodologies. Any specific tailoring information and values contained in these test methods should be supplanted by more up-to-date field/fleet or program-specific information when available. When applied properly, the environmental management and engineering processes described in this stan
17、dard can be of enormous value in generating confidence in the environmental worthiness and overall durability of materiel system design. However, it is important to recognize that there are limitations inherent in laboratory testing that make it imperative to use proper caution and engineering judgm
18、ent when extrapolating these laboratory results to results that may be obtained under actual service conditions. In many cases, real-world environmental stresses (singularly or in combination) cannot be duplicated practically or reliably in test laboratories. Therefore, users should not assume that
19、a system or component that passes laboratory tests of this standard also would pass field/fleet verification trials. DoD 5000-series documents call for component technology to be demonstrated in PART ONE-ii Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
20、-,-,-MIL-STD-810G PART ONE relevant environments to reduce risk on components and subsystems that have been demonstrated only in laboratory environments (DoDI 5000.2). 4. Part Three contains a compendium of climatic data and guidance assembled from several sources to include AR 70-38, “Research, Dev
21、elopment, Test and Evaluation of Materiel for Extreme Climatic Conditions,” (1979), Draft AR 70-38 (1990) that was assembled using 1987 Air Land Battlefield Environment (ALBE) report information, “Environmental Factors and Standards for Atmospheric Obscurants, Climate, and Terrain,” and MIL-HDBK-310
22、, Global Climatic Data for Developing Military Products. Part Three provides planning guidance for realistic consideration (starting points) of climatic conditions in the research, development, test, and evaluation (RDTE) of materiel and materials used throughout their life cycles in various climati
23、c regions throughout the world. It is intended that this and related documents will help achieve the objective of developing materiel that will perform adequately under the environmental conditions likely to be found throughout its life cycle in the areas of intended use. 5. The US Department of Def
24、ense would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions toward the development and publication of MIL-STD-810G: Army Air Force Jimmie Barnett Dugway Proving Ground Dwayne Bell Eglin AFB Michael Barry Aberdeen Test Center Cheryl Copes ASC/ENRS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Willi
25、am (Skip) Connon Aberdeen Test Center Lorraine Wright ASC/ENRS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Jeff Dallman White Sands Missile Range Faustino Zapata ASC/ENFS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Herb Egbert ECIII, YPG Rick Errhalt Electronic Proving Ground Navy Judy Galloway Aberdeen Test Center Brian
26、 Haugen NAWC, China Lake Mike Hale Redstone Technical Test Center James E. Howell III NSWC John Harris Redstone Technical Test Center Al Kukk Navy Consultant Al Kelley YPG-NETO Ron Merritt Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake Robert Kerr SDDC, Ft Eustis Richard F. Taddeo NAVSEA 05P12 Paul Krause COE
27、, TEC Brett Tanner Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake Bob McKinnon Aberdeen Test Center Joe Nash AMRDEC Private Industry Randy Patrick Yuma Test Center Vesta Bateman Mechanical Shock Consulting Chris Reeks Redstone Technical Test Center George Coonley KHS Tech. Lighting Rick Reynaud White Sands Mi
28、ssile Range Gus Cutting Honeywell Linda Spears YPG-NETO Jamie Sullivan Redstone Technical Test Center Organizations Ken Thompson DTC-NETO, APG IEST Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology Scott Walton Aberdeen Test Center SAVIAC Shock and Vibration Information Analysis Center The MIL-STD-
29、810G Working Group wishes to recognize with great appreciation Mr. Ken Thompson, MIL-STD-810G Committee Chairman, for his exemplary leadership, guidance, and dedication to bringing this collaborative project to fruition. PART ONE-iii Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitt
30、ed without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-810G PART ONE PART ONE-iv 6. This standard is intended to be a “living document“ that will be updated as new concepts, technologies, and methodologies evolve. Questions about this documents technical content may be addressed to the following offices: Aeronauti
31、cal Systems Center, ATTN: ASC/ENFS, 2530 Loop Road West, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7101; Commercial Tel: (937) 255-8517 or 904-5863; DSN 785-8517 or 674-5863; Fax: (937) 476-4546 or 255-2363. Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, ATTN: Code AIR-4.3.4, Patuxent River, MD 20670; Commercial
32、 Tel: (301) 342-8049; DSN 342-8049; Fax: (301) 757-1213. Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, ATTN: Code 476300D, China Lake, CA 93555-6100; Commercial Tel: (760) 939-4667; DSN 437-4667; Fax: (760) 939-1065. US Army Developmental Test Command, 314 Longs Corner Road, ATTN: CSTE-DTC-TM-B, Aberd
33、een Proving Ground, MD 21005-5055; Commercial Tel: (410) 278-1476/1417; DSN 298-1476/1417; Fax: (410) 278-9170. The Preparing Activity for MIL-STD-810 transfers from Air Force Code 11 to Army Code TE concurrent with the publication of this Revision G. Comments, suggestions, or questions on this docu
34、ment should be addressed to US Army Developmental Test Command, 314 Longs Corner Road, ATTN: CSTE-DTC-TM-B, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5055; or e-mailed to apgr-TEdtStandardsconus.army.mil. Since contact information can change, you may want to verify the currency of this address information u
35、sing the ASSIST Online database at http:/assist.daps.dla.mil. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-810G PART ONE CONTENTS PART ONE - ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM GUIDELINES Paragraph Page 1. SCOPE . PART ONE-1 1.1 Purpose. PAR
36、T ONE-1 1.2 Application . PART ONE-2 1.3 Limitations . PART ONE-3 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS PART ONE-4 2.1 General . PART ONE-4 2.2 Government Documents PART ONE-4 2.2.1 Specifications, standards, and handbooks PART ONE-4 2.2.2 Other government documents, drawings, and publications . PART ONE-5 2.3 No
37、n-Government publications . PART ONE-5 2.4 Order of precedence . PART ONE-5 3. DEFINITIONS . PART ONE-6 3.1 Terms . PART ONE-6 3.2 Acronyms . PART ONE-8 4. GENERAL PROGRAM GUIDELINES . PART ONE-9 4.1 Program Managers . PART ONE-9 4.1.1 Roles of the program manager . PART ONE-9 4.1.2 Guidance for pro
38、gram managers PART ONE-9 4.1.2.1 Mission Need Statement (MNS) PART ONE-10 4.1.2.2 Operational Requirements Document (ORD) PART ONE-11 4.1.2.3 System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) . PART ONE-11 4.1.2.4 Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) . PART ONE-11 4.2 Environmental Engineering Specialists
39、 (EES) . PART ONE-11 4.2.1 Roles of environmental engineering specialists . PART ONE-11 4.2.2 Environmental engineering tailoring tasks. PART ONE-12 4.2.2.1 General . PART ONE-12 4.2.2.2 Preparing an Environmental Engineering Management Plan (EEMP), Task 401 . PART ONE-12 4.2.2.3 Developing an Envir
40、onmental Test and Evaluation Master Plan (ETEMP) PART ONE-12 4.2.2.3.1 Defining a Life Cycle Environmental Profile (LCEP), Task 402 PART ONE-12 4.2.2.3.2 Developing Operational Environment Documentation (OED), Task 403 . PART ONE-12 4.2.2.3.3 Developing an Environmental Issues/Criteria List (EICL),
41、Task 404 . PART ONE-13 4.2.2.4 Preparing a Detailed Environmental Test Plan (DETP), Task 405 PART ONE-13 4.2.2.5 Preparing an Environmental Test Report (ETR), Task 406 . PART ONE-13 4.3 Design and Test Engineers and Facility Operators PART ONE-13 4.3.1 Roles of design engineers PART ONE-13 4.3.2 Rol
42、es of test engineers/facility operators . PART ONE-13 4.3.3 Guidance for design and test engineers and test facility operators PART ONE-13 4.3.3.1 Natural environment (field/fleet) testing PART ONE-13 4.3.3.2 Laboratory testing PART ONE-13 5. GENERAL LABORATORY TEST METHOD GUIDELINES . PART ONE-16 5
43、.1 Test Conditions PART ONE-16 5.2 Tolerances for Test Conditions PART ONE-16 PART ONE-v Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-810G PART ONE CONTENTS - Continued Paragraph Page 5.3 Test Instrumentation. . PART ONE-17 5.3.1 Suitabili
44、ty for environment. . PART ONE-17 5.3.2 Calibration. PART ONE-17 5.4 Stabilizing Test Temperature. PART ONE-17 5.4.1 Test item operating. . PART ONE-17 5.4.2 Test item non-operating. PART ONE-17 5.5 Test Sequence. . PART ONE-17 5.6 Test Level Derivation. . PART ONE-18 5.7 Pretest Information for Fac
45、ility Operators. PART ONE-18 5.8 Test Setup. . PART ONE-18 5.8.1 Installing the test item in test facility. PART ONE-18 5.8.2 Test item operation. . PART ONE-18 5.9 PretestBaseline Data. . PART ONE-18 5.10 Information During Test. . PART ONE-19 5.11 Interrupted Tests. . PART ONE-19 5.11.1 In-toleran
46、ce interruptions. PART ONE-19 5.11.2 Out-of-tolerance interruptions . PART ONE-19 5.11.3 Interruption due to test item operation failure. . PART ONE-19 5.12 Combined Tests. PART ONE-20 5.13 Post-test Data. PART ONE-20 5.14 Environmental Effects and Failure Criteria. PART ONE-22 5.15 Environmental Te
47、st Reports. PART ONE-22 5.16 Water Purity. PART ONE-22 5.17 Analysis of Results. . PART ONE-22 5.18 Monitoring. PART ONE-23 5.18.1 Monitoring test chamber parameters. . PART ONE-23 5.18.2 Monitoring the item under test. PART ONE-23 5.19 Total High Temperature Exposure Duration . PART ONE-23 6. NOTES
48、 . PART ONE-24 6.1 Intended use. PART ONE-24 6.2 Acquisition requirements . PART ONE-24 6.3 Subject term (key word) listing . PART ONE-24 6.4 International standardization agreement implementation PART ONE-25 6.5 Changes from previous issue . PART ONE-25 FIGURES 1-1. Environmental engineering progra
49、m guide PART ONE-1 1-2. Roles of acquisition personnel in environmental design/test tailoring process PART ONE-2 1-3. Environmental test program tailoring process . PART ONE-10 1-4a. Generalized life cycle histories for military hardware . PART ONE-14 1-4b. Generalized life cycle histories for military hardware . PART ONE-15 1-5. Interrupted test cycle logic . PART
