1、STP-NU-051-1 CODE COMPARISON REPORTfor Class 1 Nuclear Power Plant ComponentsSTP-NU-051-1 CODE COMPARISON REPORT for Class 1 Nuclear Power Plant Components Prepared for: Multinational Design Evaluation Programme Codes and Standards Working Group Date of Issuance: December 31, 2012 This report is the
2、 result of a multinational effort by Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) from the United States of America, France, Japan, Korea, Canada and Russia. Neither ASME, ASME ST-LLC, the contributors, nor others involved in the preparation or review of this report, nor any of their respective employ
3、ees, members or persons acting on their behalf, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privat
4、ely owned rights. Reference herein to any specific co mmercial product, process or service b y trade name, trademark, manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, r ecommendation or favoring by ASME ST-LLC or others involved in the preparation or review of this
5、 report, or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors, contributors, and reviewers of the report expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of ASME ST-LLC or others involved in the preparation or review of this report, or any agency thereof. ASME ST-LLC does not take any posit
6、ion with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any items mentioned in this document, and does not undertake to insure anyone utilizing a publication against liability for infringement of any applicable Letters Patent, nor assumes any such liability. Users of a publ
7、ication are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility. Participation by federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be interpreted as governme
8、nt or industry endorsement of this publication. ASME is the registered trademark of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ASME Standa
9、rds Technology, LLC Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990 ISBN No. 978-0-7918-6868-3 Copyright 2012 by ASME Standards Technology, LLC All Rights Reserved Code Comparison Report STP-NU-051-1 iii Summary of Changes December 31, 2012 STP-NU-051-1 CODE COMPARISON REPORT for Class 1 Nuclear Power Pl
10、ant Components The following changes have been made to the first revision of STP-NU-051. Rev. 1 Page Location Change iv-xii Table of Contents Updated to reflect changes xiv Abstract Updated to reflect addition of NIKIET input 1-128 Report Body General editorial and formatting corrections 34 Added Se
11、ction 2.6 Added background information on NIKIET 46 Added Section 3.5 PNAE G-7 General Layout Comparison 129 Added Section 8 Added PNAE G-7 vs ASME BPVC III comparison 281 Appendix B2 Added JSME comparison for pumps, valves and piping 385 Appendix C2 Updated tables to correct formatting errors 454 A
12、ppendix E Added PNAE G7 Detailed Comparison Tables STP-NU-051-1 Code Comparison Report iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . xiii Abstract xiv 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Scope . 1 1.2 Objectives . 1 1.3 Contents of the Report 1 1.4 Comparison Scale . 2 2 GENERAL PRESENTATION OF CODES 4 2.1 Backgr
13、ound Information on ASME . 4 2.2 Background Information on AFCEN . 9 2.3 Background Information on JSME. 15 2.4 Background Information on KEA 22 2.5 Background Information on CSA. 26 2.6 Background information on NIKIET . 34 3 GENERAL CODE LAYOUT COMPARISONS . 38 3.1 RCC-M versus ASME General Layout
14、 Comparison . 38 3.2 JSME versus ASME General Layout Comparison 40 3.3 KEPIC versus ASME General Layout Comparison . 43 3.4 CSA versus ASME General Layout Comparison 44 3.5 PNAE G-7 vs. ASME Code General Layout Comparison . 46 4 RCC-M VERSUS ASME BPVC SECTION III COMPARISON . 49 4.1 Abstract 49 4.2
15、Introduction 49 4.3 Preliminary Paragraphs and Scope Presentation 50 4.4 Materials . 52 4.5 Design 62 4.5.1 Piping, Valves, and Pumps . 65 4.6 Fabrication Welding 69 4.7 Examination . 78 4.8 Pressure Tests . 83 4.9 Overpressure Protection . 84 4.10 Overview of Quality Aspects . 86 4.11 Conclusion 87
16、 Code Comparison Report STP-NU-051-1 v TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 5 JSME VERSUS ASME BPVC SECTION III COMPARISON 90 5.1 Abstract 90 5.2 Introduction 90 5.3 Preliminary Paragraphs and Scope Presentation 92 5.4 Materials 92 5.5 Design 93 5.5.1 Piping, Valves, and Pumps . 96 5.6 Fabrication Welding . 10
17、1 5.7 Examination . 103 5.8 Pressure Tests 105 5.9 Overpressure Protection . 105 5.10 Overview of Quality Aspects . 106 5.11 Conclusion . 107 6 KEPIC VERSUS ASME BPVC SECTION III COMPARISON 111 6.1 Abstract 111 6.2 Introduction 111 6.3 Preliminary Paragraphs and Scope Presentation 112 6.4 Materials
18、113 6.5 Design 113 6.6 Piping, Valves, and Pumps 113 6.7 Fabrication Welding . 114 6.8 Examination . 114 6.9 Pressure Tests 114 6.10 Overpressure Protection . 114 6.11 Overview of Quality Aspects . 115 6.12 Conclusion . 118 7 CSA VERSUS ASME BPVC SECTION III COMPARISON 119 7.1 Abstract 119 7.2 Intro
19、duction 119 7.3 Preliminary Paragraphs and Scope Presentation 120 7.4 Materials 122 7.5 Design 123 7.5.1 Piping, Valves, and Pumps . 123 7.6 Fabrication Welding . 124 STP-NU-051-1 Code Comparison Report vi TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 7.7 Examination . 124 7.8 Pressure Tests . 125 7.9 Overpressure Prot
20、ection . 126 7.10 Overview of Quality Aspects . 127 7.11 Conclusion 127 8 PNAE G-7 VERSUS ASME BPVC Section III COMPARISON . 128 8.1 Abstract 128 8.2 Introduction 129 8.3 Preliminary Paragraphs and Scope Presentation 130 8.4 Materials . 131 8.5 Design 135 8.5.1 Classification of Equipment and Piping
21、 . 135 8.5.2 Classification of Service Levels 135 8.5.3 Nominal Allowable Stress (Design Stress Intensity) 136 8.5.4 Determination of Principal Dimensions (Analysis by Formula) 138 8.5.5 Stress Classification 140 8.5.6 Mechanical Loads Evaluation . 141 8.5.7 Buckling Analysis . 143 8.5.8 Ratcheting
22、Analysis 143 8.5.9 Fatigue Analysis . 144 8.5.10 Fast Fracture Analysis 148 8.6 Fabrication Welding 149 8.7 Examination . 152 8.7.1 Examination of Surface of Welded Edges 153 8.7.2 Radiographic Examination 153 8.7.3 Liquid Penetrant and Magnetic Particle Method 155 8.7.4 Ultrasonic Examination 155 8
23、.7.5 Convexity of Weld Seams 155 8.7.6 Offset of Weld Edges in Butt Weld Joints 156 8.8 Pressure Tests . 158 8.9 Overpressure Protection . 160 8.10 Overview of Quality Aspects . 161 8.10.1 Normative Legal Basis 161 8.10.2 Quality Assurance Programs. 161 8.10.3 Norms and Rules, “Requirements for repo
24、rt content about WWER type reactors (NP-006-98) safety justification (OOB NPP)” . 163 8.10.4 Conformance Evaluation in the Form of Tests . 163 8.10.5 Conformance Evaluation in the Form of State Control (Supervision) 163 8.10.6 Conformance Evaluation in the Form of Acceptance . 163 8.10.7 Conformance
25、 Evaluation in the Form of Confirmation of Compliance . 164 8.11 Conclusion 165 Code Comparison Report STP-NU-051-1 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 9 REFERENCES 166 Abbreviations and Acronyms . 167 Appendix A: RCC-M Versus ASME Section III Detailed Comparison Table . 170 Appendix B1: JSME Versus ASME
26、Section III Detailed Comparison Table 246 Appendix B2: JSME Versus ASME Section III Detailed Comparison for Class 1 Piping, Pumps and Valves 280 Appendix C1: KEPIC MNB Versus ASME Section III NB 311 Appendix C2: KEPIC MNA Versus ASME Section III NCA . 384 Appendix D1: CSA N285.0 Versus ASME Section
27、III Div. 1 NB Comparison . 402 Appendix D2: CSA N285.0 Versus ASME Section III Div. 1 NCA Comparison 435 Appendix E: PNAE G7 Versus ASME Section III Detailed Comparison Table 453 STP-NU-051-1 Code Comparison Report viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1Codes General Layout Comparison 38 Table 2Nuclear Island C
28、omponents Section Layout . 39 Table 3JSME Design Code Organization and Section Titles . 41 Table 4Comparison of ASME NB and JSME Class 1 Rules 42 Table 5Composition of KEPIC -MN and Reference Standards . 43 Table 6Composition of KEPIC -MNB and ASME NB . 43 Table 7List of the N285.0 . 45 Table 8Codes
29、 General Layout Comparison 46 Table 9ASME Code NB and PNAE G -7 Layouts Comparison 47 Table 10Location in RCC -M of Paragraphs Equivalent to ASME Section III Division 1 NB-1000 51 Table 11Location in ASME BPVC of Paragraphs Equivalent to RCC -M Section III B-1000 Paragraphs . 51 Table 12Location in
30、RCC -M of Paragraphs Equivalent to ASME Section III Division 1 NB-2000 55 Table 13Location in ASME BPVC of Paragraphs Equivalent to RCC -M Paragraphs about Materials from Sections I and II . 56 Table 14AFNOR 16MND5 (STR: M2111) as per R CC-M and SA-508 Grade 3 as per ASME Specification for Quenched
31、and Tempered Vacuum-Treated Carbon and Alloy Steel Forgings for Pressure Vessels 58 Table 15Comparison of Chemical Composition Requirements in M2111 for 16MND5 through the Years, and in SA-508 and in SA-788 for SA-508 Grade 3 Class 1 . 59 Table 16Charpy Impact Test Values for AFNOR 16MND5 (STR: M211
32、1) as per RCC -M and SA-508 Grade 3 as per ASME 59 Table 17Typical Material Specification Comparison for the RCC- M (left) and ASME (right) . 60 Table 18Location in ASME BPVC of Paragraphs Equivalent to RCC -M Paragraphs About Design . 67 Table 19Both Codes Loading Category and Applied Criteria 67 T
33、able 20Factors of Safety for Ferritic Materials . 68 Table 21Location in RCC -M of Paragraphs Equivalent to ASME Section III Division 1 NB-4000 72 Table 22Location in ASME BPVC of Paragraphs Equivalent to RCC -M Paragraphs about Welding from Section IV 73 Table 23 Location in ASME BPVC of Paragraphs
34、 Equivalent to RCC-M Paragraphs about Fabrication from Section V . 74 Table 24Location in RCC -M of Paragraphs Equivalent to ASME Section III Division 1 NB-5000 80 Code Comparison Report STP-NU-051-1 ix LIST OF TABLES (cont.) Table 25Location in ASME BP VC of Paragraphs Equivalent to RCC-M Paragraph
35、s about Fabrication from Section IV . 81 Table 26Radiographic Examination Acceptance Criteria for RCC -M and ASME BPVC . 82 Table 27 Magnetic Particle Examination Acceptance Criteria for RCC-M and ASME BPVC 82 Table 28Location in RCC -M of Paragraphs Equivalent to ASME Section III Division 1 NB-6000
36、 . 84 Table 29Location in RC C-M of Paragraphs Equivalent to ASME Section III Division 1 NB-7000 . 85 Table 30Comparison of Plastic Analysis Between JSME Code Case and ASME . 96 Table 31Comparison of ASME NB and JSME Class 1 Rules . 100 Table 32Comparison Between ASME/JSME Allowable Primary Stress f
37、or Class 1 Piping . 100 Table 33Composition of KEPIC -MNB 1000 and ASME NB 1000 . 112 Table 34Composition of KEPIC -MNB and ASME NB . 113 Table 35Comparison Between KEPIC-QAR and ASME Sec. III Div. 1 Appendix XXIII . 115 Table 36Comparison for QA and Administrative Requirements . 116 Table 37Compari
38、son for QA and Administrative Requirements . 116 Table 38Composition of KEPIC -MNB and ASME NB . 117 Table 39Comparison of Code Symbol System Between KEPIC and ASME 117 Table 40Terminology Comparison Between KEPIC- MNA and ASME NCA 117 Table 41Comparison Betw een KEPIC-QAP and ASME NQA-1 118 Table 4
39、2Equivalence Between the N285.0 and ASME NB-2000 122 Table 43Equivalence Between the N285.0 and ASME NB-3000 123 Table 44Equivalence Between the N285.0 and ASME NB-3400/-3500/-3600 . 123 Table 45Equivalence Between the N285.0 and ASME NB-4000 124 Table 46Equivalence Between the N285.0 and ASME NB-50
40、00 124 Table 47Equivalence Between the N285.0 and ASME NB-6000 125 Table 48Equivalence Between the N285.0 and ASME NB-7000 126 Table 49 E quivalence Between the N285.0 and ASME NCA-4000 127 Table 50Requirements for Chemical Composition of Austenitic Steels 321 and 081810 131 Table 51Correspondence o
41、f Operation Conditions Classification . 136 Table 52Formulae for Estimation of Wall Thickness 139 Table 53Comparison of Stress Categories 140 Table 54Comparison of Stress Category Groups . 141 Table 55 Mechanical Stresses Limitation in the Components and Pipelines in Accordance with PNAE G-7-002-86
42、141 STP-NU-051-1 Code Comparison Report x LIST OF TABLES (cont.) Table 56Stresses limitation in the Bolts in Accordance with PNAE G -7-002-86 142 Table 57 Mechanical Stress Limitation in Components and Pipelines in Accordance with NB-3000 ASME Code 142 Table 58Stress limitation in Bolts in Accordanc
43、e with NB -3000 ASME Code . 142 Table 59Fundamental Conceptions of ASME Code Section IX and PNAE G-7 . 149 Table 60List of Welding Technology Parameters Specified in ASME Code and PNAE G-7 . 150 Table 61Types of Tests and Examinations, which are Used for Qualification of the Welding Procedures . 151
44、 Table 62Methods and Amounts of Welds Examination According to PNAE G-7-010-89 (category I) and ASME Code (class 1 Subsection NB) 153 Code Comparison Report STP-NU-051-1 xi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1ASME Section III Organization Chart 6 Figure 2List of Standards Used in the ASME BPVC . 7 Figure 3AFCEN
45、 Organization Chart 10 Figure 4AFCEN Codes . 11 Figure 5List of Standards Used in the RCC -M Code . 12 Figure 6Organization of JSME Main Committee . 16 Figure 7Organization of JSME Subcommittee on Nuclear Power . 16 Figure 8List of Latest JSME Nuclear Codes and Sta ndards. 17 Figure 9List of Standar
46、ds Used in the JSME Code 18 Figure 10 KEPIC Committee Organization Chart . 23 Figure 11KEPIC Codes and Standards List (based on 2010 Edition) 24 Figure 12 KEPIC Endorsement Status by Korea Ministries . 25 Figure 13Governance of the CSA Stan dards 29 Figure 14CSA Standards Development Process 30 Figu
47、re 15NSSC and TC Organization Chart 31 Figure 16List of Standards . 32 Figure 17Organizational Pattern of SPiR Codes Development 36 Figure 18Structure of the Developed Codes SPiR- BN-2011 and SPiR-WWER-2012 37 Figure 19Comparison ASME and JSME Code Organization 42 Figure 20Design Stress (Sm), Yield
48、Stength (Sy) and Ultimate Strength (Su) Comparison of Two Carbon Steels, SA-508 Gr 3 Cl2 and 16MND5 (M2111) 57 Figure 21Design Stress (Sm), Yield Stength (Sy), and Ultimate Strength (Su) Comparison of Two Carbon Steels, SA-336 Cl F316LN and Z2CND18-12 (M3301) . 57 Figure 22Kevs. Sn/SmCurves per ASME
49、, RCC-M, JSME and Direct Calculation (Gurdal and Xu, PVP 2008) . 68 Figure 23Filler Material Reference Data Sheet Example for Filler Material Acceptance from RCC-M Section IV S-2800 75 Figure 24Example of Documentation Sheets to Give for Welding Procedure Specification from ASME Section IX Nonmandatory Appendix B . 76 Figure 25 Detailed Section-by-Section Comparison Between ASME BPVC Section III NB Paragraphs and RCC-M Section I B Paragraphs . 88 Figure 26General Comparison Betwee
