ASTM D5465-1993(2004) Standard Practice for Determining Microbial Colony Counts from Waters Analyzed by Plating Methods《由沉积法分析的水测定微生物计数的标准规程》.pdf

上传人:cleanass300 文档编号:519884 上传时间:2018-12-03 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:77.96KB
下载 相关 举报
ASTM D5465-1993(2004) Standard Practice for Determining Microbial Colony Counts from Waters Analyzed by Plating Methods《由沉积法分析的水测定微生物计数的标准规程》.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
ASTM D5465-1993(2004) Standard Practice for Determining Microbial Colony Counts from Waters Analyzed by Plating Methods《由沉积法分析的水测定微生物计数的标准规程》.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
ASTM D5465-1993(2004) Standard Practice for Determining Microbial Colony Counts from Waters Analyzed by Plating Methods《由沉积法分析的水测定微生物计数的标准规程》.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
ASTM D5465-1993(2004) Standard Practice for Determining Microbial Colony Counts from Waters Analyzed by Plating Methods《由沉积法分析的水测定微生物计数的标准规程》.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、Designation: D 5465 93 (Reapproved 2004)Standard Practice forDetermining Microbial Colony Counts from Waters Analyzedby Plating Methods1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 5465; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case

2、of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These practices cover recommended procedures forcounting colonies and reporting colony-formi

3、ng units (CFU)on membrane filters (MF) and standard pour and spread plates.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determin

4、e the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Significance and Use2.1 These practices provide a uniform set of counting,calculating, and reporting procedures for ASTM test methodsin microbiology.SectionACounting Colonies on Membrane Filters 4BCounting Colonies on Pour Plates 5CCount

5、ing Colonies on Spread Plates 62.2 The counting rules provide a best attainable estimate ofmicroorganisms in the sample, since the samples cannot beheld and reanalyzed at a later date.3. Hazards3.1 The analyst/technician must know and observe thenormal good laboratory practices and safety procedures

6、 re-quired in a microbiology laboratory while preparing, using, anddisposing of cultures, reagents, and materials.PRACTICE ACOUNTING COLONIES ONMEMBRANE FILTERS4. Procedure4.1 The grid lines help in counting the colonies. Count themfor the organism of interest following a preset plan such as thatsho

7、wn in Fig. 1. Some colonies will be in contact with the gridlines. A suggested procedure for reducing error in counting isshown in Fig. 2. Count the colonies in the squares indicated bythe arrows.4.2 The fluorescent lamp tube should be nearly parallel withand directly over the membrane filter. Ideal

8、ly, the lamp isattached to and surrounds the objective nosepiece of thestereoscopic microscope. Count the colonies individually, evenif they are in contact with each other. The technician must learnto recognize the difference between two or more colonies that1These practices are under the jurisdicti

9、on of ASTM Committee D19 on Waterand are the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D19.24 on Water Microbiology.Current edition approved June 1, 2004. Published June 2004. Originallyapproved in 1993. Last previous edition approved in 1993 as D 6465 93 (1998).FIG. 1 Colony Counting Pathway (The Inner

10、 Circle Indicates theEffective Filtering Area; the Dashed Line Indicates the Pathway)FIG. 2 Enlarged Portion of Grid-Marked Square of Filter (Coloniesin Contact with Gridlines are Counted in Squares Indicated bythe Arrow)1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshoh

11、ocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.have grown into contact with each other and the single,irregularly shaped colonies that sometimes develop on mem-brane filters. The latter colonies are usually associated with afiber or particulate material and conform to the shape and sizeof the fiber or particul

12、ates. Colonies that have grown togetheralmost invariably show a very fine line of contact.4.3 Count the colonies with a stereoscopic (dissecting)microscope that provides a magnification of at least 10 to 153.4.4 See Table 1 for guidance on acceptable counting limits.4.5 Calculation of ResultsSelect

13、the membrane with thenumber of CFU in the acceptable range and calculate thecount/reporting volume according to the following generalformulae:CFU/mL 5colonies countedvolume of sample filtered in mL3 1 (1)CFU/100 mL 5colonies countedvolume of sample filtered in mL3 100 (2)4.6 Counts Within the Accept

14、able Limits:4.6.1 The acceptable range of counts on a membrane forsamples that are diluted is a function of the organism/testcombination as given in Table 1.4.6.2 Assume that the filtration of volumes of 80, 20, 5, and1 mL produced counts of 250, 60, 15, and 4, respectively. Donot count the colonies

15、 on all filters. Select the MF(s) within theacceptable counting range and then limit the actual counting tosuch membranes. After selecting the best MF for counting, inthis case that with a 60-CFU count, the analyst counts CFUaccording to the procedures shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 andapplies the gener

16、al formula as follows:60203 1 or 3 100! 5 3 or 300! (3)Report as 3 CFU/mL or 300 CFU/100 mL.4.6.3 If there are acceptable counts on replicate plates, carrythe counts independently to final reporting units, and thencalculate the arithmetic mean of these counts to obtain the finalreported value. For e

17、xample, 1 mLvolumes produced counts of26 and 36 CFU/mL or counts of 2600 and 3600 CFU/100 mL:26 1 3625 31 (4)Report as 31 CFU/mL.2600 1 360025 3100 (5)Report as 3100 CFU/100 mL.4.6.4 If more than one dilution produced acceptable counts,count the colonies for each dilution, carry the counts indepen-d

18、ently to final reporting units, and then average for the finalreported value. For example, assume that volumes of 0.3, 0.1,0.03, and 0.01 mL produced colony counts of too numerous tocount (TNTC), 75, 30, and 8, respectively. In this example, twovolumes, 0.1 and 0.03, produce colonies in an acceptabl

19、ecounting range. Carry each MF count independently to acount/mL or count/100 mL:750.13 1 or 3 100! 5 750 CFU/mL or 75 000 CFU/100 mL!(6)300.033 1 or 3 100!= 1 000 CFU/mL (or100 000 CFU/100 mL)Then calculate the arithmetic mean of these counts to obtainthe final reported value:750 1 1 00025 875 (7)Re

20、port as 880 CFU/mL.75 000 1 100 00025 87 500 (8)Report as 88 000 CFU/100 mL.4.6.5 For finished drinking water samples only, countablemembranes may contain from one colony to the upper limit ofthe test (see Table 1). Count the target colonies/volume filtered.Calculate and report the number of CFU/100

21、 mL.4.7 Counts Outside Acceptable Limits:4.7.1 Zero counts recorded as 800 000 CFU/100 mL.4.7.6.1 Alternatively, small sample volumes or sample di-lutions can be used to minimize the TNTC problem. Replicatesof smaller sample volumes or sample dilutions may be filteredand the results combined. If the

22、 MF technique is not applicable,the most probable number (MPN) is useful.4.7.7 If there is no result because of confluency, laboratoryaccident, etc., report as no result and specify the reason.4.8 Reporting ResultsReport bacterial densities asCFU/mL or CFU/100 mL of sample, as the method requires.4.

23、9 Verification A verified MF test establishes the validityof organism identification on a differential or selective me-dium. Obviously, verification is not applied to nonselectivemedia.4.9.1 A percent verification can be determined for anycolony validation test:colonies meeting verification testcolo

24、nies subjected to verification3 100 5 percent verification(15)4.9.2 Adjust the original count according to the percent ofCFU verified. The verification of all colonies up to at least 10is recommended. This verification number is required for allpositive MF results from potable waters.4.9.3 Verificat

25、ion is also recommended for establishingquality control in research with new test waters, procedures, ortechnicians; for identifying atypical colonies; and as supportfor data used in legal actions. The worker is cautioned not toapply the percent of verification determined for one sample toother samp

26、les. The careful worker may also pick non-typicalcolonies and follow the verification procedure to determinewhether false negative responses do occur.PRACTICE BCOUNTING COLONIES ON POURPLATES5. Procedure5.1 Manual Counting Count the colonies with the aid ofmagnification under uniform light, using a

27、tally. Alternately,use a Quebec-type colony counter equipped with a guide plateruled in square centimeters. Do not mistake particles ofundissolved medium, sample, or precipitated matter in platesfor pinpoint colonies.5.2 Automatic CountersDo not use plates havingscratched surfaces, stippled agar sur

28、faces, or particles or airbubbles in the agar or plates with fingerprints or films on thebottoms of the plates. The colony counters should yield countswithin 6 10 % of those obtained manually, 90 % of the time.5.3 Count plates containing between 30 and 300 colonies.Count the number of colonies below

29、 30 if the sample is anexceptionally clean water, such as a drinking water. Count allcolonies, including those of pinpoint size, and record thesample volume and dilution used.5.4 Report the pour plate count as CFU per mL.PRACTICE CCOUNTING COLONIES ON SPREADPLATES6. Procedure6.1 Count plates contain

30、ing between 20 and 200 colonies.The maximum number of colonies per spread plate is fewerthan that for other plate techniques because surface coloniesare larger than subsurface colonies and crowding can result atlower count levels. If the water sample is exceptionally clean,count the actual number of

31、 colonies below 20. Report asCFU/mL or CFU/100 mL, depending on the use of the data.7. Significant Figures7.1 To prevent false precision in the reporting of counts, thecounts must be limited to the digit(s) known definitely plus onedigit that is in doubt. These combined digits are termed thesignific

32、ant figures (SFs).7.1.1 For example, if an analyst reports a plate count of 124to three SFs, he is indicating that he is certain of the first twodigits, 1 and 2, but is uncertain whether the last digit is 3, 4, or5. If the analyst were reporting that same number to two SFs,he would report the first

33、figure, 1, as certain, the second figure,2, as uncertain, and the third figure, 4, as unknown. Largecounts of 1200, 12 000, and 12 000 000 contain only twosignificant figures. Of course, zeros can be significant in actualcounts of 10, 60, 105, and so forth.7.2 In plate count and MF methods, the numb

34、er of signifi-cant digits that can be reported is dictated by the test methoditself, as follows: within the acceptable counting range of thetest method itself, that is, 20 to 60, 20 to 80, 20 to 100, or 30to 300, the actual number of colonies observed is the bestestimate of the true density. The num

35、ber of SFs is equal to thenumber of colonies (see Table 2).D 5465 93 (2004)37.3 Rounding Off CountsSince plate counts must belimited to the number of SFs obtainable by test method, thenon-zero number that is not significant should be treated by thestandard scientific convention.7.3.1 If the insignif

36、icant digit is below five, replace it with azero, for example, 3530 becomes 3500.7.3.2 If the insignificant digit is five, round the precedingsignificant digit to the nearest even number, for example, withtwo SFs, 3450 becomes 3400, and 3550 becomes 3600.7.3.3 If the insignificant digit is greater t

37、han five, drop thedigit and increase the preceding significant number by one, forexample, 3480 becomes 3500.8. Keywords8.1 calculating results; counting colonies; membrane filtermethods; pour plate methods; reporting results; rounding off;significant figures; spread plate methods; verification of co

38、untsASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentionedin this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the riskof infringement of such rights,

39、 are entirely their own responsibility.This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years andif not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional sta

40、ndardsand should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of theresponsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you shouldmake your views known to the ASTM Com

41、mittee on Standards, at the address shown below.This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the aboveaddr

42、ess or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or serviceastm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website(www.astm.org).TABLE 2 Number of Significant Figures ReportedActualColony CountPour Plate/Spread PlateMethodMembrane FiltrationMethod1to9 1SF 1SF10 to 99 2 SFs 2 SFs100 to 300 3 SFs .D 5465 93 (2004)4

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
  • ASTM D2112-2001a(2007) Standard Test Method for Oxidation Stability of Inhibited Mineral Insulating Oil by Pressure Vessel《用压力容器法测定防腐蚀矿物绝缘油氧化稳定性的标准试验方法》.pdf ASTM D2112-2001a(2007) Standard Test Method for Oxidation Stability of Inhibited Mineral Insulating Oil by Pressure Vessel《用压力容器法测定防腐蚀矿物绝缘油氧化稳定性的标准试验方法》.pdf
  • ASTM D2112-2015 Standard Test Method for Oxidation Stability of Inhibited Mineral Insulating Oil by Pressure Vessel《采用压力容器法测定防腐蚀矿物绝缘油氧化稳定性的标准试验方法》.pdf ASTM D2112-2015 Standard Test Method for Oxidation Stability of Inhibited Mineral Insulating Oil by Pressure Vessel《采用压力容器法测定防腐蚀矿物绝缘油氧化稳定性的标准试验方法》.pdf
  • ASTM D2113-2006 Standard Practice for Rock Core Drilling and Sampling of Rock for Site Investigation《现场勘测用岩芯钻探和取样的标准操作规程》.pdf ASTM D2113-2006 Standard Practice for Rock Core Drilling and Sampling of Rock for Site Investigation《现场勘测用岩芯钻探和取样的标准操作规程》.pdf
  • ASTM D2113-2008 Standard Practice for Rock Core Drilling and Sampling of Rock for Site Investigation《现场斟探用金刚石钻取岩芯和取样的标准试验方法》.pdf ASTM D2113-2008 Standard Practice for Rock Core Drilling and Sampling of Rock for Site Investigation《现场斟探用金刚石钻取岩芯和取样的标准试验方法》.pdf
  • ASTM D2113-2014 Standard Practice for Rock Core Drilling and Sampling of Rock for Site Exploration《现场斟探用岩石钻取岩芯和取样的标准试验方法》.pdf ASTM D2113-2014 Standard Practice for Rock Core Drilling and Sampling of Rock for Site Exploration《现场斟探用岩石钻取岩芯和取样的标准试验方法》.pdf
  • ASTM D2115-2004 Standard Practice for Oven Heat Stability of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Compositions《聚氯乙烯复合物的试验炉加热稳定性标准规程》.pdf ASTM D2115-2004 Standard Practice for Oven Heat Stability of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Compositions《聚氯乙烯复合物的试验炉加热稳定性标准规程》.pdf
  • ASTM D2115-2010 Standard Practice for Oven Heat Stability of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Compositions《聚(氯乙烯)合成物的烘箱热稳定性标准实施规程》.pdf ASTM D2115-2010 Standard Practice for Oven Heat Stability of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Compositions《聚(氯乙烯)合成物的烘箱热稳定性标准实施规程》.pdf
  • ASTM D2115-2017 Standard Practice for Oven Heat Stability of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Compositions《聚氯乙烯(PVC)组合物的烤箱热稳定性的标准实施规程》.pdf ASTM D2115-2017 Standard Practice for Oven Heat Stability of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Compositions《聚氯乙烯(PVC)组合物的烤箱热稳定性的标准实施规程》.pdf
  • ASTM D2116-2002 Standard Specification for FEP-Fluorocarbon Molding and Extrusion Materials《FEP氟化乙丙烯模制和压塑材料的标准规范》.pdf ASTM D2116-2002 Standard Specification for FEP-Fluorocarbon Molding and Extrusion Materials《FEP氟化乙丙烯模制和压塑材料的标准规范》.pdf
  • 相关搜索

    当前位置:首页 > 标准规范 > 国际标准 > ASTM

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1