ASTM F1820-1997(2009) Standard Test Method for Determining the Axial Disassembly Force of a Modular Acetabular Device《测定模数碟状体设备轴向拆解力的标准试验方法》.pdf

上传人:figureissue185 文档编号:535754 上传时间:2018-12-06 格式:PDF 页数:3 大小:137.88KB
下载 相关 举报
ASTM F1820-1997(2009) Standard Test Method for Determining the Axial Disassembly Force of a Modular Acetabular Device《测定模数碟状体设备轴向拆解力的标准试验方法》.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共3页
ASTM F1820-1997(2009) Standard Test Method for Determining the Axial Disassembly Force of a Modular Acetabular Device《测定模数碟状体设备轴向拆解力的标准试验方法》.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共3页
ASTM F1820-1997(2009) Standard Test Method for Determining the Axial Disassembly Force of a Modular Acetabular Device《测定模数碟状体设备轴向拆解力的标准试验方法》.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共3页
亲,该文档总共3页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、Designation: F 1820 97 (Reapproved 2009)Standard Test Method forDetermining the Axial Disassembly Force of a ModularAcetabular Device1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1820; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of

2、 revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method covers a standard methodology bywhich to measure the attachment strength betwe

3、en the modularacetabular shell and liner.Although the methodology describeddoes not replicate physiological loading conditions, it has beendescribed as a means of comparing integrity of various lockingmechanisms.21.2 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associ

4、ated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:3E4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines3. T

5、erminology3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.1.1 acetabular linerportion of the modular acetabulardevice with an internal hemispherical socket intended toarticulate with the head of a femoral prosthesis. The externalgeometry of this component interfaces with the acetabular shellthr

6、ough a locking mechanism which may be integral to thedesign of the liner and shell or may rely upon additionalcomponents (for example, metal ring, screws, and so forth).3.1.2 acetabular shellthe external, hollow structure (usu-ally metal) that provides additional mechanical support orreinforcement f

7、or an acetabular liner and whose externalfeatures interface directly with the bones of the pelvic socket(for example, through bone cement, intimate press-fit, porousingrowth, integral screw threads, anchoring screws, pegs, andso forth). The acetabular shell may be either solid or containholes for fi

8、xation, or contain a hole for instrumentation, or allof these.3.1.3 locking mechanismany structure, design feature orcombination thereof, that provides mechanical resistance tomovement between the liner and shell.4. Summary of Test Method4.1 The axial disassembly of an acetabular device testmethod p

9、rovides a means to measure the axial locking strengthof the acetabular liner for modular acetabular devices.4.2 Following proper assembly of the acetabular liner in anacetabular shell, the assembled device is attached to a fixturesuch that the cup opening is facing downward. The acetabularshell is s

10、upported and an axial force is applied to the acetabularliner until it disengages. The load required to disengage theacetabular liner from the acetabular shell is recorded. Theacetabular liner should only be tested one time; however, theacetabular shell may used more than once if no damage to theloc

11、king mechanism has occurred.5. Significance and Use5.1 This test method is intended to help assess the axiallocking strength of the acetabular liner in a modular shell whensubjected to a tensile loading condition. Additional means ofevaluating the locking mechanisms of modular acetabulardevices may

12、be appropriate depending upon the design of thedevice (that is, lever-out, torsional strength, fatigue, and soforth).5.2 This test method may not be appropriate for all implantapplications. The user is cautioned to consider the appropriate-ness of the method in view of the materials and design being

13、tested and their potential application.5.3 While this test method may be used to measure the forcerequired to disengage modular acetabular devices, comparisonof such data for various device designs must take intoconsideration the size of the implant and the type of lockingmechanism evaluated. The lo

14、cation of the locking mechanismrelative to the load application may be dependent upon the sizeand design of the acetabular device. In addition, the lockingmechanism itself may vary with size, particularly if the design1This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F04 on Medicaland Su

15、rgical Materials and Devices and is the direct responsibility of SubcommitteeF04.22 on Arthroplasty.Current edition approved Feb. 1, 2009. Published March 2009. Originallyapproved in 1997. Last previous edition approved in 2003 as F 1820 97(2003).2Tradonsky M.D., Steve, et al, “A Comparison of the D

16、isassociation Strength ofModular Acetabular Components,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,Number 296, November 1993.3For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information,

17、 refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.is circumferential in nature (for example, larger diameterimplants would have a greater area of acetabular shell/acetabu

18、lar liner interface than a small diameter implant).6. Apparatus6.1 An apparatus capable of supporting only the acetabularshell while allowing the acetabular liner to be freely disas-sembled from the shell is required. The fixture shall beconstructed so that the line of load application is through th

19、eapex of the shell or is perpendicular to the face center of theacetabular shell.6.2 The testing machine shall conform to the requirementsof Practices E4. The loads used to determine the attachmentstrength shall be within the range of the testing machine asdefined in Practices E4.6.3 The test machin

20、e should be capable of delivering acompressive or tensile force at a constant displacement rate.The test machine should have a load monitoring and recordingsystem.7. Sampling7.1 All acetabular liners shall be representative of implantquality products. This shall include any sterilization or thermalp

21、rocesses which may alter the material properties or geometry.7.2 Apartially finished acetabular shell or permanent fixtureblock may be substituted for a completed acetabular shellprovided that the internal materials, finish, locking mechanism,and geometry are identical to the actual acetabular shell

22、.7.3 A minimum of five shells and liners shall be tested todetermine the axial disassembly force of an acetabular device.Pairing of the acetabular shells and liners shall be at randomunless otherwise reported. The appropriateness of performingmultiple tests on the same acetabular shell will depend o

23、n thedesign of the device. The acetabular liner should only be testedone time; however, the acetabular shell may be used more thanonce if no damage has occurred to the locking mechanism.8. Procedure8.1 Assemble the liner and shell according to the surgicalprocedure guidelines. Once assembled, the li

24、ner shell constructshould be placed in a fixture similar to that described in Fig. 1,that is, a fixture that will support the acetabular shell withoutdistortion while allowing axial load to be applied to the liner.An axial load should be applied (coincident with the axes of theliner and shell) to th

25、e liner through a center hole in the shell ata rate of 5.1 cm/min. It may be necessary to create a hole in theshell at the apex in order to apply an axial load to the liner. Asmall diameter drill blank or plug could be used as a loadapplicator. The maximum load required to completely disen-gage the

26、liner from the shell should be measured and recorded.8.2 Record the maximum disassembly force.8.3 Testing of samples shall be terminated when one of thefollowing has occurred:8.3.1 The disengagement force becomes negligible.8.3.2 Prior to disassembly, the liner suffers excessive dam-age (that is, pu

27、ncture of the liner or severe liner deformation).Puncture of the liner should be considered an invalid test.9. Report9.1 Report the following information:9.1.1 The device name, size, materials, and lot number, ifapplicable,FIG. 1 Schematic of Liner DisassemblyF 1820 97 (2009)29.1.2 Maximum force req

28、uired to disengage the liner fromthe shell from each of the test samples,9.1.3 The mode of failure, and9.1.4 The orientation of the liner and outer shell if the axesare not coincident.10. Precision and Bias10.1 No information can be presented on the precision andbias of this test method for measurin

29、g the axial disassemblyforce of modular acetabular devices, because no materialhaving an accepted reference value is available.11. Keywords11.1 acetabular component; arthroplasty; disassemblyAPPENDIX(Nonmandatory Information)X1. RATIONALEX1.1 The intent of this test method is to establish a meansof

30、comparing various acetabular designs, not to set a minimumfor the disassembly force of the acetabular prosthesis. Inaddition, this test method does not specifically address thelocking mechanisms ability to maintain its integrity withsequential assemblies and disassemblies. However, if deemedappropri

31、ate by the user, the method could be considered fordetermining the ability of the locking mechanism to resistdegradation after repeated assemblies.X1.2 Prototype designs may be used with this test methodand may be considered implant quality if the geometricaldimensions are within the tolerances of t

32、he final design andhave been subjected to any processes that may affect thegeometrical stability of the implant.X1.3 Temperature and environment may affect the lockingstrength of the acetabular design. If the these factors areconsidered, then the environment and the temperature shouldbe reported in

33、the results.X1.4 Occasionally shells without holes may need to beevaluated. For these designs it may become necessary to drilla hole in the apex of the shell for insertion of the drill blank orplug. Holes should not be made if the locking mechanism iscompromised, and alternative methods should be co

34、nsidered toapply the load coincident with the acetabular liner and shellaxis.X1.5 Some designs may be susceptible to degradation inliner locking force after fatigue; therefore, consideration maybe given to the effect of fatigue on the disengagement force ofacetabular devices.4ASTM International take

35、s no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentionedin this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the riskof infringement of such rights, are entirely their own res

36、ponsibility.This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years andif not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standardsand should be address

37、ed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of theresponsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you shouldmake your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the

38、 address shown below.This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the aboveaddress or at 610-832-9585 (pho

39、ne), 610-832-9555 (fax), or serviceastm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website(www.astm.org).4Fosco, D.R., and Buchanan, D.J., “The Importance of Fatigue Loading WhenAssessing Liner/Shell Distraction Resistance and Congruency for ModularAcetabu-lar Components,” Modularity of Orthopaedic Implants, ASTM STP 1301, DonaldE. Marlowe and Michael B. Mayor, Eds., ASTM, 1997.F 1820 97 (2009)3

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3443-1993 Aerospace Series Titanium TI-P99003 Annealed Sheet and Strip Hot Rolled a Less Than or Equal to 6 mm 570 MPa Less Than or Equal to Rm Less Than or Equal to .pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3443-1993 Aerospace Series Titanium TI-P99003 Annealed Sheet and Strip Hot Rolled a Less Than or Equal to 6 mm 570 MPa Less Than or Equal to Rm Less Than or Equal to .pdf
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3444-1996 Aerospace Series Bolts Large Bihexagonal Head Close Tolerance Normal Shank Medium Length Thread in Heat Resisting Nickel Base Alloy Passivated Classificatio.pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3444-1996 Aerospace Series Bolts Large Bihexagonal Head Close Tolerance Normal Shank Medium Length Thread in Heat Resisting Nickel Base Alloy Passivated Classificatio.pdf
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3446-1993 Aerospace Series Bearings Precision Ball Without Flange in Corrosion Resisting Steel for Instruments and Equipment Dimensions and Loads (Edition 1)《航空航天系列 仪.pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3446-1993 Aerospace Series Bearings Precision Ball Without Flange in Corrosion Resisting Steel for Instruments and Equipment Dimensions and Loads (Edition 1)《航空航天系列 仪.pdf
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3451-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium TI-P99002 not Heat Treated Grade 2 Forging Stock for Annealed Forgings a or D Less Than or Equal to 300 mm (Edition P 2)《航空航天系列 a或.pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3451-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium TI-P99002 not Heat Treated Grade 2 Forging Stock for Annealed Forgings a or D Less Than or Equal to 300 mm (Edition P 2)《航空航天系列 a或.pdf
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3452-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium TI-P99002 Grade 2 Annealed Forgings De Less Than or Equal to 150 mm (Edition P 2)《航空航天系列 De≤150mm的钛合金TI-P99002制2级退火锻件 第P2版》.pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3452-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium TI-P99002 Grade 2 Annealed Forgings De Less Than or Equal to 150 mm (Edition P 2)《航空航天系列 De≤150mm的钛合金TI-P99002制2级退火锻件 第P2版》.pdf
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3453-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium TI-P99003 not Heat Treated Grade 2 Forging Stock for Annealed Forgings a or D Less Than or Equal to 300 mm (Edition P 2)《航空航天系列 a或.pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3453-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium TI-P99003 not Heat Treated Grade 2 Forging Stock for Annealed Forgings a or D Less Than or Equal to 300 mm (Edition P 2)《航空航天系列 a或.pdf
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3454-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium Alloy TI-P19001 not Heat Treated Grade 2 Forging Stock for Annealed Forgings a or D Less Than or Equal to 300 mm (Edition P2)《航空航天.pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3454-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium Alloy TI-P19001 not Heat Treated Grade 2 Forging Stock for Annealed Forgings a or D Less Than or Equal to 300 mm (Edition P2)《航空航天.pdf
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3455-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium Alloy TI-P19001 not Heat Treated Grade 2 Forging Stock for Solution Treated and Aged Forgings a or D Less Than or Equal to 300 mm .pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3455-1995 Aerospace Series Titanium Alloy TI-P19001 not Heat Treated Grade 2 Forging Stock for Solution Treated and Aged Forgings a or D Less Than or Equal to 300 mm .pdf
  • ASD-STAN PREN 3456-2010 Aerospace series Titanium alloy TI-P64001 (Ti-6Al-4V) Annealed Sheet and strip hot rolled a less than or equal to 6 mm (Edition P 3)《航空航天系列 a≤6mm的钛合金TI-P640.pdf ASD-STAN PREN 3456-2010 Aerospace series Titanium alloy TI-P64001 (Ti-6Al-4V) Annealed Sheet and strip hot rolled a less than or equal to 6 mm (Edition P 3)《航空航天系列 a≤6mm的钛合金TI-P640.pdf
  • 相关搜索

    当前位置:首页 > 标准规范 > 国际标准 > ASTM

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1