1、Designation: F1915 05 (Reapproved 2012)Standard Test Methods forGlazing for Detention Facilities1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1915; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.
2、A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These test methods, including a fire test responsemethod, cover the apparatus, procedures, and acceptanceconditions for evaluating th
3、e normal operational performanceand the performance characteristics under assault conditions ofdetention glazing used in window and door assemblies indetention and correctional facilities; thus, these test methodsonly give an indication of the performance characteristics ofdetention glazing in actua
4、l service. Such variables as installa-tion and maintenance conditions are not considered except asotherwise included in this test method.1.2 It is the intent of these test methods to help ensure thatdetention glazing performs at or above minimum acceptablelevels to restrict inmate passage to unautho
5、rized areas, toconfine inmates, to delay and frustrate escape attempts and toresist vandalism.1.3 Tools defined in these test methods are representative ofsimilar tools or materials, which may become available toinmates within the secure perimeter of detention and correc-tional facilities, and which
6、 could be used to inflict similarproduct damage.1.4 These test methods should not be used to establish orconfirm the absolute prevention of forced entries or exits.These test methods define five factors (tool, temperature,techniques, time, and number of impacts) used to determineresistance to define
7、d attacks.1.5 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas the standard. The SI values in stated parentheses are forinformation only.1.6 In these test methods, the specimens are subjected to oneor more specific sets of laboratory test conditions. If differenttest conditions are substit
8、uted or the end-use conditions arechanged, it is not always possible by or from these test methodsto predict changes in the physical attack, or fire-test-responsecharacteristics measured, or both; therefore, the results arevalid only for the physical attack, or fire-test-exposure condi-tions, or bot
9、h, described in these test methods.1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limit
10、ations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2F1233 Test Method for Security Glazing Materials AndSystemsF1450 Test Methods for Hollow Metal Swinging DoorAssemblies for Detention and Correctional FacilitiesF1577 Test Methods for Detention Locks for SwingingDoorsF1592 Test Methods fo
11、r Detention Hollow Metal VisionSystemsF1643 Test Methods for Detention Sliding Door LockingDevice AssemblyF1758 Test Methods for Detention Hinges Used onDetention-Grade Swinging Doors2.2 UL Standard:3UL 752 Bullet Resisting Equipment2.3 NIJ Standard:4NIJ 0108.1 Ballistic Resistant Protective Materia
12、ls3. Terminology3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.1.1 benchmark, nendpoint or intermediate point in thetest sequence as determined by the certification agency.3.1.2 detention security, nassurance of the restriction ofmobility of inmates to designated areas within a correctional or
13、detention facility.3.1.3 forcible egress, nability to passa5by8by8-in.(127 by 203.2 by 203.2-mm) rigid box through an opening inthe test sample created by destructive testing procedures withno more than 10 lb (44.48 N) of force.1These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F33 onD
14、etention and Correctional Facilities and are the direct responsibility of Subcom-mittee F33.02 on Physical Barriers.Current edition approved June 1, 2012. Published August 2012. Originallyapproved in 1998. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as F1915 05. DOI:10.1520/F1915-05R12.2For referenced AS
15、TM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Available from Underwriters Laboratories (UL), Corporate Progress, 333Pfingste
16、n Rd., Northbrook, IL 60062.4Available from National Institute of Justice (NIJ), 810 7th St., NW, Washing-ton, DC 20531.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.3.1.4 frame, nassembly of members surrounding andsupporting a win
17、dow or windows.3.1.5 glazing, nany infill material, usually transparent ortranslucent glass, polycarbonate, or combination thereof, usedin a security detention frame.3.1.6 glazing stop, nformed metal section used to secureglazing or panel in a frame.3.1.7 head or header, nhorizontal member that form
18、s thetop of a frame.3.1.8 hollow metal, nterm used in reference to such itemsas doors, frames, partitions, enclosures, and other items that arefabricated from metal sheet, usually carbon steel.3.1.9 jamb, nvertical member forming the side of a frame.3.1.10 manufacturer, nparty responsible for the fa
19、brica-tion of the test samples.3.1.11 performance characteristic, nresponse of the glaz-ing sample in any one of the tests described herein.3.1.12 tamper-resistant security screw, nscrew that isdesigned to be removed only by special tools kept by facilitymaintenance personnel.3.1.13 test completion,
20、 nconduct of one test sequence foreach of the glazing samples resulting in either successfulcompletion of the test sequence or the attainment of forcibleegress.3.1.14 testing laboratory, nindependent materials testinglaboratory not associated with any manufacturer.3.1.15 vision system frame, nan ass
21、embly of memberssurrounding and supporting glazing panels, steel panels, orcombinations thereof, that are located in an interior partition orexterior wall.4. Significance and Use4.1 The predictable and reliable performance of detentionglazing used in detention and correctional facilities is a majorc
22、oncern. These test methods aid in assigning a level of physicalsecurity to glazing used in window and door assemblies basedupon objective tests which can be consistently duplicated.4.2 These test methods identify four security grades, corre-sponding to the four security grades established in TestMet
23、hods F1450. The intent is to establish a comparable level ofperformance for opening assemblies which incorporate deten-tion glazing in conjunction with window and door assemblies.Test methods for detention glazing differ in sequencing avariety of attack tools and temperatures.4.3 These test methods
24、evaluate the resistance of detentionglazing to attacks using blunt and sharp impact devices andfire. These test methods evaluate the performance of glazing inhot and cold environments. These test methods do not providea measure of the resistance or performance of glazing subjectedto attack by ballis
25、tics, chemical agents, explosives or otherextreme methods of attack. Where such elements are a factor,consult the manufacturer.4.4 The primary purpose of these test methods is to approxi-mate the levels of abuse and operating conditions to whichdetention glazing is subjected in detention and correct
26、ionalinstitutions. The desired result of these test methods is toprovide a measure of assurance of protection to the correctionalpersonnel, public, and inmates.4.5 Detention and correctional facility administrative staffare encouraged to provide adequate training, supervision, andpreventative mainte
27、nance programs to enable detention glazingassemblies to function as intended.5. Sample Selection, Size, and Specimen Preparation5.1 Samples manufactured for testing purposes shall berepresentative of the types and styles intended for use in theapplication of these test methods. The manufacturer shal
28、lprovide three test samples of each product, one for each test.The test size shall be a nominal 3 ft, 0 in. (914.4 mm) wide by4 ft, 0 in. (1219.2 mm) high.5.2 Test reports shall include complete details as identifiedin Section 8.5.3 Fig. 1 shows an acceptable test fixture and the locationof the stri
29、ke points described in Tables 1 and 2.5.4 For Nonsymmetrical MaterialsThe “threat side” ofthe product shall be identified by the manufacturer and attackedduring the test procedure.6. Test Methods6.1 Cold Temperature Impact Test:6.1.1 ScopeThese test methods are designed to evaluatethe capability of
30、detention glazing to resist repeated impactforces from both a blunt and sharp impactor under coldtemperature conditions.6.1.2 Significance and UseThese test methods are in-tended to closely simulate a sustained battering ram style orpounding type attack and provide an evaluation of the capa-bility o
31、f the glazing to prevent, delay, or frustrate escape oraccess to unauthorized areas under cold temperature condi-tions. These test results are intended to aid in assigning a levelof physical security to various configurations of detentionglazing. An impact test of this design performed on detentiong
32、lazing evaluates the impact strength of the glazing and itscomponents as well as the quality of fabrication techniques.6.1.3 Apparatus:6.1.3.1 Large Blunt ImpactorThe blunt impactor shallconsist of a hinged or pivoted system with a mass of 80 lbs(36.32 kg) capable of delivering impacts of 200 ft-lbf
33、 (271.2 J)to a glazing specimen mounted in a frame assembly. Thestriking surface of the impactor shall be made fromC1010C1020 carbon steel and have a striking surface of 4 6.04 in.2(101.6 6 1.016 mm2) with rounded edges similar to a10-lb (4.54-kg) sledge hammer head. See Fig. 2a.6.1.3.2 Sharp Impact
34、orThe sharp impactor shall consistof a hinged or pivoted system with a mass of 80 lbs (36.32 kg)capable of delivering impacts of 100 ft-lbf (135.6 J) to aglazing specimen mounted in a frame assembly. The strikingsurface of the impactor shall be made from C1010C1020carbon steel and sharpness of the i
35、mpacting point similar to theend of a new firemans axe at the beginning of a test sequence.See Fig. 2b.6.1.4 Procedure:6.1.4.1 ConditioningThe panel shall be subjected to acold soak of 20F (28.89C) for a period not less than 4 h,gradually reducing the surface temperature to 20 6 5F(28.89 6 2.78C). T
36、he nonthreat surface temperature shall bemaintained at 20 6 5F (28.89 6 2.78C), 2 in. (50.8 mm)F1915 05 (2012)2from edge, during the test until an opening is created. Periodicmeasurements shall be taken by the test laboratory to maintainsurface temperature.6.1.4.2 InstallationThe panel shall be inst
37、alled into thetest fixture with a minimum 1-in. (25.4-mm) edge engagement.Appropriate gasketing material shall be used to keep glazingmaterial from contacting frame. Refer to manufacturers rec-ommendations.6.1.4.3 ProcedureUsing the test apparatus in accordancewith 6.1.3, begin a series of strikes a
38、gainst the center of thepanel for the number of required impacts, first with the bluntimpactor followed by the sharp impactor on the pendulum. Thestrikes shall be uniformly made with 9-s intervals. Changing ofblunt and sharp impactors during the test shall not exceed 90 s.During the test, reposition
39、 the pendulum as necessary toproduce the maximum possible duress on the panel, leading topanel failure. Record the number of strikes required to producethe first penetration of the panel, and the number of strikesrequired to produce an opening large enough to passa5by8by 8-in. (127 by 203.2 by 203.2
40、-mm) rigid rectangular boxwith no more than 10 lbf (44.48 N).6.1.5 Test TerminationTerminate the test after the re-quired impacts, or when an opening in the test panel largeenough to passa5by8by8-in. (127 by 203.2 by 203.2-mm)FIG. 1 Test Assembly for Detention Glazing Systems and Elevation Location
41、of Impact Strike PointTABLE 1 Impact Test Criteria: Large Blunt and Sharp ImpactorsSequence and ImpactsA1 2 3 TotalSecurityGradeTotal TimeBBluntImpactorSharpImpactorBluntImpactorNumber ofImpacts1 60 min 150 300 150 6002 40 min 100 200 100 4003 20 min 50 100 50 2004 10 min 25 50 25 100ATo be performe
42、d on both hot and cold conditioned samples.BSee Appendix X5, Element of Time.TABLE 2 Impact Test Criteria: Torch and Small Blunt ImpactorSecurity Grade Blunt ImpactsA1 1502 100375450ATo be performed on a room temperature sample only.F1915 05 (2012)3rigid rectangular box with no more than 10 lbf (44.
43、48 N) isproduced, whichever occurs first. Record the size of opening tothe nearest14-in. (6.35-mm), at test termination.6.1.6 Precision and BiasThe precision and bias of thesetest methods for evaluating the impact fatigue strength ofdetention glazing are being determined.6.1.7 See Table 1 for Impact
44、 Test Criteria: Large Blunt andSharp Impactor.6.2 Warm Temperature Impact Test:6.2.1 ScopeThese test methods are designed to evaluatethe capability of detention glazing to resist repeated impactforces from both a blunt and sharp impactor under warmtemperature conditions.6.2.2 Significance and UseThe
45、se test methods are in-tended to closely simulate a sustained battering ram style orpounding type attack and provide an evaluation of the capa-bility of the glazing to prevent, delay, or frustrate escape oraccess to unauthorized areas, or combination thereof, underwarm temperature conditions. The te
46、st results are intended toaid in assigning a level of physical security to variousconfigurations of detention glazing. An impact test of thisdesign performed on detention glazing evaluates the impactstrength of the glazing and its components as well as thequality of fabrication techniques.6.2.3 Appa
47、ratus:6.2.3.1 Large Blunt ImpactorThe blunt impactor shallconsist of a hinged or pivoted system with a mass of 80 lbs(36.32 kg) capable of delivering impacts of 200 ft-lbf (271.2 J)to a glazing specimen mounted in a frame assembly. Thestriking surface of the impactor shall be made fromC1010C1020 car
48、bon steel and have a circular striking surfaceof 4 6 0.04 in.2(101.6 6 1.016 mm2) with rounded edgessimilar to a 10-lb (4.54-kg) sledge hammer head. See Fig. 2a.6.2.3.2 Sharp ImpactorThe sharp impactor shall consistof a hinged or pivoted system with a mass of 80 lbs (36.32 kg)capable of delivering i
49、mpacts of 100 ft-lbf (135.6 J) to aglazing specimen mounted in a frame assembly. The strikingsurface of the impactor shall be made from C1010C1020carbon steel and sharpness of the impacting point similar to theend of a new firemans axe at the beginning of a test sequence.See Fig. 2b.6.2.4 Procedure:6.2.4.1 ConditioningThe panel shall be subjected to aheat soak of 120F (48.9C) for a period not less than 4 h,gradually increasing the surface temperature to 120 6 5F(48.9 6 2.78C). The nonthreat surface temperature shall bemaintained
