1、COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE DE LCLAIRAGE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON I LLU M I NATION INTERNATIONALE BELEUCHTUNGSKOMMISSION ROAD LIGHTING LANTERN AND INSTALLATION DATA = PHOTOMETRICS, CLASSIFICATION AND PERFORMANCE PUBLICATION CIE No 34 (TC-4.6) 1977 Photocopy Edition 1990 CENTRAL BUREAU OF THE CIE A
2、- 1030 VIENNA, Kegelgasse 27 - AUSTRIA CIE 34 77 7006345 0003445 580 = -2- PRELIMINARY REMARK This report has been prepared by CIE Technical Camittee 4.6 “Road Lighting“, It has been approved unanimously by the Cormnittee and is recanmended for study and application. This report is not an Officially
3、 Agreed CIE Recornendation approved by the National CaaPaittees of the Member Countries. It should be noted that any recommendations in this report are advisory and not mandatory. Nrn PRELIYIRAIRE Ce rapport a t prpar par le Comit Technique CIE 4.6 “Eclairage des voies publiques“, I1 a reu lapprobat
4、ion unanime du Comit, et il est recomnand pour tude et application. Ce rapport nest pas une Reconamandation officielle de la CIE approuve par les Comit Nationaux des Pays Membres, I1 doit tre not que toute recommandation y figurant est donne titre de conseil et non dobligation, VORBEMERKUEQS Dieser
5、Bericht wurde vom Technischen CIEiomitee 4.6 “Strassen- beleuchtung“ ausgearbeitet, Er wurde uneingeschrnkt vom Kamitee angenommen und wird zum zuknftigen Studium empfohlen. Er ist keine Offiziell Anerkannte CIE-Empfehlung, die yon den Nationalen Kmitees der Mitgliedslnder anerkannt wurde. Es muss d
6、arauf hin- gewiesen warden, dass aile Empfehlungen dieses Berichts nur als Anleitung dienen und nicht verbidieh sind. CIE 34 77 E 9006345 0001YYb 417 E -3- COMPOSITION OF TC-4.6 MEMBERS: J.B. de Boer Chairman J. Funke Secretary F. Behal H.-H. Bjbrset M. Bonomo B. Brakalov M. J .F. Dempster J.T. Duff
7、 W.H. Edman A.J. Fisher E. Frederiksen L. Gaymard P. Gergely M.A. Gudjohnsen O. Hinojosa E. Kasurinen A. Ketvirtis W. Fehorski D. Murgaski K. Narisada M.A. Ostrovslq A. Pereira Marques H. Prochazka W. Riemenschneider A. Romero do Tojadn M. Sand P. Sandgren F. Sarteel K. Stolzenberg CONSULTANTS A. M.
8、 Marsdcn E. Muller J. Renaud J. Vermeulen H.O. Westemnann Netherlands Netherlaxids Czecho-Slovakia Norway Italy Bulgaria South Africa Great Britain U.S.A. Australia Denmark France Hungary Iceland Chile Finland Canada Poland Jugoslavia Japan U.S.S.R. Portugal Austria Switzerland Spain Israel Sweden B
9、elgium Federal Republic of Germany Great Britain Sw i t z e ri and France Netherlands Be therlands -4- This technical report is one of a series of supporting documents to hblication CIE No. 12.2 (TC-4.6) 1977 “Recommendations for the lighting of roads for motorized traffic“. It is concerned with the
10、 data involved in predicting the performance of ad installation, as described in Public- ation CIE No. 30 (TC-4.6) 1976 “Calculation and Measurement of LWnance and Illuminance in Road Lighting“. The report consists of three parts. Part 1 describes the preferred form of basic Photometrie data for roa
11、d lighting lanterns: - intensity tables, isocandela diagrams, polar diagrams, flashed areas. Part 2 outlines ad= ditional derived data for an individual lantern which could be of value: - the description of a lantern (in terms of throw, spread and control), utilization factor diagrams, luminance yie
12、ld diagrams, isoluminance dia- grams. Part 3 gives three useful methods of presenting data on the per- formance of an installation of lanterns: - performance tables, perfor- mace graphs, layout tables for achieving a specjfic performance. An appen- dix gives some information on the differences in pe
13、rformance which have been found between installations using lanterns CatisQing the same specification or classification. CIE 34 77 9006345 0003Y48 27T -5- Ce rzpport technique est un de ceux destins E complter la “Publication fi0 12.2 - C I E; (T c 4.“) 1977 11 et intitule : “ECOMMENDATIONS FOUH I,
14、ECLAIiLAGE DES HOUTES UESTINEES AU tt TIIAFIC IIOTOHIJE I1 doit tre mis en corr - diagrammes isocandelas i - diagrammes polaires i - surfaces CIE 34 77 W 9006145 0001449 126 -6- - diagrammes des facteurs dut:lisation ; - diagrammes des rendements en luminance; - diagrammes isoluminance . - la troisi
15、me partie dcrit 3 mthodes pratiques de prsentation des donnes relatives aux performances cbtenues par un :;ystme de luminaires dans une installation : - ti:bles de performances i - graphiques de performances ; - tables donnant les caract6ristiques gt.orntriques respecter en installations, en vue d1.
16、btenj.r des performances donnes. Une annexe contient des informations quant au. 200 215 ZS1 240 ZW 279 YW 258 211 173 151 146 140 128 IZU 1x) 90 99 113 121 iza 135 i43 1% 16s I80 197 215 236 246 ZlO P3 334 Y19 ZT4 225 ln 150 142 i% 121 114 113 ea 93 104 114 120 128 in 139 i53 166 ia 210 241 255 2% 5
17、25 SY ni 274 2ts is ia tn OD 112 108 10s i5 e4 tos 110 III ia) 126 iw 155 in QI 250 263 293 % ns ax zr, 161 is iza 122 io1 95 e e 69 m 9 M s tw 110 IPI is9 in i90 ne m rn YB 3- wc ZM m is9 127 114 IM 91 n i9 68 76 88 97 101 1w 110 116 I28 145 168 199 254 261 302 W Sl 351 a82 223 161 I34 122 112 97 8
18、5 88 53 63 n a, 87 92 96 1Z 115 1% 152 119 210 241 Cy w8 350 3% ZTl 271 150 111 106 1Q) 85 11 l1 36 41 61 14 18 EIZ eg 91 io4 126 150 in m4 241 YI6 Ju 343 Job 26D 215 1% 101 ST 99 76 61 68 10 a9 50 59 65 11 74 n gy i15 18 168 i9 zig 261 si2 326 a6 2s1 im $11 m z 8( 61 51 65 5 8 ig 29 JS 43 47 y 66 1
19、s 151 160 168 210 279 M lw 162 lu 59 T5 41 60 22 2l 41 2 4 6 7 g 11 12 12 O) 39 m 82 80 n ita i 124 the lantern performs in lighting a roadway. Considezation is now given to data which may be derived from tbe basic photomtric data to overcome these two drawbacks for a single lantern: for a complete
20、installation of lanterns is dealt with in Part 3. on the other band it is lacking in direct information on how the -satter of perforninnce data 2.1, Lantern classification No satisfactory one-dimensional system has yet been found for describing the intensity distribution of lanterns having the degre
21、e of asymmetry found In roadway lanterns. The system iscared from the 1965 version of Publication CIE No. 12, based on ths degree of Gut-off, differentiated simultaneously between two different attributes-of intensity distribution - the angle of elevation of the lantern beam and the control of light
22、 at higher angles. different beam directions in azimuth. It failed to differentiate between lanterns having It is considered tkat a sensible descriptive system for lanterns will take into account at least three different attributes - the extent to which light is thrown up and down a road, the degree
23、 of sideways spread of light acmss a road, and the amount of control exercised over light emitted at high angles - in short, the attributes of throw, spread and control. definitions ere recornended for such a 3-way classification system to describe The following a lantern:- THROW is defined by the a
24、ngle of elevation of the centre of the lantern beam. Thia is determined from the isocandela diagram, as shown in Fig. 7, evaluating theS-augles of the 9 I- contour in the principal Vertical Plme. Throw is the average of these Cwo angles (59 in Fig. 7). - SPREA4D is defined by the most distant longit
25、udW roadway line on the road side of the lantern which intercepts the lantern beam. isocandela diagram, as shown in Fig. 7, by drawing th9 longitudinal roadway line which is tangential to the 90s: I- contour on the road side of ti lantern, Spread is thea-angle of this tangent in the C =: 90 plane (3
26、6 in Fig. 7). This is determined from the - 21 - ehort nah courte lthough longitudinal roadway lhas are used ta define the equivalent of spread in Paerican Standards for classif- lanterns, the ASA system uses the 50% I, contour. intermediate long mittel weit intermediare 10- CONTROL is defned by SLI
27、, the specific lantern index, which consists of those parameters in the S 14.5 15.5 11 12 13 14 15 10 O 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5 15.5 io 12 aB 32 36 40 44 48 52 2.25 2.05 1.85 1.65 1.75 1.6 1.4 1.25 1.9 1.65 1.5 1.3 1.85 1.65 1.45 1.3 0.80 0.74 0.69 0.66 0.16 0.69 O.& 0.61 0.75 0.67 0.61 C.57 0.70 0.65 0
28、.61 0.56 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.15 1.05 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.59 0.58 0.58 C.53 P.51 0.51 0.53 O 51 0.50 0.15 0.65 0.59 0.54 0.51 0.49 0.47 0.S 0.74 0.63 0.54 0.46 0.43 0.41 0.m 0.76 0.69 0.0 0.57 0.55 c.54 O. 0.71 0.m 0.52 0.46 0.41 0.31 7.8 1.9 7.9 7.9 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 1.8 7.8
29、 7.8 1.8 7.8 7.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.9 1.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 5.5 6 6.5 6.5 7 5 6.5 7 6 7.5 8 6.5 7 6 6.5 6.5 7 7.5 0 8.3 0.5 8.5 5 7.5 0 1-95 1.m 1.6 1.4 1-3 1.2 l-1 1.5 1.35 1.2 1.0s 0.95 0.9 0.0 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.4 1.5 1.35 1.2 1.05 1.0 0.9 0.0 0.72 0.Y 0.58 0.55 0.49 0.46 04 0.54 0.46
30、 0.43 0.b 0.35 0.Y 0.31 0.5) 0.47 0.41 0.36 0.32 0.9 0.29 0.66 0.57 0.u) 0.42 O.% 0.32 0.29 0.75 0.62 0.51 0.43 0.36 0.30 0.24 0.71 0.55 0.45 0.36 0.29 0.25 0.22 0.73 0.57 0.46 0.37 03 0.25 0.21 7.8 1.8 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.7 1.1 7.7 7.8 7.8 7 1.8 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.1 7.8 1.8
31、 7.8 0.63 O.% 0.50 0.45 0.40 o.% 0.n 7.5 8 6.5 6.5 7 6 6 7.5 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 7 7.5 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 7 7.5 e 8.5 9 9.5 IO 1.65 1.5 1.35 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.95 1.25 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.75 0.7 1.3 1.15 1.05 0.9 0.85 0.75 0.7 1-25 1.15 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.66 0.59 0.n 0.49 o. 0.41 0.38 0.59 0.53 0.47 0.41 0
32、.36 0.32 0.29 0.9 0.46 0.40 0.35 0.31 0. 0.26 0.47 0.41 0.36 0.32 O*= 0.26 0.24 0.9 0.51 0.44 0.n 0.31 o.n o.= 0.67 0.46 0.37 0.50 0.23 0.1% 0.15 0.72 0.59 0.4 0.39 0.31 0.24 0.P 0.66 0.47 0.37 0.29 0.23 0.18 0.15 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.9 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 7-7 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.7 7-7 7-7 7.7 6 7.5 8.5 9 8 2.5 7.5 8 9.5 10 6.5 7 7.5 o 9.5 10.5 11 8 9.5 10 10.5 11 11 11.5
