1、July 2014Translation by DIN-Sprachendienst.English price group 12No part of this translation may be reproduced without prior permission ofDIN Deutsches Institut fr Normung e. V., Berlin. Beuth Verlag GmbH, 10772 Berlin, Germany,has the exclusive right of sale for German Standards (DIN-Normen).ICS 01
2、.040.03; 03.100.40!%5yK“2188640www.din.deDDIN EN 1325Value Management Vocabulary Terms and definitions;English version EN 1325:2014,English translation of DIN EN 1325:2014-07Value Management Wrterbuch Begriffe;Englische Fassung EN 1325:2014,Englische bersetzung von DIN EN 1325:2014-07Management par
3、la valeur Vocabulaire Termes et dfinitions;Version anglaise EN 1325:2014,Traduction anglaise de DIN EN 1325:2014-07SupersedesDIN EN 1325-1:1996-11 andDIN EN 1325-2:2004-11www.beuth.deIn case of doubt, the German-language original shall be considered authoritative.Document comprises 21 pages06.14 DIN
4、 EN 1325:2014-072 A comma is used as the decimal marker. National foreword This document (EN 1325:2014) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 279 “Value management Value analysis, functional analysis” (Secretariat: BSI, United Kingdom), WG 1 “Value management, value analysis vocabulary”, w
5、ith German participation. The responsible German body involved in its preparation was the Normenausschuss Qualittsmanagement, Statistik und Zertifizierungsgrundlagen (Quality Management, Statistics and Certification Standards Com-mittee), Working Committee NA 147-00-06 AA Gemeinschaftsausschuss VDI-
6、GPP/DIN “Wertanalyse”. Amendments This standard differs from DIN EN 1325-1:1996-11 and DIN EN 1325-2:2004-11 as follows: a) both documents have been combined in this standard, updated and fully revised. Previous editions DIN 69910: 1973-11, 1987-08 DIN EN 1325-1: 1996-11 DIN EN 1325-2: 2004-11 EN 13
7、25 March 2014 ICS 01.040.03; 03.100.40 Supersedes EN 1325-1:1996, EN 1325-2:2004English Version Value Management - Vocabulary - Terms and definitions Management par la valeur - Vocabulaire - Termes et dfinitions Value Management - Wrterbuch - Begriffe This European Standard was approved by CEN on 3
8、February 2014. CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may b
9、e obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN member. This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to
10、the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same status as the official versions. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, I
11、reland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom. CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2014 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any
12、means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. EN 1325:2014 EEUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATIONCOMIT EUROPEN DE NORMALISATIONEUROPISCHES KOMITEE FR NORMUNGEUROPEAN STANDARDNORME EUROPENNEEUROPISCHE NORMEN 1325:2014 (E) 2 Contents PageForeword 3 Introduction .4 1 Scope 5 2 Terms and
13、definitions .5 2.1 General terms related to value .5 2.2 General terms for value management .8 2.3 Terms related to core methods of value management 9 Annex A (normative) Alphabetical index 17 Bibliography . 19 DIN EN 1325:2014-07EN 1325:2014 (E) 3 Foreword This document (EN 1325:2014) has been prep
14、ared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 279 “Value management - Value analysis, functional analysis”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by Septembe
15、r 2014 and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by September 2014. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN and/or CENELEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent
16、rights. This document supersedes EN 1325-1:1996 and EN 1325-2:2004. The main technical change compared to the previous versions is the updating of the terms and definitions. According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following countries are bound t
17、o implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, R
18、omania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. DIN EN 1325:2014-07EN 1325:2014 (E) 4 Introduction This European standard defines terms for Value Management (VM), to develop consistent language for use in optimising performance and productivity for organization
19、s, projects, products, and services. Value Management is founded on the concept of value and on the functional based approach. Value Management approaches and methods are used on the general management level of companies and organizations, for the development of products and services, or to work out
20、 the optimised solution of many kinds of industrial and organizational problems. The concern of these approaches and methods for the end purposes, or functions, of the matter examined, and their search for the optimisation of these functions in relation to the means, resources or expenditures which
21、are necessary for their attainment, are very important factors of the overall efficiency and competitiveness of companies and organizations. European Standards are being developed to promote unified concepts and the highest level of expertise and efficacy in the European countries. In order to achie
22、ve a common way of practice of these methods, and a common understanding of the standards it is essential to define and standardise in a vocabulary standard the precise meaning of the specialised terms which are used. If the standards on Value Management methods which are just now being developed re
23、quire a correction or adaptation of terms and definitions then this will be taken into account by a revision of this standard. DIN EN 1325:2014-07EN 1325:2014 (E) 5 1 Scope This European Standard defines language for optimising performance and productivity by using Value Management. This European St
24、andard defines terms in Value Management (VM). This European Standard aims to: Promote and define common language for Optimising Performance and Productivity by using Value Management; Define the main terms of the “Value Management (VM), Value Analysis (VA), Function Analysis (FA)” field; Define ter
25、ms for important methods and tools; Establish a single source for generic terms; Create accessible language for international communication; Publish useful definitions for specialists and non specialists; Clarify differences which may exist in language where a word in common use is used to signify a
26、 specific meaning in Value Management; Reduce the risk of inconsistency between standards applied internationally. 2 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply. NOTE When a term, which is defined in this vocabulary, is used in the definition of
27、 another term, it is printed in bold type. 2.1 General terms related to value 2.1.1 value measure which expresses how well an organization, project, or product satisfies stakeholders needs in relation to the resources consumed Figure1 The concept of valueDIN EN 1325:2014-07N1) National footnote: Ple
28、ase note: In German the term “Wert” means both “value” and “worth”. The meaning is to be taken from the context. N1)EN 1325:2014 (E) 6 Note 1 to entry: Value informs assessment (or judgement) of solutions: it is an index of relevance, constituting a decision-making support. The concept is relevant t
29、o all possible scenarios and can also include a decrease of negative impacts with constant services, through an increase of services, innovative approaches, and integrating an increase in the services with the reduction of negative impacts. Note 2 to entry: Value is relevant for any type of object:
30、tangible or non tangible product, service, process, organization. Note 3 to entry: All the combinations of increase / reduction of the provided services and the consumed resources are possible, subject to yielding an improvement of the general result. An approach of cost reduction does not improve v
31、alue when it entails a reduction of the provided services which is not controlled or an increase of the negative consequences. Note 4 to entry: Satisfaction of need can be assessed only with regard to reference functions which define the supposed needs or provided services and constraints to be met.
32、 This logic fundamentally distinguishes the value management approach from any other approach of optimisation, design or more generally of problem solving. Note 5 to entry: According to the subject of the project, it is relevant to consider satisfaction (or contributions) from a point of view wider
33、than the reference functions defining the provided services, and being possibly linked to: positive effects for the environment, social, or broader economy; gains and advantages for the parties involved in the project; uncertainties as to what benefits, foreseen or not (upside potential) may be requ
34、ired or achieved; and uncertainties in the balance of risks and opportunities. Note 6 to entry: According to the subject of the project, such as where the environment comprises human beings the notion of “consumption of resources”, due to its more general meaning, can bring a relevant way to evaluat
35、e a proposal. It is possible to consider, as for the perceived advantages, the consequences from more global points of view and from various timescales, comprising: the consequences on the environment of the subject or of the stakeholders (economic, social, ecological consequences, etc.); the identi
36、fication and the assessment of the resources at stake to cover risks and opportunities associated with choices (market scenario risks and opportunities, possibilities and constraints of the fulfilment of the requirements, project risks and opportunities, risks and opportunities of evolutions of the
37、environment, even of the needs, etc.); the uncertainties as to resources which may be consumed, constrained, or present, foreseen or not, balancing upside potential and risk; uncertainties in balance of risks and opportunities. Note 7 to entry: When making an assessment of value some organizations m
38、ay examine the global perspective as well as the organizational perspective. This implies that, in addition to stakeholders need and consumption of resources, positive and negative impacts beyond the interests of the stakeholders should be considered. 2.1.2 stakeholder person or organization which h
39、as an interest in and influence on a product at any time during its life cycle 2.1.3 customer person or organization who has the potential to be a user or enquirer of a product at any time during its life cycle DIN EN 1325:2014-07EN 1325:2014 (E) 7 2.1.4 user person or organization for which the pro
40、duct is designed and which exploits at least one of its functions at any time during its life cycle Note 1 to entry: A user can be an external or internal customer. 2.1.5 product result of activities or processes, any goods, process, service, system, strategy or organization Note 1 to entry: A produ
41、ct can include service, hardware, processed materials, software or a combination thereof. Note 2 to entry: A product can be tangible (e.g. assemblies or processed materials) or intangible (e.g. knowledge or concepts), or a combination thereof. Note 3 to entry: A product can be either intended (e.g.
42、offering to customers) or unintended (e.g. pollutant or unwanted effects). SOURCE: EN ISO 9000:2005, EN ISO 14024:2000 2.1.6 constraint characteristic result or design feature which is made compulsory or has been prohibited for any reason, with no alternative possibility being left Note 1 to entry:
43、Constraints are generally restrictions on the choice of solutions in a value study. Note 2 to entry: The constraints can result from laws, from standards, from the demand of the market. These elements contribute to the characterisation of the functions. It is wise to record the relationship between
44、them and the functions to which they apply (traceability). Note 3 to entry: Given the importance which the constraints can have on the definition of the product, it is good practice to justify any specified constraint. Note 4 to entry: To facilitate the reading of the results of the Function Analysi
45、s, constraints can be included in a particular section of the FNE. 2.1.7 cost expenditure incurred on, or attributable to, a given product Note 1 to entry: Cost is expressed in terms of money expended by one or more stakeholders. 2.1.8 need what is necessary for or desired by the user Note 1 to entr
46、y: A need can be declared or undeclared; it can be existing or potential. 2.1.9 resources everything that is required to satisfy the needs Note 1 to entry: Resources include not just cost (both long and short term) but also time, materials and other inputs, whether physical such as materials or abst
47、ract such as intellectual property, sustainability and social impact. Note 2 to entry: Resources used include initial cost plus operation costs plus other considerations such as influence on environment DIN EN 1325:2014-07EN 1325:2014 (E) 8 2.1.10 life cycle time interval from product inception unti
48、l its removal from use and disposal Note 1 to entry: Life cycle encompasses evolution undergone by a product studied in the course of time, from its conceptualisation to its withdrawal. Withdrawal should be understood as the final elimination of the product beyond its withdrawal from service. Note 2
49、 to entry: Examination of life cycle may consider product usage conditions which may be encountered including scenario planning, risk assessment, transport, handling, storage, intended duration of use and other factors. 2.1.11 life situation product usage condition (for transport, handling, storage, maintenance, various applications, etc.) with the respective occurrences and duration 2.2 General terms for value management 2.2.1 value management VM s
