1、July 2014 Translation by DIN-Sprachendienst.English price group 7No part of this translation may be reproduced without prior permission ofDIN Deutsches Institut fr Normung e. V., Berlin. Beuth Verlag GmbH, 10772 Berlin, Germany,has the exclusive right of sale for German Standards (DIN-Normen).ICS 91
2、.010.30; 91.080.10!%7A“2203099www.din.deDDIN EN 1993-1-1/A1Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings;English version EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014,English translation of DIN EN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07Eurocode 3: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbauten Teil 1-1:
3、 Allgemeine Bemessungsregeln und Regeln fr den Hochbau;Englische Fassung EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014,Englische bersetzung von DIN EN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07Eurocode 3: Calcul des structures en acier Partie 1-1: Rgles gnrales et rgles pour les btiments;Version anglaise EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014,Traduction an
4、glaise de DIN EN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07ModifiesDIN EN 1993-1-1:2010-12www.beuth.deIn case of doubt, the German-language original shall be considered authoritative.Document comprises 8 pages 06.14 DIN EN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07 2 A comma is used as the decimal marker. National foreword This document (EN 199
5、3-1-1:2005/A1:2014) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 250 “Structural Eurocodes” (Secretariat: BSI, United Kingdom). The responsible German body involved in its preparation was the Normenausschuss Bauwesen (Building and Civil Engineering Standards Committee), Working Committee NA 005-0
6、8-16 AA Tragwerksbemessung (SpA CEN/TC 250/SC 3). EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPENNE EUROPISCHE NORM EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1 May 2014 ICS 91.010.30; 91.080.10 English Version Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings Eurocode 3: Calcul des structures en acie
7、r - Partie 1-1: Rgles gnrales et rgles pour les btiments Eurocode 3: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbauten -Teil 1-1: Allgemeine Bemessungsregeln und Regeln fr den Hochbau This amendment A1 modifies the European Standard EN 1993-1-1:2005; it was approved by CEN on 6 March 2014. CEN members are
8、bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for inclusion of this amendment into the relevant national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to th
9、e CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN member. This amendment exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has t
10、he same status as the official versions. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxem
11、bourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMIT EUROPEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPISCHES KOMITEE FR NORMUNG CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brusse
12、ls 2014 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014 EEN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014(E)2 Contents Page Foreword 3 1 Modification to the Contents 4 2 Modification to the Foreword .4 3 Modification to 1.1.1 4 4 Mod
13、ification to 2.1.2 4 5 Addition of a new Annex C .4 DINEN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014 (E) 3 Foreword This document (EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 250 “Structural Eurocodes”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI. This Amendment to the Eur
14、opean Standard EN 1993-1-1:2005 shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by May 2015, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by May 2015. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some
15、of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN and/or CENELEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following countries are bound to implem
16、ent this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania,
17、Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. DIN EN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07 EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014(E)4 1 Modification to the Contents After implementing all the changes, please regenerate the whole table of Contents while making sure that the new Annex C appears in it
18、; see below). 2 Modification to the Foreword At the end of the list for “National annex for EN 1993-1-1“, add the following list entries: “ C.2.2(3) C.2.2(4) “. 3 Modification to 1.1.1 In Paragraph (3), replace the reference to EN 1090 with: “ EN 1090-1, Execution of steel structures and aluminium s
19、tructures Part 1: Requirements for conformity assessment of structural components EN 1090-2, Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures Part 2: Technical requirements for steel structures ”. 4 Modification to 2.1.2 Replace the content of the clause with the following text: “ (1)P With re
20、spect to the application of EN 1090-1 and EN 1090-2, execution classes shall be selected in accordance with Annex C in this standard. (2) If different levels of reliability are required, these levels should preferably be achieved by an appropriate choice of quality management in design and execution
21、, according to EN 1990 Annex B and Annex C and EN 1090. “. 5 Addition of a new Annex C Add the following new Annex C after Annex B: “ DIN EN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07 EN 1993-1-1:2005/A1:2014 (E) 5 Annex C (normative) Selection of execution class C.1 General C.1.1 Basic requirements (1)P To obtain the rel
22、iability of the completed works required according to EN 1990 an appropriate execution class shall be selected. This annex forms the basis for this selection. C.1.2 Execution class (1) Execution class (EXC) is defined as a classified set of requirements specified for the execution of the works as a
23、whole, of an individual component or of a detail of a component. (2) In order to specify requirements for the execution of steel structures to EN 1090-1 and EN 1090-2 the choice of execution class, EXC1, EXC2, EXC3 or EXC4, should be made prior to the commencement of execution. The execution require
24、ments are progressively more onerous from EXC1 up to EXC4. NOTE 1 EN 1993 and EN 1994 are based on the assumption that they are used in conjunction with EN 1090-1 and EN 1090-2. EN 1993-1-9, EN 1993-2, EN 1993-3-1 and EN 1993-3-2 give supplementary requirements to EN 1090-2 for the execution of stru
25、ctures or components or details subject to fatigue actions. In addition to EN 1090-2, EN 1993-5 refers to other European Standards for the execution of piling works. NOTE 2 EN 1090-2 states that EXC2 should apply if no execution class is specified. C.2 Selection process C.2.1 Governing factors (1) T
26、he selection of the execution class should be based on the following three factors: the required reliability; the type of structure, component or detail; and the type of loading for which the structure, component or detail is designed. C.2.2 Selection (1) In terms of reliability management, the sele
27、ction of execution class should be based on either the required consequences class (CC) or the reliability class (RC) or both. The concepts of reliability class and consequences class are defined in EN 1990. (2) In terms of the type of loading applied to a steel structure or component or detail, the
28、 selection of execution class should be based on whether the structure or component or detail is designed for static actions, quasi-static actions, fatigue actions or seismic actions. (3) The selection of execution class (EXC) should be based on Table C.1. DINEN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07EN 1993-1-1:2005/A
29、1:2014(E)6 Table C.1 Choice of execution class (EXC) Reliability Class (RC) or Consequences Class (CC) Type of loading Static, quasi-static or seismic DCLa Fatiguebor seismic DCM or DCHa RC3 or CC3 EXC3cEXC3c RC2 or CC2 EXC2 EXC3 RC1 or CC1 EXC1 EXC2 aSeismic ductility classes are defined in EN 1998
30、-1: Low = DCL; Medium = DCM; High = DCH. bSee EN 1993-1-9. cEXC4 may be specified for structures with extreme consequences of structural failure. NOTE 1 The National Annex may specify whether the selection of execution classes is based on reliability classes or consequences classes or both and may s
31、pecify the choice in terms of the type of the structure. The National Annex may specify whether Table C.1 is to be adopted. NOTE 2 Designs to EN 1993-4-1 and EN 1993-4-2 depend on the choice of consequences class. Designs to EN 1993-3-1 and EN 1993-3-2 depend on the choice of reliability class. (4)
32、If the required execution class for particular components and/or details is different from that applicable to the structure in general, then these components and/or details should be clearly identified. NOTE The National Annex may specify the choice of execution class in terms of types of components
33、 or details. The following is recommended: If EXC1 is selected for a structure, then EXC2 should apply to the following types of component: a) welded components manufactured from steel products of grade S355 and above; b) welded components essential for structural integrity that are assembled by wel
34、ding on the construction site; c) welded components of CHS lattice girders requiring end profile cuts; d) components with hot forming during manufacturing or receiving thermic treatment during manufacturing. (5) Specification of a higher execution class for the execution of a structure or component or detail should not be used to justify the use of lower partial factors for resistance in the design of that structure or component or detail. “. DINEN 1993-1-1/A1:2014-07
