1、* ETS 300 374-2 February 1996 Source: ETSI TC-SPS Reference: DWSPS-03015-2 ICs: 33.020, 33.080 Key words: IN, CS1, INAP, PICS Intelligent Network (IN); Intelligent Network Capability Set 1 (CSI); Core Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP); Part 2: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statem
2、ent (PICS) proforma specification for Service Switching Function (SSF), Specialized Resource Function (SRF) and Service Control Function (SCF) ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute ETSI Secretariat Postal address: F-O6921 Sophia Antipoiis CEDEX - FRANCE Office address: 650 Route des L
3、ucioles - Sophia Antipoiis - Vaibonne - FRANCE X.400: c=fr, a=atlas, p=etsi, s=secretarat - Internet: secretariate etsi.fr Tel.: +33 92 94 42 O0 - Fax: +33 93 65 47 16 Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the foregoing restri
4、ction extend to reproduction in ail media. 8 European Telecommunications Standards institute 1996. Ail rights reserved. ETSI ETS*300 37V-2 96 = 3400855 0081072 178 H _ ETSI ETS*300 374-2 96 3400855 008L073 O04 Page 2 ETS 300 374-2: February 1996 Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation an
5、d publication of this document, errors in content, typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to “ETSI Editing and Committee Support Dept.“ at the address shown on the title page. ETSI ETS*300 374-2 96 = 3400855 OOl1074 Tir0 = Page 3 ETS 300 374
6、-2: February 1996 Contents Foreword . 5 1 Scope 7 2 Normative references 7 3 Definitions and abbreviations 7 3.1 Definitions 7 3.2 Abbreviations . 8 4 Conformance . 8 Annex A (normative): PICS proforma for core INAP CS1 . 9 - A . 1 A.2 A.3 A.4 Guidance for completing the PICS proforma 9 Purpose and
7、structure . 9 Symbols. abbreviations and terms . 9 Instructions for completing the PICS proforma 11 A.l.l A.1.2 A.1.3 Identification of the implementation . 12 A.2.1 Date of the statement 12 A.2.2 Implementation Under Tes (IUT) identification . 12 A.2.3 System Under Test (SUT) identification 12 A.2.
8、4 Product supplier . 12 A.2.5 Client 13 A.2.6 PICS contact person 14 Identification of the protocol 14 PICS proforma tables 14 A.4.1 Global statement of conformance 14 A.4.2 Physical entities . 15 A.4.3 External interfaces . 15 A.4.4 Application contexts . 16 A.4.5 Operations . 16 A.4.6 Arguments, r
9、esults and errors . 18 A.4.6.1 A.4.6.2 A.4.6.3 A.4.6.4 A.4.6.5 A.4.6.6 A.4.6.7 A.4.6.8 A.4.6.9 A.4.6.10 A.4.6.11 A.4.6.12 A.4.6.13 A.4.6.14 A.4.6.15 A.4.6.16 A.4.6.17 A.4.6.18 A.4.6.19 A.4.6.20 ActivateSewiceFiltering . 18 ActivityTest 20 ApplyChargingReport 22 AssistRequestlnstructions . 23 CallGap
10、 . 24 CalllnformationReport . 26 CalIInformationRequest . 27 Cancel . 28 Collectlnformation . 29 Connect . 30 ConnectToResource . 31 Continue 32 DisconnectForwardConnection . 33 EstablishTemporaryConnection 33 EventNotificationCharging . 34 EventReporiBCSM 35 Applycharging . 21 FurnishCharginglnform
11、ation 36 InitialDP . 37 In i tiatecal IAttempt . 38 ETSI ETSt300 374-2 96 3400855 0085075 987 Page 4 ETS 300 374-2: February 1996 A.4.6.21 PlayAnnouncement . 40 A.4.6.22 P romptAndCollect Userlnformation . 42 A.4.6.23 ReleaseCall 44 A.4.6.24 RequestNotificationChargingEvent . 45 A.4.6.25 RequestRepo
12、rtBCSMEvent 46 A.4.6.26 ResetTimer . 47 A.4.6.27 SendChargingInformation . 48 A.4.6.28 ServiceFiltering Response . 49 A.4.7 Timers . 50 A.4.8 Range constants . 52 A.4.6.29 SpecializedResourceReport . 49 History . 55 ETSI ETSx300 374-2 96 = 3400855 008107b 813 Page 5 ETS 300 374-2: February 1996 Fore
13、word This European Telecommunication Standard (ETS) has been produced by the Signalling Protocols and Switching (SPS) Technical Committee of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). This ETS is part 2 of a multi-part standard covering the Capability Set 1 (CS1) core Intelligent Ne
14、twork Protocol (INAP) as described below: Part 1: “Protocol specification“; Part 2: “Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma specif ication“; Part 3: “Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS Part 4: “Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation extra Inform
15、ation for Testing (P IXIT) proforma specif ication“; Part 5: “Protocol specification for the SCF-SDF interface“; Part 6: “PICS proforma specification for the SCF-SDF interface“. NOTE: Further parts of this standard may be identified later. Transposition dates Date of adoption of this ETC: Date of la
16、test announcement of this ETS (doa): 1 March 1996 31 May 1996 Date of latest publication of new National Standard or endorsement of this ETS (dop/e): 30 November 1996 Date of withdrawal of any conflicting National Standard (dow): 30 November 1996 ETSI ETS*300 374-2 9b = 3400855 0081077 75T Page 6 ET
17、S 300 374-2: February 1996 Blank page ETSI ETS*300 374-2 76 3400855 0081078 676 Page 7 ETC 300 374-2: February 1996 - 1 Scope This second part of ETS 300 374 provides the Implementation Conformance Statement (ICs) proforma for the core -Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP) of Intelligent-
18、Network (IN) Capability Set 1 (CS1) defined in ETS 300 374-1 l in compliance with the relevant requirements, and in accordance with the relevant guidance given in ISOAEC 9646-7 3. 2 Normative references This ETS incorporates by dated and undated reference, provisions from other publications. These n
19、ormative references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications apply to this ETS only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the
20、latest edition of the publication referred to applies. PI 31 ETS 300 374-1 (1 994): “InteIligent Network (IN); Intelligent Network Capability Set 1 (CS1); Core Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP); Part 1: Protocol specification“. ISOAEC 9646-1 : “Information technology - Open systems int
21、erconnection - Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 1 : General concepts“. ISOAEC 9646-7: “Information technology - Open systems interconnection - Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 7: implementation Conformance Statements“. 3 Def i n it ions and abbreviations 3.1 D
22、efinitions For the purposes of this ETS, the following definitions apply: - - terms defined in ETS 300 374-1 l; terms defined in ISOAEC 9646-1 2 and in ISO/IEC 9646-7 3. In particular, the following terms defined in ISO/IEC 9646-1 2 apply: Implementation Conformance Statement (ICs): A statement made
23、 by the supplier of an implementation or system claimed to conform to a given specification, stating which capabilities have been implemented. The ICs can take several forms: protocol ICs, profile ICs, profile specific ICs, information object ICs, etc. ICs proforma: A document, in the form of a ques
24、tionnaire, which when completed for an implementation or system becomes an ICs. Protocol ICs (PICS): An ICs for an implementation or system claimed to conform to a given protocol specification. ETSI ETS*3OO 374-2 9b = 3400855 008107q 522 m Page 8 ETS 300 374-2: February 1996 3.2 Abbreviations For th
25、e purposes of this ETS, the following abbreviations apply- AC ASE BCSM cs1 ICs IN INAP IP I UT PDU PICS SCF SCP SCS SRF SSF SSP SUT 4 Conformance Application Context Application Service Element Basic Call State Model Capability Set 1 implementation Conformance Statement Intelligent Network Intellige
26、nt Network Application Protocol Intelligent Peripheral Implementation Under Test Protocol Data Unit Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement Service Control Function Service Control Point System Conformance Statement Specialized Resource Function Service Switching Function Service Switching Poi
27、nt System Under Test If it claims to conform to this ETS, the actual PICS proforma to be filled in by a supplier shall be technically equivalent to the text of the PICS proforma given in annex A, and shall preserve the numberinghaming and ordering of the proforma items. A PICS which conforms to this
28、 ETS shall be a conforming PICS proforma completed in accordance with the instructions for completion given in clause A.1. Page 9 ETS 300 374-2: February 1996 Annex A (normative): PICS proforma for core INAP CS1 Notwithstanding the provisions of the copyright clause related to the text d this ETS, E
29、TSI grants that users of this ETS may freely reproduce the PICS proforma in this annex so that it can be used for its intended DurDoses and may further Dublich the ComDieted PICS. A.l Guidance for completing the PICS proforma A.l.l Purpose and structure The purpose of this PICS proforma is to provid
30、e a mechanism whereby a supplier of an implementation of the requirements defined in ETC 300 374-1 l may provide information about the implementation in a standardized manner. The PICS proforma is subdivided into clauses for the following categories of information: - - identification of the implemen
31、tation; - identification of the protocol; - PICS proforma tables; - global statement of conformance; - physical entities; - external interfaces; - application contexts; - operations; - arguments, results and errors; - range constants. - instructions for completing the ICs proforma; ti mers; A.1.2 Sy
32、mbols, abbreviations and terms The PICS proforma contained in this annex is comprised of information in tabular form in accordance with the guidelines presented in ISO/IEC 9646-7 3. Item column The item column contains a number which identifies the item in the table. Item description column The item
33、 description column describes in free text each respective item (e.g. parameters, timers, etc.). It implicitly means “is supported by the implementation?“. Status column The following notations, defined in ISO/IEC 9646-7 3, are used for the status column: m mandatory -the capability is required to b
34、e supported. O optional - the capability may be supported or not. nia not applicable - in the given context, the capability cannot be used. X 0.i prohibited (excluded) - there is a requirement not to use this capability in the given context. qualified optional - for mutually exclusive or selectable
35、options from a set. “i“ is an integer which identifies an unique group of related optional items and the logic of their selection which is defined immediately following the table. ci conditional - the requirement on the capability (“m“, “o“, “x“ or ln/a“) depends on the support of other optional or
36、conditional items. “i“ is an integer identifying an unique conditional status expression which is defined immediately following the table. For nested conditional expressions, the syntax “IF-. THEN (IF . THEN . ELSE .) ELSE .I is used to avoid ambiguities. - Reference column Entries in the reference
37、column refer to subclauses of ETS 300 374-1 l, except where explicitly stated otherwise. -3 NOTE: A reference indicates only the location of the most essential information about an item. All additional requirements contained in ETS 300 374-1 l have also to be taken into account when making a stateme
38、nt about the conformance of that particular item. Support column The support column shall be filled in by the supplier of the implementation. The following common notations, defined in ISO/IEC 9646-7 3, are used for the support column: Y ory supported by the implementation Norn not supported by the
39、implementation N/A, n/a or - no answer required (allowed only if the status is n/a, directly or after evaluation of a conditional status) NOTE: As stated in ISO/IEC 9646-7 3, support for a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) requires the ability to parse all valid parameters of that PDU. Supporting a PDU while
40、 having no ability to parse a valid parameter is non-conformant. Support for a parameter on a PDU means that the semantics of that parameter are supported. If this PICS proforma is completed in order to describe a multiple-profile support in a system, it is necessary to be able to answer that a capa
41、bility is supported for one profile and not supported for another. In that case, the supplier shall enter the unique reference to a conditional expression, preceded by I?“ (e.g. ?3). This expression shall be given in the cell provided at the bottom of the table. It uses predicates defined in the Sys
42、tem Conformance Statement (SCS), each of which refers to a single profile and which takes the value TRUE if and only if that profile is to be used. EXAMPLE: ?3: IF prof1 THEN Y ELSE N It is further possible to provide comments to an answer at the bottom of each table. Values allowed column The value
43、s allowed column contains the values or the ranges of values allowed. Values supported column The values supported column shall be filled in by the supplier of the implementation. In this column, the values or the ranges of values supported by the implementation shall be indicated. ETSI ETSx300 374-
44、2 96 3400855 0081082 017 = Page 11 ETS 300 374-2: February 1996 Protocol item Mandatory Ontional References to items Invoke request invoke indication m m O m For each possible item answer (answer in the support column) within the PICS proforma exists a unique reference; used, for example, in the con
45、ditional expressions. It is defined as the table identifier, followed by a solidus character “/“, followed by the item number in the table. If there is more than one support column in a table, the columns shall be discriminated by letters (a, b, etc.), respectively. EXAMPLE 1: A34 is the reference t
46、o the answer of item 4 in table 5 of annex A. EXAMPLE 2: A.6/3b is the reference to the second answer (Le. in the second support column) of item 3 in table 6 of annex A. A.1.3 instructions for completing the PICS proforma The supplier of the implementation shall complete the PICS proforma in each of
47、 the spaces provided using the notation described in subclause A.1.2. Optional items in ETS 300 374-1 l are dealt with as follows: - mandatory protocol items need to be supported by both operation invokers and responders; - optional protocol items are optional for operation invokers, but mandatory f
48、or operation responders; - network specific options are optional for both operation invokers and responders. Table A.l gives an overview of this rule tabular form. Table A.l As a general rule, the ASN.l “CHOICE“ construct is indicated in the parameter tables: - as an option (0.x) in the “Invoke requ
49、est“ column; - as mandatory in the “Invoke indication“ column. When a (ASN.l) parameter which contains a “SIZE“ field is not explicitly constrained in a table, then the complete size field has to be supported. ETSI ETS*300 374-2 96 3400855 0081083 T53 Page 12 ETS 300 374-2: February 1996 A.2 Identification of the implementation Identification of the Implementation Under Test (IUT) and the system in which it resides (the System Under Test (SUT) should be filled in so as to provide as much detail as possible rega
