1、 ETSI TR 102 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12)Technical Report Electromagnetic Compatibility and Radio Spectrum Matters (ERM);European Air Traffic Management Network (EATMN);Part 2: Work programmeETSI ETSI TR 102 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12) 2 Reference DTR/ERM-TG25-025-2 Keywords ATM, procedure, protocol, system ET
2、SI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association but non lucratif enregistre la Sous-Prfecture de Grasse (06) N 7803/88 Important notice Individual copies of the present document can be
3、downloaded from: http:/www.etsi.org The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print. In any case of existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions, the reference version is the Portable Document Format (PDF). In case of dispute, the refe
4、rence shall be the printing on ETSI printers of the PDF version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents
5、 is available at http:/portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: http:/portal.etsi.org/chaircor/ETSI_support.asp Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permissi
6、on. The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media. European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2005. All rights reserved. DECTTM, PLUGTESTSTM and UMTSTM are Trade Marks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members. TIPHONTMand the TIPHON logo are Trade Mark
7、s currently being registered by ETSI for the benefit of its Members. 3GPPTM is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners. ETSI ETSI TR 102 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12) 3 Contents Intellectual Property Rights5 Foreword.5 Introduction 5 1 Scope 6
8、2 References 7 3 Definitions and abbreviations.7 3.1 Definitions7 3.2 Abbreviations .7 4 Work programme .8 4.1 Introduction 8 4.2 Proposals, scopes and schedules.8 5 CS development process 8 5.1 Benchmarks from other industries8 5.1.1 Introduction.8 5.1.2 ETSI9 5.1.3 CEN/CENELEC .11 5.1.4 ECSS.11 5.
9、1.5 Euro-Interlocking12 5.1.6 Void 12 5.1.7 EUROCAE .12 5.1.8 Comparison.12 5.2 Standardization process for CSs.13 5.2.1 Initiation13 5.2.2 Production.13 5.2.2.1 Conversion process .13 5.2.2.2 Consolidation process .14 5.2.2.3 “From Scratch“ process15 5.3 Void15 5.3.1 Void 15 5.3.2 Void 15 5.3.3 Con
10、sultation15 5.3.4 Approval .15 5.3.5 Publication 16 5.3.6 Scope of the standardization work16 5.4 Timescale estimates17 6.0 The proposed realization of the work programme .18 6.1 Introduction 18 6.1.1 CS grouping18 6.1.2 Maturity assessment18 6.1.3 Expertise assessment.19 6.1.4 Priority assessment .
11、19 6.1.5 Effort assessment 19 6.1.6 Timescale assessment .19 6.2 Group I community specifications .20 6.2.1 Maturity 20 6.2.2 Expertise required.21 6.2.2.1 Specialist expertise22 6.2.3 Priorities22 6.2.4 Efforts required.23 6.2.5 Timescales 24 6.3 Group II candidate community specifications24 6.3.1
12、Maturity 25 ETSI ETSI TR 102 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12) 4 6.3.2 Expertise required.26 6.3.2.1 Specialist expertise27 6.3.3 Void 27 6.3.4 Efforts required.28 6.3.5 Timescale29 6.4 Group III candidate community specifications.29 6.4.1 Maturity 30 6.4.2 Expertise required.31 6.4.2.1 Specialist expertise31
13、6.4.3 Efforts required.32 6.4.4 Timescale32 6.5 Group IV, existing systems and procedures needing standardization 33 7.0 Managing the resources34 7.1 Work force required .34 7.2 Resource allocation 35 7.3 A proposed solution to expedite urgently needed standardization processes .35 7.3.1 Normal draf
14、ting and approval processes.35 7.3.2 Creating a project35 7.4 General resource management .36 8.0 Proposed work plan36 8.1 Planning tool 36 8.2 Planning overviews 36 8.2.1 Overview of all four groups37 8.2.2 Candidate CSs of Group I.38 8.2.3 Candidate CSs of Group II39 8.2.4 CSs of Group III .41 8.2
15、.5 CSs of Group IV .42 Annex A: The ETSI Standardization process43 A.1 The Standards Making Process (SMP).43 A.1.1 Process overview43 A.1.2 Inception.43 A.1.3 Conception .44 A.1.4 Drafting 44 A.1.5 Adoption.44 A.1.5.1 EN - One-step Approval Procedure (OAP).45 A.1.5.2 EN - Two-step Approval Procedure
16、 (TAP) 45 A.1.6 Combined processes.45 History 46 ETSI ETSI TR 102 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12) 5 Intellectual Property Rights IPRs essential or potentially essential to the present document may have been declared to ETSI. The information pertaining to these essential IPRs, if any, is publicly available fo
17、r ETSI members and non-members, and can be found in ETSI SR 000 314: “Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs); Essential, or potentially Essential, IPRs notified to ETSI in respect of ETSI standards“, which is available from the ETSI Secretariat. Latest updates are available on the ETSI Web server (http
18、:/webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp). Pursuant to the ETSI IPR Policy, no investigation, including IPR searches, has been carried out by ETSI. No guarantee can be given as to the existence of other IPRs not referenced in ETSI SR 000 314 (or the updates on the ETSI Web server) which are, or may be, or may
19、 become, essential to the present document. Foreword This Technical Report (TR) has been produced by ETSI Technical Committee Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM). The present document is part 2 of a multi-part deliverable covering the Electromagnetic Compatibility and Radi
20、o Spectrum Matters (ERM); European Air Traffic Management Network (EATMN), as identified below: Part 1: “Inventory of existing standards and specifications in progress“; Part 2: “Work programme“. Introduction The Terms of Reference, TOR of the special task force STF 293 define the second step of its
21、 task as follows: This task is to develop proposals for the necessary work items identified as requiring ENs to implement mandate M/354. This programme should also identify scopes and proposed time schedules for the work that can be agreed by the managing body as being realistic and aligned with wor
22、k going on in other bodies that is to be referenced. ETSI ETSI TR 102 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12) 6 1 Scope The present document is based on the findings of the previous task of STF 293. These have been laid down in TR 102 395-1 2. For the work items outlined in above reference, which are potential Commu
23、nity Standards (CSs) requiring European Norms (ENs) to implement Mandate M/354, the present document will develop proposals based on the urgency of need and maturity of the candidate CSs as was previously defined. In a next step the present document will identify the scope of work for the candidate
24、CSs and propose time schedules for the development of standards. Estimates on the efforts required for the individual candidate CSs will be based on the documented accomplishments achieved by various expert bodies (mainly ICAO, EUROCAE and EUROCONTROL) and also consider the status of work which is c
25、urrently ongoing. Last not least the present document will include Gantt diagrams outlining a sequence of activities for carrying out the standardization processes based on the preliminary priorities appointed by the stakeholders. To this end it will outline the typical ETSI standardization process
26、with its predefined schedules as this is one major parameter delimiting the potential schedules (see also annex A). The other most critical constraint which will limit the amount of realistically achievable results is the availability of the essential experts. Therefore, the document will make an at
27、tempt to indicate which specific expertise will be required to attain the scope and the expected results of each candidate CSs. Based on the above it will provide best practise estimates on the efforts required based on experience gained with similar standardization matters. It will also make an eff
28、ort to “de-conflict“ the working processes in such a way that the resources (limited number of experts) will not be overloaded but at the same time trying to ensure that the results will be available when needed. The aim of this Work Programme is to facilitate the process of the selection of the can
29、didate CSs which will actually enter the standardization process. This effort rests with the SES Programme authorities and comprises setting the priorities, determining the schedules and resources for the realization. ETSI ETSI TR 102 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12) 7 2 References For the purposes of this Te
30、chnical Report (TR), the following references apply: 1 Terms of Reference for Specialist Task Force 293 (PJ) ERM TG25 - Mandate M/354 European Air Traffic Management Network (EATMN) Phase 1: Inventory of European specification work in progress. 2 ETSI TR 102 395-1: “Electromagnetic Compatibility and
31、 Radio Spectrum Matters (ERM); European Air Traffic Management Network (EATMN); Part 1: Inventory of existing standards and specifications in progress“. 3 Definitions and abbreviations 3.1 Definitions European Norm (EN): document that has been ratified by one of the 3 European Standards Organization
32、s, CEN, CENELEC or ETSI NOTE: They are designed and created by all interested parties through a transparent, consensual process. specification: document that defines design or performance requirements and methods of measurements that may be used by a manufacturer(s) or other related industry groups
33、to achieve a measure of performance or commonality NOTE: The document may be solely the responsibility of a manufacturer, an agreement with a customer or a collaboration between industrial members. The document may also be commercially available. standard: document produced under the remit of a nati
34、onal or international standards institute intended to be adopted nationally as the definitive test, performance and assessment requirement for products in relation to specific applications or environments that have national or international significance NOTE: The document must be agreed by relevant
35、industry interested parties and organizations as part of a public consultation exercise and accepted by the National Standards Organization. To attain international standard status the document must be accepted by the government appointed Nation Standards Organizations and be publicly available. 3.2
36、 Abbreviations For the purposes of the present document, the following abbreviations apply: ATC Air Traffic Control ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management ATM Air Traffic Management ATS Air Traffic Services C-CS Candidate Community Specification CEN Committee for European Normalisation CENELEC Committee f
37、or European Normalisation in the Electro-technical Field CS Community Specification EC European CommissionECSS European Cooperation for Space Standardization EN European Norm ER Essential Requirement ESA European Space Agency ETSI European Telecommunications Standardisation Institute EU European Uni
38、on EUROCAE EURopean Organisation for Civil Aviation Electronics ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation ETSI ETSI TR 102 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12) 8 ICB Industry Consultative Board IR Implementing Rule OMG Object Management Group SES Single European Sky SSC Single Sky Committee STF Special Task
39、Force (ETSI) TOR Terms Of Reference TWP Technical Working Procedures WG Working Group 4 Work programme 4.1 Introduction The Work Programme is the second deliverable to be produced under Mandate M/354. The Terms of Reference, TOR, of the special task force STF 293 define the second step of its task a
40、s follows: “This task is to develop proposals for the necessary work items candidate CSs identified as requiring ENs to implement mandate M/354. This programme should also identify scopes and proposed time schedules for the work that can be agreed by the managing body as being realistic and aligned
41、with work going on in other bodies that is to be referenced.“ 4.2 Proposals, scopes and schedules We understand the first sentence to task STF 293 to devise an overview of the total efforts required provided all candidate CSs would get approved. We, therefore have outlined our findings and estimates
42、 in a draft project plan for all candidate CSs (“work items“) requiring the production of ENs. As the second sentence of the TOR demands, this plan shall identify the scopes of what needs to be performed, the resulting schedules which need to be realistically attainable and make reference to work wh
43、ich is ongoing in other bodies where the required know-how exists and the resources can be found. All these needs can be easier fulfilled by presenting the SES standardization process in form of a large project using the appropriate tools for project management. Project Management describes the proc
44、esses of planning, organizing, and administering of work items and resources which are needed to attain a defined goal within the constraints of time, resources and cost. The “project of SES related standardization“ shows typical activities, which comprise the breaking down of the work into a struct
45、ure of easily controllable packages, the calculation of the related work efforts, the allocation of resources and the communication with the team and stakeholders. Once the work is in progress the planning tool will be a great help in controlling and co-ordinating the activities, keeping the stakeho
46、lders informed by keeping the project plan up to date. 5 CS development process 5.1 Benchmarks from other industries 5.1.1 Introduction We have reviewed the availability of relevant information from other industries and have found two areas of direct interest. Firstly, however, it is useful to disco
47、unt other areas where we have been unable at this stage to find helpful information. The key to relevance is published information on timescales achieved or planned for EN or standards development on similar activities to those required for CS development for the Single European Sky. ETSI ETSI TR 10
48、2 395-2 V1.1.1 (2005-12) 9 There may be information available on the development of large-scale cross-industry standards developments of the type produced for ISO. We have not pursued this because we believe that such developments would not be as directed as our expectations for SES. Also, these sta
49、ndards are known to take a long time and involve extensive consultation. Information on costs and timescales is therefore unlikely to provide a useful benchmark for this exercise. We have investigated the availability of information from ICAO and the Object Management Group (OMG). In neither case were we able to identify useful benchmarks. Such information may be available, but we were unable to find it. The most relevant information which we have found is from the European Space Agency (ESA) and an organization entitled European Cooperation for Space Standardisation
