1、 ETSI TR 1Universal Mobile TelDynamically reconfiguriUser Equipment (UE) rewhen desired Q(3GPP TR 25.9TECHNICAL REPORT 125 906 V13.0.0 (2016elecommunications System (uring a Frequency Division Du) receiver to reduce power conQuality of Service (QoS) is m.906 version 13.0.0 Release 1316-01) (UMTS); D
2、uplex (FDD) o sumption met 13) ETSI ETSI TR 125 906 V13.0.0 (2016-01)13GPP TR 25.906 version 13.0.0 Release 13Reference RTR/TSGR-0425906vd00 Keywords UMTS ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N 348 623 562 00017 - NA
3、F 742 C Association but non lucratif enregistre la Sous-Prfecture de Grasse (06) N 7803/88 Important notice The present document can be downloaded from: http:/www.etsi.org/standards-search The present document may be made available in electronic versions and/or in print. The content of any electroni
4、c and/or print versions of the present document shall not be modified without the prior written authorization of ETSI. In case of any existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions and/or in print, the only prevailing document is the print of the Portable Document Format (PDF) ve
5、rsion kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at http:/portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.as
6、p If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: https:/portal.etsi.org/People/CommiteeSupportStaff.aspx Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying
7、and microfilm except as authorized by written permission of ETSI. The content of the PDF version shall not be modified without the written authorization of ETSI. The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media. European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2016. All
8、 rights reserved. DECTTM, PLUGTESTSTM, UMTSTMand the ETSI logo are Trade Marks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members. 3GPPTM and LTE are Trade Marks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners. GSM and the GSM logo are Trade Marks registered
9、and owned by the GSM Association. ETSI ETSI TR 125 906 V13.0.0 (2016-01)23GPP TR 25.906 version 13.0.0 Release 13Intellectual Property Rights IPRs essential or potentially essential to the present document may have been declared to ETSI. The information pertaining to these essential IPRs, if any, is
10、 publicly available for ETSI members and non-members, and can be found in ETSI SR 000 314: “Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs); Essential, or potentially Essential, IPRs notified to ETSI in respect of ETSI standards“, which is available from the ETSI Secretariat. Latest updates are available on the
11、 ETSI Web server (https:/ipr.etsi.org/). Pursuant to the ETSI IPR Policy, no investigation, including IPR searches, has been carried out by ETSI. No guarantee can be given as to the existence of other IPRs not referenced in ETSI SR 000 314 (or the updates on the ETSI Web server) which are, or may be
12、, or may become, essential to the present document. Foreword This Technical Report (TR) has been produced by ETSI 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). The present document may refer to technical specifications or reports using their 3GPP identities, UMTS identities or GSM identities. These sho
13、uld be interpreted as being references to the corresponding ETSI deliverables. The cross reference between GSM, UMTS, 3GPP and ETSI identities can be found under http:/webapp.etsi.org/key/queryform.asp. Modal verbs terminology In the present document “shall“, “shall not“, “should“, “should not“, “ma
14、y“, “need not“, “will“, “will not“, “can“ and “cannot“ are to be interpreted as described in clause 3.2 of the ETSI Drafting Rules (Verbal forms for the expression of provisions). “must“ and “must not“ are NOT allowed in ETSI deliverables except when used in direct citation. ETSI ETSI TR 125 906 V13
15、.0.0 (2016-01)33GPP TR 25.906 version 13.0.0 Release 13Contents Intellectual Property Rights 2g3Foreword . 2g3Modal verbs terminology 2g3Foreword . 4g31 Scope 5g32 References 5g33 Definitions and abbreviations . 5g33.1 Definitions 5g33.2 Abbreviations . 6g34 Techniques considered for dynamically rec
16、onfiguring a FDD UE receiver to reduce power consumption when desired Quality of Service is met 6g34.1 Scenarios in which individual UE receiver performance reduction has no, or minimal impact to the overall UTRAN system level performance or user experience 6g34.1.1 MBMS transmission . 6g34.2 Scenar
17、ios in which individual UE receiver performance reduction may impact to the overall UTRAN system level performance or user experience . 6g34.2.1 HSDPA transmission 6g34.2.2 Transmission on dedicated channels . 7g34.2.3 E-DCH related downlink transmissions 7g35 MBMS Link level simulation scenarios, a
18、ssumptions and results . 7g35.1 Link level scenarios based on adaptive thresholds . 7g35.1.1 Switching algorithm method 1 . 8g35.1.2 Switching algorithm method 2 8g35.1.3 Further simulation parameters 9g35.1.4 Results 10g35.1.4.1 Panasonic simulation results . 10g35.1.4.2 Nokia simulation results 14
19、g36 MBMS system level simulation scenarios, assumptions and results 17g36.1 System level scenarios 17g36.2 System level results and conclusions 17g37 Non-MBMS link level simulation scenarios, assumptions and result 23g37.0 General . 23g37.1 Link level scenarios for dedicated channels . 23g37.1.1 Swi
20、tching algorithm for DCH . 23g37.1.2 Simulation conditions . 24g37.1.3 Simulation results . 24g37.1.3.1 Static channel conditions . 24g37.1.3.2 Case1 channel conditions 25g37.2 Link level scenarios for HSDPA DL channels . 27g37.2.1 Switching method algorithm for HSDPA . 27g37.2.2 Simulation conditio
21、ns . 28g37.2.3 Simulation results . 28g38 Non-MBMS system level simulation scenarios, assumptions and result . 29g38.0 General . 29g38.1 Network simulation assumptions . 29g38.2 Network simulation results . 30g39 Conclusions 31g3Annex A: Change history 32g3History 33g3ETSI ETSI TR 125 906 V13.0.0 (2
22、016-01)43GPP TR 25.906 version 13.0.0 Release 13Foreword This Technical Report has been produced by the 3rdGeneration Partnership Project (3GPP). The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the
23、 contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows: Version x.y.z where: x the first digit: 1 presented to TSG for information; 2 presented to TSG for approval; 3 or greater indicates TSG approv
24、ed document under change control. Y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc. z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document. ETSI ETSI TR 125 906 V13.0.0 (2016-01)53GPP T
25、R 25.906 version 13.0.0 Release 131 Scope The objectives of this study are: a) RAN4 to identify whether there are situations in which individual UE receiver performance reduction has no, or minimal impact to the overall UTRAN system level performance or user experience. RAN4 should also identify sce
26、narios in which UE receiver performance reduction cannot safely be performed. b) RAN4 to investigate scenarios for the identified situations where the UE could reduce its performance. The purpose of these scenarios is to ensure that UE performance is not degraded when conditions are not suitable. c)
27、 RAN2 to investigate additional signalling which may be beneficial to support Ues in the decision making process for reducing their performance, for example quality thresholds which assist the UE in determining that conditions are suitable to reduce receiver performance. 2 References The following d
28、ocuments contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document. References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific. For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply. For
29、 a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same Release as the present document. 1 3GPP TR 21.905: Vocabulary for 3GPP Specif
30、ications. 2 3GPP TS 25.214: Physical layer procedures (FDD). 3 3GPP TS 25.101: UE Radio transmission and reception (FDD). 4 3GPP TS 25.331: RRC Protocol Specification. 3 Definitions and abbreviations 3.1 Definitions For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in TR 21.9
31、05 1 and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in TR 21.905 1. (no further terms defined) ETSI ETSI TR 125 906 V13.0.0 (2016-01)63GPP TR 25.906 version 13.0.0 Release 133.2 Abbreviations For the purposes of the pres
32、ent document, the abbreviations given in TR 21.905 1 and the following apply. An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in TR 21.905 1. (no further abbreviations defined) 4 Techniques considered for dynamically reconfigurin
33、g a FDD UE receiver to reduce power consumption when desired Quality of Service is met 4.1 Scenarios in which individual UE receiver performance reduction has no, or minimal impact to the overall UTRAN system level performance or user experience 4.1.1 MBMS transmission It is considered acceptable fr
34、om the system perspective to reduce or switch off UE receiver enhancements in good radio conditions when receiving point to multi-point MBMS data (mapped on S-CCPCH). This is because such transmission takes place with fixed transmission power level and so does not provide any opportunity to reduce t
35、ransmission power when UE is operating in good conditions. When the same UE moves into relatively worse radio conditions the enhanced receiver should be fully enabled, to provide the better MBMS service reception. From a user experience perspective, the important aspect is that UE attempts to mainta
36、in a certain downlink quality target corresponding to enhanced receiver performance requirements. This means that generally a UE in good radio conditions has the opportunity to reduce its receiver power consumption by reducing or turning off its receiver enhancements. However, in order to ensure cor
37、rect UE behaviour, the initial assessment indicates that network should provide the desired quality target, which the UE should then autonomously attempt to meet or exceed when enhanced receiver is off. Determining “good radio condition“ based on the network signalled quality target should be depend
38、ent on UE implementation, but additional requirements scenarios may need to be developed by RAN4 to ensure that Ues are able to meet or exceed the desired quality target in different radio conditions and there is consistent behaviour between different UE implementations. Unlike dedicated channels, w
39、here the quality target is signalled to the UE for the purpose of outer loop power control, no quality targets are currently signalled for MBMS channels. Based on the analysis in RAN4 the transport channel level BLER or SDU error rate is found to be a good measure to determine MBMS quality (e.g. MTC
40、H BLER or SDU error rate) and the feasibility of additional signalling to create targets for such measures could be further investigated by RAN2. It should also be noted that the UE may either exceed the MTCH quality target, or be unable to meet the MTCH quality target regardless of whether receiver
41、 enhancements are enabled, so the definition of quality target is rather different from the currently defined outer loop power control concept of a quality target. Due to the lack of signalling of quality target for p-t-m MBMS channels, some level of standardization is needed to assist UE to do rece
42、iver reconfiguration in p-t-m MBMS scenario. This could include specifying the signalling of quality target and some test cases to ensure that the UE attempts to follow the network signalled quality target. 4.2 Scenarios in which individual UE receiver performance reduction may impact to the overall
43、 UTRAN system level performance or user experience 4.2.1 HSDPA transmission One main benefit of HSDPA is the ability to transmitted high data rate in a very short period of time by exploiting the good radio conditions. This enhances the user bit rate as well as the system throughput. Secondly, the p
44、ower control on HSDPA channels (HS-DSCH and HS-SCCH) is implementation dependent. There is also an advantage to be gained in ETSI ETSI TR 125 906 V13.0.0 (2016-01)73GPP TR 25.906 version 13.0.0 Release 13terms of downlink transmit power reduction by using an enhanced receiver. Thus it is generally b
45、eneficial for the network that UE fully uses its enhanced receiver to measure CQI and for the demodulation of HSDPA downlink channels Furthermore, no procedure is required to be standardized to support any possible receiver reconfiguration in HSDPA scenario. The standard specifies the CQI reporting
46、range, which UE should be capable of reporting 2. The standard also specifies the enhanced receiver requirements, which are required to be fulfilled by the UE supporting enhanced receiver 3. While fulfilling these requirements any possible receiver reconfiguration could be performed autonomously by
47、the UE without specifying any procedure in 3GPP specification. Potential HSDPA reception scenarios where it might be desirable to utilize UE dynamic receiver reconfiguration are explored in section 7.2. 4.2.2 Transmission on dedicated channels This refers to scenario, where dedicated channels such a
48、s DCH and F-DPCH are in operation. In these scenarios the closed loop power control automatically adjusts the downlink transmitted power in response to the variation in the downlink measured quality at the UE. Thus, a continuously active enhanced receiver on dedicated channels will enable the power
49、control to reduce the downlink transmitted power compared to the scenario where enhanced receiver is dynamically switched on and switched off. The saved downlink power can be used to accommodate more users in the cell, extend the cell coverage or to increase the data rate transmission of the on going cells if needed. Furthermore, no procedure is required to be standardized to support any possible receiver reconfiguration in DCH scenarios. The network already signals the quality target (BLER for DCH and TPC command error rate for F-DPCH) 4.
