1、AMSC 9120 FSC SESS INCH-POUND MIL-STD-3034 21 January 2011 SUPERSEDING MIL-P-24534A w/ Amendment 1 (IN PART) 18 October 2010 See 6.4DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) PROCESS Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without lice
2、nse from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-3034 ii FOREWORD 1. This standard is approved for use by the Department of the Navy and is available for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense. 2. Comments, suggestions, or questions on this document should be addressed to: Commander, Naval Sea Sys
3、tems Command, ATTN: SEA 05S, 1333 Isaac Hull Avenue, SE, Stop 5160, Washington Navy Yard DC 20376-5160 or emailed to CommandStandardsnavy.mil, with the subject line “Document Comment”. Since contact information can change, you may want to verify the currency of this address information using the ASS
4、IST Online database at https:/assist.daps.dla.mil. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-3034 iiiCONTENTS PARAGRAPH PAGE 1. SCOPE 1 1.1 Scope . 1 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 1 2.1 General 1 2.2 Government documents 1 2.2.1 Specification
5、s, standards, and handbooks 1 2.2.2 Other Government documents, drawings, and publications . 2 2.3 Order of precedence 2 3. DEFINITIONS . 3 3.1 Age-reliability characteristics . 3 3.2 Conditional probability of failure 3 3.3 Consequence . 3 3.3.1 Economic/mission consequence . 3 3.3.2 Failure conseq
6、uence . 3 3.3.3 Hidden failure consequence . 3 3.3.4 Safety consequence 3 3.4 Default answer 3 3.5 Development . 3 3.6 Item . 3 3.6.1 End item . 3 3.6.2 Functionally significant item 3 3.7 Fail-safe system 3 3.8 Failure . 3 3.8.1 Functional failure . 3 3.8.2 Potential failure 3 3.9 Failure effects .
7、 3 3.10 Failure mode . 3 3.10.1 Dominant failure mode . 3 3.11 Function 3 3.11.1 Active function . 3 3.11.2 Evident function . 3 3.11.3 Hidden function 4 3.11.4 Passive function . 4 3.12 Indenture level 4 3.13 Maintenance 4 3.13.1 Corrective maintenance 4 3.13.2 Inactive equipment maintenance (IEM)
8、. 4 3.13.3 Lay-up maintenance . 4 3.13.4 Planned maintenance 4 3.13.5 Preventive maintenance 4 3.13.6 Reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) . 4 3.13.7 Situational maintenance . 4 3.13.8 Start-up maintenance 4 3.13.9 Unscheduled maintenance 4 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networkin
9、g permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-3034 ivPARAGRAPH PAGE 3.14 Maintenance coordinating activity (MCA) . 4 3.15 Maintenance development activity (MDA) . 4 3.17 Periodicity . 4 3.18 Redundancy 4 3.19 Reliability 4 3.20 Task . 4 3.20.1 Applicable task . 4 3.20.2 Condition-directed (CD) ta
10、sk . 5 3.20.3 Discard task 5 3.20.4 Effective task 5 3.20.5 Failure-finding task 5 3.20.6 Lubrication task 5 3.20.7 Servicing task . 5 3.20.8 Time-directed (TD) task. 5 4. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5 4.1 Recycled, recovered, or environmentally preferable materials . 5 4.2 Security classification . 5 4.3
11、Certification requirements . 5 4.4 Maintenance requirements 5 5. DETAILED REQUIREMENTS . 7 5.1 RCM process . 7 5.1.1 RCM Phase 1 System partitioning and functional block diagram . 7 5.1.1.1 Level of development 11 5.1.1.2 Documenting analysis boundaries and subdivisions 11 5.1.1.3 Functional block d
12、iagrams . 12 5.1.1.4 Completing MSSI data collection 12 5.1.1.5 Submission to MCA 12 5.1.2 Phase 2 Functional failure analysis (FFA) 13 5.1.2.1 Purpose of the FFA 13 5.1.2.2 FFA preparation guidelines . 13 5.1.2.2.1 FFA information gathering . 13 5.1.2.2.2 Functions . 14 5.1.2.2.3 Interfaces . 14 5.
13、1.2.2.4 Functional failures 14 5.1.2.2.5 Documenting the functional failure analysis . 14 5.1.3 Phase 3 Additional functionally significant item selection (AFSI) . 16 5.1.3.1 Beginning development at Phase 3. . 16 5.1.3.2 Completing the AFSI selection form . 16 5.1.3.3 Completing the FSI index form
14、. 17 5.1.4 Phase 4 Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) 18 5.1.4.1 Failure modes 18 5.1.4.2 Failure effects 18 5.1.4.3 Dominant failures 18 5.1.4.4 Documenting the failure modes and effects analysis . 19 5.1.5 Phase 5 Decision logic tree analysis (LTA) 19 5.1.5.1 RCM decision logic tree questio
15、n 1 . 20 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-3034 vPARAGRAPH PAGE 5.1.5.2 RCM decision logic tree question 2 . 21 5.1.5.3 RCM decision logic tree question 3 . 21 5.1.5.4 RCM decision logic tree questions 4, 5, 6, and 7 21 5.1.5.4.
16、1 Applicability . 21 5.1.5.4.2 Effectiveness . 22 5.1.5.5 Rationale and justification for questions 4, 5, 6, and 7 22 5.1.5.6 RCM decision logic tree question 8 . 22 5.1.5.7 Maintenance task periodicity . 23 5.1.5.8 Documenting the RCM decision logic tree analysis 23 5.1.6 Phase 6 Servicing and lubr
17、ication analysis . 24 5.1.6.1 Completing the servicing and lubrication analysis 25 5.1.7 Phase 7 Inactive equipment maintenance (IEM) task identification . 26 5.1.7.1 Inactive equipment maintenance analysis 26 5.1.7.2 Completing the IEM data/form 26 5.1.8 Phase 8 Corrective maintenance task identifi
18、cation 28 5.1.8.1 CM task analysis process . 28 5.1.8.2 Completing the corrective maintenance task list . 28 5.1.9 Phase 9 Maintenance requirements index (MRI) 29 5.1.9.1 Completion of the MRI data/form . 29 5.1.10 Phase 10 Maintenance requirement task definition . 30 5.1.10.1 Preparation guidelines
19、 . 30 5.1.10.2 Completing the RCM task definition data/form 31 5.1.10.3 Engineering reviews . 37 5.1.11 Phase 11 Maintenance procedure validation . 37 5.1.11.1 Validation requirements 37 5.1.11.2 Validation performance . 37 5.1.11.3 Procedure validation data/form (PV) . 38 5.1.12 Phase 12 Maintenanc
20、e index page (MIP) and maintenance requirement card (MRC) development and preparation 38 6. NOTES . 39 6.1 Intended use 39 6.2 Acquisition requirements 39 6.3 Associated Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) . 39 APPENDIX A RCM ANALYSIS DATA COLLECTION FORMS . 41 A.1 SCOPE . 41 A.1.1 Scope 41 APPENDIX B AGE
21、 EXPLORATION 54 B.1 SCOPE . 54 B.1.1 Scope . 54 B.2 Introduction 54 B.3 Age-reliability relationship 54 B.4 TD tasks . 54 B.5 CD and FF tasks . 54 B.6 Refining the estimate . 54 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-3034 viFIGURE PA
22、GE 1. NAVSEA RCM analysis process . 6 2. Partition boundary considerations 8 3. Illustrated ESWBS breakdown . 10 4. RCM decision logic tree . 20 A-1. Master systems and subsystems index (MSSI) . 42 A-2. Functional failure analysis (FFA) . 43 A-3. Additional functionally significant items (AFSI) . 44
23、 A-3A. Functionally significant item index (FSI Index). . 45 A-4. Failure modes that is, organizational, intermediate, and depot level maintenance. This standard provides the procedure to develop preventive, corrective, and inactive equipment maintenance (see 3.13.1, 3.13.2, and 3.13.5) within a pla
24、nned maintenance management system. Specific maintenance procedures may be developed, after the application of the RCM procedure outlined in this standard, for inclusion in class maintenance plans, and depot, intermediate, and organizational maintenance systems. This standard supersedes Phases 1 thr
25、ough 11 of MIL-P-24534A Amendment 1. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1 General. The documents listed in this section are specified in sections 3, 4, or 5 of this standard. This section does not include documents cited in other sections of this standard or recommended for additional information or as examp
26、les. While every effort has been made to ensure the completeness of this list, document users are cautioned that they must meet all specified requirements of documents cited in sections 3, 4, or 5 of this standard, whether or not they are listed. 2.2 Government documents. 2.2.1 Specifications, stand
27、ards, and handbooks. The following specifications, standards, and handbooks form a part of this document to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents are those cited in the solicitation or contract. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPECIFICATIONS MIL-PRF-6086 - Lubr
28、icating Oil, Gear, Petroleum Base MIL-P-24534 - Planned Maintenance System: Development of Maintenance Requirement Cards, Maintenance Index Pages, and Associated Documentation MIL-DTL-24784 - Manuals, Technical: General Acquisition and Development Requirements, General Specifications for DEPARTMENT
29、OF DEFENSE HANDBOOKS MIL-HDBK-267 - Guide for Selection of Lubricants and Hydraulic Fluids for Use in Shipboard Equipment (Copies of these documents are available online at https:/assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ or from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Phila
30、delphia, PA 19111-5094.) Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-3034 22.2.2 Other Government documents, drawings, and publications. The following other Government documents, drawings, and publications form a part of this document to
31、the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these documents are those cited in the solicitation or contract. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ISSUANCES DoDI 4151.22 - Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+) for Materiel Maintenance DoDD 5000.01 - The Defense Acquisition System DoD 50
32、10.12 - M - Procedures for the Acquisition and Management of Technical Data (Copies of these documents are available online at http:/www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/.) NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) PUBLICATIONS S9081-AB-GIB-010 - Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Handbook ST000-AG-IDX-010 - Te
33、st, Measurement and Diagnostics Equipment Index (TMDEI) (Copies of these documents are available on line at https:/mercury.tdmis.navy.mil.) NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSUP) PUBLICATIONS NAVSUP P - 4400 - The Afloat Shopping Guide (ASG) Copies of this document are available from the Naval Logist
34、ics Library, 5450 Carlisle Pike, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 or online at http:/www.dlis.dla.mil/navy/asg_guide.asp.) NAVSEA INSTRUCTIONS NAVSEAINST 4790.1 - Expanded Ship Work Breakdown Structure (ESWBS) Hierarchical Structure Codes (HSC) for Ships, Ship Systems employed in the development of an initia
35、l preventive maintenance program to arrive at a course of action in the absence of complete information. 3.5 Development. The act of researching, examining, and writing maintenance documentation. 3.6 Item. 3.6.1 End item. An assembly of hardware elements that is not used to assemble a higher level p
36、hysical item, and is ready for its intended use. 3.6.2 Functionally significant item. An item whose functional failure has safety, mission, or major economic consequences. 3.7 Fail-safe system. A device or feature which, in the event of failure, responds in a way that will cause no harm or at least
37、a minimum of harm to machinery or personnel. 3.8 Failure. The presence of an unsatisfactory condition. What constitutes an unsatisfactory condition must be specifically identified for each function. 3.8.1 Functional failure. The inability of an item to perform a specific function within specified li
38、mits. 3.8.2 Potential failure. A definable and measurable condition that indicates a functional failure is imminent. 3.9 Failure effects. Failure effects describe what happens when a failure mode occurs if no other action is taken to otherwise address the failure. 3.10 Failure mode. The specific con
39、dition causing a functional failure (often best described by the material condition at the point of failure). 3.10.1 Dominant failure mode. A cause of failure that is important because of its frequent occurrence or the serious consequences of the failure. 3.11 Function. Any action or operation which
40、 an item is intended to perform. 3.11.1 Active function. A function provided by activity of an item. 3.11.2 Evident function. A function provided by an item whose loss is observable to the operating crew during the performance of their routine duties. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or
41、networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-MIL-STD-3034 43.11.3 Hidden function. A function provided by an item for which there is no immediate indication of malfunction or failure. The demand for such functions usually follows another failure or unexpected event. 3.11.4 Passive function. A f
42、unction that does not require activity of an item. 3.12 Indenture level. A level of relative importance in a hierarchical set. The levels progress from the general to the specific. 3.13 Maintenance. Actions taken to ensure components, equipment and systems provide their intended functions when requi
43、red. 3.13.1 Corrective maintenance. Maintenance task performed to identify, isolate, and rectify a fault so that the failed equipment, machine, or system can be restored to an operational condition within the tolerances or limits established for in-service operations. 3.13.2 Inactive equipment maint
44、enance (IEM). Tasks performed while equipment is in a lay-up status to ensure equipment is fully operational when it is returned to service. 3.13.3 Lay-up maintenance. Tasks performed to prepare equipment for a period of inactivity. 3.13.4 Planned maintenance. Maintenance carried out according to a
45、fixed and standardized plan. 3.13.5 Preventive maintenance. An action that reduces the probability of occurrence of a particular failure mode, or discovers a hidden failure. 3.13.6 Reliability-centered maintenance (RCM). A method for determining maintenance requirements based on the analysis of the
46、likely functional failures of systems/equipment having a significant impact on safety, operations, and lifecycle cost. RCM supports the failure-management strategy for any system based on its inherent reliability and operating context. 3.13.7 Situational maintenance. Requirements which cannot be sch
47、eduled on a calendar basis. 3.13.8 Start-up maintenance. Tasks performed to prepare equipment for operation after a period of inactivity. 3.13.9 Unscheduled maintenance. Consists of unplanned actions performed when triggered by other scheduled maintenance actions. 3.14 Maintenance coordinating activ
48、ity (MCA). Activity which funds, authorizes, manages, monitors, or coordinates maintenance management documentation developed by commercial contractor, In-service Engineering Agents (ISEAs), Naval Sea Logistics Center (NAVSEALOGCEN), etc. The MCA has review authority for the phases of RCM developmen
49、t. 3.15 Maintenance development activity (MDA). Activity (commercial contractors, ISEAs, NAVSEA field activities, etc.) which develop maintenance documentation. The MDA is the activity to which the maintenance developer is assigned. 3.16 Master system and subsystem index (MSSI). Documents the hierarchical breakdown of a development. 3.17 Periodicity. Delineates ho
