REG NASA-LLIS-1831--2004 Lessons Learned Human Engineering should be considered a Systems Engineering and Integration function.pdf

上传人:fuellot230 文档编号:1019309 上传时间:2019-03-21 格式:PDF 页数:3 大小:14.83KB
下载 相关 举报
REG NASA-LLIS-1831--2004 Lessons Learned Human Engineering should be considered a Systems Engineering and Integration function.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共3页
REG NASA-LLIS-1831--2004 Lessons Learned Human Engineering should be considered a Systems Engineering and Integration function.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共3页
REG NASA-LLIS-1831--2004 Lessons Learned Human Engineering should be considered a Systems Engineering and Integration function.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共3页
亲,该文档总共3页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、Lessons Learned Entry: 1831Lesson Info:a71 Lesson Number: 1831a71 Lesson Date: 2004-3-17a71 Submitting Organization: KSCa71 Submitted by: Damon StambolianSubject: Human Engineering should be considered a Systems Engineering and Integration function Abstract: At the Orbiter Space Plane (OSP) System D

2、esign Review there was a lack of evidence that Human Factors contributions were being made to all applicable areas within the System, in particular, ground operations. For example, Human Engineering methods to evaluate access to the spacecraft were not shown, both in the way of platforms for hard to

3、 reach areas of the spacecraft and access to the spacecrafts individual subsystems for repairs and testing. Integrating Human Engineering methods into a systems approach at the beginning of the design development is vital to making the operations safer and easier for the maintainer and operator, as

4、well as improving turnaround time and processing. To ensure that Human Engineering is not overlooked each system should have its own Human Engineering section to confirm that this particular system has been addressed by Human Engineering. Within this section, useful parts of MIL-STD-1472 and other a

5、pplicable Human Engineering documents that apply to this system should be listed.Description of Driving Event: At the Orbiter Space Plane (OSP) System Design Review there was a lack of evidence that Human Factors contributions were being made to all applicable areas within the System, in particular,

6、 ground operations. Contractor products did not adequately consider Human Engineering functions. Even though the development was in the early stages, proposed tools and methods used for developing tasks analysis and usability testing between operators and hardware should have been presented. For exa

7、mple, Human Engineering methods to evaluate access to the spacecraft were not shown, both in the way of platforms for hard to reach areas of the spacecraft and access to the spacecrafts individual subsystems for repairs and testing. Addressing these simple Human Engineering aspects of spacecraft pro

8、cessing would have given some indication that they were planning on integrating Human Engineering into a systems approach. Integrating Human Engineering methods into a systems approach at the beginning of the design development is vital to Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking p

9、ermitted without license from IHS-,-,-making the operations safer and easier for the maintainer and operator, as well as improving turnaround time and processing. Lesson(s) Learned: Human Engineering contributions are best considered if integrated during the design process. Failure to involve Human

10、Engineering at the System level ultimately leads to design that are less then optimal from a maintainability, supportability, and operability standpoint.Recommendation(s): 1. Future Programs should place more emphasis on Human Engineering effects for design, development, and operation. 2. An effecti

11、ve approach would be to include Human Engineering under Systems Engineering and Integration (SE&I). 3. Ensure data products are in place up front to address Human Engineering Functions at the Systems level. 4. To ensure that Human Engineering is not overlooked within each system, e.g., Mechanical, E

12、lectrical, Fluids, etc., each system should have its own Human Engineering section to confirm that this particular system has been addressed by Human Engineering. Within this section, useful parts of MIL-STD-1472 and other applicable Human Engineering documents that apply to this system should be li

13、sted.Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness: OSP Program was working to recognize and integrate Human Engineering as a Program-level entity, but this was never realized. Request For Proposal inputs added emphasis to Human Engineering functions and were a step in the right direction for future

14、contractor work. Documents Related to Lesson: Mil-Std-1472, Human EngineeringMission Directorate(s): N/AAdditional Key Phrase(s): a71 Missions and Systems Requirements Definition.Human factors impact on mission designa71 Engineering Design (Phase C/D).Human Factors/HabitabilityProvided by IHSNot for

15、 ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-a71 Mission Operations and Ground Support Systems.Ground support systemsAdditional Info: a71 Project: Oribiter Space Plane Program (OSP)Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2008-04-11a71 Approval Name: mbella71 Approval Organization: HQProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
  • ASTM C1128-2015 Standard Guide for Preparation of Working Reference Materials for Use in Analysis of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Materials《核燃料循环材料分析用操作参考材料制备的标准指南》.pdf ASTM C1128-2015 Standard Guide for Preparation of Working Reference Materials for Use in Analysis of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Materials《核燃料循环材料分析用操作参考材料制备的标准指南》.pdf
  • ASTM C1128-2018 Standard Guide for Preparation of Working Reference Materials for Use in Analysis of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Materials《核燃料循环材料分析用工作参考材料的制备标准指南》.pdf ASTM C1128-2018 Standard Guide for Preparation of Working Reference Materials for Use in Analysis of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Materials《核燃料循环材料分析用工作参考材料的制备标准指南》.pdf
  • ASTM C1129-1989(2001) Standard Practice for Estimation of Heat Savings by Adding Thermal Insulation to Bare Valves and Flanges《通过给凸面阀门及法兰增加热绝缘材料评估蓄热量的标准实施规程》.pdf ASTM C1129-1989(2001) Standard Practice for Estimation of Heat Savings by Adding Thermal Insulation to Bare Valves and Flanges《通过给凸面阀门及法兰增加热绝缘材料评估蓄热量的标准实施规程》.pdf
  • ASTM C1129-1989(2008) Standard Practice for Estimation of Heat Savings by Adding Thermal Insulation to Bare Valves and Flanges《通过给凸面阀门及法兰增加热绝缘材料评估蓄热量的标准实施规则》.pdf ASTM C1129-1989(2008) Standard Practice for Estimation of Heat Savings by Adding Thermal Insulation to Bare Valves and Flanges《通过给凸面阀门及法兰增加热绝缘材料评估蓄热量的标准实施规则》.pdf
  • ASTM C1129-2012 Standard Practice for Estimation of Heat Savings by Adding Thermal Insulation to Bare Valves and Flanges 《通过给凸面阀门及法兰增加热绝缘材料评估蓄热量的标准实施规程》.pdf ASTM C1129-2012 Standard Practice for Estimation of Heat Savings by Adding Thermal Insulation to Bare Valves and Flanges 《通过给凸面阀门及法兰增加热绝缘材料评估蓄热量的标准实施规程》.pdf
  • ASTM C1129-2017 Standard Practice for Estimation of Heat Savings by Adding Thermal Insulation to Bare Valves and Flanges《在裸阀和法兰上增加绝热保温的热节能估算标准实施规程》.pdf ASTM C1129-2017 Standard Practice for Estimation of Heat Savings by Adding Thermal Insulation to Bare Valves and Flanges《在裸阀和法兰上增加绝热保温的热节能估算标准实施规程》.pdf
  • ASTM C113-2002 Standard Test Method for Reheat Change of Refractory Brick《耐火砖的二次加热变化的标准试验方法》.pdf ASTM C113-2002 Standard Test Method for Reheat Change of Refractory Brick《耐火砖的二次加热变化的标准试验方法》.pdf
  • ASTM C113-2002(2008) Standard Test Method for Reheat Change of Refractory Brick《耐火砖的二次加热变化的标准试验方法》.pdf ASTM C113-2002(2008) Standard Test Method for Reheat Change of Refractory Brick《耐火砖的二次加热变化的标准试验方法》.pdf
  • ASTM C113-2014 Standard Test Method for Reheat Change of Refractory Brick《耐火砖的二次加热变化的标准试验方法》.pdf ASTM C113-2014 Standard Test Method for Reheat Change of Refractory Brick《耐火砖的二次加热变化的标准试验方法》.pdf
  • 相关搜索

    当前位置:首页 > 标准规范 > 国际标准 > 其他

    copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
    备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1