1、SURFACEVEHICLESTANDARDJ2666REAF.JUN2010Issued 2003-11Reaffirmed 2010-06Superseding J2666 NOV2003Hose Gauge Evaluation Procedure1. ScopeThe Gauge Evaluation Procedure Task Force was formed by the Non-Hydraulic Hose Committee todevelop a gauge evaluation procedure to be used when evaluating the capabi
2、lity of gauges used for hosemeasurement. The use of a standard method for gauge evaluation will help users easily compare equipmentcapability. The information provided in this recommendation is based on the methods used to produce thedata presented in SAE J1759 and J2605.2. References2.1 Applicable
3、PublicationsThe following publications form a part of this specification to the extent specifiedherein. Unless otherwise indicated, the latest version of SAE publications shall apply.2.1.1 SAE PUBLICATIONSAvailable from SAE, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001.SAE J1759SAE Hose Measure
4、ment Study, Issued 2000-10. Summary of a GR&R study completedusing plug gauges, PI tapes, and calipers.SAE J2605SAE Non-Contact Hose Measurement Study 1, Issued 2001-8. Summary of a GR&R studycompleted using the LOTIS QC-20 Hose Measurement Device.2.2 Related PublicationThe following publication is
5、provided for information purposes only and is not arequired part of this document.2.2.1 AIAG PUBLICATIONAvailable from Automotive Industry Action Group, Suite 200, 262 Lahser Road,Southfield, MI 48034.(MSA) Manual-Measurement Systems Analysis Manual3. ProcedureThe following procedure enumerates the
6、important features of a gauge capability study and ismodeled after SAE J1759 and J2605. This procedure is to be used for equipment that provides variableoutput data.3.1 Metric measurement shall be used. 3.2 Clearly define the types of hoses the study will include. Ideally, the study should include a
7、 range of parts, i.e.,straight, curved, material, etc.SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular
8、use, including any patent infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user.” SAE reviews each technical report at least every five years at which time it may be reaffirmed, revised, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions. Copyright 2010 SAE Internationa
9、l All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE. TO PLACE A DOCUMENT ORDER: Tel: 877-606-7323 (in
10、side USA and Canada) Tel: +1 724-776-4970 (outside USA) Fax: 724-776-0790 Email: CustomerServicesae.org SAE WEB ADDRESS: http:/www.sae.org SAE values your input. To provide feedbackon this Technical Report, please visit http:/www.sae.org/technical/standards/J2666_201006 SAE J2666 Reaffirmed JUN2010-
11、2-3.3 Define what dimensions or features the study will include, i.e., inside diameter, outside diameter, wallthickness, wall thickness variation, etc. Use the same tolerance levels as previous studies to simplifycomparisons.3.4 The study must include 3 operators, 3 test locations, and 3 different g
12、auges (one at each testing location).Minimum of 3 sets of parts with 10 samples in each set. The parts are transferred from location to location tocomplete the study. Clearly mark which end of the hose is used for the measurement and the depth at whichthe measurement is taken, if applicable.3.5 Sele
13、ct one of the test locations to perform the GR&R calculations.3.6 Use standard GR&R calculations (AIAG using the Anova method):Compute the average GR&R over the 3 test locations - each location provides GR&R for one system and 3operators for each measurement similar to SAE J1759.Compute the GR&R fro
14、m each location/system and measurement Use this data to compute an averageGR&R.Compute a composite GR&R using the results from the first operator from each test location/system. This isuseful as an additional measure of gauge capability (more stringent because it includes any gauge offsetsbetween sy
15、stems).3.7 The study must include a detailed test procedure with sufficient detail that any operator that has been trainedto use the specific equipment can duplicate the study. 3.8 The study should reference any previous or similar gauge studies like SAE J1759 and J2605. 3.9 The study can include bo
16、th electronic and manual recording of data.4. ConclusionThe use of the procedures outlined in this document will allow gauging equipment users tocompare results between different gauging methods and equipment from different gauge manufacturers.DEVELOPED BY THE SAE NON-HYDRAULIC HOSE COMMITTEESAE J26
17、66 Reaffirmed JUN2010RationaleNot applicable.Relationship of SAE Standard to ISO StandardNot applicable.ApplicationThe Gauge Evaluation Procedure Task Force was formed by the Non-Hydraulic HoseCommittee to develop a gauge evaluation procedure to be used when evaluating the capability ofgauges used f
18、or hose measurement. The use of a standard method for gauge evaluation will help userseasily compare equipment capability. The information provided in this recommendation is based on themethods used to produce the data presented in SAE J1759 and J2605.Reference SectionSAE J1759SAE Hose Measurement S
19、tudy, Issued 2000-10. Summary of a GR&R study completedusing plug gauges, PI tapes, and calipers.SAE J2605SAE Non-Contact Hose Measurement Study 1, Issued 2001-8. Summary of a GR&R studycompleted using the LOTIS QC-20 Hose Measurement Device.(MSA) Manual-Measurement Systems Analysis ManualDeveloped by the SAE Non-Hydraulic Hose Committee
