1、UFC 3-701-07 2 July 2007 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DoD FACILITIES PRICING GUIDE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-UFC 3-701-07 2 July 2007 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DoD
2、 FACILITIES PRICING GUIDE Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (Preparing Activity) NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AIR
3、FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY Record of Changes (changes are indicated by 1 . /1/) Change No. Date Location This UFC supersedes UFC 3-701-06, dated March 2006. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo repr
4、oduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-UFC 3-701-07 2 July 2007 i CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1-1 SCOPE. 1 1-1.1 Unit Costs for Military Construction Projects 1 1-1.2 Unit Costs for DoD Facilities Cost Models . 1 1-1.3 Common Cost Adjustment Factors. 1 1-2 PROPONENT. 1 C
5、HAPTER 2 UNIT COSTS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2 2-1 OVERVIEW 2 2-2 COST ESTIMATING HEIRARCHY 2 2-3 UNIT COST TABLE . 3 2-3.1 Escalation 3 2-3.2 Notes 4 2-4 SIZE ADJUSTMENT TABLES. 4 2-4.1 Application 4 2-4.2 Examples . 4 CHAPTER 3 UNIT COSTS FOR DOD FACILITIES COST MODELS. 6 3-1 OVERVIEW 6
6、3-2 REPLACEMENT COST FACTORS . 6 3-2.1 Definition . 6 3-2.2 Use of Replacement Cost Factors. 6 3-3 SUSTAINMENT COST FACTORS 7 3-3.1 Definition . 7 3-3.2 Use of Sustainment Cost Factors 8 3-4 MODERNIZATION FACTORS. 8 3-4.1 Definitions . 8 3-4.2 Use of Modernization Factors 8 3-5 OPERATION COST FACTOR
7、S. 9 3-5.1 Definition . 9 3-5.2 Use of Operation Cost Factors 9 3-6 COST FACTOR HEIRARCHY . 9 3-7 REVISING COST FACTORS . 10 CHAPTER 4 COMMON COST ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 11 4-1 LOCATION ADJUSTMENTS. 11 4-2 ESCALATION 12 TABLES Table 2A: Unit Costs for Military Construction 13 Table 2B: Size Adjustment F
8、actors for Military Construction 16 Table 2C: Project Size Adjustment Factors 16 Table 3: FAC Cost Factors. 17 Table 4A: Area Cost Factors / Locality Indices. 31 Table 4B: Escalation Rates 47 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-UFC 3-701-
9、07 2 July 2007 1CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 SCOPE The DoD Facilities Pricing Guide supports a spectrum of facility planning, investment, and analysis needs. This version of the Guide, revised to reflect updated cost and pricing data for FY 2007, is intended to correspond with preparation of the DoD b
10、udget for FY 2009. It includes reference information organized into three chapters: 1-1.1 Unit Costs for Military Construction Projects Chapter 2 and tables 2A through 2C provide unit cost data and related adjustment factors for selected DoD facility types and is intended for use in preparing Milita
11、ry Construction (MILCON) project documentation (DD Forms 1391) and other project-level estimates. MILCON unit costs are associated with a particular reference size for each facility type that can then be adjusted to the actual size for each project. Costs are expressed in FY 2009 and FY 2010 dollars
12、. 1-1.2 Unit Costs for DoD Facilities Cost Models Chapter 3 and table 3 provide unit costs associated with the DoD Real Property Classification System (RPCS) to be used in DoD facilities cost models. These cost factors are based upon the reported average DoD facility size or an established benchmark
13、 size, as annotated for each Facility Analysis Category (FAC) in the RPCS (published separately). Many of these cost factors are also based upon a “composite” facility that reflects a weighted mix of various similar facilities found in the inventory, rather than a single facility. For these reasons,
14、 these unit costs are intended for macro-level analysis and planning rather than individual facilities or projects. Costs are expressed in current-year dollars. 1-1.3 Common Cost Adjustment Factors Chapter 4 and tables 4 A and 4B provide common cost adjustment factors for future price escalation and
15、 location that are applicable to the base unit costs in both chapters 2 and 3. 1-2 PROPONENT The Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment is the proponent for the Facilities Pricing Guide. Recommendations from users toward improving the usefulness of this ref
16、erence are welcome. Please e-mail your comments or questions to: DoD.Pricing.Guideosd.mil. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-UFC 3-701-07 2 July 2007 2CHAPTER 2 UNIT COSTS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2-1 OVERVIEW The unit costs a
17、nd size adjustment factors in this chapter apply to military construction (MILCON) project estimates at the planning level. More detailed project cost estimates may vary from these values with appropriate justification. These tables are also maintained and available on the National Institute of Bldg
18、 Science (NIBS) Construction Criteria Database (CCB) through the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG). 2-2 COST ESTIMATING HIERARCHY There are four general methods used to estimate construction costs, described below in order from least- to most-accurate. Increased accuracy provides a greater level of
19、 confidence in the estimate but requires more information about specific project requirements and local conditions. Use the most accurate method for the amount of information known when preparing the estimate. The Unit Cost table described in section 2-3 supports a Square Foot Estimating method as d
20、escribed below, and is generally applicable during the planning phase of a project. The unit costs in the table are national average historical costs with a known standard deviation for each facility type. When additional information allows a more detailed estimate using the Parametric or Quantity-T
21、ake-Off methods, the unit costs in Table 2A should not govern the estimate. Project Comparison Estimating is used in early planning stages when little information is known about the program other than overall project parameters. Project comparison estimating uses historical information on total cost
22、s from past projects of similar building types. For example, the number of beds in a hospital, or number of spaces in a parking garage, or number personnel in an administration building can form the basis of a project comparison estimate by comparing them to recent projects of similar scope in the s
23、ame geographic region. Supporting facilities are estimated as a percentage of total facilities cost. This method is considered “preliminary“ and is accurate only from -20% to +50%. Square Foot Estimating is another method of developing both preliminary and intermediate budgets based on historical da
24、ta. This method is effective in preparing fairly accurate estimates if the design is developed enough to allow measurement and calculation of floor areas and volumes of the proposed spaces. There are several historical databases such as this UFC or RSMeans available to support this method of estimat
25、ing providing unit costs ($/SF). More accurate estimates made with this method make adjustments and additions for regional cost indices, escalation rates, and size adjustment cost tables. Further adjustments may be made to account for other unique aspects of the design such as special site condition
26、s or design features being planned. In addition, the estimate can develop overall “core and shell“ costs along with build-out costs of different space types, allowing for relative ease of determining the impact of Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license f
27、rom IHS-,-,-UFC 3-701-07 2 July 2007 3changes to the program. Estimates made with this method can be expected to be accurate between -15% to +25%. Parametric Cost Estimating is an intermediate-level estimate performed when design drawings are typically between 10% and 35% complete. Parametric costs
28、are based on assemblies or systems grouping the work of several trades, disciplines and/or work items into a single unit for estimating purposes. For example, a foundation usually requires excavation, formwork, reinforcing, concrete, including placement, finish and backfill. A parametric cost estima
29、te prices all of these elements together by applying engineered values developed in assemblies cost data databases. These databases are based on historical data, typically organized in Uniformat II. Estimates made with this method can be expected to be accurate between -10% to +15%. In Quantity Take
30、 Off (QTO) Estimating, the work is divided into the smallest possible work increments, and a “unit price“ is established for each piece. These work increments are typically organized by MasterFormat. The unit price is then multiplied by the required quantity to find the cost for the increment of wor
31、k. All costs are summed to obtain the total estimated cost. For example, the cost to erect a masonry wall can be accurately determined by finding the number of bricks required and estimating all costs related to delivering, storing, staging, cutting, installing, and cleaning the brick along with rel
32、ated units of accessories such as reinforcing ties, weep-holes, flashings, and the like. Accuracy is more likely to be affected by supply and demand forces in the current market. This method provides the most accurate estimate, typically within 5% of construction costs. 2-3 UNIT COST TABLE Table 2A
33、provides unit cost data for various DoD facility types in dollars per square meter ($/m2) and equivalent English unit cost data in dollars per square foot ($/SF). Most unit costs and referenced facility sizes are based on historic construction award data for Air Force, Army and Navy projects with co
34、nstruction contracts awarded after January 2003. Unit costs for a few category codes that have a limited number of awarded projects are based on contracts awarded since 2000. The unit costs should be further refined using parametric estimating tools or detailed cost estimates. The unit cost database
35、 includes only new construction projects and does not include data from renovation or add/alter projects. The facility types listed represent those facilities more frequently constructed by the Military Services. 2-3.1 Escalation Unit costs are escalated to October 2009 and October 2010, the assumed
36、 midpoints of construction for FY09 and FY10 projects, respectively, with an area cost factor of 1.00. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-UFC 3-701-07 2 July 2007 4Use the escalation rates shown in Table 4B to escalate the FY10 unit cost
37、s beyond FY10. 2-3.2 Notes Various qualifications and restrictions apply to the unit costs in Table 2A. These are specified in the notes above the table. 2-4 SIZE ADJUSTMENT TABLES The Size Adjustment Factor tables are based upon data analysis that shows a correlation exists between project size and
38、 construction cost. Unit construction costs generally are lower for larger projects due to greater opportunities for material quantity discounts and for spreading mobilization, demobilization and general overhead costs over a greater number of units. 2-4.1 Application All unit costs in Table 2A are
39、based upon the referenced facility sizes. Whenever the project size differs from the referenced facility size, use size adjustment factors in Table 2B to adjust unit costs. Divide the gross area of the proposed facility by the reference size for that facility type to determine the size relationship
40、ratio. Use this ratio to find the appropriate size adjustment factor in Table 2B. Multiply the unit cost by the size adjustment factor to calculate the adjusted unit cost for the facility. Base the proposed project size on the total project scope to be awarded as a single construction contract, rega
41、rdless of the number of buildings to be constructed within that scope. If a construction project is to be broken into a number of discreet phases where the contractor has limited control over the phasing, use the average scope for all phases as the basis for your size adjustment calculations. For en
42、listed dormitory (barracks), use the project size adjustment factors in Table 2C in addition to the size adjustment factors in Table 2B, as applicable. An example is provided below. 2-4.2 Examples Example 1: You propose to build a 144 Person/Room (4,752 m2) Enlisted Barracks/Dormitory in FY09. The r
43、eferenced facility size taken from the unit cost summary is 9,250 m2. The size relationship ratio is 0.51 (4,752 m2divided by 9,250 m2). Enter the size adjustment table to find the Size Adjustment Factor of 1.08 and the Project Size Adjustment Factor of 1.03. Multiply the unit cost of $2,099/m2by 1.
44、08 and 1.03 to determine the adjusted unit cost of $2,335/m2. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-UFC 3-701-07 2 July 2007 5Example 2: You propose to build a 3,500 m2multi-purpose administrative facility in FY09. The referenced facility s
45、ize taken from the unit cost summary is 2,300 m2. The size relationship ratio is 1.52 (3,500 m2divided by 2,300 m2). Enter the size adjustment table to find the Size Adjustment Factor of 0.96. Multiply the unit cost of $2,002/m2by 0.96 to determine the adjusted unit cost of $1,922/m2. Provided by IH
46、SNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-UFC 3-701-07 2 July 2007 6CHAPTER 3 UNIT COSTS FOR DOD FACILITIES COST MODELS 3-1 OVERVIEW This chapter describes the unit costs used in support of DoD facilities cost models. These cost factors are intended for macr
47、o-level analysis and planning and should not be used for individual facilities or project estimates. The unit costs are based upon facility classifications defined by the DoD Real Property Classification System (RPCS), a hierarchical scheme of real property types and functions that serves as the fra
48、mework for identifying, categorizing, and modeling the departments inventory of land and facilities around the world. This scheme is comprised of a 5-tier structure represented by numerical codes, with 1-digit codes being the most general and 5- or 6-digit codes representing the most specific types
49、of facilities. The RPCS is available on the web at: http:/www.acq.osd.mil/ie/irm/ProgramAnalysis_Budget/ToolAndMetrics/RPCS/RPCS.htm. Cost factors are associated with Facility Analysis Categories (FACs) represented by a 4-digit code. FACs are common across the department and suitable for department-wide applications. For eac
