ASTM B895-2015 Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Powder Metallurgy (PM) Parts Specimens by Immersion in a Sodium Chloride Solution《通过.pdf

上传人:visitstep340 文档编号:462679 上传时间:2018-11-27 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:145KB
下载 相关 举报
ASTM B895-2015 Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Powder Metallurgy (PM) Parts Specimens by Immersion in a Sodium Chloride Solution《通过.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
ASTM B895-2015 Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Powder Metallurgy (PM) Parts Specimens by Immersion in a Sodium Chloride Solution《通过.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
ASTM B895-2015 Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Powder Metallurgy (PM) Parts Specimens by Immersion in a Sodium Chloride Solution《通过.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
ASTM B895-2015 Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Powder Metallurgy (PM) Parts Specimens by Immersion in a Sodium Chloride Solution《通过.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
ASTM B895-2015 Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steel Powder Metallurgy (PM) Parts Specimens by Immersion in a Sodium Chloride Solution《通过.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、Designation: B895 05 (Reapproved 2010)1B895 15Standard Test Methods forEvaluating the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless SteelPowder Metallurgy (PM) Parts/Specimens by Immersion in aSodium Chloride Solution1This standard is issued under the fixed designation B895; the number immediately following the

2、 designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1 NOTEUpdated abbreviation for powder

3、 metallurgy throughout editorially in June 2010.1. Scope Scope*1.1 These test methods cover a procedure for evaluating the ability of sintered PM stainless steel parts/specimens to resistcorrosion when immersed in a sodium chloride (NaCl) solution.1.2 Corrosion resistance is evaluated by one of two

4、methods. In Method 1, the stainless steel parts/specimens are examinedperiodically and the time to the first appearance of staining or rust is used to indicate the end point. In Method 2, continuedexposure to the sodium chloride solution is used to monitor the extent of corrosion as a function of ti

5、me.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of theuser of this standard to establish appro

6、priate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitationsprior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2A380 Practice for Cleaning, Descaling, and Passivation of Stainless Steel Parts, Equipment, and SystemsB243 Terminology of Powder MetallurgyB528 Test Me

7、thod for Transverse Rupture Strength of Powder Metallurgy (PM) SpecimensD610 Practice for Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Steel SurfacesD1193 Specification for Reagent WaterG1 Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test SpecimensG48 Test Methods for Pitting and Crevice Co

8、rrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and RelatedAlloys by Use of Ferric ChlorideSolution3. Terminology3.1 DefinitionsUseful definitions of terms for metal powders and powder metallurgy are found in Terminology B243.4. Summary of Test Method4.1 Method 1 is recommended for evaluating the corrosion r

9、esistance of stainless steel powder metallurgy parts/specimens andto verify that proper materials and processing conditions were used.4.1.1 In this method, parts/specimens are immersed in 5 % (by mass) NaCl solution and examined periodically until the firstappearance of staining or rust. A part or s

10、pecimen is considered to have reached the end point when the first sign of corrosionoccurs.4.2 Method 2 is recommended for evaluating the processing variables used in producing parts/specimens.1 These test methods are under the jurisdiction of Committee B09 on Metal Powders and Metal Powder Products

11、 and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee B09.05on Structural Parts.Current edition approved May 1, 2010Oct. 1, 2015. Published June 2010November 2015. Originally approved in 1999. Last previous edition approved in 20052010 asB895 05.B895 05(2010)1. DOI: 10.1520/B0895-05R10E01.10.1520/B0895-

12、15.2 For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standardsvolume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page on the ASTM website.This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only

13、 to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Becauseit may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current versio

14、nof the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standardCopyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States14.2.1 In this method, parts/specimens are

15、 exposed further to the NaCL solution and periodically rated as either A, B, C, or D(A-no corrosion; D-high or extreme corrosion) by comparison with Fig. 1, a photograph of corroded specimens which serves asa standard. Additional examples of quantitative ratings may be found in Test Method D610. Met

16、hod 2 has been found useful inalloy screening and process optimization studies.5. Significance and Use5.1 The ability of sintered powder metallurgy stainless steel parts/specimens to resist corrosion when immersed in sodiumchloride solution is important to their end use. Causes of unacceptable corro

17、sion may be incorrect alloy, contamination of the partsby iron or some other corrosion-promoting material or improper sintering of the parts (for example, undesirable carbide and nitrideformations caused by poor lubricant burnoff or improper sintering atmosphere).5.2 This standard may be part of a p

18、urchase agreement between the PM parts producer (seller) and the user of the parts(purchaser) (Method 1). It may also be used to optimize part or specimen production parameters (Method 2).6. Apparatus6.1 Sealable Glass or Plastic Jars, of suitable capacity for specimens to be completely covered by t

19、he NaCl solution.6.2 Glass Beads (4 mm is recommended).6.3 Glass Stirring Rods.6.4 Tongs (Stainless steel or plastic, nonmetallic plated).7. Reagents7.1 A sodium chloride solution consisting of 5 6 0.1 % (by mass) NaCl shall be prepared using distilled or deionized waterconforming to Specification D

20、1193 (Type 4) and ACS reagent grade NaCl solution. The 5 % NaCl solution shall be prepared noless than 16 h before beginning the corrosion testing.7.2 Concentrated HCl.7.3 Distilled or deionized water.FIG. 1 Examples of Ratings for Various Amounts of Rust or Stain (Immersion in Aqueous Solution of 5

21、 % NaCl)B895 1528. Test Specimen8.1 Usually test parts are sintered parts, but they may also be standard transverse rupture bars as defined in Test Method B528.A minimum of fiveten parts/specimens shall be used for each test.test except for routine testing of production parts, where the useof five p

22、arts is acceptable. The use of ten parts/specimens is, however, recommended for evaluating new materials/processes.8.1.1 The density of the parts or specimens as well as any post sintering treatments, (that is, coining, repressing, machining, etc.)shall be stated. Parts or specimens shall be free of

23、 oil, dirt, grease and fingerprints. If they have been cleaned, the cleaning methodshall be stated. Refer to Practices A380 and G1 for recommended cleaning practices.8.1.2 The use of tongs or gloves, or both, to prevent contamination in handling is suggested.NOTE 1Iron or low-alloy steel particles p

24、resent on the surface of the sintered stainless steel parts/speciments can be revealed by placing theparts/specimens in a concentrated solution of copper sulfate, CuSO4. The dissolved copper plates out on the iron/low-alloy particles within minutes andcan be seen by using a low-magnification microsc

25、ope.9. Preparation of Apparatus9.1 Soak previously used jars and glass beads in concentrated HCl for at least 12 h to remove rust stains; rinse with distilledor deionized water, then rinse again and allow to dry.9.1.1 Place the glass beads in the bottom of the beaker. Use a sufficient number of bead

26、s to keep the test specimen off the bottomof the jar.10. Procedure10.1 Method 1:10.1.1 Place one part or specimen per jar on top of the glass beads. Add the NaCl solution to each jar so that the volume ofsolution, in millilitres, is at least five times the mass of the specimen in grams. The distance

27、 from the surface of the part/specimento the top of the solution should be at least 25 mm. The ratio of the volume of air to the volume of solution in a jar is recommendedto be about 1:2 to 1:3. Remove air bubbles attached to the specimen surface and glass beads by swirling the solution or movingthe

28、 specimen with a glass stirring rod. Close the jars. Record the date and the time of the start of the test. Store the immersed testspecimens at a temperature of 21 to 24 C.10.1.2 Examine the parts/specimens after 12, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h and at 24 h intervals from the onset of the test. Thereafter, thei

29、nterval may be lengthened as time progresses until the first appearance of rust or stain. The corrosion life of a part or specimenis the time of the previous examination, that is, the last examination taken before the observation of stain or rust. Do not includecorrosion which appears at the interfa

30、ce between a part/specimen and the glass beads. This is considered to be crevice corrosionand may be evaluated by Test Method G48.10.2 Method 2:10.2.1 Method 2 follows the procedure of Method 1 through 10.1.1. It continues with periodic examination as in 10.1.2, exceptthat testing continues beyond t

31、he first appearance of stain or rust. In Method 2, for each examination, the parts/specimens areranked for the degree of staining or corrosion according to the following:AThe part/specimen is free from stain or rust.BThe first sign of stain or rust appears or up to 1 % of surface is covered by stain

32、 or rust.CMore than 1 and up to 25 % of surface is covered by stain or rust.DMore than 25 % of surface is covered by stain or rust.10.2.1.1 Examples of ratings exhibiting these conditions are shown in Fig. 1.10.2.1.2 Do not include corrosion which appears at the interface between the test specimens

33、and the glass beads. This isconsidered to be crevice corrosion and is not the subject of this test method.As a part/specimen shows increasing amounts of rust,it may become necessary to use a pair of tongs to remove it from the solution so as to distinguish between loose and adherent rust.Rinsing sho

34、uld not be used because loose rust may be washed off.10.2.2 Record the results of the timed observation at the intervals used. Table 1 shows a typical example of a data collectiontable.10.2.3 Plot the percent of parts/specimens having an A, B, or C class rating for suitable time intervals on a logar

35、ithmic timescale.10.2.4 Draw curves to fit the data. A typical plot is shown in Fig. 2. When plotting the data for the “B” and “C” ratings, it isthe percentage holding a “B or better” rating and a “C or better” rating that is plotted. For example, in Table 1, a “B or better”rating is held by 100% of

36、 the specimens for up to 168 h. A “C or better” rating is held by 100% of the specimens for up to 496h.11. Report11.1 Method 1:11.1.1 Report the individual corrosion lives in hours as determined in 10.1.2 and calculate the arithmetic average. Acceptancecriteria shall be mutually agreed upon between

37、purchaser and seller.11.1.2 Density of parts/specimens as well as any post-sintering treatments and cleaning methods (if cleaned) shall be recorded.B895 15311.2 Method 2:11.2.1 Report the time when 50 % of the parts/specimens have an A, B, or C class rating.11.2.2 Photographs of tested parts, indica

38、ting the test conditions and the number of hours tested shall be provided at thecustomers request.11.2.3 Density of parts or specimens as well as any post-sintering treatments and cleaning methods (if cleaned) shall berecorded.TABLE 1 Example of Corrosion Rating Chart for a Set of Ten Replicate Spec

39、imens of Sintered 316L Stainless SteelASpecimen Hours submersed in 5 % aq. NaCl# 0.5 1 2 4 8 24 31 50 74 104 168 240 336 496 696 984 1368 1804 22821 A A A A A A A A B B B B C C C C D D D2 A A A A A A A A A A B B B B C C C D D3 A A A A A A A B B B B C C C D D D D D4 A A A A A A A A A B B B B C C C C

40、C D5 A A A A A A A A A B B B B C C C C C C6 A A A A A A A A A B B B B C C C C C D7 A A A A A A B B B B B B C C C C C D D8 A A A A A A A B B B B B C C C D D D D9 A A A A A A A A B B B B B C C C C D D10 A A A A A A A A A B B B B C C C C C D% Holding A Rating100 100 100 100 100 100 90 70 50 10 0% Holdi

41、ng B Rating100 90 60 10 0% Holding C Rating100 90 80 70 40 10ASee Section 10.1.1 for definition of ratings.FIG. 2 Plot of Percentage of Replicate Specimens with a Given Rating Versus Immersion TimeB895 15412. Precision and Bias12.1 No repeatability and reproducibility data or information on any bias

42、 inherent in these test methods are available at this time.13. Keywords13.1 corrosion; powder metallurgy (PM) parts; stainless steelSUMMARY OF CHANGESCommittee B09 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue(B895-05(2010)1) that may impact the use of this st

43、andard.(1) Added a statement on units.(2) Increased the minimum number of parts/specimens from five to ten, but indicated that five parts are acceptable for routinetesting of production parts.(3) Added a note on checking for the presence of iron or low-alloy contamination.(4) Provided clarification

44、in subsection 10.2.4 on the plotting of data.ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentionedin this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, an

45、d the riskof infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years andif not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn.Your comments are invited either for revisio

46、n of this standard or for additional standardsand should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of theresponsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you sho

47、uldmake your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obta

48、ined by contacting ASTM at the aboveaddress or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or serviceastm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http:/ 155

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 标准规范 > 国际标准 > ASTM

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1