1、BSI Standards PublicationBS EN 16601-10-01:2014Space project managementPart 10-01: Organization and conduct ofreviewsBS EN 16601-10-01:2014 BRITISH STANDARDNational forewordThis British Standard is the UK implementation of EN16601-10-01:2014. It supersedes BS EN 14093:2002 which iswithdrawn.The UK p
2、articipation in its preparation was entrusted to TechnicalCommittee ACE/68, Space systems and operations.A list of organizations represented on this committee can beobtained on request to its secretary.This publication does not purport to include all the necessaryprovisions of a contract. Users are
3、responsible for its correctapplication. The British Standards Institution 2014. Published by BSI StandardsLimited 2014ISBN 978 0 580 83334 2ICS 49.140Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity fromlegal obligations.This British Standard was published under the authority of theStandard
4、s Policy and Strategy Committee on 31 August 2014.Amendments issued since publicationDate Text affectedBS EN 16601-10-01:2014EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPENNE EUROPISCHE NORM EN 16601-10-01 August 2014 ICS 49.140 Supersedes EN 14093:2002 English version Space project management - Part 10-01: Organiz
5、ation and conduct of reviews Management des projets spatiaux - Partie 10-01: Organisation et conduite de revues Raumfahrt-Projektmanagement - Teil 10-01: Organisation und Durchfhrung von Reviews This European Standard was approved by CEN on 14 December 2013. CEN and CENELEC members are bound to comp
6、ly with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC
7、 Management Centre or to any CEN and CENELEC member. This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN and CENELEC member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Mana
8、gement Centre has the same status as the official versions. CEN and CENELEC members are the national standards bodies and national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Ger
9、many, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom. CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2014 CEN/CENELEC All right
10、s of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members and for CENELEC Members. Ref. No. EN 16601-10-01:2014 EBS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 2 Table of contents Foreword 4 1 Scope . 5 2 Normative references . 6 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated t
11、erms 7 3.1 Terms from other standards 7 3.2 Terms specific to the present standard . 7 3.3 Abbreviated terms. 8 4 Fundamentals of reviews . 9 4.1 Basic principles . 9 4.2 Review tasks 9 4.2.1 Initiation of the review . 9 4.2.2 Preparation and distribution of the review data-package . 9 4.2.3 Review
12、of the documentation 10 4.2.4 Review findings and conclusions . 10 5 Requirements 11 5.1 General . 11 5.2 Review bodies 11 5.3 Roles and tasks 12 5.3.1 Review authority . 12 5.3.2 Customer 12 5.3.3 Supplier . 13 5.3.4 Review team leader 13 5.3.5 Review team . 13 5.4 Prerequisite conditions for holdi
13、ng the review . 13 5.5 Review meetings 14 5.5.1 Prerequisite key point 14 5.5.2 Kick-off meeting 14 5.5.3 Coordination meeting 14 5.5.4 Collocation meeting . 14 BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 3 5.5.5 Review team close-out meeting 14 5.5.6 Review authority meeting 15 5.6 RID processing
14、 and action item follow-up . 15 Annex A (normative) Review procedure - DRD . 16 Annex B (normative) Review item discrepancy (RID) - DRD 18 Annex C (normative) Review team report - DRD . 21 Annex D (normative) Review authority report - DRD 23 Annex E (informative) Logic diagram for RID processing . 2
15、4 Annex F (informative) Examples for defined terms 25 Bibliography . 26 Figures Figure 4-1: Review information flow 10 Figure B-1 : Example of RID form . 19 Figure B-2 : Example of RID form (continued) 20 Figure E-1 : Flow logic for the RID processing 24 BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E)
16、 4 Foreword This document (EN 16601-10-01:2014) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/CLC/TC 5 “Space”, the secretariat of which is held by DIN. This standard (EN 16601-10-01:2014) originates from ECSS-M-ST-10-01C. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, eithe
17、r by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by February 2015, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by February 2015. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN and
18、/or CENELEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. This document supersedes EN 14093:2002. This document has been developed to cover specifically space systems and has therefore precedence over any EN covering the same scope but with a wider domain of applicabil
19、ity (e.g. : aerospace). According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic o
20、f Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 5 1 Scope This St
21、andard provides means for identifying and structuring all of the activities and information required in a project review. It identifies the information outputs and activities necessary to complete the process. It also provides a checklist of activities and information required for each of the projec
22、t reviews identified in the ECSS Management Standards. This standard may be tailored for the specific characteristics and constraints of a space project, in conformance with ECSS-S-ST-00. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 6 2 Normative references The following normative documents contain
23、 provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this ECSS Standard. For dated references, subsequent amendments to, or revision of any of these publications do not apply, However, parties to agreements based on this ECSS Standard are encouraged to investigate the possibil
24、ity of applying the more recent editions of the normative documents indicated below. For undated references, the latest edition of the publication referred to applies. EN reference Reference in text Title EN-16601-00-01 ECSS-S-ST-00-01 ECSS system - Glossary of terms EN 16601-10 ECSS-M-ST-10 Space p
25、roject management - Project planning and implementation EN 16603-10 ECSS-E-ST-10 Space engineering - System engineering general requirements EN 16602-10 ECSS-Q-ST-10 Space product assurance - Product assurance management BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 7 3 Terms, definitions and abbrev
26、iated terms 3.1 Terms from other standards For the purpose of this Standard, the terms and definitions from ECSS-S-ST-00-01 apply, in particular for the following terms: customer NOTE 1 In the context of the current document, it identifies the body ensuring the execution of all tasks necessary for t
27、he realization of the project according to the high level requirement document and within the financial resources allocated by the consumer. NOTE 2 The customer is responsible for the implementation of the review recommendations endorsed by the review authority. NOTE 2 See informative annex F for ex
28、ample of application of the above to different levels of a space project supplier NOTE 1 In the context of the current document, it identifies the body executing all tasks necessary for the realization of the project according to the terms and condition of a business agreement submitted by the custo
29、mer. NOTE 2 See informative Annex F for example of application of the above to different levels of a space project 3.2 Terms specific to the present standard 3.2.1 consumer body specifying a project or (product) through a high level requirement document (such as mission statement or SFS and STS) and
30、 providing the necessary financial resources for its realization. NOTE See informative Annex F for example of application of the above to different levels of a space project BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 8 3.2.2 review authority body appointed by the consumer organization, having the
31、 mandate to issue recommendations to the customer and issue decisions relating to the review process NOTE This is also referred to as the review board. 3.2.3 review item discrepancy (RID) issue, identified by a reviewer, that is not compliant with a requirement, a review objective or a design goal 3
32、.2.4 review prerequisite conditions necessary to be fulfilled prior to the start of the review 3.2.5 review team body appointed by the review authority, having the mandate to evaluate the status of the project under review 3.2.6 review team leader person responsible for the review team activities an
33、d issuing the review team report 3.3 Abbreviated terms For the purpose of this Standard, the abbreviated terms from ECSS-S-ST-00-01 and the following apply: Abbreviation Meaning DRD document requirement description FEPS Fiche dtude de problme soulev MRD mission requirements document RID review item
34、discrepancy SRD system requirements document BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 9 4 Fundamentals of reviews 4.1 Basic principles Project reviews are examinations of the technical status of a project and associated issues at a particular point in time. Their primary purpose is to provide a
35、 comprehensive assessment of the project status against targets and requirements. Through independent participation, they give additional support to the project concerned at crucial stages and give the responsible management confidence in the technical progress being achieved. Additionally, reviews
36、can identify potential lessons learned. Reviews are carried out throughout the project life cycle, as defined in ECSS-M-ST-10, at all levels from mission to unit level. The review purpose, mandate and documentation vary for each particular project and for the specific phase or stage of activity of t
37、he project. The efficiency of any review process is dependent upon the planning and organization of the review work, including specific assignment of responsibilities and the plan to close out the action items raised during the review. The current ECSS document specifies basic principles in order to
38、 establish these organisational aspects. 4.2 Review tasks 4.2.1 Initiation of the review This task comprises the assignment of review members to the review bodies, the preparation and release of the review procedure and the assessment of the prerequisites. 4.2.2 Preparation and distribution of the r
39、eview data-package This task comprises the preparation and distribution of the documentation as defined in the review procedure. In a kick-off meeting review participants are familiarized with the review objectives and the documentation submitted for the review. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:
40、2014 (E) 10 4.2.3 Review of the documentation This task comprises the detailed review of the review data-package including additional information provided in the kick-off presentation. Identified problems, questions and solutions arising from the examination of the documentation are recorded on revi
41、ew item discrepancy (RID) forms. Collocation meetings between the review team and the customer/supplier serve to solve issues raised in RIDs, to consolidate findings and to provide recommendations for RID closure. Finally a report is issued on the behalf of the review team, synthesizing the results
42、of the review and identifying major issues for attention of the review authority. The information flow for this review activity is illustrated in Figure 4-1. An example of a logic diagram for the RID processing is presented in Annex E. SUPPLIERREVIEW TEAMCUSTOMERREVIEW AUTHORITYProvides the Data-Pac
43、kValidates the Data-PackReports findings and recommendationsRIDMajor/MinorCollocationCoordinationReviews the datapackageFigure 4-1: Review information flow 4.2.4 Review findings and conclusions This task comprises the examination of the review team findings, confirmation of the recommendations, deci
44、sions for follow-up activities and confirmation of the achievement of the review objectives. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 11 5 Requirements 5.1 General a. The customer shall ensure the level of independent expertise in the review team and provide access to the information identified
45、 in the review procedure. b. A project review shall provide the customer with advice and recommendations aiming at the resolution of any deficiencies identified during the process. c. The activity specified in 5.1b shall typically cover the following aspects: compliance with the mission objectives o
46、r applicable STS or SFS; adequacy of the requirements; credibility of the proposed design, development and verification; risk assessment and mitigation; credibility of plans and schedules. d. The customer shall organize the review with the approval of the consumer. e. A project review shall be based
47、 on the examination of a data-package that: 1. is compliant with the list of documents to be delivered as specified for the review 2. is sufficient to demonstrate achievement of the review objectives. 5.2 Review bodies a. The participants in a review shall include the review authority at the level o
48、f the consumer, the project teams at the level of the customer and supplier, and the review team. b. The members of the review authority shall be appointed by the consumer organization. c. The review authority shall be chaired by an independent representative of the consumer organization and may be
49、co-chaired by a representative of the customer organization. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 12 d. The review team shall include representatives of the consumer organization having no direct involvement in the project activities. 5.3 Roles and tasks 5.3.1 Review authority a. The review authority shall approve the review procedure and in particular: 1. the objectives of the review according to ECSS-M-ST-10 requirements; 2. the review team composition; 3. the execution of the review. b. The review authority shall examine the final review team report(s). c
