1、MODEL COURSE PORT STATE CONTROL 2001 Edition MODEL COURSE 3.09 PORT STATE CONTROL 2001 Edition Model course developed under the IMO - Norwegian Programme INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION London, 2001 First published in 1995 by the INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 Albert Embankment. London SE
2、I 7SR Revised edition, 2007 Printed in the United Kingdom by Ashford Overload Services 2 4 6 8 10 9 7 5 3 I IMO PUBLICATION I Sales number: TA309E ISBN 92-801 -51 04-5 Copyright O IMO 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted
3、 in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the International Maritime Organization. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This course on port State control is based on material developed for IMO under contract by
4、 the International Maritime Academy in Trieste, Italy. IMO wishes to express its sincere appreciation to the Academy for its expert assistance and co-operation. CONTENTS Foreword Introduction Part A: Course Framework Part B: Course Outline and Timetable Part C: Detailed Teaching Syllabus Part D: Ins
5、tructor Manual Attachment: Guidance on the implementation of model courses Page W 10 40 53 iii Foreword Since its inception the International Maritime Organization has recognized the importance of human resources to the development of the maritime industry and has given the highest priority to assis
6、ting developing countries in enhancing their maritime training capabilities through the provision or improvement of maritime training facilities at national and regional levels. IMO has also responded to the needs of developing countries for postgraduate training for senior personnel in administrati
7、on, ports, shipping companies and maritime training institutes by establishing the World Maritime University in Malm, Sweden, in 1983. Following the earlier adoption of the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, a number of IMO Member G
8、overnments had suggested that IMO should develop model training courses to assist in the implementation of the Convention and in achieving a more rapid transfer of information and skills regarding new developments in maritime technology. IMO training advisers and consultants also subsequently determ
9、ined from their visits to training establishments in developing countries that the provision of model courses could help instructors improve the quality of their existing courses and enhance their effectiveness in meeting the requirements of the Convention and implementing the associated Conference
10、and IMO Assembly resolutions. In addition, it was appreciated that a comprehensive set of short model courses in various fields of maritime training would supplement the instruction provided by maritime academies and allow administrators and technical specialists already employed in maritime adminis
11、trations, ports and shipping companies to improve their knowledge and skills in certain specialized fields. IMO has therefore developed the current series of model courses in response to these generally identified needs and with the generous assistance of Noway. These model courses may be used by an
12、y training institution and the Organization is prepared to assist developing countries in implementing any course when the requisite financing is available. W. A. ONEIL Secretary-General V Introduction Purpose of the model courses The purpose of the IMO model courses is to assist maritime training i
13、nstitutes and their teaching staff in organizing and introducing new training courses, or in enhancing, updating or supplementing existing training material where the quality and effectiveness of the training courses may thereby be improved. It is not the intention of the model course programme to p
14、resent instructors with a rigid “teaching package” which they are expected to Vollow blindly”. Nor is it the intention to substitute audio-visual or “programmed” material for the instructors presence. As in all training endeavours, the knowledge, skills and dedication of the instructors are the key
15、components in the transfer of knowledge and skills to those being trained through IMO model course material. Because educational systems and the cultural backgrounds of trainees in maritime subjects vary considerably from country to country, the model course material has been designed to identify th
16、e basic entry requirements and trainee target group for each course in universally applicable terms, and to specify clearly the technical content and levels of knowledge and skill necessary to meet the technical intent of IMO conventions and related recommendations. Use of the model course To use th
17、e model course, the instructor should review the course plan and detailed syllabus, taking into account the information provided under the entry standards specified in the course framework. The actual level of knowledge and skills and the prior technical education of the trainees should be kept in m
18、ind during this review, and any areas within the detailed syllabus which may cause difficulties because of differences between the actual trainee entry level and that assumed by the course designer should be identified. To compensate for such differences, the instructor is expected to delete from th
19、e course, or reduce the emphasis on, items dealing with knowledge or skills already attained by the trainees. He should also identify any academic knowledge, skills or technical training which they may not have acquired. By analysing the detailed syllabus and the academic knowledge required to allow
20、 training in the technical area to proceed, the instructor can design an appropriate pre-entry course or, alternatively, insert the elements of academic knowledge required to support the technical training elements concerned at appropriate points within the technical course. Adjustment of the course
21、 objective, scope and content may also be necessary if in your maritime industry the trainees completing the course are to undertake duties which differ from the course objectives specified in the model course. -Within the course plan, the course designers have indicated their assessment of the time
22、 which should be allotted to each area of learning. However, it must be appreciated that these allocations are arbitrary and assume that the trainees have fully met all entry requirements of the course. The instructor should therefore review these assessments and may need to re-allocate the time req
23、uired to achieve each specific learning objective or training outcome. 1 PORT STATE CONTROL Lesson plans Having adjusted the course content to suit the trainee intake and any revision of the course objectives, the instructor should draw up lesson plans based on the detailed syllabus. The detailed sy
24、llabus contains specific references to the textbooks or teaching material proposed to be used in the course. Where no adjustment has been found necessary in the learning objectives of the detailed syllabus, the lesson plans may simply consist of the detailed syllabus with keywords or other reminders
25、 added to assist the instructor in making his presentation of the material. I Presentation The presentation of concepts and methodologies must be repeated in various ways until the instructor is satisfied, by testing and evaluating the trainees performance and achievements, that the trainee has atta
26、ined each specific learning objective or training outcome. The syllabus is laid out in learning-objective format and each objective specifies what the trainee must be able to do as the learning or training outcome. Taken as a whole, these objectives aim to meet the knowledge, understanding and profi
27、ciency specified in the appropriate tables of the STCW Code. Implementation For the course to run smoothly and to be effective, considerable attention must be paid to the availability and use of: properly qualified instructors; support staff; rooms and other spaces; equipment; textbooks, technical p
28、apers; and other reference material. Thorough preparation is the key to successful implementation of the course. IMO has produced “Guidance on the implementation of model courses”, which deals with this aspect in greater detail and is included as an attachment to this course. 2 Part A: Course Framew
29、ork n Scope This course provides training for officers to be authorized by their Government to execute port State control in accordance with: - SOLAS 74, regulations 1/19 and X1/4 - MARPOL 73/78, articles 5 and 6 and regulations 1/4, IV1 O, 11V8 and V/8; - ICLL 66, article 21; - STCW 78, article X a
30、nd regulation 114 - Tonnage 69, article 12 It sets out the responsibilities, possibilities and limitations of port States exercising control and gives detailed information on what authorized officers are to look for and how to initiate remedial action. Although, in principle, port State control is t
31、he verification that the ship is carrying a valid certificate and that the ships officers are properly certified, the control procedures developed by IMO also give guidance on the control of ships, their safety management systems and miscellaneous operations. The course amplifies these guidelines so
32、 that authorized officers may carry out effective control, thereby contributing towards the prevention of marine accidents, the maintenance of operational standards on board and the prevention of marine pollution. Note: The course does not address control procedures under the IL0 conventions as thes
33、e are covered by a separate IL0 publication: Inspection of labour conditions on board ships - Guidelines for procedure. n Objective n identify the responsibilities of the flag State to exercise control over their ships and explain the role of a port State in supplementing such control; n identify an
34、d correctly use the legal instruments available for port State control; n correctly identify and properly report deficiencies to the flag State; and n maximize regional co-operation. n Entry standards The course lays great emphasis upon IMO Control Procedures which, for many important decisions, rel
35、y on the discretion of the officer authorized to exercise port State control. It is therefore essential that trainees in this course have experience with ships, .e. they must either be ships surveyors or have been in charge of the day-to-day operation of a ship, as masters, chief officers, or chief
36、or second engineer officers. Trainees should have a working knowledge of the SOLAS, STCW, Load Lines and Tonnage Conventions and the .equipment requirements of the Collision Regulations. In order to exercise control on board oil and chemical tankers and gas carriers, it is essential for trainees to
37、have had adequate experience in such ships, or to have successfully completed the familiarization courses and advanced training programmes on the operation of tankers 3 PORT STATE CONTROL For environmental control, trainees require a good working knowledge of the MARPOL Convention; alternatively, th
38、ey should have completed the courses on MARPOL 73/78 - Annex I and Annex II. Those having satisfactorily completed the course should be issued with a certificate to that effect. Course certificate, diploma, or document Course intake limitations The number of trainees should not exceed 20 and the pra
39、ctical training should be undertaken in smaller groups of no more than five trainees. Staff requirements All training and instruction should be performed by qualified personnel; the senior instructor should be an experienced ships surveyor and should have experience in carrying out port State contro
40、l inspections. He should also have a good knowledge of the relevant conventions. Assistant instructors should be ships surveyors or senior ships officers; if they do not have experience in port State control inspections they should have successfully completed relevant short courses and advanced trai
41、ning programmes. Teaching facilities and equipment Ordinary classroom facilities and an overhead projector are sufficient. Visits to ships should be arranged, if possible, as part of the practical training. The appropriate equipment must be available if audio-visual materials, such as slides and tap
42、ed recordings, are to be used. Teaching aids (A) Al Instructor Manual (Part D of the course). IMO References R1.l R1.2 R1.3 R2 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, consolidated edition 1996 amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1 998 edition) (I
43、MO-1 67E) 1997/1998 amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1999 edition) (IMO-158E) International Convention on the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the 1978 Protocol Relating thereto, consolidated edition 1997 R2.1- Annex I R2.2 - Annex II
44、R2.3 - P in particular: Teaching aids (indicated by A); IMO references (indicated by ); Course Compendium (indicated by T) will provide valuable information to instructors. The abbreviations used are: add.: addendum app. : appendix art.: article ch. : chapter p. : page para. : paragraph reg. : regul
45、ation sect. : section The following are examples of the use of references: RI .1 - reg. l/l9(f) refers to paragraph (f) of chapter I regulation 19 of the 1974 SOLAS Convention; AI - para. 5 refers to training area 5 (“Action by the Port State”) in the guidance notes of the instructor manual. NOTE Th
46、roughout the course, safe working practices are to be clearly defined and emphasized with reference to current international requirements and regulations. It is expected that the national institution implementing the course will insert references to national and/or regional requirements and regulati
47、ons as necessary. 10 PART C: DETAILED TEACHING SYLLABUS LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1 1.1 Need for Control (3.5 hours) Provisions for port State control in the IMO Conventions (1 hour) .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 .IO .I 1 explains the responsibilities of the flag State Administration under the provisions of:
48、 -the International Convention for the Safety of Life at -the International Convention for the Prevention of Sea, 1974 (SOLAS 74); Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 Relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78) -the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966 (ICLL 66) ; - the Inter
49、national Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW 78); and - the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 (Tonnage 69) with respect to implementing the Conventions explains why administrations may find it difficult to exercise full and continuous control on ships entitled to fly their flag explains that port States may have a legitimate interest in the standards of ships entering their port explains that for reasons of such legitimate interest certain port States undertook to supplement the work of flag
