1、MILITARY STAN DARD Validation Plans For Naval Ordnance Overhaul And Repair Activities, Preparation Of Licensed by Information Handling ServicesDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Washington, D. C. 20301 I_ _- - - - - NIL-STD-LbSb NI qll 00427q5 MIL-STD-1656 (OS) 18 September 1974 Validation Plans for Naval Ordnan
2、ce Overhaul and Repair Activities, Prep- aration of MIL-STD-1656 (OS). 1. This Military Standard is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense. 2. Recommended corrections, additions, or deletions should be addressed to: Commanding Officer, Naval Ordnance Station, S
3、tandardization Divi- sion (5021, Indian Head, MD, 20640. In this regard DD Form 1426 “Standardization Document Improvement Proposal“ has been included at the end of this standard for your convenience. ii Licensed by Information Handling ServicesPARAGRAPH CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 1.1 1.2 2.0 2.1 3.0 4.0 4.1
4、 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.1.1 4.2.1.2 4.2.1.3 4.3 4.3.1 4.3.2 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.2.1 5.2.1.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 5.2.4.1 5.2.4.2 5.2.5 5.3 APPENDIX A B SCOPE . Purpose . Application 1 1 1 REFERENCED DOCUMENT Availability of Documents . 1 1 DEFINITIONS . 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Format Typography General Typing Instruct
5、ions . Page Numbering . Paper Stock . Assembly Changes i Revisions to the Validation Plan Changes . Revisions . 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 DETAIL REQUIREMENTS . Cover Sheet . Prevalidation Planning and Preparation Section Validation Team Formation . Typical Team Complement . Designated Activity Coordinatio
6、n Meetings Potential Validation Tasks . Validation in Conjunction with TRS Proofing Optional Validation Tasks . Milestones and Responsibilities Record . Conclusions and Recommendations . . 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 Optional Validation Tasks . Sample Validation Plan . Al -Al 1 Bl-B22 iii Licensed by In
7、formation Handling ServicesMIL-STD-1656 MI m 9797913 0082997 8 m MIL-STD-1656 (OS) 18 September 1974 1.0 SCOPE. This standard defines the format and provides guid- ance for developing the content of a Validation Plan for validating the capability and capacity of in-house and contractor activities wh
8、ich are involved in the repair/overhaul of Naval Ordnance systems, equipments or integral repairable assemblies. 1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this standard is to standardize the development of a Validation Plan which will provide for the: (a) (b) Definition of how the validation will be performed. De
9、signation of who will perform the validation. (c) Determination of milestones and responsibilities. (d) Detail of what was done during the validation. (e) Permanent record of the validation effort. 1.2 Application. This standard is to be used for the develop- ment of a Validation Plan to validate th
10、e capability and capacity of an in-house or contractor activity to perform repairloverhaul of a specific Naval Ordnance system or equipment, or its specific integral repairable assemblies. Planning documents, such as ILS plans, which indicate re- quirements for intermediateldepot level maintenance s
11、upport of Ordnance systems or equipments shall cite this standard for development of Valida- tion Plans to ensure capability and capacity are available when required. 2.0 REFERENCED DOCUMENT. The issue of the following document in effect on the date of use of this standard forms a part of this stand
12、ard to the extent specified herein: STANDARD MIL-STD-1604 (OS) Technical and Maintenance Overhaul and Repair Standards, Preparation of 2.1 Availability of Documents. Copies of specifications, stan- dards and publications should be obtained through normal agency or activ- ity procedures. 1 Licensed b
13、y Information Handling Services_I_ - -_I MIL-STD-3bSb NI m 7777733 0082978 T m MIL-STD-1656 (OS) 18 September 1974 3.0 DEFINITIONS. Base-Level Repair (BLR) . Repair performed at organ- izational-level and intermediate-level maintenance activities. Designated Overhaul Activity (DOA) . A Designated Ov
14、erhaul Point (DOP) performing depot maintenance on a particular system/equipment with the exception of those components designated for repair or over- haul at a specialized Overhaul Activity (SOA). Designated Repair Activity (DRA), A Base-Level Re- pair activity performing intermediate maintenance o
15、n a particular system/equipment with the exception of those components designated for repair or over- haul at an SOA. Equipment. A component or components and necessary assemblies, subassemblies, and parts connected or associated together to perform an operational func- t ion. Equipment Maintenance.
16、 Equipment maintenance is the function of sustaining material in an operational - status, restoring it to a serviceable condition or updating and upgrading its functional utility through modification. Maintenance Capability, Maintenance capability con- sists of those resources, namely, facilities, t
17、ools, test equipment, drawings, technical publications, trained maintenance personnel, engineering support, and an assured availability of spare parts, required to modify, retain equipment in, or restore to serv- iceable condition. Maintenance Capacity, Maintenance capacity is the quantitative expre
18、ssion of maintenance capability in the amount of direct labor man-hours that can be applied in a 40 hour week (one shift-five days) basis. Overhaul. inal specifications, except for purely cosmetic de- fects, by disassembly, component inspection, re- placement or restoration of unacceptable component
19、s, reassembly incorporating approved alterations, and The process of restoring an item to orig- 2 Licensed by Information Handling ServicesMIL-STD-1656 (OS) 18 September 1974 inspection and test at all required levels of assem- bly. The process insures meeting current approved specifications with a
20、life expectancy for the re- stored item equivalent to new equipment similarly configured. Repair. The restoration of an unserviceable item to an operational status by replacement of failed parts or components, and the replacement of parts/ components necessitated by wear, deterioration, or damage, t
21、o preclude premature failures. Specialized Overhaul Activity (SOA). Overhaul Point (DOP) performing depot maintenance A Designated on a particular equipment/component in support of supply system demands emanating from Designated Overhaul Activities and Base-Level Repair Activities. Tender Repair (TR
22、) . A Base-Level Repair activity performing intermediate maintenance aboard ships designated as tenders in support of equipments in- stalled in Fleet ships. Functions are similar to those of the DRA within available facilities except that emergency repair may be performed as required on components d
23、esignated for repair or overhaul at an SOA. Validation. The systematic administrative, organi- zational and technical actions taken by the Govern- ment to verify an activitys capability to perform intermediate and/or depot maintenance on specifically defined NAVORD components/equipments in accordanc
24、e with applicable directives and established engineer- ing practices. Activities subject to validation include Designated Overhaul Activities (DOAS), Des- ignated Repair Activities (DRAs), Specialized Over- haul Activities (SOAS), and Tender Repair (TR). Designated Overhaul Point (DOP) . An activity
25、 (in- cluding an activity of another service or a contrac- tor) designated by a Hardware Systems Command or Project Manager to perform the highest (depot) level of repair on a particular item or group of items. Validation Program. Validation Program is that part of the NAVORD Equipment Overhaul/Repa
26、ir Program in- volving the validation of the capability and capac- ity of commercial and Government activities to per- form overhaul/repair of NAVORD equipments and com- ponents. 3 Licensed by Information Handling Services_ _l_IL_ MIL-STD-3bSb NI W 77777311 0083000 2 W _ MIL-STD-1656 (OS) 18 Septemb
27、er 1974 4.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. The Validation Plan will be retained as a permanent record for future reference or revalidation effort; there- fore, the quality of the Plan shall be such that it can be handled accord- ingly. 4.1 Format. The Validation Plan shall present material in the following f
28、ormat: Cover Sheet (see Para. 5.1 and Appendix B, page B-1). e Table of Contents (see Appendix By page B-2). e Prevalidation Planning and Preparation (see Para. 5.2 and Appendix B, page B-3). I Milestones and Responsibilities Record (see Para. 5.2.5 and Appendix By page B-4). e Validation Checkoff R
29、ecord (see Appendix By page B-5 through page B-20). e Validation Notes (see Appendix B, page B-21). O Conclusions and Recommendations (see Para. 5.3 and Appendix By page B-22). 4.2 Typography 4.2.1 General Typing Instructions. General typing instructions shall be as follows: (a) Use elite type size,
30、 12 characters per inch. (b) Top, bottom, right and left margins shall be approx- imately 1 inch. 4.2.1.1 Page Numbering. Pages shall he numbered consecutively, in the center, approximately 112 inch from the bottom of the page. 4.2.1.2 Paper Stock. Any good quality white paper stock (8 inches by 10-
31、112 inches) which is suitable for reproduction may be used, out sheets may be used when necessary. Fold- 4.2.1.3 Assembly. Validation Plans shall be assembled as demon- strated by Appendix B, SAMPLE Validation Plan. Attachments to individual validation checkoff records shall follow that sheet. tion
32、Plan shall be stapled. The complete Valida- 4 Licensed by Information Handling Services- MIL-STD-LbSb MI W 77977LL 008300L 4 W MIL-STD-1656 (OS) 18 September 1974 4.3 Changes and Revisions to the Validation Plan. 4.3.1 Changes. The Validation Plan is usually generated by the personnel appointed to c
33、onduct the validation of the activity. Changes may be made by these personnel during the validation process without the use of a formal change or revision procedure. 4.3.2 Revisions. Validation Plans are revised only when an ac- tivity is revalidated. At such time, additions, changes, etc., are made
34、 to the sheets and a Revalidation Date entered on the cover sheet. The in- dividual involved as the Team Leader should sign the revalidation at the same time as the date is affixed to the revised document. 5.0 DETAIL REQUIREMENTS. 5.1 Cover Sheet. The Cover Sheet (see Appendix B) , when filled in, s
35、hall indicate: O Activity Name (activity to be validated). O Activity Designation, i.e. , DOA, SOA, DRA, or TR. O Items for which the Validation Plan is pre- pared will be identified by Mark and Mod Nomenclature, NAVORD Top Drawing Number , and Federal Stock Number (FSN) . However, if there is a fam
36、ily of items, i.e., items which are sufficiently alike that the dis- assembly, repair , testing and inspection is similar, it is permissible to list as many of such items on a single Validation Plan as desired. A common nomenclature, as an example, “HYDRAULIC VALVES FOR ELEVATING MECHANISM, should b
37、e noted on the cover sheet, and a complete listing of each of the “family“ included in the Prevalidation Planning Section. O Applicable ORDALTS shall be noted; however, if a family of items is involved in the validation, the list of ORDALTS for each of the “family“ shall be listed in the Preval- ida
38、tion Planning Section. O Approval Signature and Date shall be filled in by the responsible individual generating the Validation Plan. In a majority of in- stances this will be the validation Team Leader. Licensed by Information Handling Services -_ _I_ _I NIL-STD-LbSb NI m 77777LL 0083002 b m MIL-ST
39、D-1656 (OS) 18 September 1974 5.2 Prevalidation Planning and Preparation Section. The Pre- validation Planning and Preparation Section of the Validation Plan will, as a minimum, include the following information: o References (a) , (b) , (c) , etc. , list all known correspondence that designated the
40、 activity, appointed the Validation Team Leader and team members, correspondence between the designated activity and the team, etc. o Items Covered. Use only when a family of items are covered, then list all individual items involved and applicable ORDALTS. o Provide record of all meetings, telephon
41、e conversations, etc. Where they pertain to an individual item (milestone event) they may be attached to the checkoff ret- ord for that item. 5.2.1 Validation Team Formation. A Validation Team shall be formed for each activitylitem combination being validated. The primary function of the Validation
42、Team is to provide the cognizant Equipment Maintenance Manager, or the delegated MEA, the required assurance that a designated maintenaneelrepair activity can, in fact, accomplish a quality repair within the necessary time frame. 5.2.1.1 Typical Team Complement. NAVORD, or the designated equip- ment
43、 MEA, shall be responsible for appointing the Team Leader and team members to the Validation Team. The Validation Team Leader shall be either a NAVORD representative or a representative of the designated MEA. The team shall be comprised, as a minimum, of the following: (a) One engineering representa
44、tive. (b) One quality assurance representative. (c) One industrial (process) representative. The representatives noted above shall comprise the basic Validation Team. If additional expertise or other support is required for the satisfactory completion of a validation, additional team members shall b
45、e appointed as required. Where possible, auxiliary team members shall not be chosen from the staff of the activity being validated. However, engineers, technicians, craftsmen, and other persons with the necessary skills required to perform overhaullrepair functions for observation by the Validation
46、Team, shall be assigned by the activity undergoing validation at the request of the MEA. 6 Licensed by Information Handling ServicesMIL-STD-1656 (OS) 18 September 1974 There are sufficient variables in the preparation of a Val- idation Plan to prohibit the preparation of the Plan by other than perso
47、n- nel designated to conduct the validation of the activity. 5.2.2 Designated Activity Coordination. Where feasible, the Val- idation Team shall be supplied with available historical data relative to the activity. ing capability, reliability of products either repaired or manufactured, and its avail
48、able technical personnel, should be provided to the Validation Team for its information. Such data as past performance on similar items, manufactur- Prior to establishing firm dates for conducting the vali- dation, there should be mutual assurance that the designated activity is prepared to begin th
49、e required tasks. The activity should provide infor- mation to the team that its various departments and shops have had suffi- cient time to prepare for the validation. Appendix By page B-5, provides a record sheet listing major categories to be checked to provide a per- manent record that the activity was prepared to receive the Validation Team. An overhaullrepair activity being validated to perform ac- ceptable required maintenance on an individual item, may be considered as being validated for all of the items in the “family“; however, assurance of capac
