1、Systems 2020 and AFOSR Status Overview,Barry Boehm, USC Aerospace-USC Technical Interchange November 19, 2010,Agenda,1000-1030. Barry Boehm - Systems 2020 and AFOSR status overview1030-1115. JoAnn Lane/Sue Koolmanojwong/Nupul Kukreja - Process and cost modeling; requirements negotiation1115-1200. Az
2、ad Madni/Ann Majchrzak - Platform-based engineering, collaboration technology, experimental evaluation1200-1245. Lunch and Cliff Neuman - Cyber security research1245-1300. Mike Gruntman - Space systems modeling1300-1330. Aiichiro Nakano - Parallel programming and multicore exploitation1330-1415. Nen
3、o Medvidovic/George Edwards - Architecture-based analysis tools; metadata-based model integration1415-1500. Barry Boehm - General discussion,Systems 2020 Strategic Initiative Overview,Kristen Baldwin ODDR&E/Systems Engineering 13th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference San Diego, CA | October 2
4、8, 2010,Need for Systems 2020,Adversary can use commercial technologies and new tactics to rapidly alter the threat to US forces Increasing uncertainty in future Defense missions & environments DoD engineering, and business processes not structured for adaptability Sequential, single step progressio
5、n from fixed requirements Individually designed, monolithic systems Vulnerabilities from global supply chain New research, tools, pilot efforts needed to determine best methods for building adaptable defense systems,Systems 2020 Designing DoD Systems for Adaptability,Trusted System Design Developing
6、 trusted systems from untrusted components,Platform Based Engineering Using a common core platform to develop many related systems/capabilities,Model Based Engineering Using modeling and simulation for rapid, concurrent, integrated system development and manufacturing,Design Disciplines,Design Frame
7、work,Capability on Demand Real-time Adaptive Systems Rapidly Reconfigurable Systems Pre-planned Disposable Systems,Adaptable DoD Systems,Model Based Engineering Framework Designing for Adaptability,TodayModel selected critical subsystemsLots of design physical prototypes,Stage 1 Segmented Virtual: C
8、oncept Modeling Product Modeling Model Driven Manufacturing,Stage 2 Fully Integrated Process Flow: System Concept, Design, Build, Field, Adapt,- Design decisions and interactions captured on paper, lost in personnel turnover. - Lack of iterative concept design environment. - Manual integration acros
9、s product design seams. - Custom manufacturing solutions.,- Emergence of open virtual design environment, interoperable tools and design data/artifacts. - Early analysis of PBE and TSD system trades in concept, product, manufacturing models.,- Robust end-to-end open multi-scale design environment, t
10、ools, data, patterns & virtual/physical verification. - Support full system PBE & TSD trades, responding to dynamic threats & trust scenarios.,Early DesignLock In,Iterative/ Adaptive Process - Entire Life Cycle,Adaptive Transparent Systems,Systems Engineering Gaps and Critical Needs,Gaps,Need for a
11、conceptual design environment,Lack of tools to integrate system modeling capabilities across domains,Lack of open, virtual, realistic environment for validation, testing and manufacturing,Summer 2010 Studies Identified deficiencies and gaps in systems engineering,BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON Systems-2020 Stu
12、dy Final Report Booz Allen Hamilton 8/16/2010,Analysis of these reports categorized gaps into 3 areas,An integrated framework for concept, design and analysis of systems Accomodates custom and commercial tools based on open architectures and standards Common conceptual environment and design tools f
13、or seamless interoperability Capabilities to verify system integrity, promote modularity and re-use, and design for trust Enhanced multi-scale Mod/Sim tools that support cross domain testing,SE Research Center S-2020 Study,Booz Allen Hamilton S-2020 Study,Lead to Critical Needs,Overview of S-2020 Pa
14、th Ahead POM12 5-year budget over $100M,Research and Development,Pilot Projects - Demos,FY 12,FY 13,FY 14,FY 15,FY 16,PBE Research,MBE Research,Phase I,Phase II,Other Research,Pilot Demonstrations,Pilot Demonstrations,Business Processes, Standards, Transition,Pilot Demonstrations,Pilot-specific R&D
15、(New and Leveraged),Phase III,Summary,DDR&Es Systems 2020 initiative develops the design disciplines and framework to build adaptable Defense systems Program consists of research, pilot projects and transition efforts to advance key technologies Platform Based Engineering, Model Based Engineering, T
16、rusted Systems Design Rapidly reconfigurable systems Execution performed through partnership with Services, Government, Industry, AcademiaWe look forward to broad community engagement,Reduced Air Force operating costs Highly adaptive autonomous systems Human performance augmentation Increased cyber
17、resilience Precision navigation timing without GPS Electromagnetic spectrum warfare Processing-enabled intelligent systems Directed energy for tactical strike/defense Next-generation, high-efficiency gas turbine engines Persistent space situational awareness Rapidly composable small satellites,AFOSR Research Strategy Addresses Technology Horizons Study Priorities,
