1、BSI Standards PublicationBS EN 16601-10-01:2014Space project managementPart 10-01: Organization and conduct ofreviewsBS EN 16601-10-01:2014 BRITISH STANDARDNational forewordThis British Standard is the UK implementation of EN16601-10-01:2014. It supersedes BS EN 14093:2002 which iswithdrawn.The UK p
2、articipation in its preparation was entrusted to TechnicalCommittee ACE/68, Space systems and operations.A list of organizations represented on this committee can beobtained on request to its secretary.This publication does not purport to include all the necessaryprovisions of a contract. Users are
3、responsible for its correctapplication. The British Standards Institution 2014. Published by BSI StandardsLimited 2014ISBN 978 0 580 83334 2ICS 49.140Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity fromlegal obligations.This British Standard was published under the authority of theStandard
4、s Policy and Strategy Committee on 31 August 2014.Amendments issued since publicationDate Text affectedBS EN 16601-10-01:2014EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPENNE EUROPISCHE NORMEN 16601-10-01 August 2014 ICS 49.140 Supersedes EN 14093:2002 English version Space project management - Part 10-01: Organiza
5、tion and conduct of reviews Management des projets spatiaux - Partie 10-01: Organisation et conduite de revues Raumfahrt-Projektmanagement - Teil 10-01: Organisation und Durchfhrung von Reviews This European Standard was approved by CEN on 14 December 2013. CEN and CENELEC members are bound to compl
6、y with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for givingthis European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC M
7、anagement Centre or to any CEN and CENELEC member. This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN and CENELEC member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Manage
8、ment Centre has the same status as the official versions. CEN and CENELEC members are the national standards bodies and national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germa
9、ny, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom. CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2014 CEN/CENELEC All rights
10、of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members and for CENELEC Members. Ref. No. EN 16601-10-01:2014 EBS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 2 Table of contentsForeword 4 1 Scope. 5 2 Normative references. 6 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms
11、7 3.1 Terms from other standards 7 3.2 Terms specific to the present standard . 7 3.3 Abbreviated terms. 8 4 Fundamentals of reviews. 9 4.1 Basic principles. 9 4.2 Review tasks 9 4.2.1 Initiation of the review . 9 4.2.2 Preparation and distribution of the review data-package . 9 4.2.3 Review of the
12、documentation 10 4.2.4 Review findings and conclusions.10 5 Requirements11 5.1 General.11 5.2 Review bodies 11 5.3 Roles and tasks 12 5.3.1 Review authority .12 5.3.2 Customer 12 5.3.3 Supplier.13 5.3.4 Review team leader 13 5.3.5 Review team .13 5.4 Prerequisite conditions for holding the review.13
13、 5.5 Review meetings 14 5.5.1 Prerequisite key point14 5.5.2 Kick-off meeting 14 5.5.3 Coordination meeting 14 5.5.4 Collocation meeting.14 BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 3 5.5.5 Review team close-out meeting 14 5.5.6 Review authority meeting15 5.6 RID processing and action item follo
14、w-up .15 Annex A (normative) Review procedure - DRD.16 Annex B (normative) Review item discrepancy (RID) - DRD18 Annex C (normative) Review team report - DRD.21 Annex D (normative) Review authority report - DRD23 Annex E (informative) Logic diagram for RID processing .24 Annex F (informative) Exampl
15、es for defined terms25 Bibliography.26 FiguresFigure 4-1: Review information flow10Figure B-1 : Example of RID form.19 Figure B-2 : Example of RID form (continued) 20 Figure E-1 : Flow logic for the RID processing24 BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 4 Foreword This document (EN 16601-10-
16、01:2014) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/CLC/TC 5 “Space”, the secretariat of which is held by DIN. This standard (EN 16601-10-01:2014) originates from ECSS-M-ST-10-01C. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text o
17、r by endorsement, at the latest by February 2015, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by February 2015. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN and/or CENELEC shall not be held responsib
18、le for identifying any or all such patent rights. This document supersedes EN 14093:2002. This document has been developed to cover specifically space systems and has therefore precedence over any EN covering the same scope but with a wider domain of applicability (e.g. : aerospace). According to th
19、e CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, H
20、ungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 5 1 ScopeThis Standard provides means for identifying an
21、d structuring all of the activities and information required in a project review. It identifies the information outputs and activities necessary to complete the process. It also provides a checklist of activities and information required for each of the project reviews identified in the ECSS Managem
22、ent Standards. This standard may be tailored for the specific characteristics and constraints of a space project, in conformance with ECSS-S-ST-00. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 6 2 Normative referencesThe following normative documents contain provisions which, through reference in t
23、his text, constitute provisions of this ECSS Standard. For dated references, subsequent amendments to, or revision of any of these publications do not apply, However, parties to agreements based on this ECSS Standard are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the more recent editions
24、of the normative documents indicated below. For undated references, the latest edition of the publication referred to applies. EN reference Reference in text Title EN-16601-00-01 ECSS-S-ST-00-01 ECSS system - Glossary of terms EN 16601-10 ECSS-M-ST-10 Space project management - Project planning and
25、implementation EN 16603-10 ECSS-E-ST-10 Space engineering - System engineering general requirements EN 16602-10 ECSS-Q-ST-10 Space product assurance - Product assurance management BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 7 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms3.1 Terms from other standards
26、For the purpose of this Standard, the terms and definitions from ECSS-S-ST-00-01 apply, in particular for the following terms: customer NOTE 1 In the context of the current document, it identifies the body ensuring the execution of all tasks necessary for the realization of the project according to
27、the high level requirement document and within the financial resources allocated by the consumer. NOTE 2 The customer is responsible for the implementation of the review recommendations endorsed by the review authority. NOTE 2 See informative annex F for example of application of the above to differ
28、ent levels of a space project supplier NOTE 1 In the context of the current document, it identifies the body executing all tasks necessary for the realization of the project according to the terms and condition of a business agreement submitted by the customer. NOTE 2 See informative Annex F for exa
29、mple of application of the above to different levels of a space project 3.2 Terms specific to the present standard3.2.1 consumerbody specifying a project or (product) through a high level requirement document (such as mission statement or SFS and STS) and providing the necessary financial resources
30、for its realization. NOTE See informative Annex F for example of application of the above to different levels of a space project BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 8 3.2.2 review authoritybody appointed by the consumer organization, having the mandate to issue recommendations to the custo
31、mer and issue decisions relating to the review process NOTE This is also referred to as the review board. 3.2.3 review item discrepancy (RID)issue, identified by a reviewer, that is not compliant with a requirement, a review objective or a design goal 3.2.4 review prerequisiteconditions necessary to
32、 be fulfilled prior to the start of the review 3.2.5 review teambody appointed by the review authority, having the mandate to evaluate the status of the project under review 3.2.6 review team leaderperson responsible for the review team activities and issuing the review team report 3.3 Abbreviated t
33、ermsFor the purpose of this Standard, the abbreviated terms from ECSS-S-ST-00-01 and the following apply: Abbreviation Meaning DRD document requirement description FEPS Fiche dtude de problme soulev MRD mission requirements document RIDreview item discrepancy SRD system requirements document BS EN 1
34、6601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 9 4 Fundamentals of reviews4.1 Basic principles Project reviews are examinations of the technical status of a project and associated issues at a particular point in time. Their primary purpose is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the project status again
35、st targets and requirements. Through independent participation, they give additional support to the project concerned at crucial stages and give the responsible management confidence in the technical progress being achieved. Additionally, reviews can identify potential lessons learned. Reviews are c
36、arried out throughout the project life cycle, as defined in ECSS-M-ST-10, at all levels from mission to unit level. The review purpose, mandate and documentation vary for each particular project and for the specific phase or stage of activity of the project. The efficiency of any review process is d
37、ependent upon the planning and organization of the review work, including specific assignment of responsibilities and the plan to close out the action items raised during the review. The current ECSS document specifies basic principles in order to establish these organisational aspects. 4.2 Review t
38、asks 4.2.1 Initiation of the reviewThis task comprises the assignment of review members to the review bodies, the preparation and release of the review procedure and the assessment of the prerequisites. 4.2.2 Preparation and distribution of the review data-packageThis task comprises the preparation
39、and distribution of the documentation as defined in the review procedure. In a kick-off meeting review participants are familiarized with the review objectives and the documentation submitted for the review. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 10 4.2.3 Review of the documentationThis task
40、comprises the detailed review of the review data-package including additional information provided in the kick-off presentation. Identified problems, questions and solutions arising from the examination of the documentation are recorded on review item discrepancy (RID) forms. Collocation meetings be
41、tween the review team and the customer/supplier serve to solve issues raised in RIDs, to consolidate findings and to provide recommendations for RID closure. Finally a report is issued on the behalf of the review team, synthesizing the results of the review and identifying major issues for attention
42、 of the review authority. The information flow for this review activity is illustrated in Figure 4-1. An example of a logic diagram for the RID processing is presented in Annex E. SUPPLIERREVIEWTEAMCUSTOMERREVIEWAUTHORITYProvides the Data-PackValidates the Data-PackReports findings andrecommendation
43、sRIDMajor/MinorCollocationCoordinationReviews the datapackageFigure 4-1: Review information flow4.2.4 Review findings and conclusionsThis task comprises the examination of the review team findings, confirmation of the recommendations, decisions for follow-up activities and confirmation of the achiev
44、ement of the review objectives. BS EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 11 5 Requirements5.1 General a. The customer shall ensure the level of independent expertise in the review team and provide access to the information identified in the review procedure. b. A project review shall provide th
45、e customer with advice and recommendations aiming at the resolution of any deficiencies identified during the process. c. The activity specified in 5.1b shall typically cover the following aspects: compliance with the mission objectives or applicable STS or SFS; adequacy of the requirements; credibi
46、lity of the proposed design, development and verification; risk assessment and mitigation; credibility of plans and schedules. d. The customer shall organize the review with the approval of the consumer. e. A project review shall be based on the examination of a data-package that: 1. is compliant wi
47、th the list of documents to be delivered as specified for the review 2. is sufficient to demonstrate achievement of the review objectives. 5.2 Review bodies a. The participants in a review shall include the review authority at the level of the consumer, the project teams at the level of the customer
48、 and supplier, and the review team. b. The members of the review authority shall be appointed by the consumer organization. c. The review authority shall be chaired by an independent representative of the consumer organization and may be co-chaired by a representative of the customer organization. B
49、S EN 16601-10-01:2014EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 12 d. The review team shall include representatives of the consumer organization having no direct involvement in the project activities. 5.3 Roles and tasks 5.3.1 Review authoritya. The review authority shall approve the review procedure and in particular: 1. the objectives of the review according to ECSS-M-ST-10 requirements; 2. the review team composition; 3. the execution of the review. b. The review authority shall examine the final review team report(s). c. The review authority shall endorse or amend the recommendatio
