1、 STD-ITU-T RECMN X.724-ENGL L77b H LiAb257L Ob25078 IT2 INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITUmT TELECOMMUN KATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU X.724 (I 0/96) SERIES X: DATA NETWORKS AND OPEN SYSTEM COM M U N I CATI ON OS management - Structure of Management Information Information technology -
2、Open Systems Interconnection - Structure of management information: Requirements and guidelines for implementation conformance statement proformas associated with OS1 management ITU-T Recommendation X.724 (Previously “CCITT Recommendation“) ITU-T X-SERIES RECOMMENDATIONS DATA NETWORKS AND OPEN SYSTE
3、M COMMUNICATION PUBLIC DATA NETWORKS Services and facilities Interfaces Transmission, signalling and switching Network aspects Maintenance Administrative arrangements Model and notation Service definitions Connection-mode protocol specifications Connectionless-mode protocol specification PICS profor
4、mas Protocol Identification Security Protocols Layer Managed Objects Conformance testing General Satellite data transmission networks MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS DIRECTORY OS1 NETWORKING AND SYSTEM ASPECTS Networking Efficiency Naming, Addressing and Registration OPEN SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION INTERWORKIN
5、G BETWEEN NETWORKS X. 1-X.199 X. 1-X. 19 X.20-X.49 X.50-X.89 X.90-X. 149 X.150-X.179 X. 180-X. 199 X.200-X.299 X.200-X.209 X.2 1 O-X.2 19 X.220-X.229 X.230-X.239 X.240-X.259 X.260-X.269 X.270-X.279 X.280-X.289 X.290-X.299 X.300-X.399 X.300-X.349 X.350-X.399 X.400-X.499 X.500-X.599 X.600-X.699 X.600-
6、X.629 X.630-X.649 X.650-X.679 I Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) X.680-X.699 Systems Management framework and architecture Management Communication Service and Protocol X.700-X.709 X.710-X.719 I Strnctnie o Management information X1720-X.729 Management functions SECURITY OS1 APPLICATIONS Commitm
7、ent, Concurrency and Recovery Transaction processing Remote operations OPEN DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING X.730-X.799 X.800-X.849 X.850-X.899 X.850-X.859 X.860-X.879 X.880-X.899 X.900-X.999 For further details, please refer to ITU-TList of Recommendations. FOREWORD ITU (International Telecommunication Unio
8、n) is the United Nations Specialized Agency in the field of telecommunications. The IT Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of the ITU. Some 179 member countries, 84 telecom operating entities, 145 scientific and industrial organizations and 38 international organiza
9、tions participate in ITU-T which is the body which sets world telecommunications standards (Recommendations). The approval of Recommendations by the Members of ITU-T is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSC Resolution No. 1 (Helsinki, 1993). In addition, the World Telecommunication Standardizat
10、ion Conference (WTSC), which meets every four years, approves Recommendations submitted to it and establishes the study programme for the following period. In some areas of information technology which fall within ITU-Ts purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with IS0
11、 and IEC. The text of ITU-T Recommendation X.724 was approved on 5th of October 1996. The identical text is also published as ISO/IEC International Standard 10165-6. NOTE In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration” is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administrati
12、on and a recognized operating agency. O ITU 1997 I l All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the ITU, except as noted in footnotes 1)
13、 to 7) in Annexes A to G respectively. ITU-T Rec. X.724 (1996 E) 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 CONTENTS Scope Normative references . 2.1 Identical Recommendations I International Standards 2.2 Paired ITU-T Recommendations 1 International Standards equivalent in technical content . Definitions 3.1 ASN.l definitions
14、. 3.3 3.4 Systems management overview definitions 3.5 CMIS definitions . 3.6 3.7 Guidelines for the definition of managed objects definitions . 3.8 3.9 Additional defnitions . Abbreviations . 3.2 Management framework definitions . Conformance testing methodology definitions . Management information
15、model definitions . Implementation conformance statements definitions Requirements and guidelines for specification and completion of proformas . 5.1 Structure of proformas 5.2 General instructions 5.3 Instructions for MCS proforma specification . 5.4 Instructions for MOCS proforma specification . 5
16、.5 Instructions for MIDS proforma specification 5.6 Instructions for MRCS proforma specification for name bindings . 5.7 Instructions for MICS proforma specification Compliance Annex A . MCS proforma A.l Introduction . A.2 Identification of the implementation . A.3 Identification of the document in
17、which the management information is defined A.4 Management conformance summary Annex B - MOCS proform a. . B . 1 Introduction . B.2 B.3 Statement of conformance to the managed object class B.4 Attributes B.5 Attribute Groups . B.6 Actions B.7 Notifications B.8 Parameters . Annex C - MIDS (attribute)
18、 proforma C.1 Attributes C.2 Parameters . Annex D - MIDS (attribute group) proforma . D . 1 Attribute groups D.2 Parameters . Annex E - MIDS (action) proforma E.l Actions E.2 Parameters . Instructions for completing the MOCS proforma to produce a MOCS 11 ITU-T Rec . X.724 (1996 E) Page 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
19、 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 7 8 9 10 10 15 16 16 16 17 17 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 23 24 24 24 25 25 25 STD-ITU-T RECMN X.724-ENGL L77b W 9Ab257L Ob25102 953 Annex F . MIDS (notification) proforma . F.l Notifications F.2 Parameters . Annex G - MRCS proforma for name bindings G.l Introduction . G.
20、2 Instructions for completing the MRCS proforma for name bindings to produce an MRCS for name bindings . G.3 G.4 Parameters . Annex H - MICS (attribute) proforma H.l Attributes H.2 Parameters . Statement of conformance to the name binding Annex I - MICS (attribute group) proforma . 1.1 Attribute gro
21、ups 1.2 Parameters . Annex J - MICS (action) proforma . J.l Actions J.2 Parameters . Annex K - MICS (notification) proforma . K.1 Notifications K.2 Parameters . Annex L - MICS (create and delete) proforma . Create and Delete support . L.l L.2 Parameters . Annex M - Additional informative guidelines
22、for proforma specification . M.l Introduction . M.2 Table labels and indexing . M.4 Condition statements . M.5 No such characteristics in the managed object class definition M.6 Abbreviations for object identifiers M.7 Parameter tables M.8 Action and notification field name labels . M.9 Guidelines f
23、or package support tables M.10 When different proformas should be included M.11 Minimum conformance requirement . M . 12 Compatible classes M.13 MOCS proforma for non-instantiable classes . M . 14 Attributes inherited from top . M . 15 Interpretation of m in status column M.16 Guidelines on conditio
24、nal expressions M . 17 Multiple MICS proformas of the same type M.18 Order of ICs proformas Annex N - Additional informative guidelines for completion of proformas N.l Introduction . N.2 N.3 N.4 M.3 Extending tables . Use support summary tables to map table numbers Support of set by create in manage
25、r role . To claim limited support in manager role . Page 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 28 28 28 29 29 29 30 30 30 31 31 31 32 32 32 33 33 33 33 35 37 37 37 37 38 38 39 40 40 40 40 41 41 41 42 42 42 42 42 . ITU-T Rec . X.724 (1996 E) 111 STD-ITU-T RECMN XJZq-ENGL 179b 9 48b2571 Ob25103 37T m Annex O . Exam
26、ple of MCS profonna . 0.1 Introduction . 0.2 0.3 Identification of the document in which the management information is defined 0.4 Management conformance summary Annex P - Example of MICS proforma P . 1 Introduction . P.2 Instnictions P.3 Example Annex Q - Example of MOCS profonna Q.1 Introduction .
27、 4.3 Statement of conformance to the managed object class 4.4 Attributes 4.5 Attribute Groups . 4.6 Actions Q.7 Notifications Q.8 Parameters . Identification of the implementation . 4.2 Instructions for completing the MOCS proforma to produce a MOCS Annex R - Example of MRCS profonna for name bindin
28、g Instructions for completing the MRCS proforma for name binding to produce a MRCS R.l Introduction . R.2 R.3 Statement of conformance to the name binding R.4 Parameters . Page 43 43 44 45 45 49 49 49 49 52 52 52 52 53 54 54 54 56 57 57 57 57 57 iv ITU-T Rec . X.724 (1996 E) L99b M 48b259L Ob25304 2
29、2b Summary ITU-T Rec. X.724 (1993) I ISOAEC 10165-6:1994 defines a standard method for specifying the agent and message conformance in a manager-agent Operations System (OS) interaction that uses OS1 systems management-based messages. This revision extends ITU-T Rec. X.724 I ISOAEC 10165-6 to cover
30、the manager end of the interaction. The result of this extension is that the time to carry out interoperability tests between a manager OS from one vendor and an agent OS from another vendor may be reduced because product developers can be provided with more explicit message specification for the ma
31、nager OS. Introduction This Recommendation I International Standard includes the modifications necessary to 10165-6 to cover all types of conformance claims associated with management information and an overview of the situation related to ICs proformas. The major part of the modifications are neces
32、sary for claims of conformance for systems supporting management information in the manager role. This Recommendation I International Standard also includes an issues list related to manager role ICs proformas. The modifications are an attempt to satis the following requirements: 0 the addition of m
33、anager role proformas should have minimal impact on existing ICs proformas; the proformas must be flexible enough for all possible conforming implementations; the proformas should be as compact as possible; the proformas should be easy to reference from Profile Requirements Lists; Related work The f
34、ollowing related work is being performed to provide the complete framework for manager role ICs proformas: Guidance are given in 10040 - SMO on how specifications defining management information should define conformance requirements in the conformance clause. The basis for all claims of conformance
35、 to a specification are defined in the conformance clause of this Specification. For Specifications defining management information (including SMFs), which can be supported by a system in the manager role, the conformance clauses are being amended to contain a requirement that an implementation iden
36、tifies the management information it supports in the manager role. Standards defining management information include or reference an MCS proforma. A supplier of an implementation should be able to use the MCS proforma to provide a summary of the management information supported in the agent role and
37、or the manager role. Standards defining management information are being amended to provide MICS proformas for all management information defined in those standards. Current situation Guidelines for the definition of proformas for conformance claims are defined in this Recommendation I International
38、 Standard. These guidelines are currently restricted to agent role conformance claims. Guidelines are given for MCS, MOCS and MRCS proformas. The MIDS proforma defined in this Recommendation I Intemational Standard cannot be used for conformance claims, it is only used as a building block in the con
39、struction of a MOCS proforma. ICs proformas following these guidelines are currently being developed as amendments to standards defining management information. New standards are expected to include the proformas as they are developed. Conformance claims for systems supporting the manager role canno
40、t be made using the current MCS, MOCS and MRCS proformas. Manager role proformas are being added in the current standards to allow claims of conformance in the manager role. These proformas and guidelines to use them should be documented in this Recommendation I International Standard to ensure cons
41、istent use of manager role ICs proformas in all systems management standards. ITU-T Rec. X.724 (1996 E) V Structure for ICs proformas related to OS1 Management A conformance claim for a system supporting management information can be structured in two levels. The rst level is a summary of the implem
42、ented management information. This information is given in the MCS. The second level is the support of individual management information. This is given in MOCS, MICS and MRCS. A MICS proforma (Management Information Conformance Statement) must be defined together with any definition of management in
43、formation if claims in the manager role should be possible. The proforma can be used by an implementation to provide information on the options implemented. It can also be used as the basis for Profile Requirements Lists used in the definition of profiles. For a system implementing agent role, the c
44、laim should include MCS, MOCS and MRCS. For a system implementing manager role, the claim should include MCS and MICS. The conformance clause of a Specification defining management information should reference an MCS proforma where all requirements for support are explicitly defined. The conformance
45、 clause must identi the mandatory requirements and any optional requirements. Proformas for conformance claims must in general be sufficiently flexible to enable all possible conformance claims allowed by this Specification. For standards defining management information some guidelines for the struc
46、ture should be given in this Recommendation I International Standard (and in CCIT Rec. X.701 1 ISOAEC 10040). The MICS proformas include an Additional Information column, that could be used to give information about how the management information is supported. The use of the Additional Information c
47、olumn is described in 5.2. vi ITU-T Rec. X.724 (1996 E) STD-ITU-T RECMN X.72Li-ENGL L77b m 4b257L b25Lb UT7 ISO/IEC 10165-6 : 1997 (E) INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ITU-T RECOMMENDATION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - OPEN SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION - STRUCTURE OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION: REQUIREMENTS PROFORMAS ASSOC
48、IATED WITH OS1 MANAGEMENT AND GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION CONFORMANCE STATEMENT 1 Scope This Recommendation I Intemational Standard provides requirements and guidelines for Management Conformance Summary (MCS) proformas, Management Information Conformance Statement (MICS) proformas, Managed Object
49、 Conformance Statement (MOCS) proformas, Management Information Definition Statement (MIDS) proformas, and Managed Relationship Conformance Statement (MRCS) proformas and for the specification of these proformas. These proformas are applicable to standards for OS1 management including definitions of managed objects. The MCS proforma provides a summary of PICS proforma, MICS proforma, MOCS proforma and MRCS proforma. The PICS is a statement made by an implementor to claim conformance to a protocol specification. The MICS is a statement made by an implementor to claim confo
