NEMA ABP 8-2016 Avoid Arc-Flash Occurrences by Following Industry Standards.pdf

上传人:周芸 文档编号:993939 上传时间:2019-03-16 格式:PDF 页数:9 大小:513.34KB
下载 相关 举报
NEMA ABP 8-2016 Avoid Arc-Flash Occurrences by Following Industry Standards.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共9页
NEMA ABP 8-2016 Avoid Arc-Flash Occurrences by Following Industry Standards.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共9页
NEMA ABP 8-2016 Avoid Arc-Flash Occurrences by Following Industry Standards.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共9页
NEMA ABP 8-2016 Avoid Arc-Flash Occurrences by Following Industry Standards.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共9页
NEMA ABP 8-2016 Avoid Arc-Flash Occurrences by Following Industry Standards.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共9页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、NEMA Standards PublicationNational Electrical Manufacturers AssociationNEMA ABP 8-2016 Avoid Arc-Flash Occurrences by Following Industry Standards 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association A NEMA Low Voltage Distribution Equipment Section Document ABP 8-2016 Avoid Arc-Flash Occurrences by F

2、ollowing Industry Standards Published by National Electrical Manufacturers Association 1300 North 17th Street, Suite 900 Rosslyn, Virginia 22209 www.nema.org 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association. All rights, including translation into other languages, reserved under the Universal Copyr

3、ight Convention, the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, and the International and Pan American copyright conventions. NEMA ABP 8-2016 Page ii 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this publication was considered t

4、echnically sound by the consensus of persons engaged in the development and approval of the document at the time it was developed. Consensus does not necessarily mean that there is unanimous agreement among every person participating in the development of this document. NEMA standards and guideline

5、publications, of which the document contained herein is one, are developed through a voluntary consensus standards development process. This process brings together volunteers and/or seeks out the views of persons who have an interest in the topic covered by this publication. While NEMA administers

6、the process and establishes rules to promote fairness in the development of consensus, it does not write the document and it does not independently test, evaluate, or verify the accuracy or completeness of any information or the soundness of any judgments contained in its standards and guideline pub

7、lications. NEMA disclaims liability for any personal injury, property, or other damages of any nature whatsoever, whether special, indirect, consequential, or compensatory, directly or indirectly resulting from the publication, use of, application, or reliance on this document. NEMA disclaims and ma

8、kes no guaranty or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any information published herein, and disclaims and makes no warranty that the information in this document will fulfill any of your particular purposes or needs. NEMA does not undertake to guarantee the performan

9、ce of any individual manufacturer or sellers products or services by virtue of this standard or guide. In publishing and making this document available, NEMA is not undertaking to render professional or other services for or on behalf of any person or entity, nor is NEMA undertaking to perform any d

10、uty owed by any person or entity to someone else. Anyone using this document should rely on his or her own independent judgment or, as appropriate, seek the advice of a competent professional in determining the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances. Information and other standards o

11、n the topic covered by this publication may be available from other sources, which the user may wish to consult for additional views or information not covered by this publication. NEMA has no power, nor does it undertake to police or enforce compliance with the contents of this document. NEMA does

12、not certify, test, or inspect products, designs, or installations for safety or health purposes. Any certification or other statement of compliance with any health or safety-related information in this document shall not be attributable to NEMA and is solely the responsibility of the certifier or ma

13、ker of the statement. NEMA ABP 8-2016 Page 1 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Foreword This is an update to a NEMA white paper originally published in 2003. To ensure that a meaningful publication was being developed, draft copies were sent to a number of groups within NEMA having

14、an interest in this topic. Their resulting comments and suggestions provided vital input prior to final NEMA approval and resulted in a number of substantive changes in this publication. This publication will be periodically reviewed by the Molded Case Circuit Breaker Product Group of the Low Voltag

15、e Distribution Equipment Section of NEMA for any revisions necessary to keep it up to date with advancing technology. Proposed or recommended revisions should be submitted to: Senior Technical Director, Operations National Electrical Manufacturers Association 1300 North 17thStreet, Suite 900 Rosslyn

16、, VA 22209 This white paper was developed by the Molded Case Circuit Breaker Product Group of the Low Voltage Distribution Equipment Section of NEMA. Approval of this white paper does not necessarily imply that all members of the Product Group voted for its approval or participated in its developmen

17、t. At the time it was approved, the Molded Case Circuit Breaker Product Group had the following members: ABB Inc.Wichita Falls, TX Eaton CorporationPittsburgh, PA General ElectricPlainville, CT Siemens Industry, Inc.Norcross, GA Schneider Electric USAAndover, MA NEMA ABP 8-2016 Page 2 2016 National

18、Electrical Manufacturers Association 1 Introduction The hazards of arc flash have received considerable attention in recent time for a number of reasons. When an arcing fault occurs, the harmful results can be devastating and deadly for those who are not properly prepared. Because of the potentially

19、 long-term effects, not only is the individual impacted, but also the family and employer. Equipment damage is usually considerable, frequently resulting in extended down time for the installation. Awareness of this hazard has arisen through industry forums such as the IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Wor

20、kshop and NFPA training conferences. Industry codes and standards have also included measures to reduce the effects of arc flash. These codes and standards help facility operators to take preventive steps. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the nature of the hazard and the industry codes and

21、standards that address arc flash. It also introduces the requirements with which facilities must comply. 2 The Arc-Flash Hazard NFPA 70E-2015, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace defines the arc-flash hazard as “a dangerous condition associated with the possible release of energy caused

22、by an electric arc.” An arc flash is an explosion involving an electric arc operating at temperatures of several thousand degrees Celsius and a pressure wave created by the arc. Within a few milliseconds, the energy from this explosion can cause severe burns and damage to hearing, vision, taste and

23、smell. Molten metal particles, equipment parts and other loose items are expelled from the arc area. As a result, multiple trauma effects can occur that frequently prevent the worker from returning to work and may cause hardship for the family in relationships and financial issues, as well as medica

24、l treatment issues. These effects sometimes result in death. Many electricians “take pride” in their ability to work on energized equipment without incident. Perhaps they and their employers are not aware of the risk they are taking. One unexpected condition can initiate the explosion, which is over

25、 before reaction time permits escape. Appropriate training and preparation can be done to minimize the effects of an arc-flash event. The potential hazardous energy associated with an arc flash can be calculated. Personal protective equipment (PPE) intended for use in the environment can be used. In

26、 fact, these steps of performing the calculations, providing the training, preparation and PPE are now industry requirements. 3 Industry Standards The primary industry standards that address the arc-flash hazard are these. OSHA, 29 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1910, Subpart S NFPA 70E, Standard

27、for Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces ANSI/NFPA 70, National Electrical Code(NEC) IEEE 1584, Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) was created to assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and

28、women by setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education and assistance. OSHA 29 CFR Part 1910.333 states in part that “Safety related work practices shall be employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical conta

29、cts when work is performed near or on equipment or circuits which are or may be energized” Although a number of related requirements are included within OSHA standards, OSHA field personnel also reference the requirements of NFPA 70E to enforce safety related to arc flash. NEMA ABP 8-2016 Page 3 201

30、6 National Electrical Manufacturers Association NFPA 70E might be thought of as a “how to” standard. It provides guidance on specific steps that must be taken to comply with the more general OSHA requirements. The NFPA 70E recognizes that there are circumstances that allow working on live, energized

31、 electrical equipment. As a result, recommendations and requirements are defined for the levels of protective systems and apparatus that must be in place when personnel are working near live energized electrical equipment. Strict guidelines are outlined in NFPA 70E for the various levels of PPE that

32、 must be worn by personnel in certain hazardous situations. IEEE 1584 provides definitive calculation steps in support of NFPA 70E. It provides a method to calculate incident energy from which decisions about the kind of PPE needed are made. The method takes into account the key role of the interrup

33、ting time of the overcurrent protective device. It also includes other factors such as the presence of an enclosure for the overcurrent protective device, the gap between conductors, the type of grounding system, and the distance from the possible arcing point to a person. In NEC Section 110.16, Arc

34、-Flash Hazard Warning, electrical equipment, such as switchboards, panelboards, industrial control panels, meter socket enclosures, and motor control centers that are in other than dwelling units and are likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized shall be fi

35、eld marked to warn qualified persons of potential electric arc-flash hazards. The marking shall be permanently affixed to the equipment or wiring method, and be of sufficient durability to withstand the environment involved. The label shall adequately warn of the hazard using effective words, colors

36、, and/or symbols. It should be located so it is clearly visible to qualified persons before examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance of the equipment. Both the NEC, in Section 110.16, and the NFPA 70E require that equipment be field or factory marked with a label which warns qualified pers

37、ons of potential arc-flash hazards. The label includes information to warn of conditions such as the Flash Hazard Boundary, the arc-flash energy (expressed in cal/cm2), and the recommended PPE level. An example of this type of label is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 Example of an Arc-Flash Warning Labe

38、l, per NFPA 70E NEMA ABP 8-2016 Page 4 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Electrically Safe Work Condition Both OSHA standards and NFPA 70E require that equipment be placed in an electrically safe work condition before employees work on or near them. Essentially, this requires that e

39、quipment be de-energized and that verification be made that the equipment is truly de-energized before it is worked on. There are exceptions for cases in which de-energizing would introduce additional hazards or for cases in which the work cannot be done with the system de-energized. For example, to

40、 shut down a life-support system or a ventilation system for a hazardous location would introduce additional hazard. Trouble shooting might be an example of work that cannot be done with the system de-energized. The point is that the basic requirement, and it is a requirement, is to de-energize befo

41、re working on equipment. The reason is that the hazard is removed by de-energizing. With careful planning, work can almost always be done with equipment de-energized. However, placing equipment in an electrically safe work condition involves the main steps in which an electrical conductor or circuit

42、 part has been disconnected from energized parts, locked/tagged in accordance with established standards, tested to ensure the absence of voltage, and grounded if determined necessary. These steps are done while the equipment is not yet verified to be in a safe condition, which requires that appropr

43、iate protective precautions including use of PPE are applied during the de-energizing process. Electrical Safety Program NFPA 70E requires establishment of an electrical safety program for each facility. The safety program provides for developing practices, providing training for employees and perfo

44、rmance of a flash hazard analysis. It is the responsibility of the employer to provide the practices and training. In addition, the employer is responsible to make sure that qualified employees are in compliance with safety-related practices, that re-training is conducted as needed, and that records

45、 of the employee training are documented. The employee is responsible for implementing the practices according to the training. OSHA requires that employers must estimate the incident heat energy of any electric-arc hazard to which a worker would be exposed. In addition, employers generally must pro

46、vide workers exposed to hazards from electric arcs with protective clothing and other PPE with an arc rating greater than or equal to the estimated heat energy. Arc-Flash Risk Assessment Prior to working on energized equipment, including working through de-energizing steps, NFPA 70E-2015 requires th

47、at an arc-flash risk assessment be performed. The assessment is required to determine 1) the arc-flash boundary distance and 2) the type of PPE required for work on each piece of equipment. In order to establish these requirements either an incident energy calculation is generally necessary, or info

48、rmation in tables from NFPA 70E may be used. 4 Incident Energy Calculations The arc flash boundary shall be the distance at which the incident energy equals 1.2 cal/cm2(5 J/cm2), according to NFPA 70E-2015. One of the units used to measure incident energy is calories per centimeter squared (cal/cm2)

49、. Incident Energy is defined in NFPA 70E-2015 as “The amount of thermal energy impressed on a surface, a certain distance from the source, generated during an electrical arc event.” NEMA ABP 8-2016 Page 5 2016 National Electrical Manufacturers Association The Incident Energy may be determined by using calculation derived from IEEE 1584, IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations. IEEE 1584 provides the ability to perform calculations that more accurately take into consideration the true electrical conditions of the facility. These calculations are d

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 标准规范 > 国际标准 > 其他

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1