1、Designation: B 588 88 (Reapproved 2006)Standard Test Method forMeasurement of Thickness of Transparent or OpaqueCoatings by Double-Beam Interference MicroscopeTechnique1This standard is issued under the fixed designation B 588; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year ofor
2、iginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the thick-ness of
3、 transparent metal oxide and metallic coatings byutilizing a double-beam interference microscope.21.2 The test method requires that the specimen surface orsurfaces be sufficiently mirrorlike to form recognizable fringes.1.3 This test method can be used nondestructively to mea-sure 1 to 10 m thick tr
4、ansparent coatings, such as anodiccoatings on aluminum. The test method is used destructivelyfor 0.1 to 10 m thick opaque coatings by stripping a portionof the coating and measuring the step height between thecoating and the exposed substrate. The stripping method canalso be used to measure 0.2 to 1
5、0 m thick anodic coatings onaluminum.1.4 The test method is usable as a reference method for themeasurement of the thickness of the anodic film on aluminumor of metallic coatings when the technique includes completestripping of a portion of the coating without attack of thesubstrate. For anodic film
6、s on aluminum, the thickness must begreater than 0.4 m; the uncertainty can be as great as 0.2 m.For metallic coatings, the thickness must be greater than 0.25m; the uncertainty can be as great as 0.1 m.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with
7、its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:3B 504 Test Method for Measurement of Thickness of Me-tallic Coatings
8、by the Coulometric Method3. Summary of Test Method3.1 While observing the specimen surface through theinterference microscope, the top surface of the coating and thesubstrate surface are located with white light interferencefringe group(s). Then the elevation difference between the twosurfaces is as
9、certained by counting the number of monochro-matic fringes by which the white light fringes are displaced.The number of fringes, multiplied by one half of the lightwavelength, is the film thickness.3.2 When light is reflected, it undergoes a phase shift, themagnitude of which depends on the material
10、 and on itsstructure. The uncertainty of the thickness measurement due tothis phenomenon is, theoretically, less than18 the wavelengthof the light for metals and14 wavelength for nonmetalliccoatings on metal. Those uncertainties are included in thosegiven in 1.4. They can be eliminated for measureme
11、nts made inaccordance with 1.3 and 7.1.2 by coating the specimen after thestripping operation with a thin but uniform reflective layer of ametal by evaporation. The two reflecting surfaces will then beof the same material and the phase shifts will be the same.3.3 The aperture of the microscope objec
12、tive contributes tothe fringe displacement by an amount determined by theaperture size. Therefore, a correction4is added equal to a2/4where a, expressed in radians, is the arc sine of the numericalaperture of the microscope objective.NOTE 1When the angle is given in radians and is less than 0.6, the
13、angle is approximately equal to its sine.3.4 With a reticle such as shown in the figures, the fringecount is likely to have an uncertainty of110 wavelength (15fringe interval). More precise measurements can be made withthe aid of a filar micrometer eyepiece.4. Significance and Use4.1 The thickness o
14、f a coating is often critical to itsperformance.1This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee B08 on Metallicand Inorganic Coatings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee B08.10 onTest Methods.Current edition approved April 1, 2006. Published April 2006. Originallyapproved i
15、n 1973. Last previous edition approved in 2001 as B 588 88 (2001).2Saur, R. L., “New Interference Microscope Techniques for MicrotopographicMeasurements in the Electroplating Laboratory,” Plating, PLATA, Vol 52, July1965, pp. 663666.3For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.or
16、g, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.4Bruce, C. F., and Thornton, B. S., Journal of Scientific Instruments, JSINA, Vol34, 1957, p. 203.1Copyright ASTM International,
17、 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.4.2 For some coating-substrate combinations, the interfer-ence microscope method is a reliable method for measuringcoating thickness.4.3 This test method is suitable for specification acceptance.5. Apparatus5.1 Inte
18、rference Microscope equipped with a reticle or filarmicrometer eyepiece for linear measurements.5.2 Incandescent and Monochromatic Light Sources.6. Sample Preparation for Destructive Technique6.1 Anodic Coating on AluminumAfter masking (Note 2),the coating is stripped by immersion in a solution cont
19、aining 33g/L chromic acid (CrO3) and 0.5 cm3/L phosphoric acid(H3PO4) (85%). Operating temperature is 85 to 95C.NOTE 2Masking for both transparent and opaque coatings can beaccomplished by applying an adhesive tape such as 3M #470 or equivalentwith its edge at a location where the thickness measurem
20、ent is desired.The tape must be sufficiently adherent and impervious to protect thecoating beneath from subsequent stripping action.NOTE 3In certain cases, this method causes attack of the basis metal.The attack is usually accompanied by pitting, which is easily observablein the interference microsc
21、ope by comparing the general contour exhibitedby the fringes on the unstripped portion with the general contour on thestripped portion. If such attack occurs, the method is not valid.6.2 Metallic Coatings on Metallic SubstratesAfter mask-ing (Note 2), the coating is stripped without attack of thesub
22、strate (see Appendix X1).7. Thickness MeasurementNOTE 4Many surfaces have microscopical ridges or valleys producedby a previous operation (such as rolling or polishing). Measurements offilm thickness are made best with the fringes oriented in a directionperpendicular to the directional surface rough
23、ness.7.1 Transparent Coatings:7.1.1 Nondestructive Technique:7.1.1.1 As the surface of a specimen is viewed through theinterference microscope using the incandescent illuminator(white light), adjust the microscope fine-focus knob and thereference mirror controls so that a group of strong fringes(ari
24、sing from the coating-substrate interface) and a group ofweak fringes (arising from the coating-air interface) are both inview as illustrated in Fig. 1A.7.1.1.2 Determine the number of monochromatic fringesbetween the centers of the white light fringe groups. AppendixX2 indicates alternative ways of
25、 doing this.7.1.1.3 Calculate thickness T as follows:T 5 nl/2! 1 1 a2/4!# (1)where:n = number of fringes,l = wavelength of monochromatic light, m, = refractive index of coating for light of wave length, l,anda = arc sine (numerical aperture of objective) in radians.Thus for the thickness of the anod
26、ic coating on aluminumrepresented in Fig. 1,T 5 24 3 0.546!/2 3 1.62!# 1 1 0.782/4!# 5 4.66 m (2)where the monochromatic source is a mercury green lightwith a wavelength of 0.546 m, where the refractive index ofthe anodic coating is 1.62, and where alpha is equal to 0.78.7.1.2 Destructive Technique:
27、7.1.2.1 Position the boundary between the stripped andunstripped portion of the specimen in the field of view of themicroscope.7.1.2.2 As the surface of the specimen is viewed through theinterference microscope using the white light, adjust themicroscope fine-focus knob and the reference mirror cont
28、rolsso that the group of fringes arising from the bare substrate andthe weak fringes arising from the coating-air interface are bothin view, as illustrated in Fig. 2A.7.1.2.3 Determine the number of monochromatic fringesbetween the centers of the white light fringe groups. AppendixX2 indicates alter
29、native ways of performing this procedure.7.1.2.4 Calculate thickness T as follows:T 5 nl/2! 1 1 a2/4!# (3)where:n = number of fringes,l = wavelength of monochromatic light, m, anda = arc sine (numerical aperture of objective) in radians.7.2 Opaque CoatingsDestructive Technique:7.2.1 Position the bou
30、ndary between the stripped and un-stripped portions of the specimen in the field of view of themicroscope.FIG. 1 Anodized Aluminum Surface as Seen Through Interference Microscope Using White (A) or Monochromatic (B) LightB 588 88 (2006)27.2.2 As the surface of the specimen is viewed through theinter
31、ference microscope using the incandescent illuminator,adjust the microscope fine-focus knob and the tilt of thereference mirror so that the fringe group on both sides of theboundary is in the field of view, as illustrated in Fig. 3A.7.2.3 Determine the number of monochromatic fringes be-tween the ce
32、nters of the white light fringe groups. AppendixX2 indicates alternative ways of performing this procedure.7.2.4 Calculate thickness T as follows:T 5 nl/2! 1 1 a2/4!# (4)where:n = number of fringes,l = wavelength of monochromatic light, m, anda = arc sine (numerical aperture of objective) in radians
33、.8. Accuracy Requirement8.1 Transparent Coating on Metal SubstrateThe entireprocedure shall be such that the coating thickness can bedetermined either within 60.2 m or within 5 % of the coatingthickness, whichever is greater.8.2 Metal Coating on Metal SubstrateThe entire proce-dure shall be such tha
34、t the coating thickness can be determinedeither within 60.1 m or within 5 % of the coating thickness,whichever is greater.9. Precision and Bias9.1 A satisfactory interlaboratory comparison of this testmethod has not yet been conducted.FIG. 2 Fringes Formed on Anodized Surface, on Which the Anodic Co
35、ating Has Been Completely Stripped from the Left Portion, asSeen Through an Interference Microscope Using White (A) or Monochromatic (B) LightFIG. 3 Nickel-Chromium Boundary as Seen Through Interference Microscope Using White (A) or Monochromatic (B) LightB 588 88 (2006)3APPENDIXES(Nonmandatory Info
36、rmation)X1. STRIPPING OF METALLIC COATINGS5X1.1 The cell and electronic equipment used for thecoulometric method of measuring coating thickness, TestMethod B 504, provides a convenient way of masking andstripping a small area of coating. Chromium coatings may bestripped from nickel or steel by anodi
37、c disolution at 5 to 10Vin a 5 g/L sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) solution using at least afull-wave rectifier filtered with 10 000 F capacitance.X2. COUNTING MONOCHROMATIC FRINGESX2.1 White Light FringesChromatic aberrations imposea limit to the way a microscope can be used, and the extent ofthese aberr
38、ations should be determined. With white light andwith a specimen and the microscope adjusted so that the centralfringe of the color fringes crosses the center of the field, thecentral fringe usually has a different color near the edge of thefield. For example, the central fringe may be black at the
39、centeroff the field and composed of contiguous red, black, and greenlayers near the edge. If the fringe pattern is moved perpendicu-larly across the field, the black central line may becomecolored and an adjacent line becomes black so that the originalcentral line loses its identity.X2.1.1 The chang
40、e is associated with chromatic aberrationsthat give rise to measurement errors. The operator is advised toscan the field with the central fringe and to note the extent of5Saur, R. L., and Basco, R. P., “Power Supply forAnodic Stripping of Chromiumon Nickel Electrodeposits,” Plating, PLATA, Vol 57, J
41、uly 1970, p. 714.FIG. 4 CoatingSubstrate Boundary with Parallel Reticle Using White Light At Beginning (A) and End (B) of Measurement (X2.3)FIG. 5 Beveled CoatingSubstrate Boundary WithMonochromatic FringesB 588 88 (2006)4aberrations. The observations described in the following para-graphs should be
42、 confined to those parts of the field withinwhich the central fringe of each fringe group does not changecolor.X2.2 For alternative means of measuring the fringe dis-placement see X2.3, X2.4, X2.5, and X2.6. The methods ofX2.4 and X2.5 can be used if chromatic aberrations interferewith the method of
43、 X2.3. The method of X2.6 completelyavoids any chromatic aberrations, but is difficult to use if thefringe displacement is much more than about five fringes andcannot be used for the nondestructive technique (7.1.1).X2.3 Monochromatic Fringes with Stationery White LightFringesThe microscope is adjus
44、ted as described in 7.1.1.1,7.1.2.2,or7.2.2 so that the two groups of color fringes are inthe field. The positions of the central fringes on the reticle andthe reticle interval between them are noted (Fig. 1(A), Fig.2(A), and Fig. 3(A). Monochromatic light is then substitutedfor the white light with
45、out disturbing the specimen or micro-scope settings, and the monochromatic fringes within the samereticle interval are counted (Fig. 1(B), Fig. 2(B), and Fig. 3(B).X2.4 Monochromatic Fringes with Resetting of White LightFringes:X2.4.1 The microscope is adjusted using white light so thatthe eyepiece
46、hairline is over the central fringe that locates thecoating (or substrate surface), Fig. 4(A). Using the fine focuscontrol on the “compensator” control (the compensator adjuststhe relative path lengths of the two interferometer beams), theamount of adjustment required to bring the central fringeloca
47、ting the substrate (or coating) surface to the originalposition of the first central fringe Fig. 4(B), is noted and isestimated (from previous experience) in terms of number ofmonochromatic fringes. The first position, Fig. 4(A), is rein-stated, the monochromatic light is substituted for the whiteli
48、ght. The monochromatic fringes are shifted with respect tothe hairline by the previously estimated number of fringes.Then with white light, it is noted what additional adjustment isrequired to bring the second central fringe into position, and animproved estimate is made of the total adjustment requ
49、ired interms of the number of monochromatic fringes. Beginning withreinstatement of the first position, the process is repeatedseveral times until the estimated number of fringes proves to bethe adjustment needed to bring the second central fringe intoposition, Fig. 4(B).X2.4.2 For accurate measurements, the procedure describedin X2.4.1 is used to determine the whole number of fringespacings. Additional displacement of less than one fringespacing is estimated directly from the monochromatic fringes(Fig. 5).X2.5 Stage ElevationT
