1、August 2013 Translation by DIN-Sprachendienst.English price group 99No part of this translation may be reproduced without prior permission ofDIN Deutsches Institut fr Normung e. V., Berlin. Beuth Verlag GmbH, 10772 Berlin, Germany,has the exclusive right of sale for German Standards (DIN-Normen).ICS
2、 53.020.20; 91.010.30!%)Gb“2063663www.din.deDThis corrigendum should be filed together withthe translation of the standard to which it refersand a corresponding note made on thetranslation.DIN EN 1991-3 Corrigendum 1Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Part 3: Actions induced by cranes and machinery;En
3、glish version EN 1991-3:2006,Corrigendum to DIN EN 1991-3:2010-12;English version EN 1991-3:2006/AC:2012,English translation of DIN EN 1991-3 Berichtigung 1:2013-08Eurocode 1: Einwirkungen auf Tragwerke Teil 3: Einwirkungen infolge von Kranen und Maschinen;Englische Fassung EN 1991-3:2006,Berichtigu
4、ng zu DIN EN 1991-3:2010-12;Englische Fassung EN 1991-3:2006/AC:2012,Englische bersetzung von DIN EN 1991-3 Berichtigung 1:2013-08Eurocode 1: Actions sur les structures Partie 3: Actions induites par les appareils de levage et les machines;Version anglaise EN 1991-3:2006,Corrigendum DIN EN 1991-3:20
5、10-12;Version anglaise EN 1991-3:2006/AC:2012,Traduction anglaise de DIN EN 1991-3 Berichtigung 1:2013-08www.beuth.deDocument comprises 6 pagesIn case of doubt, the German-language original shall be considered authoritative.09.13 DIN EN 1991-3 Cor. 1:2013-08 2 This Corrigendum is based on EN 1991-3:
6、2006/AC:2012. In the English version of DIN EN 1991-3:2010-12 the following corrections are to be made: Re Subclause 1.2 Just above the reference to EN 1990, add the following new reference: EN 1090-2 Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures Part 2: Technical requirements for steel str
7、uctures On the last line, replace: EN 1993-6 Design of steel structures Part 6: Crane runway beams with: EN 1993-6 Design of steel structures Part 6: Crane supporting structures Re Subclause 1.3 In Paragraph (1), replace “prEN 1991” with “EN 1991”. Re Subclause 1.5 In Paragraph (2), in the list Gree
8、k lower case letters, replace: 321, 7654, dynamic factor applied to actions induced by cranes with: 321, 7654, dynamic factor applied to actions induced by cranes Re Subclause 2.1 Replace the two bullet points with the following ones: monorail hoist blocks, see 2.5.1, overhead travelling cranes, see
9、 2.5.2. DIN EN 1991-3 Cor. 1:2013-08 3 Re Subclause 2.5.3 In Paragraph (2), replace Table 2.3 with the following: “ For crane runway For crane supporting structures Single-bay building Multi-bay building Vertical crane action 3 4 NOTE: The most unfavourable position of the 4 cranes might be: a) 3 cr
10、anes behind each other and 1 on a further runway or b) 2 cranes behind each other and 2 on a further runway or c) 2 cranes behind each other and 2 above each other on 2 further runways 6 NOTE: The most unfavourable position of the 6 cranes might be: a) crane position as in a single bay building plus
11、 2 additional cranes in another bay or b) 6 cranes distributed over several bays Horizontal crane action 1 NOTE: Consider two cranes if they operate together in order to lift heavy loads and if that is more unfavourable 2 NOTE: 2 cranes per bay operating above each other 4 NOTE: Under consideration
12、of conditions for crane runways and for single-bay buildings ”. DIN EN 1991-3 Cor. 1:2013-08 4 Re Subclause 2.6 In Paragraph (2)P, replace the whole Table 2.4 with the following one: “ Table 2.4 Dynamic factors i for vertical loads Values of dynamic factors 1 0,9 1 1,1 The two values 1,1 and 0,9 ref
13、lect the upper and lower values of the vibrational pulses. 2 2 = hv2min,2 + hv - steady hoisting speed in m/s min,2 and 2 see Table 2.5 3 )1(133 +=mmwhere m released or dropped part of the hoisting mass m total hoisting mass 3 = 0,5 for cranes equipped with grabs or similar slow-release devices 3 =
14、1,0 for cranes equipped with magnets or similar rapid-release devices 4 4 = 1,0 provided that the class 1 functional tolerances for rail tracks as specified in EN 1090-2 are observed. NOTE: If Class 1 functional tolerances for rail tracks as specified in EN 1090-2 are not observed, the dynamic facto
15、r 4 can be determined with the model provided by EN 13001-2. ”. DIN EN 1991-3 Cor. 1:2013-08 5 Re Subclause 2.7.4 Paragraph (4), replace Tables 2.8 and 2.9 with the following ones: “ Table 2.8 Determination of the distance h Fixing of wheels according to lateral movements Combination of wheel pairs
16、h coupled (c) independent (i) Fixed/Fixed FF eemj2j221+ Fixed/Movable FM eemj2j21+ Where: h is the distance between the instantaneous centre of rotation and the relevant guidance means; m is the number of pairs of coupled wheels (m = 0 for independent wheel pairs); 1 is the distance of the instantan
17、eous centre of rotation from rail 1; 2 is the distance of the instantaneous centre of rotation from rail 2; is the span of the appliance; ejis the distance of the wheel pair j from the relevant guidance means. DIN EN 1991-3 Cor. 1:2013-08 6 Table 2.9 Determination of distance S,i,j,kvalues System j,
18、S L,j,1,S T,j,1,S L,j,2,S T,j,2,S CFF nhej1 hn21henj2- 1 hn21henj1- 1 IFF 0 henj2- 1 0 henj1- 1 CFM nhej2- 1 hn21henj2- 1 hn210 IFM 0 henj2- 1 0 0 Where: n is the number of wheel pairs; 1 is the distance of the instantaneous centre of rotation from rail 1; 2 is the distance of the instantaneous cent
19、re of rotation from rail 2; is the span of the appliance; ejis the distance of the wheel pair j from the relevant guidance means; h is the distance between the instantaneous centre of rotation and the relevant guidance means. ”. Re Subclause 2.12.2 In the NOTE, replace “EN 1993-6, 9.4.2.3” with “EN 1993-6, 9.4.2(3)”.
