1、Designation: F 1450 05Standard Test Methods forHollow Metal Swinging Door Assemblies for Detention andCorrectional Facilities1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1450; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revisio
2、n, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These test methods cover requirements for mechanicaltests, simulated service test, and testing equipme
3、nt for deter-mining the performance characteristics of swinging detentionhollow metal door assemblies of various styles and types ofconstruction for use in wall openings designed to incarcerateinmates in detention/correctional institutions.1.2 These test methods test the capability of a swinging doo
4、rassembly to prevent, delay, and frustrate escape, to limit orcontrol access to unauthorized or secure areas, and to resistcommon types of vandalism.1.3 These test methods apply primarily to detention doorassemblies to and from secure areas generally found insidedetention/correctional facilities, su
5、ch as: day rooms, controlrooms, cells, and sally ports.1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas the standard. The values given in parentheses are forinformation only.1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is
6、theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E 2074 Test Method for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies,Including Positive Pressure Tes
7、ting of Side-Hinged andPivoted Swinging Door AssembliesF 1577 Test Methods for Detention Locks for SwingingDoorsF 1592 Test Methods for Detention Hollow Metal VisionSystemsF 1643 Test Methods for Detention Sliding Door LockingDevice AssemblyF 1758 Test Methods for Detention Hinges Used onDetention-G
8、rade Swinging DoorsF 1915 Test Methods for Glazing for Detention Facilities2.2 ANSI Standard:3ANSI/NAAMM/HMMA 863 Guide Specifications for De-tention Security Hollow Metal Doors and Frames2.3 NFPA Standard:4252 Methods of Fire Tests of Door Assemblies2.4 UL Standards:5UL-10 (B) Fire Tests of Door As
9、sembliesUL-10 (C) Fire Tests of Door AssembliesUL-437 Standard for Key LocksUL-752 Bullet Resisting EquipmentUL-1034 Standard for Burglary Resistant Electric LockingMechanisms3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 boltmetal bar which, when actuated, is projected (orthrown) either horizontally or vertic
10、ally into a retaining mem-ber, such as a strike plate, to prevent a door from moving oropening.3.1.2 bolt projection (or bolt throw)distance from theedge of the door or frame, at the bolt center line, to the farthestpoint on the bolt in the projected position.3.1.3 componenta subassembly, as disting
11、uished from apart, that combines with other components to make up a totaldoor assembly.3.1.3.1 DiscussionThe prime components of a door as-sembly include the following: door, lock, hinges, wall, anddoor frame (includes hinge jamb, strike jamb, and header).3.1.4 detention securityassurance of the res
12、triction ofmobility of inmates to designated areas within a correctional ordetention facility.1These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F33 onDetention and Correctional Facilities and are the direct responsibility of Subcom-mittee F33.02 on Physical Barriers.Current edition ap
13、proved April 1, 2005. Published April 2005. Originallyapproved in 1992. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as F 1450 97 (2004).2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume informa
14、tion, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,4th Floor, New York, NY 10036.4Available from National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 BatterymarchPark, Quincy, MA 02269-9101.5Available from Unde
15、rwriters Laboratories (UL), Corporate Progress, 333Pfingsten Rd., Northbrook, IL 60062.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.3.1.5 door assemblyunit composed of a group of parts orcomponents that make up an opening barrier
16、for a passagewaythrough a wall.3.1.5.1 DiscussionFor the purpose of these test methods,a door assembly consists of the following parts: door; hinges;locking device or devices; operation contacts (such as handles,knobs, or flush pulls); security glazing and glazing molding;miscellaneous hardware and
17、closers; the frame, including thehead and jambs plus anchorage devices to the surroundingwall; and a portion of the surrounding wall extending 32 in.(81.3 cm) from each side of the jambs and 16 in. (40.65 cm)above the head.3.1.6 frameassembly of members surrounding and sup-porting a door or doors.3.
18、1.7 hinged doordoor equipped with hinges that permit itto swing about the vertical hinge axis, either right-hand,left-hand, right-hand reverse bevel, or left-hand reverse bevel,depending upon hardware configuration.3.1.8 hollow metalterm used in reference to such items asdoors, frames, partitions, e
19、nclosures, and other items that arefabricated from metal sheet, typically cold-rolled or hot-rolledpickled-and-oiled carbon steel.3.1.8.1 DiscussionThese products are internally rein-forced but hollow, hence the term hollow metal. Typically, thevoids in doors and partitions are filled with insulatio
20、n. Wheninstalled in masonry walls, the voids in frame jambs, headers,and mullions may be grouted or left hollow.3.1.9 manufacturerparty responsible for the fabrication ofthe test samples.3.1.10 panelfor the purposes of these test methods, thepanel is a steel plate at least 0.375 in. (9.5 mm), instal
21、led inorder to transfer impact energy to the glazing stops and theassembly.3.1.11 performance characteristicresponse of the doorassembly in any one of the tests described herein.3.1.12 test completionconduct of one test sequence foreach of the door assemblies.3.1.13 testing laboratoryindependent mat
22、erials testinglaboratory not associated with the manufacturer.4. Significance and Use4.1 A major concern for prison administrative officials issecurity barriers used in detention/correctional facilities. Thesetest methods are designed to aid in identifying levels ofphysical security for swinging det
23、ention hollow metal doorassemblies.4.2 These test methods are not intended to provide ameasure of resistance for a door assembly subjected to attackby corrosive agents, by high-powered rifles, explosives, saw-ing, or other such methods. These test methods are intended toevaluate the resistance of a
24、door assembly to violent attacksusing battering devices, such as benches, bunks, or tables; byhandguns up to and including .44 magnum; by prying devices;by devices used to deform the door and render it inoperable;and by fires started by using mattresses, books, and otherflammable materials.4.3 The p
25、rimary purpose or result of these test methods is toapproximate the levels of abuse to which door assemblies maybe subjected in the field. The desired result of its use is to helpprovide insurance of protection to the public, to facilityadministrative personnel, and to the inmates themselves.4.4 It
26、is recommended that detention/correctional facilityadministration provide adequate training, supervision, andpreventative maintenance programs to enable door assembliesto function as intended throughout the expected service life.5. Sampling5.1 Sample door and frame assemblies shall be constructedin
27、accordance with Section 6.1.5.2 The manufacturer shall permanently mark the testsamples and retain them at the manufacturing facility for futurereference for a period of at least one year from test date.Instead of test samples, the manufacturer may contract with thetesting laboratory to provide a ce
28、rtified procedure for theconstruction of tested assemblies with factory follow-up ser-vice as an option (see 8.2).5.3 Test reports shall include complete details of the testassemblies, details, photographs, or a combination thereof, ofthe testing apparatus, and installation instructions includingtem
29、plates for all items of hardware (see Section 9).5.4 In the event of failure in one or more of the performancetests, the manufacturer shall provide another complete testsample including door, frame, and hardware assembly alongwith test wall where applicable. If the test is performed only onthe door,
30、 as in the door rack test (7.4), only the door need beprovided for retesting.6. Specimen Preparation6.1 Construction:6.1.1 The construction and size of the test door assembliesconsisting of single doors, frames, and all hardware compo-nents shall be representative of the application under investi-ga
31、tion within the following guidelines:6.1.1.1 The same construction and size of test doors andassemblies shall apply to all tests.6.1.1.2 Each test door shall be equipped with a 100 in.2(64 516 mm2) vision light with impact panel installed, 4 by 25in. (102 by 635 mm) clear opening positioned generall
32、y asshown in Fig. 1.6.1.1.3 The first door shall swing on three full mortised butthinges and shall be locked using a door-mounted, pocket-typedetention security lock with bolt size not to exceed 2 in. (51mm) high by34 in. (19 mm) wide and latch bolt engagementnot to exceed78 in. (22.3 mm).6.1.1.4 Th
33、e second door shall swing on three full mortisedbutt hinges and shall be locked using a jamb-mounted securitylock with bolt size not to exceed 2 in. (51 mm) high by34 in.(19 mm) wide and latch bolt engagement not to exceed78 in.(22.3 mm).6.1.1.5 Required results indicated in Table 1 are based upona
34、nominal door size of 3 by 7 ft (914 by 2133 mm).6.2 Impact Test Fixture:6.2.1 The door assembly support fixture and wall shallsimulate the rigidity normally provided to a door assembly ina building by the ceiling, floor, and walls. Fig. 2 illustrates anacceptance fixture.F14500526.2.2 The fixture is
35、 designed to accommodate two testsamples; however, it is permissible to construct a test fixturethat accommodates one sample only, if the manufacturer sochooses.6.2.3 Description of the Test WallThe door assembly shallbe mounted in a vertical wall section constructed suitably toretain the sample(s)
36、throughout the testing procedure. Typicalwall details shown in Figs. 2-5 describe an acceptance wall.The wall specification shall be included as part of the testreport.6.3 Mounting for Impact Testing:6.3.1 Mount the swinging doors so as to open away from theworking area. Position the impact test ram
37、 opposite the doorside of the assembly so that the door opens away from the ram.6.3.2 Prepare doors and door jambs for the installation oflocksets and hinges in conformance with the hardware manu-facturers instructions and templates. Follow the hollow metaldoor assembly manufacturers instructions fo
38、r fastening thejamb to the support fixture described in 7.2.6.3.3 Install components such as test doors, door frames,hinges, and hardware in the component test fixture described in7.2. Provide clearances on the lock side, hinge side, and top ofthe door18 6132 in. (3.2 6 0.8 mm) maximum. Clearance at
39、the threshold is not considered critical in these tests.7. Procedures7.1 Bullet Penetration:FIG. 1 Test Assembly Elevation Location of Strike Points Described in Table 1F14500537.1.1 When specified by the contract documents of adetention/correctional facility project, test door assemblies forbullet
40、penetration in accordance with UL-752.7.1.2 Testing of the door, frame, hardware, and securityglazing preparation as individual components is acceptable ifconducted in accordance with UL-752. The level of perfor-mance shall meet the rating of .44 magnum, Level 3.7.1.3 The pass/fail criteria shall be
41、 in accordance withUL-752.7.2 Door Assembly Impact Test:7.2.1 ScopeThis test method is designed to evaluate thecapability of a complete swinging detention door assemblyincluding frame, door, wall anchoring, lock, hinges, and otheroptions as required by the manufacturer, to resist repetitiveimpact fo
42、rces at the designated critical areas.7.2.2 Significance and Use:7.2.2.1 This test method is intended to closely simulate asustained battering ram style attack and provide an evaluationof the capability of the assembly to prevent, delay, and frustrateescape or access, or both, to unauthorized areas.
43、 The test maybe used to aid in identifying a level of physical security forvarious configurations of swinging detention hollow metaldoor assemblies.7.2.2.2 An impact test of this design performed on acomplete assembly evaluates the impact fatigue strength of theassembly and its components as well as
44、 quality of fabricationtechniques and strength of materials used.7.2.3 Apparatus:7.2.3.1 Door RamThe door ram shall be a pendularsystem with steel weight capable of delivering horizontalimpacts of up to 200 ftlbf (271.2 J). The weight of the ram mayvary from 80 lb (36 kg). The striking nose of the r
45、am shall bemade from C10101020 carbon steel, the striking surface areaof which shall be 4.0 6 0.04 in.2(25.8 cm2) (see Fig. 6).7.2.4 Procedure:7.2.4.1 With the test fixture and test apparatus, deliver theseries of impacts listed in Table 1 (and shown in Fig. 1)totheassembly on the push side of the d
46、oor.7.2.4.2 Keep the door closed and locked, and keep securityglazing, if used in the assembly, in place throughout the testingprocedure. Failure is constituted by the door assembly beingdamaged to the extent that forcible egress can be achieved.This does not apply to the passage of contraband.7.2.4
47、.3 After impact testing is completed, keep the doorslocked and secure such that forcible egress cannot be achieved.7.2.4.4 Disengage or remove the lock electrically or manu-ally. If the lock will not disengage normally, disengage it usingtools commonly carried in a correctional facility maintenancet
48、ool kit, such as: hand screwdrivers (various sizes and tipconfigurations including tips for coverplate security screws),claw hammer, ball peen hammer, chisel, pliers (any commonsize), and vice grips.7.2.4.5 Once the lock is disengaged or removed, open thedoor enough to provide normal personnel egres
49、s.7.2.4.6 If the lock cannot be disengaged or removed withconventional hand tools as listed, or the door cannot be openedenough to provide personnel egress, the assembly shall bejudged to have failed the impact test.7.2.5 Precision and Bias:7.2.5.1 The precision and bias of this test method forevaluating the impact fatigue strength of the swinging deten-tion hollow metal door assembly are being determined.7.3 Door Static Load Test:7.3.1 ScopeThis test method is designed to evaluate thecapability of a detention hollow metal door prepared forhardware and o
