1、Designation: F1643 05 (Reapproved 2012)Standard Test Methods forDetention Sliding Door Locking Device Assembly1This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1643; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of l
2、ast revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These test methods cover the apparatus, procedures, andacceptance conditions for evaluating the normal operationalperfo
3、rmance and the performance characteristics under assault,smoke, and fire conditions of sliding device assemblies indetention and correctional institutions. These test methods givean indication of the performance characteristics of devices inactual service. Such variables as installation and maintena
4、nceconditions are not considered.1.2 It is the intent of these test methods to help ensure thatdetention sliding devices perform at or above minimum ac-ceptable levels to control passage to unauthorized or secureareas, to confine inmates and to delay and frustrate escapeattempts and resist vandalism
5、. However, these test methods donot address door construction. It is recognized that in order tomeet the intent of these test methods, door assemblies shall becompatible with the level of performance required by TestMethods F1450.1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regardedas the sta
6、ndard. The values given in parentheses are forinformation only.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applic
7、a-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2F1450 Test Methods for Hollow Metal Swinging DoorAssemblies for Detention and Correctional FacilitiesF1577 Test Methods for Detention Locks for SwingingDoorsF1592 Test Methods for Detention Hollow Metal Vision
8、SystemsF1758 Test Methods for Detention Hinges Used onDetention-Grade Swinging DoorsF1915 Test Methods for Glazing for Detention Facilities2.2 NFPA Standards:3NFPA 101 Life Safety CodeNFPA 105 Installation of Smoke Control Door AssembliesNFPA 252 Methods of Fire Tests of Door Assemblies2.3 UL Standa
9、rd:4UL-752 Bullet Resisting EquipmentUL-1034 Standard for Burglary Resistant Electric LockingMechanisms3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 controlled passage, ncapability to restrict the unau-thorized movement of individuals.3.1.2 cover box, nenclosure that contains, secures, andprotects all horizon
10、tal tracks, cables, tubing, wiring, motors,etc. that support and control the door; the enclosure iscontinuous across the horizontal door movement and may becontinuous across several doors. Also referred to as horizontalmechanism housing.3.1.3 deadlocked, adjmechanical condition of the lockingmechani
11、sm that secures against unlocking or unlatching by endpressure, lifting, prying, or other manipulations against themechanism.3.1.4 door guide, nhorizontal member attached to thewall adjacent to the bottom of the door used to control thebottom of the door.3.1.5 forcible egress, nability to pass a 5 3
12、 8 3 8 in. (1273 203.2 3 203.2 mm) rigid box through an opening in the testsample created by destructive testing procedures with no morethan 10 lb (44.48 N) of force.3.1.6 hand tools, nitems permitted for use in disengaginga lock when it fails to disengage either remotely or manually.For example, ha
13、nd screwdrivers (of various sizes and tipconfigurations including tips for coverplate security screws),claw hammer, ball peen hammer, chisel, pliers (any commonsize), and locking pliers. These tools are commonly carried ina correctional facility maintenance tool kit.1These test methods are under the
14、 jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F33 onDetention and Correctional Facilities and are the direct responsibility of Subcom-mittee F33.04 on Detention Hardware.Current edition approved June 1, 2012. Published August 2012. Originallyapproved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as F1643 05. DO
15、I:10.1520/F1643-05R12.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Available from National Fire Protectio
16、n Association (NFPA), 1 BatterymarchPark, Quincy, MA 02269-9101.4Available from Underwriters Laboratories (UL), Corporate Progress, 333Pfingsten Rd., Northbrook, IL 60062.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.3.1.7 leading
17、edge, nend of the door panel that travelsacross the door opening.3.1.8 lock column, nvertical enclosure that contains, se-cures, and protects the mechanical locking mechanism.3.1.9 locked, adjdoor is held in place by the engagementof the locking mechanism in the door. Sliding doors must bedeadlocked
18、 to be secure. A sliding door is not consideredlocked unless it is also deadlocked.3.1.10 receiver, nvertical channel that wraps around theleading edge of the door and provides vertical support againstlateral and perpendicular movement of the door in a closedposition.4. Significance and Use4.1 A maj
19、or concern for detention and correctional admin-istrative officials is the reliable operation of sliding devicesused in their facilities. These test methods aid in assigning alevel of physical security and performance to devices forsliding door assemblies.4.2 These test methods evaluate the resistan
20、ce of a slidingdoor assembly to attacks using battering devices, pryingdevices, smoke, and fire. These test methods also evaluate theperformance of a sliding device under simulated operatingconditions. These test methods do not provide a measure of theresistance or performance of the device subjecte
21、d to attack bychemical agents, ballistics, explosives, or other extreme meth-ods of attack. These test methods do not measure the resistanceor performance of the device when subjected to environmentalelements such as humidity, temperature, rain, snow, or wind-carried dust or sand. Where such element
22、s may be a factor themanufacturer should be consulted for proper application.4.3 The primary purpose of these test methods is to approxi-mate the levels of abuse and operating conditions to whichdevices are subjected in detention and correctional institutions.The result of these test methods will pr
23、ovide a measure ofassurance of protection to the correctional personnel, public,and inmates.4.4 Preventative maintenance programs shall be provided inaccordance with the manufacturers recommendation to enablesliding device assemblies to function as intended throughoutthe expected service life.4.5 Th
24、ese test methods do not measure the performance orcycle life of the local or remote mechanical emergency releasemechanism, or both, due to their design variables and low userrequirements.5. Sample Selection, Construction, and Size5.1 Sample devices shall be representative of the types andstyles inte
25、nded for use in the application of these test methods.5.2 The manufacturer shall permanently mark the testsamples and retain them at the manufacturing facility for futurereference. In lieu of test samples, the manufacturer mayprovide a certified procedure for the construction of testedassemblies.5.3
26、 The test assembly shall be certified by an independentthird party testing and certification agency; any change ofcomponents or assembly methods or processes shall be certi-fied in writing by the testing and certification agency. Theagency shall have the sole authority to decide the extent andscope
27、of retesting required.5.4 Test reports shall include complete details and photo-graphs of the test specimen, the testing apparatus, and instal-lation instructions including templates for all items of hard-ware.6. Test Methods6.1 A test sample shall consist of a minimum of one lockingdevice complete
28、with cover box, lock column, receiver, anddoor guide where these elements are part of a complete lockingdevice. The test methods that follow consist of independentsetups and procedures.6.2 Horizontal Impact TestLocking devices shall complywith the following:6.2.1 ScopeThis test method is designed to
29、 evaluate thecapability of a detention sliding door locking device to resistrepeated impact forces against the side of the door.6.2.2 Significance and Use:6.2.2.1 This test method is intended to closely simulate asustained battering ram attack and provide an evaluation of thecapability of the lockin
30、g device to prevent, delay, or frustrateescape or access to unauthorized areas, or both. The test resultsare intended to aid in assigning a level of physical security tovarious configurations of detention sliding door locking de-vices.6.2.2.2 An impact test of this design performed on adetention sli
31、ding device evaluates the impact strength of thedevice and its components, as well as quality of fabricationtechniques.6.2.3 Apparatus:6.2.3.1 Test AssemblyThis assembly consists of a testfixture (frame) and impactor apparatus as shown in Fig. 1.Refer to Appendix X1. The device under test and the te
32、st doorpanel are mounted on the test fixture.6.2.3.2 ImpactorThe impactor shall consist of a hinged orpivoted system with a mass capable of delivering impacts of200 ftlbf (271.2 J) to a sliding panel simulating a door andlocking device mounted to a wall. The striking surface of theimpactor shall be
33、made from C1010C1020 carbon steel andhave a striking surface area of 4.06 0.04 in.2(25.8 cm2) (seeFig. 2). The weight of the impactor shall be 80 lb (36.3 kg) 61%.6.2.4 Procedure:6.2.4.1 Install the locking device on a test fixture thatsimulates installation of a detention sliding device on a wall.A
34、nchoring method for the device including lock column,receiver jamb, and door guide shall be consistent with manu-facturer recommended installation procedures. Using test ap-paratus described in 6.2.3.1 (Fig. 1), deliver the number ofimpacts of 200 ftlbf (271.2 J) as required for grade level beingtes
35、ted. See Table 1 for the number of required impacts. Thenumber of impacts shall be one quarter of the total number ofblows required by Table 1, delivered at each corner of the dooras shown in Fig. 1.6.2.4.2 MaintenanceMaintenance of the device is limitedto initial lubrication as specified by the man
36、ufacturer.6.2.5 Test Termination and Conditions of AcceptanceThedevice shall remain locked and controlled passage shall beF1643 05 (2012)2FIG. 1 Test AssemblyFIG. 2 Steel Impact RamF1643 05 (2012)3maintained throughout the testing. Failure of device to remainlocked or to control passage shall consti
37、tute failure. If thedevice will not unlock and open by remote or key operation orby use of commonly available hand tools, it shall constitutefailure.6.2.6 Precision and BiasNo information is presentedabout either precision or bias of the horizontal impact test inthese test methods since the test res
38、ult is nonquantitative.6.3 Vertical Impact TestSliding device assemblies shallcomply with the following:6.3.1 ScopeThis test method is designed to evaluate thecapability of a detention sliding device assembly to resistrepeated impact force.6.3.2 Significance and UseThis test method is intended tosim
39、ulate the impact caused by lifting the door to the maximumallowed by device clearances and then releasing the door.6.3.3 ApparatusThe test equipment will consist of amechanism capable of lifting a 300-lb (136-kg) door andapplying a controlled vertical force. The device should be ableto repeatedly ex
40、ert a controllable vertical force on the door andthen quickly release it to simulate dropping the door. A typicaltest arrangement is shown in Fig. 3.6.3.4 ProcedureUsing the test apparatus described in6.3.3, the 300-lb (136-kg) door will be locked in the closedposition and raised to the extent allow
41、ed by the mechanicalclearances of the locking device. When the door is at its upperextreme, no more than 50 lbf (222 N) of vertical force will beapplied. Then remove the vertical force quickly enough toallow the door to fall of its own weight. Repeat this sequencethe number of cycles required by Tab
42、le 2. During the test, thedoor will remain locked and maintain controlled passage.6.3.4.1 MaintenanceMaintenance of the device is limitedto initial lubrication as specified by the manufacturer.6.3.5 Test Termination and Conditions of AcceptanceThedoor shall maintain controlled passage and remain loc
43、kedthroughout the test. Inability of the sliding device assembly toremain locked and maintain controlled passage throughout thetest shall constitute failure. Upon completion of the testsequence, the sliding device will be cycled in its normal modeof operation, open then closed and locked. The slidin
44、g deviceshall achieve physical locking and shall indicate a securecondition when indicators are provided. This cycle shall berepeated a total of five times. Inability of the sliding device tocomplete any cycle shall constitute failure.6.3.6 Precision and BiasNo information is presentedabout either p
45、recision or bias of the vertical impact test in thesetest methods since the test result is nonquantitative.6.4 Remote Unlocking Force Test:TABLE 1 Impact Test CriteriaSecurity Grade Number of Impacts Element of TimeA1 600 60 min2 400 40 minAElement of time is based on the assumption that sustained m
46、anpower candeliver 400 blows of 200 ftlbf (271.2 J) each in as few as 40 min. Since 400 blowsis the number of impacts a Grade 2 device must absorb and still be operable, asdescribed in 6.2.5; it is assumed failure of the Grade 2 device will occur after 40min. The element of time assigned to the vari
47、ous grades of devices is adjusted toachieve more manageable time periods than actual calculations provide. Theelement of time is hypothetical.FIG. 3 Vertical Impact ApparatusF1643 05 (2012)46.4.1 ScopeThis test method covers the capabilities ofremotely controlled devices to function under simulated
48、oper-ating conditions while lateral force is applied either perpen-dicular or parallel to the door face to prohibit device operation.6.4.2 Significance and UseThis test method simulates theremote release (unlocking) of devices while being subjected toeither a perpendicular or parallel lateral force
49、directed to stopunlocking operation. A test of this design performed on asliding device evaluates the operating force characteristics andstrength of the device and its components as well as quality offabrication techniques.6.4.3 Apparatus:6.4.3.1 The test fixtures shall consist of assemblies suitablefor mounting the locking devices and a test door panel.Examples of these fixtures are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 andshall incorporate the device manufacturers recommendationsfor mounting the device.6.4.3.2 Test apparatus shall consist of a loading dev
