1、Amendment 1:1999 to National Standard of Canada CAN/CSA-ISOBEC 101 64-1-95 Amendment 1:1996 to International Standard ISO/IEC 10164-1:1993 has been adopted without modification as Amendment 1:1999 to CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 10164-1-95. This Amendment was reviewed by the CSA Technical Committee on Informatio
2、n Technology (TCIT) under the jurisdiction of the Strategic Steering Committee on Information Technology and deemed acceptable for use in Canada. June 1999 Reaff i r med 2004) Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems Management: Object Management Function AMENDMENT 1 : Impleme
3、ntation conformance statement prof ormas Technologies de /information - lnterconnexion de systemes ouverts (OSI) - Gestion-s ysternes: Fonction de gestion dobjets AMENDEMENT I: Proformes ICs Reference number ISO/IEC 10164-1 :1993/Amd.l:1996(E) ISO/IEC 10164-1: 1993lAmd.l: 1996(E) Foreword IS0 (the I
4、nternational Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are members of IS0 or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical committees esta
5、blished by the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical activity. IS0 and IEC technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with IS0 and IEC, also take part in the work. In th
6、e field of information technology, IS0 and IEC have established a joint technical committee, ISOLEC JTC 1. Draft International Standards adopted by the joint technical committee are circulated to national bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 %
7、of the national bodies casting a vote. Amendment 1 to International Standard ISO/IEC 10164-1 was prepared by Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology, Subcommittee SC 2 1, Open systems interconnection, data management and open distributed processing, in collaboration with ITL-
8、T. The identical text is published as ITU-T Rec. X.730/Amd. 1. 0 ISOLEC 1996 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be repro- duced or utilized in any form or by any means. electronic or mechanical, including photo- copying and microfilm, without permission
9、in writing from the publisher. ISO/IEC Copyright Office Case Postale 56 CH-1211 Genbve 20 Switzerland 11 Information technology Open Systems Interconnection Systems Management: Object Management FunctionTechnical Corrigendum 1:2013 (IDT) toAmendment 1:1999 toNational Standard of CanadaCAN/CSA-ISO/IE
10、C 10164-1-95(ISO/IEC 10164-1:1993, IDT)NOT FOR RESALE. / PUBLICATION NON DESTINE LA REVENTE.Standards Update ServiceTechnical Corrigendum 1:2013 to Amendment 1:1999 toCAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 10164-1-95January 2013Title:Information technology Open Systems Interconnection Sy stems Management: Object Managemen
11、t FunctionPagination:2 pagesTo register for e-mail notification about any updates to this publicationgo to shop.csa.caclick on CSA Update ServiceThe List ID that you will need to register for updates to this publication is 2411688.If you require assistance, please e-mail techsupportcsagroup.org or c
12、all 416-747-2233.Visit CSA Groups policy on privacy at csagroup.org/legal to find out how we protect your personal information.INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISOJIEC 10164-1:1993/Amd.1:1996 TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 Published 1996-l 2-I 5 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION l ME)KLIYHAPOnHAfl OPrAH
13、M3AUMfI n0 CTAHjJAPTM3AMM . ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION l MEmYHAPOJJHAfl 3JlEKTPOTEXHMECKAFl KOMMCCMfl l COMMISSION LECTRTECHNOUE NTERNATIONALE Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems Management: Object Management Fun
14、ction AMENDMENT 1: Implementation conformance statement proformas TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 Technologies de Iinforma tion - Interconnexion de syst b) protocol implementation conformance statement; c) system conformance statement.” ITU-T Rec. X.730 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E) 1 ISO/IEC 10164-1: 1993/Amd.l: 19
15、96(E) Insert the following new subclause: “3.8 Implementation conformance statement proforma definitions This Recommendation I International Standard makes use of the following terms defined in ITU-T Rec. X.724 I ISO/IEC 10165-6: a) b) Management Conformance Summary (MCS); c) MCS proforma; d) MRCS p
16、roforma.” Managed Relationship Conformance Statement (MRCS): 7) 8) Add the following abbreviations to clause 4: “ICs Implementation Conformance Statement MCS Management Conformance Summary MICS Management Information Conformance Statement MIDS Management Information Definition Statement MOCS Managed
17、 Object Conformance Statement MRCS Managed Relationship Conformance Statement PICS Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement” Replace clause 13 by the following: “13 Conformance Implementations claiming to conform to this Recommendation I International Standard shall comply with the conformance
18、requirements as defined in the following subclauses. 13.1 Static conformance The implementation shall conform to the requirements of this Recommendation I International Standard in the manager role, the agent role, or both roles. A claim of conformance to at least one role shall be made in Table A.
19、1. If a claim of conformance is made for support in the manager role, the implementation shall support at least one of the notifications or at least one of the management operations specified in this Recommendation I International Standard. The conformance requirements in the manager role for those
20、management operations and notifications, are identified in Table A.3 and further tables referenced by Annex A. If a claim of conformance is made for support in the agent role, the implementation shall support at least one of the notifications specified in this Recommendation I International Standard
21、. The conformance requirements in the agent role are identified in Table A.4 and further tables referenced by Annex A. The implementation shall support the transfer syntax derived from the encoding rules specified in CCITT Rec. X.209 I ISOLEC 8825 named joint-iso-ccitt asnl(1) basicEncoding( I) for
22、the abstract data types referenced by the definitions for which support is claimed. NOTE - Prior to the publication of this amendment, this Recommendation I International Standard identified general and dependent conformance classes. A claim of conformance similar to general conformance class can be
23、 made by stating support in the manager role, the agent role, or both roles, for object events functional unit in Table A.2. A claim of conformance similar to dependent conformance class can be made by stating support for at least one of the items in Tables A.3 or A.4. 13.2 Dynamic conformance Imple
24、mentations claiming to conform to this Recommendation I International Standard shall support the elements of procedure and definitions of semantics corresponding to the definitions for which support is claimed. 13.3 Any MCS proforma, MICS proforma, MOCS proforma, and PICS proforma which conforms to
25、this Recommendation I International Standard shall be technically identical to the proformas specified in Annexes A, B, C, E preserving table numbering and the index numbers of items, and differing only in pagination and page headers. Management implementation conformance statement requirements 2 IT
26、U-T Rec. X.730 (1992)/Arnd.l(1995 E) ISO/IEC 10164-1: 1993hhd.l: 1996(E) The supplier of an implementation which is claimed to conform to this Recommendation I International Standard shall complete a copy of the Management Conformance Summary (MCS) provided in Annex A as part of the conformance requ
27、irements together with any other ICs proformas referenced as applicable from that MCS. An ICs which conforms to this Recommendation I International Standard shall: - describe an implementation which conforms to this Recommendation I International Standard; - have been completed in accordance with th
28、e instructions for completion given in ITU-T Rec. X.724 I ISO/IEC 10165-6; - include the information necessary to uniquely identify both the supplier and the implementation. Claims of conformance to the management information defined in this Recommendation I International Standard in managed object
29、classes defined elsewhere shall include the requirements of the MIDS proforma, as specified in Annexe D, in the MOCS for the managed object class.” 9) Apply the following change to 11.1.1.2.1: In the last sentence replace “1 1.1.2.2” by “1 1.1.1.2.2” Apply the following change to 11.1.8.2.1: In the
30、last sentence replace “1 1.1.6.2.2” by “1 1.1.8.2.2” ITU-T Rec. X.730 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E) 3 ISOAEC 10164-1:1993/Amd.l:1996(E) 1 I) Add the following annexes: Index Annex A First block of columns Second block of columns Etc. MCS proforma3) (This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation I
31、International Standard) A.l Introduction A.l.l Purpose and structure The Management Conformance Summary (MCS) is a statement by a supplier that identifies an implementation and provides information on whether the implementation claims conformance to any of the listed set of documents that specify co
32、nformance requirements to OS1 management. The MCS proforma is a document, in the form of a questionnaire that when completed by the supplier of an implementation becomes the MCS. A.1.2 The supplier of the implementation shall enter an explicit statement in each of the boxes provided. Specific instru
33、ction is provided in the text which precedes each table. A.1.3 Symbols, abbreviations and terms For all annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT Rec. X.291 I ISOAEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISOLEC 9646-7 are used for the Status co
34、lumn: Instructions for completing the MCS proforma to produce an MCS m Mandatory; o Optional; c Conditional; x Prohibited; - NOTES 1 IC, m, and 0 are prefixed by a c: when nested under a conditional or optional item of the same table; 2 0 may be suffixed by .N (where N is a unique number) for select
35、able options among a set of status values. Support of at least one of the choices (from the items with the same values of N) is required. For all annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT Rec. X.291 I ISOLEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296
36、I ISOLEC 9646-7 are used for the Support column: Not applicable or out of scope. Y Implemented; N Not implemented; - No answer required; Ig The item is ignored (i.e. processed syntactically but not semantically). A.1.4 Table format Some of the tables in this Recommendation I International Standard h
37、ave been split because the information is too wide to fit on the page. Where this occurs, the index number of the first block of columns are the index numbers of the corresponding rows of the remaining blocks of columns. A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts should have the follo
38、wing layout: 3, Users of this Recommendation I International Standard may freely reproduce the MCS proforma in this annex so that it can be used for its intended purpose, and may further publish the completed MCS. Instructions for completing the MCS proforma are specified in ITU-T Rec.X.724 I ISOlIE
39、C 10165-6. 4 ITU-T Rec. X.730 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E) ISOAEC 10164-1:1993/Amd.l:1996(E) Index 1 2 In this Recommendation I International Standard the constituent parts of the table appear consecutively, starting with the first block of columns. When a table with sub-rows is too wide to fit on a page, t
40、he continuation tables(s) have been constructed with index numbers identical to the index numbers in the corresponding rows of the first table, and with sub-index numbers corresponding to the sub-rows within each indexed row. For example, if Table X.l has 2 rows and the continuation of Table X.l has
41、 2 sub-rows for each row, the tables are presented as follows: A B C D E F G ab- ab- Table X.l- Title Table X.1 (continued) - Title A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts should have the following layout: References made to cells within tables shall be interpreted as references wi
42、thin reconstructed tabled. In the example, above, the reference X.l/ld corresponds to the blank cell in the column G for row with Index 1, and X.1/1.2b corresponds to the blank cell in column L for row with Sub-index 1.2 A.2 Identification of the implementation A.2.1 Date of statement The supplier o
43、f the implementation shall enter the date of this statement in the box below. Use the format DD-MM- YYYY. Date of statement ITU-T Rec. X.730 (1992)/Amd.1(1995 E) 5 ISOAEC 10164-1:1993/Amd.l:1996(E) A.2.2 Identification of the implementation The supplier of the implementation shall enter information
44、necessary to uniquely identify the implementation and the system(s) in which it may reside, in the box below. A.2.3 Contact The supplier of the implementation shall provide information on whom to contact if there are any queries concerning the content of the MCS or any referenced implementation conf
45、ormance statement, in the box below. A.3 Identification of the Recommendations I International Standards in which the management information is defined The supplier of the implementation shall enter the title, reference number and date of the publication of the Recommendations I International Standa
46、rds which specify the management information to which conformance is claimed, in the box below. Recommendations I International Standards to which conformance is claimed A.3.1 Technical corrigenda implemented The supplier of the implementation shall enter the reference numbers of implemented technic
47、al corrigenda which modify the identified Recommendations I International Standards, in the box below. A.3.2 Amendments implemented The supplier of the implementation shall state the titles and reference numbers of implemented amendments to the identified Recommendation I International Standard, in
48、the box below. 6 ITU-T Rec. X.730 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E) ISO/IEC 10164-1: 1993lAmd.l: 1996(E) 1 2 A.4 Management conformance summary Manager role support 0.1 Agent role support 0.1 The supplier of implementation shall state the capabilities and features supported and provide a summary of conformance c
49、laims to Recommendations I International Standards using the tables in this annex. _ Index Capability 1 obiectEvents functional unit The supplier of the implementation shall specify the roles that are supported, in Table A.l. Manager Agent Status Support Status Support Addltlonal inforrnatlon cl c2 I Table A.l- Roles 3 I control functional unit I cl I Index I Roles supported I Status I support I Additional information 1 I c2 I 4 I monitor functional unit I cl The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for the systems managem
