1、I NT E R N AT1 0 N AL STANDARD ISO/IEC 10164-7 First edition AMENDMENT 1 1992-05-1 5 1995-1 2-1 5 (Reaffirmed 2004) Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems Management: Security alarm reporting function AMENDMENT I : Implementation conformance statement proformas Technologies
2、de iinformation - lnterconnexion de systemes ouverts (OS/) - Gestion-systemes: Fonction de rapport dalarme de securite AMENDEMENT 7.- Proformes de declaration de conformite de mise en ceuvre Amendment VI996 to National Standard of Canada CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC-lOd64-7-95 Amendment 1: 1995 to International
3、Standard ISO/IEC 101647:1992 has been adopted, without modification, as Amendment 1: 1996 to CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC-10164-7-95. November 1996 Reference number ISOilEC 10164-7:1992/Amd.l1995(E) ISO/IEC 10164-7:1992/Arnd.l:1995(E) Foreword IS0 (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the
4、 International Electrotechnical Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are members of IS0 or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical committees established by the respective organization to deal with particu
5、lar fields of technical activity. IS0 and IEC technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in Iiaison with IS0 and IEC, also take part in the work. In the field of information technology, IS0 and IEC have establi
6、shed a joint technical committee, ISOAEC JTC 1. Draft International Standards adopted by the joint technical committee are circulated to national bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the national bodies casting a vote. Amendment 1 to Inter
7、national Standard ISO/IEC 10164-7: 1992 was prepared by Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1, Infurmarion technology, Subcommittee SC 21, Open systems interconnection, data management and open distributedprocessing, in collaboration with ITU-T. The identical text is published as ITU-T Rec. X.736/
8、Amd. 1. 0 ISO/IEC 1995 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be repro- duced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photo- copying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISODEC Copyright Office
9、 Case Postale 56 CH-1211 Genkve 20 Switzerland 11 Information technology Open Systems Interconnection Systems Management: Security alarm reporting functionTechnical Corrigendum 1:2013 (IDT) toAmendment 1:1999 toNational Standard of CanadaCAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 10164-7-95(ISO/IEC 10164-7:1992, IDT)NOT FOR R
10、ESALE. / PUBLICATION NON DESTINE LA REVENTE.Standards Update ServiceTechnical Corrigendum 1:2013 to Amendment 1:1999 toCAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 10164-7-95January 2013Title: Information technology Open Systems Interconnection Systems Management: Security alarm reporting functionPagination: 2 pagesTo register
11、for e-mail notification about any updates to this publicationgo to shop.csa.caclick on CSA Update ServiceThe List ID that you will need to register for updates to this publication is 2412132.If you require assistance, please e-mail techsupportcsagroup.org or call 416-747-2233.Visit CSA Groups policy
12、 on privacy at csagroup.org/legal to find out how we protect your personal information.INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 10164-7: 1992JAmd. 1: 1995 TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 Published 1996-l 2-15 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION l MEKLIYHAPOjJHAfl OPl-AHM3ALWl l-l0 CTAHIJAPTM3AlJWl l ORGANI
13、SATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION l MEKJLYHAPOflHM 3JlEKTPOTEXHWiECKAfl KOMMCCMR . COMMISSION ELECTROTECHNIOUE INTERNATONALE Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems Management: Security alarm reporting function AMENDMENT 1: Imple
14、mentation conformance statement proformas TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 Technologies de I in formation - lnterconnexion de systdmes ouverts (OS/) - Gestion-syst f) MOCS proforma;” 5) Apply the following change to 3.7: Replace “system conformance statement” with the following: “a) PICS proforma; b) protoco
15、l implementation conformance statement; c) system conformance statement.” 6) Renumber 3.8 as 3.9 and inserl the following new subclause: ITU-T Rec. X.736 (1992)/Arnd.l (1995 E) 1 ISODEC 10164-7 : 1992/Amd.l : 1995 (E) “3.8 ImpIementation conformance statement proforma definitions This Recommendation
16、 I International Standard makes use of the following terms defined in ITU-T Rec. X.724 I ISOflEC 10165-6: a) Managed Relationship Conformance Statement (MRCS); b) Management Conformance Summary (MCS); c Management Information Definition Statement (MIDS) proforma; d) MCS proforma; e) MRCS proforma.”
17、7) Add the following abbreviations to clause 4: “ICs Implementation Conformance Statement MCS Management Conformance Summary MICS Management Information Conformance Statement MIDS Management Information Definition Statement MOCS Managed Object Conformance Statement MRCS Managed Relationship Conforma
18、nce Statement PICS Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement” 8) Replace clause 13 with the following: “13 Conformance Implementations claiming to conform to this Recommendation I International Standard shall comply with the conformance requirements as defined in the following subclauses. 13.1 S
19、tatic conformance The implementation shall conform to the requirements of this Recommendation I International Standard in the manager role, the agent role, or both roles. A claim of conformance to at least one role shall be made in Table A. 1. If a claim of conformance is made for support in the man
20、ager role, the implementation shall support at least one of the notifications or at least one of the management operations specified in this Recommendation I International Standard, The conformance requirements in the manager role for those management operations and notifications are identified in T
21、able A.3 and further tables referenced by Annex A. If a claim of conformance is made for support in the agent role, the implementation shall support at least one of the notifications specified in this Recommendation I International Standard. The conformance requirements in the agent role are identif
22、ied in Table A.4 and further tables referenced by Annex A. The implementation shall support the transfer syntax derived from the encoding rules specified in CCITT Rec. X.209 I ISOflEC 8825 named joint-iso-ccitt asnl( 1) basicEncoding(1) 1 for the abstract data types referenced by the definitions for
23、 which support is claimed. NOTE - Prior to the publication of this amendment, this Recommendation 1 International Standard identified general and dependent conformance classes. A claim of conformance similar to general conformance class can be made by stating support in the manager role, the agent r
24、ole, or both roles, for the security alarm reporting functiond unit in Table A.2. A claim of conformance similar to dependent conformance class can be made by stating support for at least one of the items in Tables A.3 or A.4. 13.2 Dynamic conformance Implementations claiming to conform to this Reco
25、mmendation I International Standard shall support the elements of procedure and definitions of semantics corresponding to the definitions for which support is claimed. 13.3 Management implementation conformance statement requirements Any MCS proforma, MICS proforma, and MOCS proforma which conforms
26、to this Recommendation I InternationaI Standard shall be technically identical to the proformas specified in Annexes A, B and C preserving table numbering and the index numbers of items, and differing only in pagination and page headers. 2 ITU-T Rec. X.736 (1992)/Arnd.l(1995 E) ISO/IEC 10164-7 : 199
27、UAmd.l : 1995 (E) The supplier of an implementation which is claimed to conform to this Recommendation I International Standard shall complete a copy of the Management Conformance Summary (MCS) provided in Annex A as part of the conformance requirements together with any other ICs proformas referenc
28、ed as applicable from that MCS. An ICs which conforms to this Recommendation I International Standard shall: - describe an implementation which conforms to this Recommendation I International Standard; have been completed in accordance with the instructions for completion given in ITU-T Rec. X.724 I
29、 ISO/IEC 10 165-6; include the information necessary to uniquely identify both the supplier and the implementation. Claims of conformance to the management information defined in this Recommendation I International Standard in managed object classes defined elsewhere shall include the requirements o
30、f the MIDS proforma in the MOCS for the managed object class.” Add fhe following annexes: ITU-T Rec. X.736 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E) 3 ISO/IEC 10164-7 : 1992/Amd.l : 1995 (E) Index First block of columns Second block of columns Annex A Etc. MCS proforma5) (This annex forms an integral part of this Recomm
31、endation I International Standard) A.1 Introduction A.l.l Purpose and structure The Management Conformance Summary (MCS) is a statement by a supplier that identifies an implementation and provides information on whether the implementation claims conformance to any of the listed set of documents that
32、 specify conformance requirements to OS1 management. The MCS proforma is a document in the form of a questionnaire that when completed by the supplier of an implementation becomes the MCS. A.1.2 Instructions for completing the MCS proforma to produce a MCS The supplier of the implementation shall en
33、ter an explicit statement in each of the boxes provided. Specific instruction is provided in the text which precedes each table. A.1.3 Symbols, abbreviations and terms For all annexes of this Recornmendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT Rec. X.291 I ISOA
34、EC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7, are used for the Status column: m Mandatory; 0 Optional; C Conditional; X Prohibited; - NOTES I 2 Not applicable or out of scope. c, m, and 0 are prefixed by “c:” when nested under a conditional or optional item of the same table: 0 may be suffixed by
35、 “.N (where ?4 is a unique number) for selectable options among a set of status values. Support of at least one of the choices (from the items with the same value of N) is required. For all annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT Rec.
36、 X.291 I ISO/IEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7, are used for the Support column: Y Implemented; N Not implemented ; - No answer required; Ig The item is ignored (Le. processed syntactically but not semantically). A.1.4 Table format Some of the tables in this Recommendation ! Internati
37、onal Standard have been split because the information is too wide to fit on the page. Where this occurs, the index number of the first block of columns are the index numbers of the corresponding rows of the remaining blocks of columns. A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts should
38、 have the following layout: In this Recommendation I International Standard the constituent parts of the table appear consecutively, starting with the first block of columns. 5, Users of this Recommendation I International Standard may freely reproduce the MCS proforma in this annex so that it can b
39、e used for its intended purpose, and may further publish the completed MCS. Instructions for the MCS proforma are specified in ITU-T Rec. X.724 I ISO/IEC 10165-6. 4 ITU-T Rec. X.736 (1992)/Amd.l (1995 E) ISO/IEC 10164-7 : 1992/Arnd.l : 1995 (E) When a table with sub-rows is too wide to fit on a page
40、, the continuation table(s) have been constructed with index numbers identical to the index numbers in the corresponding rows of the first table, and with sub-index numbers corresponding to the sub-rows within each indexed row. For example, if Table X.l has 2 rows and the continuation of Table X.l h
41、as 2 sub-rows for each row, the tables aTe presented as follows: Table X.l -Title Table X.1 (concluded) - Title A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts should have the following layout: References made to cells within tables shall be interpreted as references within reconstructed t
42、ables. In the example, above, the reference X. l/ld corresponds with the blank cell in column G for row with Index 1, and X. 1/1.2b corresponds with the blank cell in column L for row with Sub-index 1.2. A.2 A.2.1 Identification of the implementation Date of statement The supplier of the implementat
43、ion shall enter the date of this statement in the box below. Use the format DD-MM- YYYY. Date of statement ITC-T Rec. X.736 (1992)/Amd.1(1995 E) 5 ISO/IEC 10164-7 : 1992/Amd.l : 1995 (E) A.2.2 Identification of the implementation The supplier of the implementation shall enter information necessary t
44、o uniquely identify the implementation and the system(s) in which it may reside, in the box below. A.2.3 Contact The supplier of the implementation shalI provide information on whom to contact if there are any queries concerning the content of the MCS or any referenced conformance statement, in the
45、box below. A.3 Identification of the Recommendations 1 International Standards in which the management information is defined The supplier of the implementation shall enter the title, reference number and date of the publication of the Recommendations I International Standards which specify the mana
46、gement information to which conformance is claimed, in the box below. &endations I International Standards to which conformance is claimed I A.3.1 Technical corrigenda implemented The supplier of the implementation shall enter the reference numbers of implemented technical corrigenda which modify th
47、e identified Recommendations I International Standards, in the box below. A.3.2 Amendments implemented The supplier of the implementation shall state the titles and reference numbers of implemented amendments to the identified Recommendations 1 International Standards, in the box below. 6 ITU-T Rec.
48、 X.736 (1992)/Amd.l (1995 E) ISOlIEC 10164-7 : 199WAmd.l: 1995 (E) Index Roles supported Status Support A.4 Additional information Management conformance summary 1 The supplier of the implementation shall state the capabilities and features supported and provide a summary of conformance claims to Re
49、commendations I International Standards using the tables in this annex. Manager role support 0.1 The supplier of the implementation shall specify the roles that are supported, in Table A. 1 2 Agent role support Table A.1- Roles 0.1 Manager Agent The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for the systems management functional unit, in Table A.2. Index Table A.2 - Systems management functional unit Systems management functional unit name Status Support Status Support Additional information 1 security alarm reporting functional unit cl c2 The supplie
