1、ASQC El 96 0759506 0003775 319 ANSVASQC El -1 996 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD Quality Program Guidelines for Project Phase of Nonnuclear Po wer Generation Facilities AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR QUALITY CONTROL 611 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUE MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN 53202 COPYRIGHT American Society for QualityLicense
2、d by Information Handling Services ASQC EL 96 W 0757506 0001776 255 W ANSVASQC El -1 996 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD Quality Program Guidelines for Project Phase of Nonnuclear Po wer Generation Facilities Reaffirmation of ANSVASQC E1-1989 Prepared by American Society for Quality Control Standards Com
3、mittee for American National Standards Committee Z- I on Quality Assurance An American National Standard Approved on February 26, 1996 Amencan National Standard: An American National Standard implies a consensus of those substantially concerned with its scope and provisions. An American National Sta
4、ndard is intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer, the consumer, and the general public. The existence of an American National Standard does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether he or she has approved the standard or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, proces
5、ses, or procedures not conforming to the standard. American National Standards are subject to periodic review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest editions. Caution Notice: This American National Standard may be revised or withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American National Standa
6、rds Institute require that action be taken to reafnrm, revise, or withdraw this standard no later than five years from the date of approval. Purchasers of American National Standards may receive current information on all standards by calling or writing the American National Standards Institute. COP
7、YRIGHT American Society for QualityLicensed by Information Handling Services ASQC EL 96 m 0759506 OOOii777 LL m 01996 by ASQC All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior wr
8、itten permission of the publisher. ASQC Mission: To facilitate continuous improvement and increase customer satisfaction by identifying, communicating, and promoting the use of quality principles, concepts, and technologies; and thereby be recognized throughout the world as the leading authority on,
9、 and champion for, quality. 109 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of America Printed on acid-free paper Published by: ASQC 611 East Wiseonsin Avenue Milwaukee, Wiseonsin 53202 COPYRIGHT American Society for QualityLicensed by Information Handling ServicesASQC El 76 9 0757506 0003778 O28 9
10、 ANSUASQC El-1996 Contents 1.0 Introduction . 1 1.2 Applicability . 1 2.0TemsandDefnitions 1 3.0 Quality Policy and Quality Program Management . 1 3.1 Quality Objective 1 3.2 Quality Program Description 1 3.4 Administration 1 3.5 QualityAudits 2 3.6 Control of Nonconformances 2 3.1 CorrectiveAction
11、2 3.8 StatisticalControls . 3 3.9 Quality Records . 3 4.0 Designcontrol . 3 4.1 DesignOrganization 3 4.2 Method of Documenting Design 3 4.3 DesignReviewNenfication . 3 4.4 Item Inspection, Examination. and Testing Definition . 3 4.5 Item Identification . 3 4.6 Design Change Control 3 5.0 Control of
12、Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE) 3 6.0 Control of Proamment of Items and Services Included in the Quality Program 4 6.1 Supplier QuaMcation . 4 6.2 Procurement Document Preparation. Review. and Control 4 6.2.1 Preparation of Procurement Documents . 4 6.2.2 Review of Procurement Documents . 5 6.2.
13、3 Changes to Procurement Documents . 5 6.3 Source Surveillance/Inspection . 5 6.4 Supplier Quality Evidence 5 6.5 Receivinghspection 5 6.7 Control of Lower-Tier Procurements . 6 7.0 Control of Construction and Installation 6 7.1 Control of Construction and Installation Activities . 6 7.2 DocumentCon
14、rol . 6 7.3 CongurationControl . 6 7.4 Special Process Controis . 6 7.5 Identification of Inspection Status . 6 7.6 Handling andstorage . 6 7.7 Inspection . 7 7.8 Testcontrol 7 1.1 scope 1 3.3 QualityPlanning 1 6.6 Supplier Performance Evaluation . 5 COPYRIGHT American Society for QualityLicensed by
15、 Information Handling Services ASQC EL 96 m 0759506 0001779 Tb4 = Foreword (This Foreword is not part of American National Standard El-1996, Quality Program Guidelines for Project Phase of Nonnuclear Power Generation Facilities.) This document was developed to provide quality program guidelines for
16、that segment of the electrical power genedon in- dustry which is not covered by mandatory nuclear quality standards nor other industry quality documents that are directly applicable. Although many standards are cmntly available, a detailed review of those standards reveals that adaptation of those s
17、tandards or portions thereof to nonnuclear power generation applications would be difficult, if not impractical. The intent of this document is to delineate the guidelines for a quality program which will provide adequate control of those factors that affect quality and reliability of nonnuclear pow
18、er generation facilities. The quality program is designed so that it may be applied in total or in part. The extent and manner in which this document is used must be determined by the organization imposing it based on the nature and scope of work, and the criticality of the item or services to opera
19、bility, safety, reliability, environmental impact, or other such factors. The adoption of this guideline, or any portion thereof, is voluntary on the part of the electrical power generation industry. It must be recognized that this is a guideline only and adoption or utilization of it in whole or in
20、 part by any third party (e.g., utility, regulatory agency, insurance company) is neither intended nor condoned by ANSYASQC. This document is a reafnrmation of El-1989. The user may wish to consult other documents which were considered in the development of the 1989 edition of this document, such as
21、: ANSVASQC Z1.15 Generic Guidelines for Quality Systems (superceded by ANSHSO/ASQC Q9004-I) ANSVASQC Al Dqnitions, Symbols, Formulas, and Tables of Control Charts (superceded in part by ANSHSO/ASQC ANSYASQC A2 Terms, Symbols, and Dcrfinitions for Acceptance Sampling (superceded in pari by ANSHSO/ASQ
22、C A3534-1 andANSHSO/ASQC A3534-2) A3534-1 and ANSHSO/ASQC A3534-2) ANSVASQC A3 Quality System Terminology (superceded by ANSuISO/ASQC A8402) The Energy Division Standards Committee included the following personnel during preparation of the 1989 edition of document: R. J. AirhartAeneral Electric Comp
23、any R. W. Bass-impel1 Corporation D. Bounelis-Argonne National Laboratory R. G. Bums, chairman, Coordinating Subcommittee-Stone &Webster J. D. Cardl-TVA R. Chase-Maine Yankee Atomic Power S. Cunningham, chairman, E-2 Writing Group-Westinghouse Electric V COPYRIGHT American Society for QualityLicense
24、d by Information Handling Services ASQC EL b m 075950b OOOL780 786 m ANSVASQC El-1996 R. B. Glasscock, chairman-Washington Public Power Supply System R. Jeffers, secretary-Utah Power & Light R. E. Jouppi, Writing GroupTransmation, Inc. W. R. Kazor-Integrated Quality Systems W. Kellerman-Bechtel Powe
25、r J. E. King-Tampa Electric Company D. E. Leaver-Delian Corporation D. Martin, chairman, E-1 Writing Group (Temp)-F&M Technical Services D. Palmer-Niagara Mohawk Power Company D. Pedrick, IV, chairman, E-3 Writing GroupFlorida Power & Light D. Plaskon-San Diego Gas & Electric Company E Porter-mnsult
26、ant R. Riderman-Cleveland Electric Illuminating B. E. Scagna-Westinghouse Electric R. W. Seier-Impeil Corporation R. E. Souder-Hour Engineers & Constructors (deceased) C. T. Springer4ommonwealh Associates B. A. TomMenerai Electric Company W. E. Underwood, vice chairman - Ralph M. Parsons Company R.
27、W. Vandemanden-Bonneville Power Administration vi COPYRIGHT American Society for QualityLicensed by Information Handling ServicesASQC El 96 m 075950b 000178l bL2 m ANSUASQC El-1996 Quality Program Guidelines for Project Phase of Nonnuclear Power Generation Facilities quality manual or procedures or
28、a combination which is appropriate for the organization and the activities under its cognizance. These documents should be readily available to and used by persons performing quality-related tasks andor functions. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 scope This document provides general guidelines for establish- in
29、g and implementing a quaiity program for controiling design, procurement, manufacturing, construction, instal- lation, and testing activities related to power generating facilities which are not covered by nuclear regulatory or other quality standards. The scope of this document extends to materials
30、, parts, components, services, and systems as a means of obtaining and sustaining reliable The manual or procedures should define the extent to which the guidelines of this document apply to activities and items. This determination should be based on the im- portance (critical function) of an item a
31、s determined by the criteria listed in 3.3. facility operating capacity and availability, and thereby reducing the cost of producing electric energy. 33 QualityPlanning 1.2 Appiicabiiily This document may be applied to, or by, any organization which has responsibility for performing activities assoc
32、i- ated with power generating facilities during the various phases as described in Paragraph 1.1 above. The user of this document is responsible for its interpretation and its application in total or in part to the users organization or imposition of applicable portions on subtier organizations. Its
33、 application may vary from a total plant or facility to limited systems or components. 2.0 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS Planning should take into consideration (1) the nature of the work or service, (2) the importance of the work to plant operation, (3) the necessity for procedures or instructions, (4) the
34、 need for trained personnel, special equipment, and documentation, (5) the need for control measures to ensure satisfactory perfomance of quality-related tasks and func- tions, and (6) cost effectiveness of its application. Planning actions should focus on defect prevention. Quality planning should
35、also include deteminin gtherequire- ments hat wiil be imposed on primary contractors, subcon- tractors, and suppliers. This determination should be based on the significance of the item or service, including cost-to- benet consideratons. Cri&a for determinhg significance Standard terminology is used
36、 throughout this document. If may include items or activities, the failure of which coula further clartcation is required, refer to ANSVISO/ASQC A8402-1994, Quality Management and Quality Assur- ance-Vocabulary, a) Create a safety hazard to operating personnel and equipment or cause shutdown of the
37、unit. 3.0 QUALITY POLICY AND QUALITY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 3.1 Quaiity Objective b) Have adverse environmental impact. c) Cause a reduction in output of the generating source, or create the need for excessive repair, maintenance, or replacement costs. d) Cause delays in construction schedules due to un
38、ac- The objective of the quality program is to assure that ade- quate design criteria are specied and complied with to en- ceptable material or rework. hance the availability and reliability of operating facilities in a cost-effective manner. 3.4 Administration 3.2 Quaiity Program Description Respon
39、sibility and authority should be clearly defined for personnel charged with implementing and administering The quality policy and program should be documented. Documentation may be accomplished by preparation of a the quality probam. The following bidelines should be followed as applicable: COPYRIGH
40、T American Society for QualityLicensed by Information Handling Services ASQC EL 76 075750b OOOL782 557 ANSVASQC El-1996 Organization responsibility and authority for the estab- lishment, implementation, and management of the quality program should be defined in directives, poli- cies, or procedures.
41、 being audited. Auditing of activities covered by a quality program should be conducted in accordance with plans or procedures by adequately trained personnel. Results of these audits should be documented in a report that will be submitted to management of the organization being audited for resoluti
42、on of findings. Follow-up activities should be initiated to assure that all the findings have been resolved and resolution verified as appropriate to the circumstance. Quality is the responsibility of all persons and organi- zations responsible for performing the work or activi- ties to which the qu
43、ality program applies. _ The person) responsible for the direction and man- agement of the quality program and assessment of the programs effectiveness should be at a level within the company structure that is able to interface with the Audits may include: a) Program audit to determine adequacy of p
44、lanning and implementation of the quality program. management of other departments and organizations. The responsible person(s) should also have access to upper management for the resolution of items requiring upper managements approval. b) Procedures evaluation to determine adequacy of work instruc
45、tions and correct interpretation by implementing personnel. c) product and process audits to determine that items and Personnel performing quality verification and quality program assessments should have sufficient organiza- related services conform to requirements. tional freedom, authority, and ca
46、pability to identify and evaluate quality problems and to initiate, recommend, 3*6 Of Nonconformances or provide solutions and to ve their implementation in areas of critical work specincally identied in the program. When required, designated personnel should have the authority to prevent further pr
47、ocessing of de- Nonconforming materials, equipment, and services (e.g., testing, NDE, and design services) should be controlled. Nonconforming items should be segregated when practi- cable, identified, and controlled to prevent inadvertent use. fective or questionable work or materials until a suit-
48、 able disposition has been obtained. The responsibility for the dispositioning of nonconfor- mances should be clearly defined. Dispositions may in- The development, administration, and verification of the quality program should be coordinated among de- partments or pups which are responsible for act
49、ivities that could affect quality. clude accept-as-is, repair, return to source, scrap, or re- work. Nonconformances which cannot be reworked to specified requirements should be reviewed by the appro- priate engineering and other disciplines for dispositions. When supplier nonconformances are detected, the supplier should be notified with requests for corrective action and resolution of unsatisfactory conditions. The adequacy and effectiveness of the quality program should periodically be evaluated by management. Eval- uations should, as applicable,
