1、Campaigning and collaborating on REACH in Europe,Michael Warhurst EU Chemicals Policy WWF European Policy Office, Brussels,Introduction,This talk gives a brief introduction to: What is the EU, What is Reach and how EU decision making works Environmental NGO views on REACH, and how these relate to th
2、e history of chemicals regulation in Europe How environmental and other NGOs are collaborating on this issue Some tactics that have been used at EU level, or within Member States.,What is the EU?,The European Union was created by intergovernmental treaties between the Member States These treaties de
3、fined a number of institutions, and defined their competence. The EU is much more than a free trade area - it also has considerable competence in general environmental and other policies. There are three key pillars of EU Governance: The European Commission Like a Civil Service, but more powerful. D
4、ivided into departments or “Directorate Generals” e.g. DG Environment and DG Enterprise Drafts legislation, often after a request from Council. Most implementation and enforcement is done at Member State level Council The EU Member State governments - subdivided into specialities, e.g. Environment C
5、ouncil is made up of Environment Ministers One of the two “chambers” of EU policy making European Parliament Elected by the people of Europe every 5 years The second chamber of EU policy making. Final agreement on most legislation is by votes in both Council and Parliament, or if disagreements remai
6、n, then by a 6-week forced compromise procedure “conciliation”,Why is the EU important for chemicals?,A major producer The EU produces 29% of the worlds chemicals - the largest chemical industry in the world A major market Currently 15 countries, 375 million people (the US population is 275 million)
7、 In 2004, 25 countries, around 450 million people The EU is becoming the global leader on environmental policy The EU is willing to legislate for environmental improvement Control of the production and use of chemicals is controlled at EU level not within individual Member States,What is REACH?,A ne
8、w regulatory system that will control the production, marketing and use of chemicals in Europe Five key elements are: Registration of safety data for all chemicals on market 1 tpa (ignorance is not evidence) Includes promotion of in vitro testing, grouping, data sharing etc. Identification of chemic
9、als of very high concern - CMRs, vPvB, PBT, EDC An authorisation procedure to deal with the use of these chemicals of very high concern Though currently allows continued use of chemicals of high concern even when safer alternatives are available. Greater information flow up and down the supply chain
10、, and - to some extent - to consumers Needs improving Greater control of the use of chemicals in articles (e.g. furniture and TVs Needs improving for imported products.,The history so far.,Building pressure for reform Failure of current system Lack of safety data Lack of action on worst chemicals Re
11、source intensive for authorities Imbalance between new and existing Industry wanted small changes, NGOs a full re-write Creation of new approach Stakeholder meetings (e.g. Feb 1999) The White paper - REACH (Feb 2001) Council and parliament support (2001) A mobilisation of industry inaccurate and mis
12、leading information on costs and jobs (2002, 2003) Scaremongering of downstream users - and other countries (2002, 2003) Finalisation of Commission proposal Internet consultation (2003) Inter service text (2003) Impact assessment (2003) Publication - October 29th 2003?,REACH timetable and process -
13、guess,Environmental NGO view of REACH,The current system is ineffective and has failed Industry has not provided safety data Chemicals of high concern continue to be used REACH provides a good framework for a new system Based on information, not ignorance Acting on the worst chemicals, not just eter
14、nally debating controls Promoting an innovative industry - both chemical and downstream - developing safer products for consumers REACH needs to be improved, for example: An obligation to phase out chemicals of very high concern when safer substitutes are available. An increase in openness and trans
15、parency Improved control of chemicals in imported articles A restoration of recently removed safety tests for 1-10t chemicals, and independent auditing of registration dossiers,Cross-NGO working,EU-level NGOs have been collaborating closely on REACH The big 3 Environmental NGOs (Greenpeace, Friends
16、of the Earth and WWF) In addition, the European Environment Bureau (EEB) - an EU-level NGO coalition - is a key partner. This collaboration includes: Short policy statements: Copenhagen charter, Declaration for the internet consultation in June 2003 Long policy documents: Various policy documents, i
17、ncluding a detailed joint response to the Commissions internet consultation Press work Meetings with decision makers Detailed discussions on policy and tactics (often in 6-monthly EEB chemicals expert meetings) Team work has allowed us to use our limited resources effectively. We have also carried o
18、ut joint work with Consumer, Animal Welfare, Health and Womens NGOs,The Copenhagen Charter,Drafted in 1999, agreed between NGOs through EEB process, still relevant to REACH debate. We demand from the EU review of chemicals policy:1) A full right to know, including what chemicals are present in produ
19、cts.2) A deadline by which all chemicals on the market must have had their safety independently assessed. All uses of a chemical should be approved and should be demonstrated to be safe beyond reasonable doubt.3) A phase out of persistent or bioaccumulative chemicals.4) A requirement to substitute l
20、ess safe chemicals with safer alternatives.5) A commitment to stop all releases to the environment of hazardous substances by 2020.,Some NGO approaches,Reports Highlighting the problems Promoting the benefits of REACH, including benefits to Business and to innovation Monitoring and analysis Exposing
21、 the contamination of our bodies and lives by industrial chemicals Email actions Bringing the public closer to the key decision makers Retailer campaigning Encouraging retailers and downstream users of chemicals to examine their use of chemicals, and ranking their performance. Getting key downstream
22、 users engaged in the debate,Conclusion,Environmental NGOs in Europe support REACH The framework is good We want changes, but they can be put into this framework We are concerned about the increasing chemical industry lobbying success But more downstream users should become allies now REACH is more
23、concrete. Cross NGO agreement on key priorities has: Given us a clear message Enabled joint policy statements Enabled us to work as a team, making up for shortage of resources. A range of tactics have worked - sometimes generating unplanned positive impacts E.g. Retailer campaigning We have 2-3 year
24、s of campaigning and lobbying ahead, when we must raise the profile of chemicals US support is an important part of the debate REACH can also help the chemicals debate in the US,Key URLs for reference,WWF European Policy Office Toxics: http:/www.panda.org/epo/toxics FoE safer chemicals campaign http:/www.foe.co.uk/saferchemicals WWF UK Chemicals and Health Campaign http:/www.WWF.org.uk/chemicals Greenpeace: http:/www.greenpeace.org/ European Environment Bureau: http:/www.EEB.org/activities/chemicals/main.htm,
