1、专业英语八级写作-10及答案解析 (总分：100.00，做题时间：90分钟)一、WRITING(总题数：1，分数：100.00)1.Directions: The practice is well established in Singapore and Hong Kong of reserving a fund for incorruptible government officials and rewarding them on retirement. Those who have violated related regulations and disciplines on the jo
2、b will have less or no bonus according to the circumstances. Whats your opinion on this issue? Write a composition of about 400 words to state your view.In the first part of your essay you should state clearly your main argument, and in the second part you should support your argument with appropria
3、te details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or make a summary.You should supply an appropriate title for your essay.Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a l
4、oss of marks.（分数：100.00）_专业英语八级写作-10答案解析 (总分：100.00，做题时间：90分钟)一、WRITING(总题数：1，分数：100.00)1.Directions: The practice is well established in Singapore and Hong Kong of reserving a fund for incorruptible government officials and rewarding them on retirement. Those who have violated related regulations a
5、nd disciplines on the job will have less or no bonus according to the circumstances. Whats your opinion on this issue? Write a composition of about 400 words to state your view.In the first part of your essay you should state clearly your main argument, and in the second part you should support your
6、 argument with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or make a summary.You should supply an appropriate title for your essay.Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instru
7、ctions may result in a loss of marks.（分数：100.00）_正确答案：(参考范文1 We Should Not Pay Civil Servants Not to CorruptIs it helpful to build an honest and clean government by a fund for incorruptible civil servants? Such an issue has aroused controversy among the public. Proponents believe the innovative move
8、 will help to fight against corruption and build a clean government. Opponents say that being clean is an officials obligation and duty and there is therefore no need to reward them with additional funds. Personally, Id like to express my disapproval on this question. First of all, to establish an a
9、ccumulation fund for clean officials is in fact a challenge to social justice. Public servants should work diligently in an honest and clean way and abide by laws and regulations when performing their duties. That is the basic requirement for them. Any official who fails in this sense does not deser
10、ve the position of a public servant. Extra pay for clean public servants will naturally damage the image of public servants in the eyes of ordinary people. In addition, it will play a negative role in their professional work ethics. When public servants are rewarded for what they should do, what abo
11、ut clean doctors, teachers, lawyers, policemen? Obviously such a policy is not well-grounded.Secondly, the most unfair part about the reserve fund is that it infringes upon the interests of taxpayers who contribute to public servants salary in the first place. Its Gods truth that officials should wo
12、rk for the taxpayers interests. But to sustain such fund system, a large number of workers and farmers will have to pay more for what public servants are supposed to do. As for the reserve fund, only when the amount of the award comes to a tempting figure can it restrain corruption to a certain degr
13、ee. However, it is impossible to raise such an enormous fund only from their welfare fund. So, the fund is actually a disguised form of reward to public servants through taking advantage of fiscal revenue.Relatively speaking, public servants are well paid for their service, so it is not rational to
14、raise such a fund of reward. What we can do is to strengthen supervision mechanisms, so as to effectively track down and punish corrupted officials and let them pay higher costs for their behavior. In addition, to fundamentally minimizing the corruption phenomenon in the government, we should take e
15、ffective measures to put a limit on their power in an attempt to provide fewer opportunities to abuse power.参考范文2 Honest Officials Should Be RewardedRecent years have even seen an increasing gap between salary of public servants and workers in other professions. The meager income of some government
16、officials has resulted in their abusing power or taking in bribes. In fact, the fund can be made available to clean officials, which serves as a good incentive of stimulating honest performance and keeping an honest record.Initially, the fund is aimed to provide some after-retirement guarantee to go
17、vernment officials financially. Public servants are responsible for providing governmental services and managing public affairs. Their responsibilities enable them to have access to different administrative powers, making corrupt behavior possible. Though being honest and clean is the basic professi
18、onal ethic for public servants, the public who sincerely hope officials will be self-disciplined in their posts are willing to offer them rewards. Given this, corrupt officials will not only be punished by the law, but also lose their job-related income, that is the cost they should pay. It has been
19、 a well-practiced tradition in Singapore and Hong Kong and the results speak for its feasibility.In addition, setting up a reserve fund for clean officials actually reflects a new concept, which is to fight against corruption through economic means. If public servants have an honest and clean career
20、, then they can enjoy promotions and lead honorable lives after retirement. But for those who covet petty profits, they may end up losing their reputation in the latter half of their lives. In doing so, corrupt officials will have to pay a higher price for their misbehavior. Bearing such a positive
21、incentive in mind, civil servants will be encouraged to keep a safe distance from misconduct.Launching a public reserve fund has nothing to do with the so-called increasing corruption costs. In fact it promotes the chances of keeping a clean service record for officials as well as providing an access to an additional income from a justified source. Positive effects of this new concept have been proved in other countries practice, which will help tackle Chinas corruption problem.)解析：
